耦合EMMS曳力与简化双流体模型的气固流动模拟

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180065

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (5): 1867-1872.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180065

耦合EMMS曳力与简化双流体模型的气固流动模拟

邱小平^1,2, 王利民¹, 杨宁¹

1. 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-01-16 修回日期:2018-02-02 出版日期:2018-05-05 发布日期:2018-05-05
通讯作者: 王利民
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51776212，91434113，21406238）；中国科学院前沿科学重点研究计划项目（QYZDB-SSW-SYS029）；国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2015CB251402）。

Simplified two-fluid model coupled with EMMS drag for simulating gas-solid flow

QIU Xiaoping^1,2, WANG Limin¹, YANG Ning¹

1. Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-01-16 Revised:2018-02-02 Online:2018-05-05 Published:2018-05-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51776212, 91434113, 21406238), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDB-SSW-SYS029) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB251402).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提出了一种耦合EMMS曳力的简化双流体模型，该模型忽略固相黏度，用简单的经验关联式来计算固相压力，并且耦合考虑了介尺度结构的EMMS曳力模型来计算气固相间作用力。采用简化双流体模型成功模拟一个三维实验室尺度鼓泡流化床，数值模拟结果与完整双流体模型以及实验测量结果进行了比较，结果表明耦合EMMS曳力的简化双流体模型模拟结果与完整双流体模型耦合EMMS曳力的模拟结果基本相当，并且都与实验结果吻合良好，然而简化双流体模型的计算速度是完整双流体模型的两倍以上。这表明曳力模型在气固模拟中起着主导作用，而固相应力的作用是其次的，耦合EMMS曳力的简化双流体模型在实现工业规模气固反应器快速模拟中具有巨大潜力。

关键词: EMMS曳力, 双流体模型, 流态化, 多相流, 计算流体力学

Abstract:

A simplified two-fluid model (STFM) combined with energy-minimization multi-scale (EMMS) drag was proposed for accurate and fast simulation of gas-solid flows. In this new approach, solid phase pressure was calculated by an empirical correlation without considering solid phase viscosity and interphase momentum transfer was calculated from EMMS drag model by taking into account of coupled effects of meso-scale structures. A lab-scale bubbling fluidized bed was successfully simulated in 3D by this approach. STFM coupled with EMMS drag had comparable simulation results to FTFM coupled with EMMS drag, and both agreed well with experimental data. Compared to FTFM, STFM doubled simulation speed and thus significantly reduced computational cost. The gas-solid simulation suggests that drag model has a primarily dominant effect, followed by solid phase stress. The model of STFM combined with EMMS drag has large potentials in rapid simulation of commercial gas-solid reactors.

Key words: EMMS drag, two-fluid model, fluidization, multiphase flow, computational fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

邱小平, 王利民, 杨宁. 耦合EMMS曳力与简化双流体模型的气固流动模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 1867-1872.

QIU Xiaoping, WANG Limin, YANG Ning. Simplified two-fluid model coupled with EMMS drag for simulating gas-solid flow[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(5): 1867-1872.

