不同余热情况下有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环能量性能对比

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161209

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (12): 5089-5097.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161209

不同余热情况下有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环能量性能对比

王梦颖¹, 冯霄², 王彧斐³

1 中国石油大学(北京)新能源研究院, 北京 102249;
2 西安交通大学化学工程与技术学院, 陕西西安 710049;
3 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程学院, 重质油国家重点实验室, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2016-08-30 修回日期:2016-09-02 出版日期:2016-12-05 发布日期:2016-12-05
通讯作者: 冯霄。xfeng@xjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21576286）。

Comparison of energy performance of organic Rankine and Kalina cycles considering different waste heat sources

WANG Mengying¹, FENG Xiao², WANG Yufei³

1 New Energy Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2 School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
3 State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2016-08-30 Revised:2016-09-02 Online:2016-12-05 Published:2016-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21576286).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环都是发展前景广阔的低温余热动力利用技术，这两种技术在余热利用方面各有其优势和劣势。在炼厂中，余热资源分布广泛，针对不同余热热源选择合适的动力循环系统对能量的有效利用具有实际意义。热效率和(火用)效率是评价动力循环系统的两个重要指标。通过将余热资源分成3类，即显热热源、复合热源和潜热热源，用Aspen Hysys软件对有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环进行流程模拟，考察了余热资源特性对有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环能量性能的影响。结果表明当余热为显热热源时，卡琳娜循环系统优于有机朗肯循环；当余热为复合热源且潜热与显热比R=1或当余热为潜热热源时，有机朗肯循环优于卡琳娜循环。

关键词: 有机朗肯循环, 卡琳娜循环, 余热资源, 能量性能, 计算机模拟, 回收, 热力学性质

Abstract:

Organic Rankine cycle(ORC) and Kalina cycle are both promising ways for low temperature waste heat utilization, and these two technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages on using waste heat. In refineries, there is considerable waste heat. It is significant to choose a proper cycle system considering different waste heat sources for efficient utilization of energy. Thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency are two key parameters to evaluate energy performance of power cycle systems. In this paper, the waste heat sources are classified into three types(i.e., sensible heat source, combined heat source and latent heat source). An organic Rankine cycle and a Kalina cycle for low waste heat recovery are simulated by Aspen Hysys considering the characteristics of waste heat sources. The results show that when the waste heat is sensible heat source, the energy performance of Kalina cycle is better than that of ORC, while when waste heat is combined heat source and the ratio of latent heat source and sensible heat source(R) is equal to 1 or when waste heat is latent heat source, the energy performance of ORC is better than that of Kalina cycle.

Key words: organic Rankine cycle, Kalina cycle, waste heat sources, energy performance, computer simulation, recovery, thermodynamic properties

中图分类号:

TQ021.8

王梦颖, 冯霄, 王彧斐. 不同余热情况下有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环能量性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12): 5089-5097.

WANG Mengying, FENG Xiao, WANG Yufei. Comparison of energy performance of organic Rankine and Kalina cycles considering different waste heat sources[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12): 5089-5097.

