CIESC Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 76 ›› Issue (9): 4440-4448.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20241377
• Special Column: Modeling and Simulation in Process Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaofeng CAO1,2(
), Huahai ZHANG2, Jiangyun WANG1, Limin WANG2,3(
)
Received:2024-12-02
Revised:2025-02-02
Online:2025-10-23
Published:2025-09-25
Contact:
Limin WANG
曹潇风1,2(
), 张华海2, 王江云1, 王利民2,3(
)
通讯作者:
王利民
作者简介:曹潇风(1998—),男,硕士研究生,xfcao@ipe.ac.cn
基金资助:CLC Number:
Xiaofeng CAO, Huahai ZHANG, Jiangyun WANG, Limin WANG. Structural design and flow characteristics of conical gas laminar flow element[J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4440-4448.
曹潇风, 张华海, 王江云, 王利民. 锥形气体层流元件结构设计及流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4440-4448.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
| r1/mm | r2/mm | L/mm | Le/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | 7.7 | 180.0 | 20.0 |
| 8.0 | 7.8 | 180.0 | 15.0 |
| 8.0 | 7.9 | 180.0 | 10.0 |
Table 1 Parameter design of laminar flow meter
| r1/mm | r2/mm | L/mm | Le/mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | 7.7 | 180.0 | 20.0 |
| 8.0 | 7.8 | 180.0 | 15.0 |
| 8.0 | 7.9 | 180.0 | 10.0 |
| 配置 | 计算时间/s | 加速比 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 CPU | 5.040 | — |
| 1 GPU | 0.400 | 12.60 |
| 2 GPU | 0.275 | 18.32 |
| 3 GPU | 0.250 | 20.00 |
| 4 GPU | 0.250 | 20.00 |
| 5 GPU | 0.255 | 19.76 |
| 6 GPU | 0.290 | 17.38 |
Table 2 Acceleration ratio of different computing configurations
| 配置 | 计算时间/s | 加速比 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 CPU | 5.040 | — |
| 1 GPU | 0.400 | 12.60 |
| 2 GPU | 0.275 | 18.32 |
| 3 GPU | 0.250 | 20.00 |
| 4 GPU | 0.250 | 20.00 |
| 5 GPU | 0.255 | 19.76 |
| 6 GPU | 0.290 | 17.38 |
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 854.10 | 0.2 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
| 2987.80 | 0.7 | 0.70 | 0.55 |
| 42354.14 | 10 | 9.87 | 1.31 |
| 84711.21 | 20 | 19.74 | 1.31 |
| 127050.22 | 30 | 29.60 | 1.32 |
| 169448.27 | 40 | 39.48 | 1.30 |
| 211814.38 | 50 | 49.35 | 1.29 |
| 232998.74 | 55 | 54.29 | 1.29 |
Table 3 Simulated data of annular gap type laminar flow meter(0.1 mm)
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 854.10 | 0.2 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
| 2987.80 | 0.7 | 0.70 | 0.55 |
| 42354.14 | 10 | 9.87 | 1.31 |
| 84711.21 | 20 | 19.74 | 1.31 |
| 127050.22 | 30 | 29.60 | 1.32 |
| 169448.27 | 40 | 39.48 | 1.30 |
| 211814.38 | 50 | 49.35 | 1.29 |
| 232998.74 | 55 | 54.29 | 1.29 |
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1073.81 | 2 | 1.98 | 1.21 |
| 3759.14 | 7 | 6.92 | 1.19 |
| 6444.14 | 12 | 11.86 | 1.19 |
| 9129.31 | 17 | 16.80 | 1.19 |
| 10740.02 | 20 | 19.76 | 1.20 |
| 16107.14 | 30 | 29.64 | 1.21 |
| 21476.71 | 40 | 39.52 | 1.21 |
| 30351.07 | 56.5 | 55.85 | 1.16 |
Table 4 Simulated data of annular gap type laminar flow meter (0.2 mm)
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1073.81 | 2 | 1.98 | 1.21 |
| 3759.14 | 7 | 6.92 | 1.19 |
| 6444.14 | 12 | 11.86 | 1.19 |
| 9129.31 | 17 | 16.80 | 1.19 |
| 10740.02 | 20 | 19.76 | 1.20 |
| 16107.14 | 30 | 29.64 | 1.21 |
| 21476.71 | 40 | 39.52 | 1.21 |
| 30351.07 | 56.5 | 55.85 | 1.16 |
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 160.13 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.74 |
| 800.65 | 5 | 4.96 | 0.74 |
| 1601.14 | 10 | 9.92 | 0.75 |
| 2722.14 | 17 | 16.87 | 0.74 |
| 3202.414 | 20 | 19.85 | 0.74 |
| 4803.04 | 30 | 29.77 | 0.75 |
| 6406.47 | 40 | 39.71 | 0.72 |
| 8018.38 | 50 | 49.71 | 0.60 |
| 8825.47 | 55 | 54.68 | 0.59 |
Table 5 Simulated data of annular gap type laminar flow meter (0.3 mm)
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 160.13 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.74 |
| 800.65 | 5 | 4.96 | 0.74 |
| 1601.14 | 10 | 9.92 | 0.75 |
| 2722.14 | 17 | 16.87 | 0.74 |
| 3202.414 | 20 | 19.85 | 0.74 |
