面向压缩空气储能的气-水直接接触换热特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240959

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高压缩空气储能系统效率，提出将直接接触换热器用作再热器以充分利用系统压缩热。利用加压湿化器实验系统和空气-水体系，研究了加压条件下基于泡沫陶瓷板波纹填料的直接接触换热过程，分析了填料液泛特性，以及操作压力、水气比、进口水温、进口空气比焓等参数对体积传质系数和效能的影响。结果表明，填料体积传质系数随水气比增加呈增大趋势，随进口水温的升高呈减小趋势，而效能随水气比的增加呈减小趋势，随进口水温升高呈增大趋势。进口空气比焓对直接接触换热过程的影响较小。对压缩空气储能系统，直接接触换热工艺设计时，水气比宜取为1.0~1.2，操作压力宜取为0.3~0.4 MPa。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 直接接触换热, 填料, 传热传质, 效能

Abstract:

Advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage (AA-CAES) is a promising technology for solving the problem of renewable energy power consumption. To improve the efficiency of AA-CAES, it is proposed to use direct contact heat exchangers as reheater to make full use of system compression heat. In this paper, the pressurized humidifier experimental system and air-water system is used to study the direct contact heat transfer process. An experimental setup with the foam ceramic corrugated packing was tested under pressurized conditions. The liquid flooding characteristics of the packing were analyzed. The effects of the operating pressure, the water-gas ratio, the inlet water temperature and the inlet air specific enthalpy on the volume mass transfer coefficient and the effectiveness were investigated. The results show that the volume mass transfer coefficient of the packing increases with the increasing water-gas ratio and decreases with the increasing inlet water temperature, while the efficiency decreases with the increase of the water-gas ratio and increases with the increase of the inlet water temperature. The influence of the inlet air specific enthalpy on the direct contact heat transfer process is relatively small. For AA-CAES, when designing direct contact heat exchange processes, the water-gas ratio is proposed to be taken as 1.0—1.2, and the operating pressure is proposed to be taken as 0.3—0.4 MPa.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, direct contact heat exchange, packing, heat and mass transfer, effectiveness

中图分类号:

TQ 053.5

王光磊, 刘晓玲, 徐震, 李琳. 面向压缩空气储能的气-水直接接触换热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(4): 1595-1603.

Guanglei WANG, Xiaoling LIU, Zhen XU, Lin LI. Performances of gas-water direct contact heat exchange for compressed air energy storage[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(4): 1595-1603.

图/表 11

图1 直接接触换热器的T-h图

Fig.1 T-h diagram of direct contact heat exchanger

图2 直接接触换热实验系统

Fig.2 Experimental facility of direct contact heat exchange

图3 泡沫陶瓷板波纹填料

Fig.3 Ceramic foam corrugated packing

表1 填料参数

Table1 Parameters of packing

参数	数值
材质	碳化硅
波距/mm	25
波高/mm	9
波纹角/(°)	45
孔密度/PPI	15~20

图4 泡沫陶瓷板波纹填料的液泛线

Fig.4 Flooding line of foam ceramic corrugated packing

图5 水气比对体积传质系数的影响

Fig.5 Influence of water/air mass flow ratio on volume mass transfer coefficient

图6 进口水温对体积传质系数的影响

Fig.6 Influence of inlet water temperature on volume mass transfer coefficient

图7 进口空气比焓对体积传质系数的影响

Fig.7 Influence of inlet air specific enthalpy on volume mass transfer coefficient

