煤/生物质流态化富氧燃烧的CO2富集特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180900

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

流化床富氧燃烧是具有重要应用前景的燃烧中碳捕集技术。为更深入认识固体燃料的流态化富氧燃烧行为，构建了微型流态化反应-质谱联用实验系统，反应器直径10 mm，燃烧温度700～900℃，探索了基于在线质谱分析的流态化燃烧过程特性表征方法，以烟煤和花梨木为对象，研究了煤、生物质及其混合物在富氧气氛和流态化条件下的燃烧行为，重点考察了氧浓度、燃烧温度、煤与生物质质量比对CO₂谱峰曲线形态、反应总时间、起始反应时刻、烟气中富集CO₂体积分数、颗粒燃烧产生CO₂量、CO₂相对生成率等特性的影响。结果表明，在O₂/CO₂燃烧气氛下，随着氧体积分数增加，燃烧总反应时间缩短，颗粒燃烧产生的CO₂量和生成速率均增加，但烟气中富集的CO₂体积分数减小；提高燃烧温度，缩短了燃烧过程所需的时间，可以促进CO₂的富集，烟气中CO₂浓度、颗粒燃烧产生的CO₂量和生成速率均增加；生物质比例增大，起始反应时间提前，燃烧反应所需总时间减少，烟气中富集的CO₂浓度和颗粒燃烧产生的CO₂均减少，但CO₂生成速率增加。

关键词: 流化床, 富氧燃烧, 多相反应, 流态化反应, 二氧化碳捕集

Abstract:

Oxy-fuel combustion with fluidized bed is one of the most promising carbon capture technologies. The oxy-fuel combustion of coal/biomass was simulated in a micro-fluidized bed reactor (inner diameter is 10 mm, combustion temperature is 700-900℃) coupled with an online mass spectrometry, to deeply understand the oxy-fuel combustion behavior. Bituminous coal and rosewood were selected as the samples. The effects of oxygen concentration, combustion temperature and mass ratio of coal to biomass on the combustion characteristics, i.e. the total reaction time, the initial reaction time, CO₂ concentration in flue gas and the generation rate of CO₂ during particle combustion, were investigated. It was found that the increment of oxygen volume fraction lead to an increase of CO₂ yield, the decrease of total reaction time and CO₂ concentration in the flue gas. Increasing the combustion temperature could enhance the enrichment of CO₂, as a result higher CO₂ production by particle combustion and CO₂ concentration in the flue gas were obtained. Higher ratio of biomass advanced the initial reaction time and shortened the total reaction time, which resulted in a decrease of CO₂ concentration in the flue gas and CO₂ production by particle combustion but the rate of CO₂ formation is increased.

Key words: fluidized bed, oxy-fuel combustion, multiphase reaction, fluidizing reaction, CO₂ capture

中图分类号:

TK16

刘沁雯, 钟文琪, 刘雪娇, 刘倩, 邵应娟, Yu Aibing. 煤/生物质流态化富氧燃烧的CO₂富集特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5199-5208.

LIU Qinwen, ZHONG Wenqi, LIU Xuejiao, LIU Qian, SHAO Yingjuan, YU Aibing. CO₂ enrichment characteristics of coal/biomass fluidized oxy-fuel combustion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5199-5208.

