CIESC Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (10): 4707-4721.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220715
• Material science and engineering, nanotechnology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xi ZHENG1(), Tao WANG1(), Yongsheng REN2, Zhenzhen ZHAO1, Xueqi WANG1, Zhiping ZHAO1
Received:
2022-04-16
Revised:
2022-05-26
Online:
2022-11-02
Published:
2022-10-05
Contact:
Tao WANG
郑喜1(), 王涛1(), 任永胜2, 赵珍珍1, 王雪琪1, 赵之平1
通讯作者:
王涛
作者简介:
郑喜(1999—),男,硕士研究生,zhengxihh@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xi ZHENG, Tao WANG, Yongsheng REN, Zhenzhen ZHAO, Xueqi WANG, Zhiping ZHAO. Preparation and properties research of poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) flat-sheet membrane[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(10): 4707-4721.
郑喜, 王涛, 任永胜, 赵珍珍, 王雪琪, 赵之平. 聚间苯二甲酰间苯二胺平板膜的制备及其性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4707-4721.
膜 | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 9 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 86 | 100 |
A2 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 85 | 100 |
A3 | 11 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 84 | 100 |
A4 | 12 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 83 | 100 |
Table 1 Casting solution of different polymer concentration
膜 | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 9 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 86 | 100 |
A2 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 85 | 100 |
A3 | 11 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 84 | 100 |
A4 | 12 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 83 | 100 |
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 0.2375 | 0.2203 | 71.98±3.84 |
A2 | 0.1145 | 0.1022 | 61.78±4.74 |
A3 | 0.0947 | 0.0918 | 56.11±3.27 |
A4 | 0.0379 | 0.0355 | 63.39±1.28 |
Table 2 Pore diameter and porosity data of membranes at different polymer concentrations
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 0.2375 | 0.2203 | 71.98±3.84 |
A2 | 0.1145 | 0.1022 | 61.78±4.74 |
A3 | 0.0947 | 0.0918 | 56.11±3.27 |
A4 | 0.0379 | 0.0355 | 63.39±1.28 |
膜 | LiCl/g | PMIA/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 2.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 87 | 100 |
B2 | 3.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 86 | 100 |
B3 | 4.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 85 | 100 |
B4 | 5.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 84 | 100 |
Table 3 Casting solutions with different concentrations of inorganic additives
膜 | LiCl/g | PMIA/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 2.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 87 | 100 |
B2 | 3.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 86 | 100 |
B3 | 4.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 85 | 100 |
B4 | 5.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 84 | 100 |
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
B1 | 0.2247 | 0.2232 | 78.87±5.66 |
B2 | 0.1768 | 0.1718 | 76.39±2.31 |
B3 | 0.1113 | 0.1057 | 70.56±4.75 |
B4 | 0.0913 | 0.0847 | 66.27±2.84 |
Table 4 Pore diameter and porosity data of membranes at different concentrations of inorganic additives
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
B1 | 0.2247 | 0.2232 | 78.87±5.66 |
B2 | 0.1768 | 0.1718 | 76.39±2.31 |
B3 | 0.1113 | 0.1057 | 70.56±4.75 |
B4 | 0.0913 | 0.0847 | 66.27±2.84 |
膜 | PEG/g | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 2 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 83 | 100 |
C2 | 4 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 81 | 100 |
C3 | 6 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 79 | 100 |
C4 | 8 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 77 | 100 |
Table 5 Casting solution of different organic additive with small molecule
膜 | PEG/g | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | PVP-K15/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 2 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 83 | 100 |
C2 | 4 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 81 | 100 |
C3 | 6 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 79 | 100 |
C4 | 8 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 77 | 100 |
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.0618 | 0.0483 | 69.58±0.68 |
C2 | 0.0571 | 0.0537 | 80.09±1.72 |