参考文献 20

[1]	YUE C, HAN D, PU W H, et al. Comparative analysis of a bottoming transcritical ORC and a Kalina cycle for engine exhaust heat recovery[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89(89):764-774.
[2]	ÖHMAN H, LUNDQVIST P. Comparison and analysis of performance using low temperature power cycles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 52(52):160-169.
[3]	VICTOR R A, KIM J K, SMITH R. Composition optimisation of working fluids for organic Rankine cycles and Kalina cycles[J]. Energy, 2013, 99(55):6059-6069.
[4]	RODRÍGUEZ C E C, PALACIO J C E, VENTURINI O J, et al. Exergetic and economic comparison of ORC and Kalina cycle for low temperature enhanced geothermal system in Brazil[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 52(1):109-119.
[5]	MLCAK H A. An Introduction to the Kalina cycle[C]//1996 International Joint Power Generation Conference. Houston, TX(United States), 1996.
[6]	ZARE V, MAHMOUDI S M S. A thermodynamic comparison between organic Rankine and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery from the gas turbine-modular helium reactor[J]. Energy, 2015, 79:398-406.
[7]	KALINA A I. Combined cycle and waste heat recovery power systems based on a novel thermodynamic energy cycle utilizing low-temperature heat for power generation[J]. Mechanical Engineering, 1983, 105(11):104.
[8]	JONSSON M, YAN J Y. Ammonia-water bottoming cycles:a comparison between gas engines and gas diesel engines as prime movers[J]. Energy, 2001, 26(26):31-44.
[9]	MLCAK H A. Kalina cycle®® concepts for low temperature geothermal[J]. Transactions-Geothermal Resources Council, 2002, 26:707-713.
[10]	THORIN E. Comparison of correlations for predicting thermodynamic properties of ammonia-water mixtures[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2000, 21(21):853-870.
[11]	DIPIPPO R. Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids[J]. Geothermics, 2004, 33(5):565-586.
[12]	GUZOVI? Z, LONCAR D, FERDELJI N. Possibilities of electricity generation in the Republic of Croatia by means of geothermal energy[J]. Energy, 2010, 35(8):3429-3440.
[13]	BOMBARDA P, INVERNIZZI C M, PIETRA C. Heat recovery from diesel engines:a thermodynamic comparison between Kalina and ORC cycles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(2/3):212-219.
[14]	HETTIARACHCHI H D M, GOLUBOVIC M, WOREK W M, et al. The performance of the Kalina cycle system 11(KCS11) with low-temperature heat sources[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2007, 129(3):243-247.
[15]	WALRAVEN D, LAENEN B, D'HAESELEER W. Comparison of thermodynamic cycles for power production from low-temperature geothermal heat sources[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2013, 66(1):220-233.
[16]	YARI M, MEHR A S, ZARE V, et al. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC(trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC(organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source[J]. Energy, 2015, 83:712-722.
[17]	ZHANG Z, GUO Z, CHEN Y, et al. Power generation and heating performances of integrated system of ammonia-water Kalina-Rankine cycle[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2015, 92:517-522.
[18]	LARSEN U, NGUYEN T V, KNUDSEN T, et al. System analysis and optimisation of a Kalina split-cycle for waste heat recovery on large marine diesel engines[J]. Energy, 2014, 64(64):484-494.
[19]	LAKEW A A, BOLLAND O. Working fluids for low-temperature heat source[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(10):1262-1268.
[20]	YU H S, FENG X, WANG Y. Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle(ORC) considering the characteristics of waste heat sources[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(5):1309-1321.

不同余热情况下有机朗肯循环和卡琳娜循环能量性能对比

Comparison of energy performance of organic Rankine and Kalina cycles considering different waste heat sources

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[4]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[5]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[6]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[7]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[8]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[9]	姚晓宇, 沈俊, 李健, 李振兴, 康慧芳, 唐博, 董学强, 公茂琼. 流体气液临界参数测量方法研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1847-1861.
[10]	陈科, 杜理, 曾英, 任思颖, 于旭东. 四元体系LiCl+MgCl₂+CaCl₂+H₂O 323.2 K相平衡研究及计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1896-1903.
[11]	党玉荣, 莫春兰, 史科锐, 方颖聪, 张子杨, 李作顺. 综合评价模型联合遗传算法的混合工质ORC系统性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1884-1895.
[12]	刘尚豪, 贾胜坤, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 基于梯度提升决策树的三组元精馏流程结构最优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2075-2087.
[13]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[14]	毛元敬, 杨智, 莫松平, 郭浩, 陈颖, 罗向龙, 陈健勇, 梁颖宗. C₆~C₁₀烷醇的SAFT-VR Mie状态方程参数回归及其热物性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1033-1041.
[15]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.