一种基于优先级的控制系统性能评估和安全监控系统

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151948

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 707-714.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151948

一种基于优先级的控制系统性能评估和安全监控系统

荣冈, 杨胜蓝, 周培杰, 冯毅萍

浙江大学工业控制技术国家重点实验室, 智能控制与系统研究所, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2015-12-22 修回日期:2015-12-29 出版日期:2016-03-05 发布日期:2016-01-12
通讯作者: 荣冈
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2014AA041805)。

A control performance monitoring and assessment system with priority strategy for process industry

RONG Gang, YANG Shenglan, ZHOU Peijie, FENG Yiping

State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Institute of Cyber-Systems and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2015-12-22 Revised:2015-12-29 Online:2016-03-05 Published:2016-01-12
Contact: 67
Supported by:
supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2014AA041805).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

控制系统性能监控和评估的研究对保障生产过程安全高效运行具有重要意义。对于一个控制系统,各种监控评估指标的重要性不同却有内在冲突性,例如控制系统的性能"卡边"操作与安全生产有时是矛盾的。因此,提出了优先级性能评估与监控的思想,系统依照优先级序列对各指标进行性能评估,并对事关安全的关键过程变量重点监控;开发了针对MPC多变量控制系统的优先级性能评估与监控系统,并应用于催化裂化反应-再生系统。

关键词: 优先级, 模型预测控制, 经济, 性能评估, 安全

Abstract:

Control performance monitoring and assessment (CPM/A) plays great role in ensuring process working safely and efficiently. However, for a control system, the importance of the performance indicators is with different degree but in conflict, e.g. maintaining the operating point on the borderline is contradict with the aim of safety. In this work, a priority strategy for CPM/A system is presented, which monitoring and accessing the control system rank by rank so as to monitor the key variances relevant with safety in particular. A prioritized CPM/A system in multi-variable Model Predictive Control (MPC) system is developed for FCCU reactor-regenerator system and shows its advantages.

Key words: priority, model-predictive control, economics, performance assessment, safety

中图分类号:

TP274

荣冈, 杨胜蓝, 周培杰, 冯毅萍. 一种基于优先级的控制系统性能评估和安全监控系统[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(3): 707-714.

RONG Gang, YANG Shenglan, ZHOU Peijie, FENG Yiping. A control performance monitoring and assessment system with priority strategy for process industry[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(3): 707-714.

参考文献 21

[1]	叶鲁彬. 工业过程运行案例性能分析与在线评价的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011. YE L B. Industrial process performance analysis and online evaluation[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
[2]	HUANG B, SHAH S L, KWOK E K. Good, bad or optimal? Performance assessment of multivariable processes[J]. Automatica, 1997, 33(6): 1175-1183.
[3]	QIN S J, YU J. Recent developments in multivariable controller performance monitoring[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2007, 17(3): 221-227.
[4]	钱积新, 赵均, 徐祖华. 预测控制[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007: 1-3. QIAN J X, ZHAO J, XU Z H. Predictive Control[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007: 1-3.
[5]	席裕庚. 复杂工业过程的满意控制[J]. 信息与控制, 1995, 24(1): 14-20. XI Y G. Satisfactory control of complex industrial process[J]. Information and Control, 1995, 24(1): 14-20.
[6]	LOU H H, MUTHUSAMY R, HUANG Y. Process security assessment: operational space classification and process security index[J]. Process Safety and Environmental, 2003, 81(6): 418-429
[7]	FRANCO A L D, BOURLES H, DE PIERI E R, et al. Robust nonlinear control associating robust feedback linearization and H∞ control[J]. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 2006, 51(7): 1200-1207.
[8]	VAN HOORN A, WALLER J, HASSELBRING W. Kieker: a framework for application performance monitoring and dynamic software analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering. ACM, 2012: 247-248.
[9]	QIN S J, BADGWELL T A. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2003, 11(7): 733-764.
[10]	邹涛, 丁宝苍, 张端. 模型预测控制工程应用导论[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010: 181-183. ZOU T, DIN B C, ZHANG R. Model Predictive Control Engineering Applications Introduction[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010.
[11]	高金吉. 装备系统故障自愈原理研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2005, 7(5): 43-48. GAO J J. Study of equipment system self-healing principles[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2005, 7(5): 43-48.
[12]	NI M, MCCALLEY J D, VITTAL V, et al. Software implementation of online risk-based security assessment[J]. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2003, 18(3): 1165-1172.
[13]	周培杰, 刘进峰, 刘苏, 等. 基于优先级策略的MPC性能评估[C]//第25届中国过程控制会议论文集. 大连, 2014. ZHOU P J, LIU J F, LIU S, et al. MPC performance assessment based on priority strategy[C].//The 25th China Process Control Conference. Dalian, 2014.
[14]	KOZUB D J. Controller performance monitoring and diagnosis: experiences and challenges[C]//AIChE Symposium Series. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1996: 83-96.
[15]	周璟.催化裂化反应-再生系统的操作优化与选进控制的研究[D].北京: 北京化工大学, 2011. ZHOU J. Process optimization and advanced control of reactor and regenerator in fluid catalytic cracking unit[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2011
[16]	陈俊武. 催化裂化工艺与工程[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2005. CHEN J W. Technology and Engineering of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit[M]. Beijing: China Petroleum Press, 2005.
[17]	AGUILAR R, MAYA-YESCAS R. Feedback regulation of temperature in FCC regenerator reactors[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2004, 22(1/2): 201-218.
[18]	SHAH N K, LI Z, IERAPETRITOU M G. Petroleum refining operations: key issues, advances, and opportunities[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 50(3): 1161-1170.
[19]	王巍. 催化裂化装置的控制研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2009. WANG W. The research of the controlling schedule of catalytic cracking equipment[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2009
[20]	杨马英, 王树青, 王骥程. 催化裂化反应再生系统的先进控制策略[J]. 化工学报, 1997, 48(4): 431-436. YANG M Y, WANG S Q, WANG J C. Advanced control strategies in FCC regenerator reactors[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 1997, 48(4): 431-436.
[21]	王克庭, 骆晨钟, 邵惠鹤. 催化裂化装置反应再生系统动态过程模型的建立与仿真[J]. 炼油设计, 1998, (2): 63-67. WANG K T, LUO C Z, SHAO H H. Modeling and simulation of dynamic process model in FCCU reactor regenerator system[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 1998, (2): 63-67.

一种基于优先级的控制系统性能评估和安全监控系统

A control performance monitoring and assessment system with priority strategy for process industry

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[2]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[3]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[4]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[5]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[6]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[7]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[8]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[9]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[10]	杜江龙, 杨雯棋, 黄凯, 练成, 刘洪来. 复合相变材料/空冷复合式锂离子电池模块散热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 674-689.
[11]	谭卓涛, 齐思雨, 许梦蛟, 戴杰, 朱晨杰, 应汉杰. 辅酶自循环的氧化还原级联体系在生物催化过程中的应用：机遇与挑战[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 45-59.
[12]	王雪松, 曾祥宇, 薄翠梅, 汤舒淇, 董超, 李俊, 张泉灵, 金晓明, 叶胜利. PTFE间歇聚合反应过程变周期动态经济优化控制[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3973-3982.
[13]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[14]	廖珊珊, 张少刚, 陶骏骏, 刘家豪, 汪金辉. 竖直射流火撞击障碍管道数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234.
[15]	王燕, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 林晨迪, 纪文涛. 草酸盐和碳酸氢盐抑制聚乙烯粉尘爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216.