图8 水气比对效能的影响

Fig.8 Influence of water/air mass flow ratio on effectiveness

图9 进口水温对效能的影响

Fig.9 Influence of inlet water temperature on effectiveness

图10 进口空气比焓对效能的影响

Fig.10 Influence of inlet air specific enthalpy on effectiveness

参考文献 32

1	高志远, 张晶, 庄卫金, 等. 关于新型电力系统部分特点的思考[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2023, 43(6): 137-143, 151.
	Gao Z Y, Zhang J, Zhuang W J, et al. Thoughts on some characteristics of new style power system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2023, 43(6): 137-143, 151.
2	陈以明, 李治. 智慧能源发展方向及趋势分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2020, 40(10): 852-858, 864.
	Chen Y M, Li Z. Analysis on the development trend and features of smart energy sources[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2020, 40(10): 852-858, 864.
3	Ge G Q, Wang H R, Li R X, et al. Investigation and improvement of complex characteristics of packed bed thermal energy storage (PBTES) in adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) systems[J]. Energy, 2024, 296: 131229.
4	郑琼, 江丽霞, 徐玉杰, 等. 碳达峰、碳中和背景下储能技术研究进展与发展建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(4): 529-540.
	Zheng Q, Jiang L X, Xu Y J, et al. Research progress and development suggestions of energy storage technology under background of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(4): 529-540.
5	Schönig F, Wilmers J, Sobolyev A, et al. Digital twin modelling for compressed air energy storage plants: dynamic modelling of the discharge unit[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 88: 111551.
6	陈来军, 梅生伟, 王斌, 等. 火电耦合压缩空气储能技术研究进展及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44(18): 7264-7276.
	Chen L J, Mei S W, Wang B, et al. An overview and outlook on thermal power unit coupled with compressed air energy storage[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44(18): 7264-7276.
7	Foley A, Díaz Lobera I. Impacts of compressed air energy storage plant on an electricity market with a large renewable energy portfolio[J]. Energy, 2013, 57: 85-94.
8	Yang B, Li D Y, Zhang Y, et al. Review of innovative design and application of hydraulic compressed air energy storage technology[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 98: 113031.
9	张文, 王龙轩, 丛晓明, 等. 新型压缩空气储能及其技术发展[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(36): 15335-15347.
	Zhang W, Wang L X, Cong X M, et al. New type of compressed air energy storage and its technological development[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(36): 15335-15347.
10	李鹏, 李国能, 苏航, 等. 不同运行方案下AA-CAES系统性能分析及优化[J]. 动力工程学报, 2022, 42(9): 843-851.
	Li P, Li G N, Su H, et al. Performance analysis and optimization of AA-CAES system under different operation schemes[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2022, 42(9): 843-851.
11	韩中合, 马帆帆, 吴迪, 等. 基于AA-CAES的综合能源系统协同优化与性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(12): 550-558.
	Han Z H, Ma F F, Wu D, et al. Collaborative optimization and performance analysis of integrated energy system based on AA-CAES[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 550-558.
12	Razmi A R, Soltani M, Ardehali A, et al. Design, thermodynamic, and wind assessments of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) integrated with two adjacent wind farms: a case study at Abhar and Kahak sites, Iran[J]. Energy, 2021, 221: 119902.
13	Özen D N, Hançer Güleryüz E, Acılar A M. Advanced exergo-economic analysis of an advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system with the modified productive structure analysis method and multi-objective optimization study[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 81: 110380.
14	Pottie D, Cardenas B, Garvey S, et al. Comparative analysis of isochoric and isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(6): 2646.
15	梅生伟, 张通, 张学林, 等. 非补燃压缩空气储能研究及工程实践: 以金坛国家示范项目为例[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2022, 39(5): 1-8, 14.
	Mei S W, Zhang T, Zhang X L, et al. Research and engineering practice of non-supplementary combustion compressed air energy storage: taking Jintan national demonstration project as an example[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2022, 39(5): 1-8, 14.
16	Geissbühler L, Becattini V, Zanganeh G, et al. Pilot-scale demonstration of advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage(Part 1): Plant description and tests with sensible thermal-energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2018, 17: 129-139.
17	Hartmann N, Vöhringer O, Kruck C, et al. Simulation and analysis of different adiabatic compressed air energy storage plant configurations[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 93: 541-548.
18	Yang L, Zhang L, Xi Y, et al. Thermal performance of counterflow wet cooling tower filled with inclined folding wave packing: an experimental and numerical investigation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2024, 235: 126151.
19	Wei H Y, Huang S F, Zhang X S. Experimental and simulation study on heat and mass transfer characteristics in direct-contact total heat exchanger for flue gas heat recovery[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 200: 117657.
20	Xu Z, Xie Y C, Xiao Y H. A compact packing humidifier for the micro humid air turbine cycle: design method and experimental evaluation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125: 727-734.
21	Patel P, Sharma A, Monde A D, et al. Performance analysis of melting phenomena in an ice-freezing type direct-contact heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 50: 104575.
22	Li B, Li Z X, Yang P Y, et al. Modeling and optimization of the thermal-hydraulic performance of direct contact heat exchanger using quasi-opposite Jaya algorithm[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2022, 173: 107421.
23	潘晓伟, 王绍民, 李硕, 等. 直接接触式低温烟气余热回收塔设计参数优化研究[J]. 热科学与技术, 2022, 21(6): 609-614.
	Pan X W, Wang S M, Li S, et al. Design optimization study on direct contact tower used for low temperature flue gas waste heat recovery[J]. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 2022, 21(6): 609-614.
24	谢迎春, 梅宁. 逆流湿化器的效能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(S1): 61-65.
	Xie Y C, Mei N. Energy effectiveness analysis of countercurrent humidifier[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(S1):61-65.
25	Yang X P, Chong D T, Liu J P, et al. Experimental study on the direct contact condensation of the steam-air mixture in subcooled water flow in a rectangular channel[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 88: 424-432.
26	陈瑶, 殷勇高, 张小松, 等. 跨温区直接蒸发冷却的热质传递特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(5): 1532-1540.
	Chen Y, Yin Y G, Zhang X S, et al. Characteristics of heat and mass transfer in direct evaporative cooling process in different temperature ranges[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(5): 1532-1540.
27	Gu L D, Min J C, Tang Y C. Effects of mass transfer on heat and mass transfer characteristics between water surface and airstream[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 122:1093-1102.
28	Parente J, Traverso A, Massardo A. Saturator analysis for an evaporative gas turbine cycle[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2003, 23: 1275-1293.
29	Hyland R W, Wexler A. Formulations for the thermodynamic properties of dry air from 173.15 K to 473.15K, and of saturated moist air from 173.15 K to 372.15 K, at pressures to 5 MPa[J]. ASHRAE Transactions, 1983, 89: 520-535.
30	Wagner W, Crouzet A. Property of Water and Steam[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
31	Halasz B. Application of a general non-dimensional mathematical model to cooling towers[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 1999, 38(1): 75-88.
32	Xu Z, Lu Y, Xie Y C. Hydrodynamic and heat and mass transfer performances of novel ceramic foam packing to humidification tower[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 87: 707-713.

