基于KECA的化工过程故障监测新方法

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151899

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 1063-1069.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151899

基于KECA的化工过程故障监测新方法

齐咏生^1,3, 张海利¹, 高学金^2,3, 王普^2,3

1. 内蒙古工业大学电力学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010051;
2. 北京工业大学电子信息与控制工程学院, 北京 100124;
3. 教育部数字工程研究中心, 北京 100124

收稿日期:2015-12-14 修回日期:2015-12-16 出版日期:2016-03-05 发布日期:2016-01-12
通讯作者: 齐咏生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(61174109,61364009);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2015MS0615)。

Novel fault monitoring strategy for chemical process based on KECA

QI Yongsheng^1,3, ZHANG Haili¹, GAO Xuejin^2,3, WANG Pu^2,3

1. Institute of Electric Power, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, Inner Mongolia, China;
2. School of Electric and Information and Control Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
3. Engineering Research Center of Digital Community, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2015-12-14 Revised:2015-12-16 Online:2016-03-05 Published:2016-01-12
Contact: 67
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61174109, 61364009) and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2015MS0615).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对化工过程数据复杂、非线性的特点,提出一种基于核熵成分分析(KECA)的化工过程故障监测算法。首先,KECA算法按照Renyi熵值的大小选取特征值及特征向量,相比传统的KPCA监测算法,其保留主元个数更少,可以有效减少运算量。同时,仿真研究表明KECA算法选取的主元具有角度结构特性,据此,提出一种新的统计量——CS(Cauchy-Schwarz)统计量,其对应到核特征空间中即为向量间的角度余弦值,可以较好表述不同概率密度分布之间的相似度。最后,将KECA和KPCA算法分别应用于TE(Tennessee Eastman)过程,结果表明KECA在故障检测延迟与检出率相比KPCA都有很大的优势。

关键词: 安全, 过程控制, 主元分析, 故障监测, KECA, CS统计量

Abstract:

A chemical process fault monitoring algorithms based on kernel entropy component analysis (KECA) is presented for the complexity and nonlinear of industrial chemical process data. The number of principal components selected by the KECA algorism is much less than the KPCA algorism, which can effectively reduce computational complexity. This is achieved by selections onto eigenvalue and eigenvector based on the value of Renyi entropy. Research shows that KECA reveals angular structure relating to the Renyi entropy of the input space data set. A new statistic—Cauchy-Schwarz divergence measure, namely the cosine value between vectors in kernel space, is proposed, which describes the similarity between different PDFs (probability density functions). It is shown that KECA has great advantages in detection latency and fault detection rate in comparing to KPCA by applying them to TE (Tennessee Eastman) process respectively.

Key words: safety, process control, principal component analysis, fault monitoring, KECA, CS statistic

中图分类号:

TP277

齐咏生, 张海利, 高学金, 王普. 基于KECA的化工过程故障监测新方法[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(3): 1063-1069.

QI Yongsheng, ZHANG Haili, GAO Xuejin, WANG Pu. Novel fault monitoring strategy for chemical process based on KECA[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(3): 1063-1069.