| 4803.04 | 30 | 29.77 | 0.75 |
| 6406.47 | 40 | 39.71 | 0.72 |
| 8018.38 | 50 | 49.71 | 0.60 |
| 8825.47 | 55 | 54.68 | 0.59 |
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.76 | 0.2 | 0.196 | 1.896 |
| 148.82 | 1 | 0.981 | 1.873 |
| 446.48 | 3 | 2.944 | 1.866 |
| 1041.63 | 7 | 6.868 | 1.881 |
| 1487.98 | 10 | 9.811 | 1.886 |
| 2976.20 | 20 | 19.624 | 1.878 |
| 4463.78 | 30 | 29.433 | 1.889 |
| 5953.93 | 40 | 39.259 | 1.853 |
| 8203.17 | 55 | 54.090 | 1.655 |
Table 6 Simulated data of nitrogen
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.76 | 0.2 | 0.196 | 1.896 |
| 148.82 | 1 | 0.981 | 1.873 |
| 446.48 | 3 | 2.944 | 1.866 |
| 1041.63 | 7 | 6.868 | 1.881 |
| 1487.98 | 10 | 9.811 | 1.886 |
| 2976.20 | 20 | 19.624 | 1.878 |
| 4463.78 | 30 | 29.433 | 1.889 |
| 5953.93 | 40 | 39.259 | 1.853 |
| 8203.17 | 55 | 54.090 | 1.655 |
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.51 | 0.2 | 0.196 | 1.895 |
| 85.75 | 0.7 | 0.686 | 1.946 |
| 245.14 | 2 | 1.9621 | 1.896 |
| 612.98 | 5 | 4.906 | 1.875 |
| 1225.84 | 10 | 9.812 | 1.884 |
| 2084.36 | 17 | 16.683 | 1.864 |
| 2452.63 | 20 | 19.631 | 1.846 |
| 2945.01 | 24 | 23.572 | 1.784 |
| 3687.42 | 30 | 29.514 | 1.620 |
Table 7 Simulated data of carbon dioxide
| ΔP/Pa | qr/(L/min) | qt/(L/min) | δ/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24.51 | 0.2 | 0.196 | 1.895 |
| 85.75 | 0.7 | 0.686 | 1.946 |
| 245.14 | 2 | 1.9621 | 1.896 |
| 612.98 | 5 | 4.906 | 1.875 |
| 1225.84 | 10 | 9.812 | 1.884 |
| 2084.36 | 17 | 16.683 | 1.864 |
| 2452.63 | 20 | 19.631 | 1.846 |
| 2945.01 | 24 | 23.572 | 1.784 |
| 3687.42 | 30 | 29.514 | 1.620 |
| [1] | Suga S, Okajima M, Fujiwara K, et al. “Cation flow” method: a new approach to conventional and combinatorial organic syntheses using electrochemical microflow systems[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001, 123(32): 7941-7942. |
| [2] | Sagi H, Zhao Y B, Wereley S T. Wide range flow sensor—Vacuum through viscous flow conditions[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A-Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, 2004, 22(5): 1992-1999. |
| [3] | Wang B, Zhang N, Cao Q W, et al. Evaluation approach to dynamic characteristic of turbine flowmeters considering calibration system response[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2018, 64: 126-132. |
| [4] | 贺登辉, 陈森林, 白博峰. 基于Chisholm模型的V锥流量计气液分层流测量新模型[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3428-3435. |
| He D H, Chen S L, Bai B F. New model for measuring stratified gas-liquid flow by Chisholm-model-based V-cone flowmeter[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3428-3435. | |
| [5] | Zhang Z Z, Ding D W, Zhang Z G. Research on fine chemical process and equipment detection and computer monitoring technology[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1992(2): 022152. |
| [6] | 娄锋炎, 尹佳滨, 段笑南, 等. 连续微反应加氢技术在脱保护反应中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 761-771. |
| Lou F Y, Yin J B, Duan X N, et al. Application of continuous micro-reactor hydrogenation technology in deprotection reaction[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(2): 761-771. | |
| [7] | 于海鹏, 陈来夫. 精对苯二甲酸装置中空气流量测量的研究与优化[J]. 石油化工自动化, 2024, 60(3): 96-97, 102. |
| Yu H P, Chen L F. Researgh and optimization of air flow measurement in a purified terephthalic acid plant[J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry, 2024, 60(3): 96-97, 102. | |
| [8] | Wang Z X, Xu Y, Liu T J, et al. Development of a measurement device for micro gas flowrate based on laminar flow element with micro-curved surface[J]. Micromachines, 2024, 15(5): 660. |
| [9] | Dong S S, Huang H Q, Peng H D, et al. Development of the pressure potential differential type laminar flow transducer for gas flow measurement[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2023, 35(10): 130-136. |
| [10] | Priestman G H, Boucher R F. The biased laminar by-pass fluidic flowmeter[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2005, 127(6): 1199-1204. |