参考文献 36

[1]	郑楚光, 赵永椿, 郭欣. 中国富氧燃烧技术研发进展[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(23):3856-3864. ZHENG C G, ZHAO Y C, GUO X. Research and development of oxy-fuel combustion in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(23):3856-3864.
[2]	WALL T, STANGER R, SANTOS S. Demonstrations of coal-fired oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage and issues with commercial deployment[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(S1):S5-S15.
[3]	TAN Y, JIA L, WU Y. Some combustion characteristics of biomass and coal cofiring under oxy-fuel conditions in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized combustor[J]. Energy& Fuel, 2013, 27(11):7000-7007.
[4]	TAN Y, JIA L, WU Y, et al. Experiences and results on a 0. 8 MWth oxy-fuel operation pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 92:343-347.
[5]	NSAKALA N Y, LILJEDAHL G N. Greenhouse gas emissions control by oxygen firing in circulating fluidized boilers[R]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information, 2003.
[6]	CZAKIERT T, BIS Z, MUSKALA W, et al. Fuel conversion from oxy-fuel combustion in a circulating fluidized bed[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87(6):531-538.
[7]	ROMEO L M, DIEZ L I, GUEDEA I. Design and operation assessment of an oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustor[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 2011, 35(3):477-484.
[8]	KRZYWANSKI J, CZAKIERT T, MUSKALA W, et al. Modelling of CO2, CO, SO2, O2 and NO? emissions from the oxy-fuel combustion in a circulating fluidized bed[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(3):590-596.
[9]	BO L, GOMEZ-BAREA A. Oxy-fuel combustion in circulating fluidized bed boilers[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 125(2):308-318.
[10]	李汉卿, 王长安, 朱晨钊, 等. O2/CO2气氛对准东煤灰熔融行为和微观理化特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6):2632-2638. LI H Q, WANG C A, ZHU C Z, et al. Influence of oxy-fuel atmosphere on melting behavior and microscopic physicochemical properties of Zhundong coal ash[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(6):2632-2638.
[11]	HOTTA A, FOSTER W E O. CFB technology solutions for CO2 capture[C]//3rd Oxy-fuel Combustion Conference. Ponferrada, Spain, 2013.
[12]	LUPION M, NAVARRETE B, OTERO P, et al. Experimental programme in CIUDEN's CO2 capture technology development plant for power generation[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011, 89(9):1494-1500.
[13]	LUPION M, ALVAREZ I, OTERO P, et al. 30 MWth CIUDEN oxy-CFB boiler-first experiences[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37:6179-6188.
[14]	YANG X, Chen A, XIE J, et al. Emissions of NO and N2O in a decoupled circulating fluidized bed combustor during coal and biomass co-firing[C]//Proceeding of International Symposium on EcoTopia Science. Nagoya, Japan, 2007.
[15]	WANG X, REN Q, LI W, et al. Thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis of nitrogen transformation during oxy-fuel combustion of coal and biomass mixtures[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(4):2462-2470.
[16]	WANG X, REN Q, LI L, et al. TG-MS analysis of nitrogen transformation during combustion of biomass with municipal sewage sludge[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, 2016, 123(3):2061-2068.
[17]	王昕. 煤/生物质循环流化床富氧燃烧及氮转化特性试验研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院工程热物理研究所, 2017. WANG X. Experimental study on oxygen-rich combustion and nitrogen conversion characteristics of coal/biomass circulating fluidized bed[D]. Beijing:Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017.
[18]	WANG X, REN Q, LI W, et al. Nitrogenous gas emissions from coal/biomass co-combustion under a high oxygen concentration in a circulating fluidized bed[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(3):3234-3242.
[19]	PU G, ZAN H, DU J, et al. Study on NO emission in the oxy-fuel combustion of co-firing coal and biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed combustor[J]. Bioresources, 2017, 12(1):1890-1902.
[20]	刘倩, 钟文琪, 苏伟, 等. 基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1):523-530. LIU Q, ZHONG W Q, SU W, et al. Oxy-coal combustion kinetics and formation characteristics of pollutants based on TG-MS analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1):523-530.
[21]	DUAN L, DUAN Y, ZHAO C, et al. NO emission during co-firing coal and biomass in an oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor[J]. Fuel, 2015, 150:8-13.
[22]	KAYAHAN U, ÖZDO?AN S. Oxygen enriched combustion and co-combustion of lignites and biomass in a 30 kWth circulating fluidized bed[J]. Energy, 2016, 116:317-328.
[23]	GIL M V, RIAZA J, ÁLVAREZ L, et al. Kinetic models for the oxy-fuel combustion of coal and coal/biomass blend chars obtained in N2 and CO2 atmospheres[J]. Energy, 2012, 48(1):510-518.
[24]	FARROW T S, SUN C, SNAPE C E. Impact of biomass char on coal char burn-out under air and oxy-fuel conditions[J]. Fuel, 2013, 114:128-134.
[25]	SMART J P, PATEL R, RILEY G S. Oxy-fuel combustion of coal and biomass, the effect on radiative and convective heat transfer and burnout[J]. Combust and Flame, 2010, 157(12):2230-2240.
[26]	TABET F, GÖKALP I. Review on CFD based models for co-firing coal and biomass[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51:1101-1114.
[27]	LUPIÁÑEZ C, MAYORAL M C, DÍEZ L I, et al. On the oxy-combustion of lignite and corn stover in a lab-scale fluidized bed reactor[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2017, 96:152-161.
[28]	LUPIÁÑEZ C, CARMEN M M, DÍEZ L I, et al. The role of limestone during fluidized bed oxy-combustion of coal and biomass[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 184:670-680.
[29]	LUPIÁÑEZ C, MAYORAL M C, GUEDEA I, et al. Effect of co-firing on emissions and deposition during fluidized bed oxy-combustion[J]. Fuel, 2016, 184:261-268.
[30]	KUMAR R, SINGH R I. An investigation in 20 kWth oxygen-enriched bubbling fluidized bed combustor using coal and biomass[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 148:256-268.
[31]	RIAZA J, GIL M V, ÁLVAREZ L, et al. Oxy-fuel combustion of coal and biomass blends[J]. Energy, 2012, 41(1):429-435.
[32]	巩志强, 夏红德, 刘志成, 等. 煤焦燃烧含氮硫气体生成的TG-MS定量分析[J]. 煤炭转化, 2016, 39(1):86-91. GONG Z Q, XIA H D, LIU Z C, et al. Quantitative study on nitrogen and sulfur gas emissions in combustion of Shenmu coal and Shenmu char by TG-MS[J]. Coal Conversion, 2016, 39(1):86-91.
[33]	曾玺, 王芳, 韩江则, 等. 微型流化床反应分析及其对煤焦气化动力学的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):289-296. ZENG X, WANG F, HAN J Z, et al. Micro fluidized bed reaction analysis and its application to coal char gasification kinetics[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):289-296.
[34]	余剑, 朱剑虹, 岳君容, 等. 微型流化床反应动力学分析仪的研制与应用[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(10):2669-2674. YU J, ZHU J H, YUE J R, et al. Development and application of micro kinetic analyzer for fluidized bed gas-solid reactions[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(10):2669-2674.
[35]	曾玺, 王芳, 余剑, 等. 微型流化床反应分析的方法基础与应用研究[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(6):1687-1697. ZENG X, WANG F, YU J, et al. Fundamentals and applications of micro fluidized bed reaction analysis[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(6):1687-1697.
[36]	郭洋洲, 赵义军, 刘鹏, 等. 过程质谱仪测量气体浓度快速变化过程的应用研究[J]. 分析化学, 2016, 44(9):1335-1341. GUO Y Z, ZHAO Y J, LIU P, et al. Use of a process mass spectrometer to measure rapid change of gas concentration[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 44(9):1335-1341.