[1]	蒲黎明, 汪贵, 郑春来, 王科, 向腾龙, 王治红. 混合制冷级联天然气液化工艺优化及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 267-275.
[2]	李焱, 郑利军, 张恩勇, 王云飞. 深水海底管道软管内部流体渗透特性模型与试验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 118-125.
[3]	程婷, 焦纬洲, 刘有智. 功能性填料在超重力旋转填料床中的应用和研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(4): 1414-1428.
[4]	王清莲, 熊佩芸, 韩俏飞, 叶长燊, 王红星, 杨臣, 邱挺. 高性能负载型催化填料的制备及其性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(11): 4226-4236.
[5]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[6]	何洋, 高森虎, 吴青云, 张明理, 龙涛, 牛佩, 高景辉, 孟颖琪. 析湿工况下平直开缝翅片传热传质特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1073-1081.
[7]	王煦清, 严圣林, 朱礼涛, 张希宝, 罗正鸿. 填料塔中有机胺吸收CO₂气液传质的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 237-256.
[8]	赵继昊, 唐伟强, 徐小飞, 赵双良, 贺炅皓. 高分子复合材料中键合剂在不同纳米填料表面的吸附能计算[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3174-3181.
[9]	王兵兵, 王超, 徐志明. 圆筒电极抑制换热表面CaCO₃污垢沉积特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 634-642.
[10]	张舒蕾, 李冰杰, 蒋健, 董新宇, 刘璐. 凸面恒温基底上固着液滴蒸发特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5537-5546.
[11]	黄子轩, 陈欢, 李海, 王明龙, 陈光进, 刘蓓. ZIF-8浆液中试分离CO₂/N₂过程模拟及能耗分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 322-331.
[12]	郝仁杰, 谯敏, 黄卫星. 气-液并流通过堆叠筛板填料的脉冲流特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1314-1321.
[13]	李群生, 李洋, 任钟旗, 薛嘉星. FGP型填料的开发及在甲醇精馏节能减排中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 6232-6240.
[14]	郭达, 祁贵生, 刘有智, 焦纬洲, 闫文超, 高雨松. 错流旋转填料床的质、热同传性能及传热机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5543-5551.
[15]	唐子龙,肖凡凡,尹玉华,李森雨,汪靖伦. 功能硅烷在有机-无机复合固态电解质中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5002-5015.