| [11] | Wang Q Q, Dong S S, Li G Z, et al. Numerical simulation of the laminar flow sensing element of pressure potential differential type[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2020, 33(11): 1587-1593. |
| [12] | 王伯年, 王荣杰, 王利民, 等. 层流流量计设计参数的选择与确定[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2000, 21(5): 474-476. |
| Wang B N, Wang R J, Wang L M, et al. On the choice and determination of design parameters for laminar flow meters[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2000, 21(5): 474-476. | |
| [13] | Wang X L, Zhao Y J, Yu H C, et al. Research on dynamic characteristics of laminar flow meter[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2024, 97: 102619. |
| [14] | Robert F B, John D W, Michael R M. Modeling laminar flow meters for process gases[J]. Proceedings of Flomeco, 2010, 8: 13-15. |
| [15] | Song J, Xie D L, Xu Y, et al. Gas micro and small flow measurement based on conical laminar flow element[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2023, 52(6): 110-116. |
| [16] | Wright J D, Cobu T, Berg R F, et al. Calibration of laminar flow meters for process gases[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2012, 25: 8-14. |
| [17] | Feng C C, Lin W T, Yang C T. Laminar flow meter with straight glass capillary[J]. MAPAN, 2011, 26(3): 237-245. |
| [18] | Berg R F. Simple flow meter and viscometer of high accuracy for gases[J]. Metrologia, 2005, 42(1): 11-23. |
| [19] | Nishimura R, Kawashima K, Kagawa T. Analysis of laminar flow meter with flute-type cross section laminar elements[C]//2008 Asia Simulation Conference-7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing. Beijing, China. IEEE, 2008:1110-1114. |
| [20] | 张嘉祥. 层流流量计计算数学模型和标定方法的研究[J]. 中国测试, 2009, 35(5): 14-17. |
| Zhang J X. Research on flow calculation mathematic model and calibration of laminar flow meter[J]. China Measurement & Test, 2009, 35(5): 14-17. | |
| [21] | Nuszkowski J, Schwamb J, Esposito J. A novel gas divider using nonlinear laminar flow[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2016, 52: 255-260. |
| [22] | Wang X L, Chen Y C, Jiang Y X, et al. Rectangle-gap-type laminar flow meter with inward pressure taps[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2021, 79: 101893. |
| [23] | Pena F L, Diaz A D, Lema M R, et al. A new approach to laminar flowmeters[J]. Sensors, 2010, 10(12): 10560-10570. |
| [24] | 王剪, 豆峰, 赵晓东, 等. 差分式层流流量传感技术研究[J]. 传感技术学报, 2019, 32(12): 1790-1794, 1829. |
| Wang J, Dou F, Zhao X D, et al. Research on the differential type laminar flow sensor[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2019, 32(12): 1790-1794, 1829. | |
| [25] | 黄浩钦. 压力位差式气体层流流量计研究[D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2021. |
| Huang H Q. Study on pressure differential gas laminar flow meter[D]. Hangzhou: China Jiliang University, 2021. | |
| [26] | Pedro A, Morgado T, Navas H. An uncertainties simulation model applied to an automated laminar flowmeter[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10: 888. |
| [27] | 张家庆, 刘朝晖, 李宇, 等. 碳氢燃料JP-10高温液态黏度测量和推算模型构建方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 153-161. |
| Zhang J Q, Liu Z H, Li Y, et al. Viscosity measurements and prediction model construction for liquid JP-10 at high-temperature conditions[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 153-161. | |
| [28] | 陈雨萱, 谢代梁, 崔骊水, 等. 环形间隙式层流元件设计及流量特性研究[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2024, 38(4): 195-201. |
| Chen Y X, Xie D L, Cui L S, et al. Design and flow characterization of annular gap laminar flow elements[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2024, 38(4): 195-201. | |
| [29] | Wojtkowiak J, Popiel C O. Inherently linear annular-duct-type laminar flowmeter[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2006, 128(1): 196-198. |
| [30] | Hoff D. The zero-Mach limit of compressible flows[J]. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 1998, 192(3): 543-554. |