参考文献 31

[1]	VAN DER HOEF M A, YE M, VAN SINT ANNALAND M, et al. Multiscale modeling of gas-fluidized beds[J]. Adv. Chem. Eng., 2006, 31:65-149.
[2]	WANG L M, ZHOUG G F, WANG X W, et al. Direct numerical simulation of particle-fluid systems by combining time-driven hard-sphere model and lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Particuology, 2010, 8:379-382.
[3]	XIONG Q G, LI B, ZHOUG G F, et al. Large-scale DNS of gas-solid flows on Mole-8.5[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2012, 71:422-430.
[4]	TSUJI Y, KAWAGUCHI T, TANAKA T. Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed[J]. Powder Technol., 1993, 77:79-87.
[5]	XU B H, YU A B. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 1997, 52:2785-2809.
[6]	ANDERSON T B, JACKSON R. A fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 1967, 6:527-539.
[7]	ISHⅡ M. Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow[M]. Paris:Eyrolles, 1975.
[8]	GIDASPOW D. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization:Continuum and Kinetic Theory Description[M]. Boston:Academic Press, 1994.
[9]	LUN C K, SAVAGE S B, JEFFREY D J, et al. Kinetic theories for granular flow:inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield[J]. J. Fluid Mech., 1984, 140:223-223.
[10]	BOUILLARD J X, LYCZKOWSKI R W, GIDASPOW D. Porosity distributions in a fluidized bed with an immersed obstacle[J]. AIChE J., 1989, 35:908-922.
[11]	PATIL D J, VAN SINT ANNALAND M, KUIPERS J A M. Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas-solid fluidized beds (Ⅰ):Bubbling gas-solid fluidized beds operated with a jet[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2005, 60:57-72.
[12]	SUN B, GIDASPOW D. Computation of circulating fluidized-bed riser flow for the fluidization(Ⅷ):Benchmark test[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, 38:787-792.
[13]	VAN WACHEM B G M, SCHOUTEN J C, VAN DEN BLEEK C M, et al. Comparative analysis of CFD models of dense gas-solid systems[J]. AIChE J., 2001, 47:1035-1051.
[14]	YANG N, WANG W, GE W, et al. CFD simulation of concurrent-up gas-solid flow in circulating fluidized beds with structure-dependent drag coefficient[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2003, 96:71-80.
[15]	WANG W, LI J. Simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007, 62:208-231.
[16]	LU B, WANG W, LI J. Searching for a mesh-independent sub-grid model for CFD simulation of gas-solid riser flows[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2009, 64:3437-3447.
[17]	LU B, WANG W, LI J, et al. Multi-scale CFD simulation of gas-solid flow in MIP reactors with a structure-dependent drag model[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007, 62:5487-5494.
[18]	ZHANG N, LU B L, WANG W, et al. Virtual experimentation through 3D full-loop simulation of a circulating fluidized bed[J]. Particuology, 2008, 6:529-539.
[19]	HONG K, SHI Z, WANG W, et al. A structure-dependent multi-fluid model (SFM) for heterogeneous gas-solid flow[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2013, 99:191-202.
[20]	LIU X, JIANG Y, LIU C, et al. Hydrodynamic modeling of gas-solid bubbling fluidization based on energy-minimization multiscale (EMMS) theory[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53:2800-2810.
[21]	ZENELI M, NIKOLOPOULOS A, NIKOLOPOULOS N, et al. Application of an advanced coupled EMMS-TFM model to a pilot scale CFB carbonator[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 138:482-498.
[22]	SHAH M T, UTIKAR R P, TADE M O, et al. Hydrodynamics of an FCC riser using energy minimization multiscale drag model[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 168:812-821.
[23]	王维, 洪坤, 鲁波娜, 等. 流态化模拟:基于介尺度结构的多尺度CFD[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):95-106. WANG W, HONG K, LU B N, et al. Fluidized bed simulation:structure-dependent multiscale CFD[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):95-106.
[24]	刘雅宁, 鲁波娜, 卢利强, 等. 基于EMMS模型的大型催化裂化装置再生器气固分布数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(8):2911-2919. LIU Y L, LU B N, LU L Q, et al. EMMS-based numerical simulation on gas and solids distribution in large-scale FCC regenerators[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(8):2911-2919.
[25]	鲁波娜, 张景远, 王维, 等. FCC反应过程的CFD模拟进展[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(8):3121-3132. LU B N, ZHANG J Y, WANG W, et al. CFD modeling of FCC reaction process:a review[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(8):3121-3132.
[26]	LU L, XU J, GE W, et al. Computer virtual experiment on fluidized beds using a coarse-grained discrete particle method-EMMS-DPM[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2016, 155:314-337.
[27]	LU L, XU J, GE W, et al. EMMS-based discrete particle method (EMMS-DPM) for simulation of gas-solid flows[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2014, 120:67-87.
[28]	徐骥, 卢利强, 葛蔚, 等. 基于EMMS范式的离散模拟及其化工应用[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(1):14-26. XU J, LU L Q, GE W, et al. Discrete simulation based on EMMS paradigm and its applications in chemical engineering[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(1):14-26.
[29]	李静海, 欧阳洁, 高士秋, 等. 颗粒流体复杂系统的多尺度模拟[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2005. LI J H, OUYANG J, GAO S Q, et al. Multi-Scale Simulation of Particle-Fluid Complex Systems[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2005.
[30]	WEN C Y, YU Y H. Mechanics of fluidization[J]. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., 1966, 162:100-111.
[31]	DUBRAWSKI K, TEBIANIAN S, BI H T, et al. Traveling column for comparison of invasive and non-invasive fluidization voidage measurement techniques[J]. Powder Technol., 2013, 235:203-220.

耦合EMMS曳力与简化双流体模型的气固流动模拟

Simplified two-fluid model coupled with EMMS drag for simulating gas-solid flow

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[2]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[3]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[4]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[5]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[6]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[7]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[8]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[9]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[10]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.
[11]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[12]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[13]	刘道银, 陈柄岐, 张祖扬, 吴琰. 颗粒聚团结构对曳力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362.
[14]	李晨曦, 刘永峰, 张璐, 刘海峰, 宋金瓯, 何旭. O₂/CO₂氛围下正庚烷的燃烧机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2157-2169.
[15]	董鑫, 单永瑞, 刘易诺, 冯颖, 张建伟. 非牛顿流体气泡羽流涡特性数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1950-1964.