甲醇-乙酸酐体系的热分解特性及安全泄放

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.04.052

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 1537-1543.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.04.052

甲醇-乙酸酐体系的热分解特性及安全泄放

邓吉平¹, 孙欣¹, 陈网桦¹, 董国强², 吕家育¹

1 南京理工大学化工学院安全工程系, 江苏南京 210094;
2 兵器工业卫生研究所, 陕西西安 710065

收稿日期:2013-07-12 修回日期:2013-09-03 出版日期:2014-04-05 发布日期:2014-04-05
通讯作者: 陈网桦
作者简介:邓吉平（1982—），男，博士研究生，助理研究员。
基金资助:
江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目（CXZZ13_0187）。

Thermal decomposition and safety relief for methanol-acetic anhydride system

DENG Jiping¹, SUN Xin¹, CHEN Wanghua¹, DONG Guoqiang², LÜ Jiayu¹

1 Department of Safety Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China;
2 Institute of Industrial Hygiene of Ordnance Industry, Xi' an 710065, Shaanxi, China

Received:2013-07-12 Revised:2013-09-03 Online:2014-04-05 Published:2014-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the Graduate Research and Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(CXZZ13_0187).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 安全泄放是在失控条件下降低反应体系风险最为经济有效的技术措施之一。为了研究泄放口的设计，利用高性能绝热量热仪Phi-TEC Ⅱ对质量分数38.6%的甲醇-乙酸酐体系进行了测试，得到热惯量为1.1条件下该体系的热行为参数。测试结果表明，该体系的起始分解温度为37℃，比反应热205.2 kJ·kg^-1；拟合得到温度与压力的关系基本符合Antoine方程，确定了反应体系的泄放类型属蒸汽体系；采用Leung方法和平衡速率模型ERM对该体系的安全泄放量和泄放能力进行了计算，求得泄放面积为1.36×10^-3 m²；低热惯量的Phi-TEC Ⅱ可以为工艺放大的泄放设计提供准确、可靠的基础数据。

关键词: 甲醇-乙酸酐体系, 热解, 泄放, 反应器, 安全

Abstract: Emergency relief systems for reducing risk of runaway reactions are being used as one of the most cost-effective technical measures. Therefore, in order to design the pressure relief system sizing, research on a 38.6% methanol-acetic anhydride was carried out based on the bench-scale Phi-TEC Ⅱ calorimeter apparatus. Parameters of thermal behavior were measured with thermal inertia 1.1. Results show that self-heating decomposition temperature tends to be around 37℃, with its corrective heat of the reaction being 205.2 kJ·kg^-1. The fitting equation obtained from experimental data is basically in accord with Antoine equation. The reactive system can be identified as a vapor system. The mass flow capacity and the average two-dimensional flowing capacity per cross-section unit area of the vent-line were determined by Leung's method and ERM. Thus, the required relief area was determined to be 1.36×10^-3 m². Thus, it is proved that the Phi-TEC Ⅱ calorimeter can be used to supply the basic runaway chemical reaction data and in turn provide technical supports for the emergency relief system, which is helpful to improve the reliability of the safety relief design.

Key words: methanol-acetic anhydride, pyrolysis, relief, reactors, safety

中图分类号:

X933

邓吉平, 孙欣, 陈网桦, 董国强, 吕家育. 甲醇-乙酸酐体系的热分解特性及安全泄放[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(4): 1537-1543.

DENG Jiping, SUN Xin, CHEN Wanghua, DONG Guoqiang, LÜ Jiayu. Thermal decomposition and safety relief for methanol-acetic anhydride system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(4): 1537-1543.