参考文献 21

[1]	周东华, 李钢, 李元. 数据驱动的工业过程故障诊断技术: 基于主成分分析与偏最小二乘的方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 1-9. ZHOU D H, LI G, LI Y. Industrial Process Fault Diagnosis Technology of Data Driven: Based on Principal Component Analysis and Partial Least Squares Method[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 1-9.
[2]	马贺贺, 胡益, 侍洪波. 基于马氏距离局部离群因子方法的复杂化工过程故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64 (5): 1674-1682. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.05.024. MA H H, HU Y, SHI H B. Fault detection of complex chemical processes using Mahalanobis distance-based local outlier factor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(5): 1764-1682. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.05.024.
[3]	韩敏, 张占奎. 基于改进核主成分分析的故障检测与诊断方法[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66 (6): 2139-2149. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157. 20141378. HAN M, ZHANG Z K. Fault detection and diagnosis method based on modified kernel principal component analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 66(6): 2139-2149. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141378.
[4]	宋冰, 马玉鑫, 方永锋, 等. 基于LSNPE算法的化工过程故障检测[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65 (2): 620-627. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.02.036. SONG B, MA Y X, FANG Y F, et al. Fault detection for chemical process based on LSNPE method[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(2): 620-627. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.02.036.
[5]	GARCIA-ALVAREZ D, FUENTE M J, SAINZ G I. Fault detection and isolation in transient states using principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, 22(3): 551-563. DOI: 10.1016/j. jprocont.2012.01.007.
[6]	YIN S, DING S X, HAGHANI A, et al. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, 22(9): 1567-1581. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.06.009.
[7]	徐圆, 刘莹, 朱群雄. 基于多元时滞序列驱动的复杂过程故障预测方法应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64 (12): 4290-4295. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.003. XU Y, LIU Y, ZHU Q X. A complex process fault prognosis approach based multivariate delayed sequences[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(12): 4290-4295. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2013.12.003.
[8]	XIONG L, LIANG J, QIAN J X. Multivariate statistical process monitoring of an industrial polypropylene catalyzer reactor with component analysis and kernel density estimation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2007, 15(4): 524-532. DOI: 10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60119-0.
[9]	NOMIKOS P, MACGREGOR J F. Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes[J]. Technometrics, 1995, 37: 41-59. DOI: 10.2307/1269152.
[10]	DONG D, MCAVOY T J. Nonlinear principal component analysis-based on principal curves and neural networks[J]. Computer & Chemical Engineering, 1996, 20(1): 65-78. DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(95)00003-K.
[11]	SCHOLKOPF B, SMOLA A, MULLER K. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem[J]. Neural Computation, 1998, 10: 1299-1319. DOI: 10.1162/089976698300017467.
[12]	LEE J M, YOO C K, CHOI S W, et al. Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59: 223-234. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.012.
[13]	CHO J H, LEE J M, CHOI S W, et al. Fault identification for process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 6: 279-288. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2004.08.007.
[14]	JENSSEN R. Kernel entropy component analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(5): 847-860. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.100.
[15]	JIANG Q C, YAN X F, LÜ Z M, et al. Fault detection in nonlinear chemical processes based on kernel entropy component analysis and angular structure[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 30(6): 1181-1186. DOI: 10.1007/s11814-013-0034-7.
[16]	RENYI A. On Measures of Entropy and Information[C/OL]//Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Oakland: University of California Press, 1961, 1: 547-561. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512181.
[17]	JENSSEN R, PRINCIPE J C, ERDOGMUS D. The Cauchy-Schwarz divergence and Parzen windowing: connections to graph theory and Mercer kernel[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2006, 343(6): 614-629. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.03.018.
[18]	JENSSEN R, ELTOFT T. A new information theoretic analysis of sum-of-squared-error kernel clustering[J]. Neurocomputing, 2008, 72(1/2/3): 23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2008.03.017.
[19]	LAU C K, GHOSH K, HUSSAIN M A, et al. Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process with multi-scale PCA and ANFIS[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2013, 120: 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.10.005.
[20]	MAHADEVAN S, SHAH A L. Fault detection and diagnosis in process data using one-class support vector machines[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19: 1627-1639. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2009. 07.011.
[21]	YANG Y H, LI X L, LIU X Z, et al. Wavelet kernel entropy component analysis with application to industrial process monitoring[J]. Neurocomputing, 2015, 147: 395-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom. 2014.06.045.

基于KECA的化工过程故障监测新方法

Novel fault monitoring strategy for chemical process based on KECA

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[2]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[3]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[4]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[5]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[6]	高学金, 姚玉卓, 韩华云, 齐咏生. 基于注意力动态卷积自编码器的发酵过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2503-2521.
[7]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[8]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[9]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[10]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[11]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[12]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[13]	杜江龙, 杨雯棋, 黄凯, 练成, 刘洪来. 复合相变材料/空冷复合式锂离子电池模块散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 674-689.
[14]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[15]	廖珊珊, 张少刚, 陶骏骏, 刘家豪, 汪金辉. 竖直射流火撞击障碍管道数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234.