C3 | 0.0797 | 0.0783 | 79.67±0.80 |
C4 | 0.1050 | 0.0774 | 76.11±3.35 |
Table 6 Pore diameter and porosity data of membrane at different concentrations of organic additives with small molecule
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
C1 | 0.0618 | 0.0483 | 69.58±0.68 |
C2 | 0.0571 | 0.0537 | 80.09±1.72 |
C3 | 0.0797 | 0.0783 | 79.67±0.80 |
C4 | 0.1050 | 0.0774 | 76.11±3.35 |
膜 | PVP-K15/g | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | 1.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 85 | 100 |
D2 | 3.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 83 | 100 |
D3 | 5.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 81 | 100 |
D4 | 7.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 79 | 100 |
Table 7 Casting solution of different organic additives with macromolecular
膜 | PVP-K15/g | PMIA/g | LiCl/g | DMAc/g | 总计/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | 1.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 85 | 100 |
D2 | 3.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 83 | 100 |
D3 | 5.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 81 | 100 |
D4 | 7.2 | 10 | 3.8 | 79 | 100 |
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
D1 | 0.1250 | 0.1176 | 73.31±0.71 |
D2 | 0.1522 | 0.1807 | 78.28±0.20 |
D3 | 0.0613 | 0.0566 | 84.80±1.52 |
D4 | 0.1354 | 0.0676 | 76.05±0.86 |
Table 8 Pore diameter and porosity data of membranes at different concentrations of organic additives with macromolecule
膜 | 平均孔径/μm | 最可几孔径/μm | 孔隙率/% |
---|---|---|---|
D1 | 0.1250 | 0.1176 | 73.31±0.71 |
D2 | 0.1522 | 0.1807 | 78.28±0.20 |
D3 | 0.0613 | 0.0566 | 84.80±1.52 |
D4 | 0.1354 | 0.0676 | 76.05±0.86 |
1 | He C S, Harden C P, Liu Y X. Comparison of water resources management between China and the United States[J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2020, 1(2): 98-108. |
2 | Cramer W, Guiot J, Fader M, et al. Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(11): 972-980. |
3 | Tan X, Rodrigue D. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation(part Ⅰ): Production techniques with polysulfone and poly(vinylidene fluoride)[J]. Polymers, 2019, 11(7): 1160. |
4 | Peters T. Membrane technology for water treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2010, 33(8): 1233-1240. |
5 | Ali A, Tufa R A, Macedonio F, et al. Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 1-21. |
6 | Wang W, Xu X, Zhang Z C, et al. Study on the improvement of PVDF flat ultrafiltration membrane with MWCNTs-OH as the additive and the influence of different MWCNTs-OH scales[J]. Colloid and Interface Science Communications, 2021, 43: 100433. |
7 | Lee A, Elam J W, Darling S B. Membrane materials for water purification: design, development, and application[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology, 2016, 2(1): 17-42. |
8 | Yang M, Zhao C, Zhang S, et al. Preparation of graphene oxide modified poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) nanofiltration membrane with improved water flux and antifouling property[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 394: 149-159. |
9 | Kakida H, Chatani Y, Tadokoro H. Crystal structure of poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide)[J]. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition, 1976, 14(3): 427-435. |
10 | Wang T, He X P, Li Y, et al. Novel poly(piperazine-amide) (PA) nanofiltration membrane based poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PMIA) hollow fiber substrate for treatment of dye solutions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 351: 1013-1026. |
11 | Lin C E, Wang J, Zhou M Y, et al. Poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) (PMIA): a potential polymer for breaking through the selectivity-permeability trade-off for ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 518: 72-78. |
12 | Song Q Q, Feng Y, Wu W W, et al. Blending modification of PMIA with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone): towards high-performance material with enhanced mechanical property[J]. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 2021, 112(12): 2004-2012. |
13 | Balakrishnan J, Pramila J. Elimination of toxic metal ion by means of poly m-phenylene (isophthalamide) ultra filtration membranes[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 33: 2858-2862. |