参考文献

[1] Francis Stoessel. Thermal Safety of Chemical Process: Risk Assessment and Process Design（化工工艺的热安全——风险评估与工艺设计）[M].Chen Wanghua(陈网桦)，Peng Jinhua(彭金华)，Chen Liping(陈利平)，trans. Beijing: Science Press，2009
[2] Lü Jiayu(吕家育)，Chen Wanghua(陈网桦)，Chen Liping(陈利平). Research on thermal runaway of certain isoperibolic reaction in batch reactor [J]. China Safety Science Journal（中国安全科学学报）, 2011, 21(4): 121-127
[3] Liu Ronghai(刘荣海)，Chen Wanghua(陈网桦)，Hu Yiting(胡毅亭). Safety Principle and Assessing Technology on Hazardous Chemical（安全原理与危险化学品测评技术）[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004
[4] Lü Jiayu（吕家育），Chen Wanghua（陈网桦），Chen Liping（陈利平），Tian Yingtao（田映韬），Yang Qian(杨茜). Temperature simulation and thermal hazard analysis on certain isoperibolic reaction in batch reactor [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全与环境学报), 2011, 11(5): 165–168
[5] Liu Xianfan（刘显凡），Meng Tingyu（孟庭宇），Yu Jianliang(喻健良), Xie Chuanxin(谢传欣). Reliability analyzing and rating of relief devices for reactors with exothermic runaway potential by using VSP2 [J]. Journal Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities（高校化学工程学报）, 2010, 24(6): 1046-1051
[6] Fisher H G，Forrest H S，Grossel S S，Huff J E，Muller A R， Noronha J A，Shaw D A，Tilley B J. Emergency Relief System Design Using DIERS Technology[M]. New York: Wiley-AIChE, 1992
[7] Fisher H G. An overview of emergency relief system design practice [J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1991, 10(1):1-12
[8] Zhou Jiandong(周建东). Emergency relief of runaway reaction [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2000
[9] Fauske H K. Emergency relief system design for reactive and non-reactive systems: extension of the DIERS methodology [J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1988, 7(3):153-158
[10] Fauske H K. Revisiting DIERS two-phase methodology for reactive systems twenty years later [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2006, 25(3): 180-188
[11] Singh J. Reliable scale-up of thermal hazards data using the PHI-TEC Ⅱ calorimeter [J]. Thermochimica Acta, 1993, 26(226): 211-220
[12] Singh J. Vent sizing for gas generating runaway reactions [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1994, 7(6): 481-491
[13] Snee T J，Cusco’ L，Hare J A，Kerr D C， Royle M. Venting of a runaway organic peroxide decomposition in viscous solvents on pilot scale [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2006, 25(3):227-236
[14] Dellavedova M，Gigante L，Lunghi A，Pasturenzi C，Cardillo P，Gerosa N P，Rota R. Safer management of process changes in chemical reactors [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(4): 515-521
[15] Burelbach J P. Vent sizing applications for reactive systems//AIChE 2001 Spring National Meeting 5th Bi-Annual Process Plant Safety Symposium, Pressure Relief Session[C]. Houston, 2001: 342-352
[16] Stoessel Francis. Thermal Safety of Chemical Processes[M]. Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2008
[17] Meng Tingyu(孟庭宇)，Xie Chuanxin(谢传欣), Liu Xianfan(刘显凡)，Shi Ning(石宁)，Huang Fei(黄飞). Experiments and theoretical calculations of exothermic reaction runaway relief [J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment(化学工程与装备), 2010(2):164-169
[18] Design Institute for Emergency Relief Systems. Emergency Relief Systems for Runaway Chemical Reactions and Storage Vessels: A Summary of Multiphase Flow Methods [R]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1986: 23-27
[19] Leung J C. Simplified vent sizing methods incorporating two-phase flow// International Symposium on Runaway Reaction and Pressure Relief Design[C]. Boston, 1995: 200-236
[20] Singh J. Runaway reaction hazard and venting of a cyanide reaction [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1992, 5(3): 140-144
[21] Fauske H K. Flashing flows or: some practical guidelines for emergency releases [J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1985, 4(3): 132-134
[22] Richardson S M，Saville G. Release the pressure [J]. Chemical Engineer-London, 1996(14): 33-44

甲醇-乙酸酐体系的热分解特性及安全泄放

Thermal decomposition and safety relief for methanol-acetic anhydride system

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[2]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[3]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[4]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[5]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[6]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[7]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[8]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[9]	王泽栋, 石至平, 刘丽艳. 考虑气泡非均匀耗散的矩形反应器声流场数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1965-1973.
[10]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[11]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[12]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[13]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[14]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[15]	付家崴, 陈帅帅, 方凯伦, 蒋新. 微反应器共沉淀反应制备铜锰催化剂[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 776-783.