CIESC Journal ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (7): 3780-3787.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20210380
• Energy and environmental engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Jian1(),FENG Xin1,JI Xiaoyan2,LU Xiaohua1(
)
Received:
2021-03-15
Revised:
2021-04-12
Online:
2021-07-05
Published:
2021-07-05
Contact:
LU Xiaohua
通讯作者:
陆小华
作者简介:
曹健(1998—),男,硕士研究生,基金资助:
CLC Number:
CAO Jian, FENG Xin, JI Xiaoyan, LU Xiaohua. Study on the theoretical limit performance of multi-pressure evaporation ORC based on zeotropic mixture[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(7): 3780-3787.
曹健, 冯新, 吉晓燕, 陆小华. 基于混合工质的多级蒸发ORC理论极限性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(7): 3780-3787.
模拟参数 | 值 |
---|---|
热源种类 | H2O |
热源进口温度/K | 423.15 |
热源质量流量/ (kg/s) | 100 |
冷却水进口温度/ K | 298.15 |
冷却水出口温度/K | 308.15 |
蒸发器夹点温差/K | 10 |
冷凝器夹点温差/K | 10 |
环境温度/K | 298.15 |
泵/透平机等熵效率/% | 80 |
泵/透平机机械效率/% | 90 |
Table 1 Key parameters of process simulation
模拟参数 | 值 |
---|---|
热源种类 | H2O |
热源进口温度/K | 423.15 |
热源质量流量/ (kg/s) | 100 |
冷却水进口温度/ K | 298.15 |
冷却水出口温度/K | 308.15 |
蒸发器夹点温差/K | 10 |
冷凝器夹点温差/K | 10 |
环境温度/K | 298.15 |
泵/透平机等熵效率/% | 80 |
泵/透平机机械效率/% | 90 |
循环性能参数 | BORC (R245fa) | BORC (R134a) | MZORC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DZORC (R245fa/ R134a) | TZORC (R245fa/ R134a) | |||
Wnet /MW | 2.23 | 1.97 | 2.71 | 3.09 |
Qeva / MW | 31.07 | 31.78 | 33.87 | 35.13 |
Qloss,es /MW | 12.54 | 12.54 | 12.54 | 12.54 |
Qloss,ex /MW | 8.37 | 9.08 | 6.28 | 5.02 |
Gdiss /(MW·K) | 1532.02 | 1702.11 | 1087.89 | 646.09 |
Gdiss,es /(MW·K) | 349.15 | 349.15 | 349.15 | 349.15 |
Gdiss,ex /(MW·K) | 1182.87 | 1352.96 | 738.74 | 296.94 |
Table 2 Cycle performance comparison between MZORC and BORC
循环性能参数 | BORC (R245fa) | BORC (R134a) | MZORC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DZORC (R245fa/ R134a) | TZORC (R245fa/ R134a) | |||
Wnet /MW | 2.23 | 1.97 | 2.71 | 3.09 |
Qeva / MW | 31.07 | 31.78 | 33.87 | 35.13 |
Qloss,es /MW | 12.54 | 12.54 | 12.54 | 12.54 |
Qloss,ex /MW | 8.37 | 9.08 | 6.28 | 5.02 |
Gdiss /(MW·K) | 1532.02 | 1702.11 | 1087.89 | 646.09 |
Gdiss,es /(MW·K) | 349.15 | 349.15 | 349.15 | 349.15 |
Gdiss,ex /(MW·K) | 1182.87 | 1352.96 | 738.74 | 296.94 |
1 | Braimakis K, Karellas S. Energetic optimization of regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) configurations[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 159: 353-370. |
2 | Tian X Y, Meyer T, Lee H, et al. Sustainable design of geothermal energy systems for electric power generation using life cycle optimization[J]. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(4): e16898. |
3 | Tchanche B F, Lambrinos G, Frangoudakis A, et al. Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles — a review of various applications[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(8): 3963-3979. |
4 | Ganjehsarabi H. Mixed refrigerant as working fluid in Organic Rankine Cycle for hydrogen production driven by geothermal energy[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(34): 18703-18711. |
5 | Maalouf S, Ksayer E B, Clodic D. Investigation of direct contact condensation for wet flue-gas waste heat recovery using Organic Rankine Cycle[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 107: 96-102. |
6 | Petrollese M, Cocco D. A multi-scenario approach for a robust design of solar-based ORC systems[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 161: 1184-1194. |
7 | Prando D, Renzi M, Gasparella A, et al. Monitoring of the energy performance of a district heating CHP plant based on biomass boiler and ORC generator[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 79: 98-107. |
8 | Astolfi M, Romano M C, Bombarda P, et al. Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium-low temperature geothermal sources (B): Techno-economic optimization[J]. Energy, 2014, 66: 435-446. |
9 | Durakovic, Skaugen. Analysis of thermodynamic models for simulation and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(17): 3307. |
