单一尺寸圆柱颗粒填充床的阻力特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190457

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过直径为3、4 mm不同长度的圆柱颗粒填充床的阻力特性实验，研究了颗粒密度对填充床孔隙率的影响，结合文献孔隙率数据修正了孔隙率模型使其在高球形度时预测更准，分析了等效直径的计算方法对Ergun常数的影响，得到圆柱颗粒填充床的阻力特性并与Nemec和Wu的阻力预测模型进行对比，提出新的拟合方法对Ergun常数进行拟合。结果表明：颗粒密度在1156~7947 kg/m3范围内对填充床的孔隙率没有影响；结合文献数据得到圆柱颗粒填充床的孔隙率修正模型；文献中预测不同L/D的圆柱颗粒堆积床的阻力时结果相差较大，Nemec模型要比Wu模型预测准确度高，但也不适用所有L/D下的阻力预测；结合圆柱颗粒填充床孔隙率提出新的拟合方法，拟合Ergun常数时，采用d_ep作为等效直径的拟合优度最高；提出新的Ergun常数表达式，适用于圆柱直径3~4 mm，L/D=1~10的圆柱颗粒，相比于Nemec模型其R²更高，适用范围更明确，因此实用性更强。

关键词: 颗粒物料, 填充床, 多孔介质, 压降, 圆柱颗粒

Abstract:

The effect of particle density on the porosity of packed bed was studied by the experiment of the resistance characteristics of packed bed with cylindrical particles of different lengths of 3 mm and 4 mm. According to the experimental results, the following conclusions can be drawn that the porosity of the packed bed of cylindrical particles is independent of the particle density and is only related to the aspect ratio of the cylindrical particles.The modified model of the porosity of cylindrical particles packed bed was developed to make the prediction more accurate at high sphericity. The existing research results still have contradictions in predicting the cylindrical particle packed bed under different L/D values. And the Nemec model has higher prediction accuracy than the Wu model. When d_ep is used as the equivalent diameter, the R² of Ergun constants are 0.92(C₁) and 0.98(C₂), respectively, which is highest compared with that of other equivalent diameters.

Key words: granular materials, packed bed, porousmedia, pressure drop, cylindrical particles

中图分类号:

X 511

张承全, 高军, 吕立鹏, 贺廉洁. 单一尺寸圆柱颗粒填充床的阻力特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4181-4190.

Chengquan ZHANG, Jun GAO, Lipeng LYU, Lianjie HE. Resistance characteristics of bed packed with mono-size cylindrical particles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(11): 4181-4190.