| [1] | Songyuan GUO, Xiaoqing ZHOU, Wubing MIAO, Bin WANG, Rui ZHUAN, Qingtai CAO, Chengcheng CHEN, Guang YANG, Jingyi WU. Numerical study on characteristics of pressurized discharge in liquid oxygen tank equipped with porous plate in the ascent period of rocket [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(S1): 62-74. |
| [2] | Ziteng YAN, Feilong ZHAN, Guoliang DING. Structural design and effect verification of casing-type distributor used in air-conditioners [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(S1): 152-159. |
| [3] | Siyuan WANG, Guoqiang LIU, Tong XIONG, Gang YAN. Characteristics of non-uniform wind velocity distribution in window air conditioner axial fans and their impact on optimizing condenser circuit optimization [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(S1): 205-216. |
| [4] | Jiuchun SUN, Yunlong SANG, Haitao WANG, Hao JIA, Yan ZHU. Study on influence of jet flow on slurry transport characteristics in slurry chamber of shield tunneling machines [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(S1): 246-257. |
| [5] | Peng TIAN, Zhonglin ZHANG, Chao REN, Guochao MENG, Xiaogang HAO, Yegang LIU, Qiwang HOU, Abuliti ABUDULA, Guoqing GUAN. Modeling and optimization of rectisol process based on self-heat regeneration [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4601-4612. |
| [6] | Jing ZHAO, Shuchen DONG, Gaoyang LI, Youke HUANG, Haosen SHI, Shuwen MIAO, Chenyan TAN, Tangqi ZHU, Yongshuai LI, Hui PAN, Hao LING. Simulation and optimization of battery performance based on the electrochemical model [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4922-4932. |
| [7] | Sheng CHEN, Zizheng LI, Chao MIAO, Xuegang BAI, Fei LI, Jiaxuan LIU, Tiantian LI, Shuang YANG, Rongrong LYU, Jiangyun WANG. Three-dimensional CFD simulation of non-uniform diffusion characteristic of high-risk chlorine gas in large-scale dense scene [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4630-4643. |
| [8] | Shuai ZHANG, Jiayu XU, Leina HUA, Wei GE. Coupled simulation method of CG-DPM and MP-PIC for gas-solid system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(9): 4412-4424. |
| [9] | Ke LI, Haolin XIE, Jian WEN. Multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization for thermal insulation performance of liquid hydrogen tank with multiple vapor-cooled shields [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 4217-4227. |
| [10] | Ze WANG, Qiong HU, Yajing CHEN, Yan WANG, Jiaxu GENG, Feiran SHEN. Leakage characteristics, sealing mechanism, and optimization design of self-impacting liquid seals [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 4194-4204. |
| [11] | Chen HE, Mingfei LU, Lingjin WANG, Xiaoying XU, Pengbo DONG, Wentao ZHAO, Wuqiang LONG. Experimental and simulation study of lean-burn laminar flow of ammonia-methanol high-pressure mixture [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 4248-4258. |
| [12] | Xiayu FAN, Jianchen SUN, Keying LI, Xinya YAO, Hui SHANG. Machine learning drives system optimization of liquid organic hydrogen storage technology [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 3805-3821. |
| [13] | Guoqing SU, Xuemei TIAN, Yan LI, Jianwen ZHANG, Zhijun ZHANG. Erosion analysis and improvement of curved-tee in pneumatic conveying system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(8): 3894-3904. |
| [14] | Xiaolong WU, Xiaohuang HUANG, Yuan XIAO, Linghai SHAN, Jiahui YE, Guomin CUI. Reserve empty node strategy applied to optimization of heat exchanger networks [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(7): 3388-3402. |
| [15] | Tao WANG, Guangming LI, Qiuxia HU, Jing XU. Optimization of warpage process for two-color injection products based on temporal evolution particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. CIESC Journal, 2025, 76(7): 3403-3415. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||