10 | Manente G, Lazzaretto A, Bonamico E. Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems[J]. Energy, 2017, 123: 413-431. |
11 | Zhou Y H, Li S S, Sun L, et al. Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energy, 2020, 194: 116785. |
12 | Wu S Y, Zhou S M, Xiao L. The determination and matching analysis of pinch point temperature difference in evaporator and condenser of organic Rankine cycle for mixed working fluid[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2016, 13(5): 470-480. |
13 | 明勇, 彭艳楠, 苏文, 等. 闭式热源下混合工质与纯工质的ORC性能比较[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1570-1579. |
Ming Y, Peng Y N, Su W, et al. Thermodynamic performance comparison of ORC between mixtures and pure fluids under closed heat source[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(4): 1570-1579. | |
14 | Andreasen J G, Larsen U, Knudsen T, et al. Selection and optimization of pure and mixed working fluids for low grade heat utilization using organic Rankine cycles[J]. Energy, 2014, 73: 204-213. |
15 | Feng Y Q, Hung T C, He Y L, et al. Operation characteristic and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low-grade waste heat using R245fa, R123 and their mixtures[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 144: 153-163. |
16 | Guo C, Du X Z, Goswami D Y, et al. Investigation on working fluids selection for organic Rankine cycles with low-temperature heat sources[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2016, 13(6): 556-565. |
17 | Heberle F, Brüggemann D. Thermo-economic evaluation of organic Rankine cycles for geothermal power generation using zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energies, 2015, 8(3): 2097-2124. |
18 | Li J, Liu Q, Duan Y Y, et al. Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycles using R600/R601a mixtures with liquid-separated condensation[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 190: 376-389. |
19 | Liu Q, Duan Y Y, Yang Z. Effect of condensation temperature glide on the performance of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixture working fluids[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 115: 394-404. |
20 | Xi H, Li M J, He Y L, et al. Economical evaluation and optimization of organic Rankine cycle with mixture working fluids using R245fa as flame retardant[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 113: 1056-1070. |
21 | Collings P, Yu Z B, Wang E H. A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 171: 581-591. |
22 | 陈超男, 罗向龙, 杨智, 等. 非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2373-2381. |
Chen C N, Luo X L, Yang Z, et al. Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2373-2381. | |
23 | Li T L, Zhang Z G, Lu J, et al. Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 150: 323-334. |
24 | Sadeghi M, Nemati A, Ghavimi A, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energy, 2016, 109: 791-802. |
25 | Li J, Duan Y Y, Yang Z, et al. Exergy analysis of novel dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 760-769. |
26 | Li J, Ge Z, Duan Y Y, et al. Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energy, 2019, 174: 436-449. |
27 | Tournier J M, El-Genk M S. Axial flow, multi-stage turbine and compressor models[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2010, 51(1): 16-29. |
28 |
过增元, 梁新刚, 朱宏晔. ![]() |
Guo Z Y, Liang X G, Zhu H Y. Entransy — a physical quality describing heat transfer ability [J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2006, 16(10):1288-1296. | |
29 | 陈玉婷, 徐燕燕, 王磊, 等. 蒸发器换热过程对ORC系统混合工质选择和运行工况的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(5): 1723-1733. |
Chen Y T, Xu Y Y, Wang L, et al. Effect of evaporator heat transfer process on selection of mixture and operating condition in ORC system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(5): 1723-1733. | |
30 | Chys M, van den Broek M, Vanslambrouck B, et al. Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles[J]. Energy, 2012, 44(1): 623-632. |
31 | Kajurek J, Rusowicz A, Grzebielec A, et al. Selection of refrigerants for a modified organic Rankine cycle[J]. Energy, 2019, 168: 1-8. |