煤/生物质流态化富氧燃烧的CO₂富集特性

CO₂ enrichment characteristics of coal/biomass fluidized oxy-fuel combustion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毛磊, 刘冠章, 袁航, 张光亚. 可捕集CO₂的纳米碳酸酐酶粒子的高效制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2589-2598.
[2]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.
[3]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[4]	朱风, 陈凯琳, 黄小凤, 鲍银珠, 李文斌, 刘嘉鑫, 吴玮强, 高王伟. KOH改性电石渣脱除羰基硫的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2668-2679.
[5]	陈巨辉, 张谦, 舒崚峰, 李丹, 徐鑫, 刘晓刚, 赵晨希, 曹希峰. 基于DEM方法的旋转流化床纳米颗粒流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2374-2381.
[6]	袁子涵, 王淑彦, 邵宝力, 谢磊, 陈曦, 马一玫. 基于幂律液固曳力模型流化床内湿颗粒流动特性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2000-2012.
[7]	王皓, 唐思扬, 钟山, 梁斌. MEA吸收CO₂富液解吸过程中固体颗粒表面的强化作用分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1539-1548.
[8]	张梦波, 楼琳瑾, 冯艺荣, 郑雨婷, 张浩淼, 王靖岱, 阳永荣. 烷基铝氧烷合成技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 525-534.
[9]	陈余, 郑晓妍, 赵辉, 王二强, 李杰, 李春山. Pickering乳液催化非均相羟醛缩合反应研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 449-458.
[10]	王煦清, 严圣林, 朱礼涛, 张希宝, 罗正鸿. 填料塔中有机胺吸收CO₂气液传质的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 237-256.
[11]	周桓, 张梦丽, 郝晴, 吴思, 李杰, 徐存兵. 硫酸镁型光卤石转化钾盐镁矾的过程机制与动态规律[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3841-3850.
[12]	张东旺, 杨海瑞, 周托, 黄中, 李诗媛, 张缦. 生物质锅炉对流受热面积灰冷态模拟实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3731-3738.
[13]	刘新华, 韩振南, 韩健, 梁斌, 张楠, 胡善伟, 白丁荣, 许光文. 基于热解与燃烧反应重构的低NO _x 解耦燃烧原理与技术[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3355-3368.
[14]	王刚, 夏志豪, 李希艳, 张虹, 韩振南, 宋兴飞, 许光文. 不同气氛下流化床菱镁矿轻烧产物特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3699-3707.
[15]	朱莲峰, 王超, 张梦娟, 刘方正, 贾鑫, 安萍, 许光文, 韩振南. 水蒸气/氧流化床两段煤气化制备低焦油合成气工艺实验[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3720-3730.