14 | Zhang L Y, Shi Y X, Wang T, et al. Fabrication of novel anti-fouling poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) ultrafiltration membrane modified with Pluronic F127 via coupling phase inversion and surface segregation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 282: 120106. |
15 | Paul M, Jons S D. Chemistry and fabrication of polymeric nanofiltration membranes: a review[J]. Polymer, 2016, 103: 417-456. |
16 | 姜钦亮, 张凯松. PMIA和氯化锂含量对PMIA平板超滤膜结构与性能的影响[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2019, 39(5): 94-100. |
Jiang Q L, Zhang K S. Effects of PMIA and LiCl content on structure and performance of PMIA flat sheet ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2019, 39(5): 94-100. | |
17 | Prince J A, Bhuvana S, Boodhoo K V K, et al. Synthesis and characterization of PEG-Ag immobilized PES hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes with long lasting antifouling properties[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 454: 538-548. |
18 | Wang T, Zheng X, Wang Y J, et al. Fabrication and performance of novel poly(piperazine-amide) composite nanofiltration membranes based on various poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) substrates[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(49): 18106-18120. |
19 | Jiang B, Zhang N, Zhang L H, et al. Enhanced separation performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes by imidazole-based deep eutectic solvents as novel functional additives[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 564: 247-258. |
20 | Li H B, Shi W Y, Zhang Y F, et al. Effects of additives on the morphology and performance of PPTA/PVDF in situ blend UF membrane[J]. Polymers, 2014, 6(6): 1846-1861. |
21 | Murakata T, Sato S, Ohgawara T, et al. Control of pore size distribution of silica gel through sol-gel process using inorganic salts and surfactants as additives[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1992, 27(6): 1567-1574. |
22 | Ma Y X, Shi F M, Wang Z J, et al. Preparation and characterization of PSf/clay nanocomposite membranes with PEG 400 as a pore forming additive[J]. Desalination, 2012, 286: 131-137. |
23 | Idris A, Ahmed I, Limin M A. Influence of lithium chloride, lithium bromide and lithium fluoride additives on performance of polyethersulfone membranes and its application in the treatment of palm oil mill effluent[J]. Desalination, 2010, 250(2): 805-809. |
24 | Zheng L B, Wu Z J, Wei Y S, et al. Preparation of PVDF-CTFE hydrophobic membranes for MD application: effect of LiCl-based mixed additives[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 506: 71-85. |
25 | 王旭东, 满丽, 王磊, 等. 添加剂对PVDF平板超滤膜性能和结构的影响[J]. 水处理技术, 2010, 36(3): 33-37. |
Wang X D, Man L, Wang L, et al. Effect of additives on the properties and structures of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) flat ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2010, 36(3): 33-37. | |
26 | Lee H J, Won J, Lee H, et al. Solution properties of poly(amic acid)-NMP containing LiCl and their effects on membrane morphologies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 196(2): 267-277. |
27 | Aryanti P T P, Joscarita S R, Wardani A K, et al. The influence of PEG400 and acetone on polysulfone membrane morphology and fouling behaviour[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 2016, 48(2): 135-149. |
28 | Liang B, Li Q, Cao B, et al. Water permeance, permeability and desalination properties of the sulfonic acid functionalized composite pervaporation membranes[J]. Desalination, 2018, 433: 132-140. |
29 | Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A K, Purkait M K. Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 309(1/2): 209-221. |
30 | Kim J H, Lee K H. Effect of PEG additive on membrane formation by phase inversion[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 138(2): 153-163. |
31 | 赵姗姗, 王鹏, 郑彤, 等. 添加剂对聚醚砜酮超滤膜结构和性能的影响[J]. 水处理技术, 2013, 39(4): 28-32. |
Zhao S S, Wang P, Zheng T, et al. Effect of additives on the structures and properties of poly(phthalazine ether sulfone ketone)(PPESK) ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2013, 39(4): 28-32. | |
32 | Zhu T, Chang S C, Song Y F, et al. PVP-encapsulated CoFe2O4/rGO composites with controllable electromagnetic wave absorption performance[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 373: 755-766. |
33 | 田立, 张云, 汪朝晖, 等. 铸膜液中大分子量PVP含量对PVDF膜的影响[J]. 化工新型材料, 2014, 42(12): 185-188. |