图/表 4

参考文献 36

1	Lillo-RódenasM A, Carratalá-AbrilJ, Cazorla-AmorósD, et al. Usefulness of chemically activated anthracite for the abatement of VOC at low concentrations [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2002, 77(2): 331-336.
2	PierreM, Marie-HeleneM, Jean-NoelF. Measurement and modeling of single- and multi-component adsorption equilibria of VOC on high-silica zeolites [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(11): 2410-2414.
3	YunJ H, ChoiD K, MoonH. Benzene adsorption and hot purge regeneration in activated carbon beds [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(23): 5857-5872.
4	BurghardtA, BartelmusG, GancarczykA. Hydrodynamics of pulsing flow in three-phase chemical reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, 1999, 38(4/5/6): 411-426.
5	LakotaA, LevecJ, CarbonellR G. Hydrodynamics of trickling flow in packed beds: relative permeability concept [J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 48(4): 731-738.
6	MacDonaldI F, ElsayedM S, MowK, et al. Flow through porous media—the Ergun equation revisited [J]. Ind.Eng.Chem.Fundam., 1979, 18(3): 199-208.
7	RoseA W. Porous media: fluid transport and pore structure (2nd Ed.)F.A.L. Dullien. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1992, 574 pp., US$99.00 [J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1993, 48(3): 372.
8	ErgunS. Fluid flow through packed columns [J]. Chem.Eng.Prog., 1952, 48(2): 89-94.
9	NivenR K. Physical insight into the Ergun and Wen & Yu equations for fluid flow in packed and fluidised beds [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(3): 527-534.
10	MayerhoferM, GovaertsJ, ParmentierN, et al. Experimental investigation of pressure drop in packed beds of irregular shaped wood particles [J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 205(1/2/3): 30-35.
11	NemecD, LevecJ. Flow through packed bed reactors(Ⅰ): Single-phase flow [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(24): 6947-6957.
12	JamiA M, IzadpanahM R. Pressure drop, gas hold-up and heat transfer during single and two-phase flow through porous media [J]. International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 2005, 26(1): 156-172.
13	LiL, MaW. Experimental study on the effective particle diameter of a packed bed with non-spherical particles [J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 89(1): 35-48.
14	FoumenyE A, KulkarniA, RoshaniS, et al. Elucidation of pressure drop in packed-bed systems [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1996, 16(3): 195-202.
15	FoumenyE A, RoshaniS. Mean voidage of packed beds of cylindrical particles [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1991, 46(9): 2363-2364.
16	HandleyD, HeggsP J. Momentum and heat transfer mechanisms in regular shaped packings [J]. Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 1968, 46(9): T251-T264.
17	FoumenyE A, BenyahiaF, CastroJ A A, et al. Correlations of pressure drop in packed beds taking into account the effect of confining wall [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1993, 36(2): 536-540.
18	OzahiE, GundogduM Y, ÖCarpinlioglu M. A modification on Ergun s correlation for use in cylindrical packed beds with non-spherical particles [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2008, 19(4): 369-381.
19	LevaM. Fluidization [M]. McGraw-Hill, 1959: 68-70.
20	ZouR P, YuA B. Evaluation of the packing characteristics of mono-sized non-spherical particles [J]. Powder Technology, 1996, 88(1): 71-79.
21	ClavierR, ChikhiN, FichotF, et al. Experimental investigation on single-phase pressure losses in nuclear debris beds: identification of flow regimes and effective diameter [J]. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 2015, 292(B4): 222-236.
22	PahlM H. Über die Kennzeichnung diskret disperser Systeme und die systematische variation der Einflußgrößen zur Ermittlung eines allgemeingültigeren Widerstandsgesetzes der Porenströmung [D]. University of Karlsruhe, 1975.
23	ReicheltW. Zur Berechnung des Druckverlustes einphasig durchströmter Kugel‐und Zylinderschüttungen [J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 1972, 44(18): 1068-1071.
24	EnglandR, GunnD. Dispersion, pressure drop, and chemical reaction in packed beds of cylindrical particles [J]. Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 1970, 48:T265-T275.
25	YuB M, LiJ H. A geometry model for tortuosity of flow path in porous media [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2004, 21(8): 1569-1571.
26	WuJ, YuB, YunM. A resistance model for flow through porous media [J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2008, 71(3): 331-343.
27	ParkJ H, LeeM, MoriyamaK, et al. Influence of particle morphology on pressure gradients of single-phase air flow in the mono-size non-spherical particle beds [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2018, 115:1-8.
28	ChikhiN, CoindreauO, LiL X, et al. Evaluation of an effective diameter to study quenching and dry-out of complex debris bed [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2014, 74:24-41.
29	FeliceR D, GibilaroL G. Wall effects for the pressure drop in fixed beds [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(14): 3037-3040.
30	ScottG D. Packing of spheres: packing of equal spheres [J]. Nature, 1960, 188(4754): 908-909.
31	YuA B, ZouR P, StandishN. Packing of ternary mixtures of nonspherical particles [J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2010, 75(10): 2765-2772.
32	HwangK S, ChoiD K, GongS Y, et al. Adsorption and thermal regeneration of methylene chloride vapor on an activated carbon bed [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(7): 1111-1123.
33	HuangC C, FairJ R. Study of the adsorption and desorption of multiple adsorbates in a fixed bed [J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 34(11): 1861-1877.
34	NastajJ, AmbrożekB. Analysis of gas dehydration in TSA system with multi-layered bed of solid adsorbents [J]. Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, 2015, 96:44-53.
35	GabruśE, NastajJ, TaberoP, et al. Experimental studies on 3A and 4A zeolite molecular sieves regeneration in TSA process: aliphatic alcohols dewatering-water desorption [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 259(2): 232-242.
36	MoonD K, ParkY, KimS H, et al. Analysis of thermal parameter effects on an adsorption bed for purification and bulk separation [J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2017, 181:95-106.

[1]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[2]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[3]	高金明, 郭玉娇, 鄂承林, 卢春喜. 一种封闭罩内顺流多旋臂气液分离器的分离特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2957-2966.
[4]	贾晓宇, 杨剑, 王博, 林梅, 王秋旺. 金属丝网毛细特性的孔隙尺度数值分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1928-1938.
[5]	王晓萱, 胡晓红, 陆雨楠, 王士勇, 凡凤仙. 旋转膜过滤器内部流动特性数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1489-1498.
[6]	张银宁, 王进卿, 冯致, 詹明秀, 徐旭, 张光学, 池作和. 升温条件下多孔介质内气泡的生长和聚并行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1509-1518.
[7]	杨辉著, 兰精灵, 杨月, 梁嘉林, 吕传文, 朱永刚. 高功率平板热管传热性能的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1561-1569.
[8]	胡香凝, 尹渊博, 袁辰, 是赟, 刘翠伟, 胡其会, 杨文, 李玉星. 成品油在土壤中运移可视化的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1827-1835.
[9]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[10]	白剑钊, 郭子轩, 王德武, 刘燕, 王若瑾, 唐猛, 张少峰. 摇摆对气液并流模式立体旋流筛板压降的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 707-720.
[11]	禹言芳, 刘桓辰, 孟辉波, 刘励图, 李毓, 吴剑华. Lightnin静态混合器内气泡分散流体动力学特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3565-3575.
[12]	王沛, 魏荣阔. 光热驱动多孔氧化铈热化学循环解水制氢非热质平衡模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2885-2894.
[13]	张宇伦, 陈长坤, 雷鹏. 不同可燃液体层高度下浸润多孔介质砂床组合燃烧特性实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1826-1833.
[14]	王晔, 张婉雨, 汪彬, 耑锐, 任枫, 蔡爱峰, 杨光, 吴静怡. 多孔网幕泡破压力预测模型的建立及实验验证[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1102-1110.
[15]	周云龙, 刘起超. 起伏振动倾斜上升管气液两相流摩擦阻力分析与计算[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 643-652.