32 | Kaşka Ö. Energy and exergy analysis of an organic Rankine for power generation from waste heat recovery in steel industry[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 77: 108-117. |
[1] | Ruihang ZHANG, Pan CAO, Feng YANG, Kun LI, Peng XIAO, Chun DENG, Bei LIU, Changyu SUN, Guangjin CHEN. Analysis of key parameters affecting product purity of natural gas ethane recovery process via ZIF-8 nanofluid [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393. |
[2] | Manzheng ZHANG, Meng XIAO, Peiwei YAN, Zheng MIAO, Jinliang XU, Xianbing JI. Working fluid screening and thermodynamic optimization of hazardous waste incineration coupled organic Rankine cycle system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512. |
[3] | Yurong DANG, Chunlan MO, Kerui SHI, Yingcong FANG, Ziyang ZHANG, Zuoshun LI. Comprehensive evaluation model combined with genetic algorithm for the study on the performance of ORC system with zeotropic mixture [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(5): 1884-1895. |
[4] | Xuerong GU, Shuoshi LIU, Siyu YANG. Research on multi-parameter optimization method based on parallel EGO and surrogate-assisted model [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1205-1215. |
[5] | Senshan CAO, Feng XU, Xionglin LUO. Process simulation of stream circulation system based on stability: [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(3): 1256-1269. |
[6] | Qian LIU, Xianglan ZHANG, Zhiping LI, Zhuoqi LI, Hong YU. Multiscale screening of ionic liquids as extractive solvents for oil-hydroxybenzene separation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(11): 5011-5024. |
[7] | Li LIU, Peng JIANG, Wei WANG, Tonghuan ZHANG, Liwen MU, Xiaohua LU, Jiahua ZHU. Coupling process simulation and random forest model for analyzing and predicting biomass-to-hydrogen conversion [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(11): 5230-5239. |
[8] | Zixuan HUANG, Huan CHEN, Hai LI, Minglong WANG, Guangjin CHEN, Bei LIU. Process simulation and energy consumption analysis of CO2/N2 pilot-scale separation using ZIF-8 slurry [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 322-331. |
[9] | Yuanxin FANG, Wu XIAO, Xiaobin JIANG, Xiangcun LI, Gaohong HE, Xuemei WU. Process design and simulation of membrane separation coupled with CO2 electrocatalytic hydrogenation to formic acid [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(9): 4740-4749. |
[10] | Zihang LI, Zhanbo WANG, Zheng MIAO, Xianbing JI. Working fluid selection and thermo-economic analysis of sub-critical organic Rankine cycle [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(9): 4487-4495. |
[11] | Jianyuan XU, Yanyang WU, Jumei XU, Yangfeng PENG. Study on vapor-liquid equilibria and distillation simulation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-2-ethyltoluene at 2 kPa [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(9): 4504-4510. |
[12] | Zhenxing SONG, Xianbao CUI, Ying ZHANG, Xuemei ZHANG, Jie HE, Tianyang FENG, Jixiao WANG. Synthesis of n-hexyl acetate via reactive distillation catalyzed by mixed ionic liquids [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4155-4165. |
[13] | RONG-YANG Yiming, WU Qiaoxian, ZHOU Xia, FANG Song, WANG Kai, QIU Limin, ZHI Xiaoqin. Research on optimization of self-utilization performance of air compression waste heat in air separation system [J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1654-1666. |
[14] | Hui YANG, Wenhao DAI, Rongxiu LU, Jianyong ZHU. Simulation of rare earth extraction process based on separation coefficient correction [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(7): 3180-3190. |
[15] | Chaonan CHEN, Xianglong LUO, Zhi YANG, Renlong HUANG, Pei LU, Jianyong CHEN, Ying CHEN. Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment [J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2373-2381. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 266
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 519
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||