Tian L, Zhang Y, Wang Z H, et al. Influence of macromolecular PVP composition in casting solution on the formation of PVDF membranes[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2014, 42(12): 185-188. | |
34 | Al Malek S A, Abu Seman M N, Johnson D, et al. Formation and characterization of polyethersulfone membranes using different concentrations of polyvinylpyrrolidone[J]. Desalination, 2012, 288: 31-39. |
[1] | Baiyu YANG, Yue KOU, Juntao JIANG, Yali ZHAN, Qinghong WANG, Chunmao CHEN. Chemical conversion of dissolved organic matter in petrochemical spent caustic along a wet air oxidation pretreatment process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920. |
[2] | Yaxin ZHAO, Xueqin ZHANG, Rongzhu WANG, Guo SUN, Shanjing YAO, Dongqiang LIN. Removal of monoclonal antibody aggregates with ion exchange chromatography by flow-through mode [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3879-3887. |
[3] | Xin YANG, Xiao PENG, Kairu XUE, Mengwei SU, Yan WU. Preparation of molecularly imprinted-TiO2 and its properties of photoelectrocatalytic degradation of solubilized PHE [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571. |
[4] | Lei XING, Chunyu MIAO, Minghu JIANG, Lixin ZHAO, Xinya LI. Optimal design and performance analysis of downhole micro gas-liquid hydrocyclone [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406. |
[5] | Shuang LIU, Linzhou ZHANG, Zhiming XU, Suoqi ZHAO. Study on molecular level composition correlation of viscosity of residual oil and its components [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241. |
[6] | Jiayi ZHANG, Jiali HE, Jiangpeng XIE, Jian WANG, Yu ZHAO, Dongqiang ZHANG. Research progress of pervaporation technology for N-methylpyrrolidone recovery in lithium battery production [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215. |
[7] | Ruihang ZHANG, Pan CAO, Feng YANG, Kun LI, Peng XIAO, Chun DENG, Bei LIU, Changyu SUN, Guangjin CHEN. Analysis of key parameters affecting product purity of natural gas ethane recovery process via ZIF-8 nanofluid [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393. |
[8] | Zhaolun WEN, Peirui LI, Zhonglin ZHANG, Xiao DU, Qiwang HOU, Yegang LIU, Xiaogang HAO, Guoqing GUAN. Design and optimization of cryogenic air separation process with dividing wall column based on self-heat regeneration [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998. |
[9] | Jie LIU, Lisheng WU, Jinjin LI, Zhenghong LUO, Yinning ZHOU. Preparation and properties of polyether-based vinylogous urethane reversible crosslinked polymers [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 3051-3057. |
[10] | Yuanliang ZHANG, Xinqi LUAN, Weige SU, Changhao LI, Zhongxing ZHAO, Liqin ZHOU, Jianmin CHEN, Yan HUANG, Zhenxia ZHAO. Study on selective extraction of nicotine by ionic liquids composite extractant and DFT calculation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2947-2956. |
[11] | Jinming GAO, Yujiao GUO, Chenglin E, Chunxi LU. Study on the separation characteristics of a downstream gas-liquid vortex separator in a closed hood [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(7): 2957-2966. |
[12] | Kuikui HAN, Xianglong TAN, Jinzhi LI, Ting YANG, Chun ZHANG, Yongfen ZHANG, Hongquan LIU, Zhongwei YU, Xuehong GU. Four-channel hollow fiber MFI zeolite membrane for the separation of xylene isomers [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(6): 2468-2476. |
[13] | Xingchi ZHU, Zhiyuan GUO, Zhiyong JI, Jing WANG, Panpan ZHANG, Jie LIU, Yingying ZHAO, Junsheng YUAN. Simulation and optimization of selective electrodialysis magnesium and lithium separation process [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(6): 2477-2485. |
[14] | Yanmei ZHANG, Tao YUAN, Jiang LI, Yajie LIU, Zhanxue SUN. Study on the construction of high-efficient SRB mixed microflora and its performance under acid stress [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610. |
[15] | Shaoyun CHEN, Dong XU, Long CHEN, Yu ZHANG, Yuanfang ZHANG, Qingliang YOU, Chenglong HU, Jian CHEN. Preparation and adsorption properties of monolayer polyaniline microsphere arrays [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 2228-2238. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 180
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 376
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||