pH调整剂对含砷酸性废水中氧化Fe（Ⅱ）共沉淀固砷行为的影响

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190454

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

双氧水催化氧化Fe（Ⅱ）共沉淀砷的过程中，采用不同的pH调整剂调节溶液的pH，研究了不同的pH调整剂对废水中砷沉淀效果及沉淀渣性质的影响。结果表明：采用Na₂CO₃和CaO作为pH调整剂时有利于废水中砷的脱除，生成的共沉淀渣中砷主要是以无定形的非晶态块状颗粒形式存在的；使用Na₂CO₃作为pH调整剂时最有利于沉淀渣颗粒的长大，所得沉淀渣粒径最大，但是砷渣的稳定性最差，更容易从渣中释放出砷；采用CaO获得的沉淀渣中由于CaSO₄棒状颗粒的存在，渣的粒径相对较小，但砷的存在形式最为稳定，固砷效果最好。

关键词: 砷, 废水, 固定化, pH调整剂, 浸出毒性, 环境

Abstract:

In the process of catalytic oxidation of Fe(Ⅱ) co-precipitated arsenic by hydrogen peroxide, different pH adjustments were used to adjust the pH of the solution. The effects of different pH adjustments on the precipitation of arsenic in wastewater and the properties of precipitated slag were studied. The results show that the pH adjustments of Na₂CO₃ and CaO are beneficial to the removal of arsenic from wastewater, and the arsenic in the coprecipitates is mainly in the form of amorphous bulk particles. When Na₂CO₃ is used as the pH adjustment, it is most favorable to the growth of particle size, the size of precipitates is the largest, but the stability of arsenic is the worst, and it is easier to release from the slag. The particle size of the precipitates obtained by CaO is relatively small due to the existence of CaSO₄ rod-like particles, but the existence form of arsenic is the most stable, and the fixation effect of arsenic is the best.

Key words: arsenic, wastewater, immobilization, pH adjustment, leaching toxicity, environment

中图分类号:

X 75

王永良, 杨晓玲, 董永霞, 杜英超, 刘翔, 韩培伟, 叶树峰. pH调整剂对含砷酸性废水中氧化Fe（Ⅱ）共沉淀固砷行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(9): 3511-3516.

Yongliang WANG, Xiaoling YANG, Yongxia DONG, Yingchao DU, Xiang LIU, Peiwei HAN, Shufeng YE. Effect of pH adjustment on immobilization of arsenic by coprecipitation through oxidizing Fe(Ⅱ) in acidic wastewater containing arsenic[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(9): 3511-3516.

图/表 6

表1 不同pH调整剂沉砷后溶液中铁和砷的含量

Table 1 Concentrations of Fe and As after arsenic coprecipitation by different pH adjustments/(mg/L)

pH调整剂	H₂O₂∶As=1		H₂O₂∶As=2		H₂O₂∶As=3
pH调整剂	Fe	As	Fe	As	Fe	As
NH₃·H₂O	8347	7.15	6600	2.90	5700	1.95
NaOH	7750	6.40	6650	2.65	5500	1.30
Na₂CO₃	8030	3.60	6900	2.50	5850	1.15
CaO	7900	4.60	6800	3.00	5300	1.50

表2 不同pH调整剂沉砷后得到的含砷渣中砷的浸出毒性结果

Table 2 Leaching toxicity of arsenic precipitates obtained by different pH adjustments/(mg/L)

H₂O₂∶As	NH₃·H₂O	NaOH	Na₂CO₃	CaO
1	13.01	10.53	10.01	9.89
2	3.28	3.56	4.12	3.21
3	1.59	1.64	2.16	0.76

图1 沉淀砷渣的粒度分布情况

Fig.1 Particle size distribution of precipitates

图2 沉淀砷渣的XRD分析结果

Fig.2 XRD results of precipitates

图3 沉淀砷渣的红外分析结果

Fig.3 Infrared analysis results of precipitates

图4 沉淀砷渣的SEM结果

Fig.4 SEM results of precipitates

参考文献 30

1	Abdul K S M , Jayasinghe S S , Chandana E P S , et al . Arsenic and human health effects: a review [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2015, 40(3): 828-846.
2	Wang Z X , Chai L Y , Wang Y Y , et al . Potential health risk of arsenic and cadmium in groundwater near Xiangjiang River, China: a case study for risk assessment and management of toxic substances [J]. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 2011, 175(1-4): 167-173.
3	Smedley P L , Kinniburgh D G . A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters [J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2002, 17(5): 517-568.
4	田文增, 陈白珍, 仇勇海．有色冶金工业含砷物料的处理及利用现状[J]．湖南有色金属, 2004, 20(6): 11-15.
	Tian W Z , Chen B Z , Qiu Y H . Review of As-containing materials treatment and utilization in nonferrous metallurgy industry [J]. Hunan Nonferrous Metals, 2004, 30(6): 11-15.
5	余自秀, 李存兄, 魏昶, 等 . 砷铁水热共沉淀制备大颗粒臭葱石 [J]. 过程工程学报, 2018, 18(1): 126-132.
	Yu Z X , Li C X , Wei C , et al . Preparation of large-sized scorodite based on arsenic and iron hydrothermal co-precipitation [J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2018, 18(1): 126-132.
6	Nazari A M , Radzinski R , Ghahreman A . Review of arsenic metallurgy: treatment of arsenical minerals and the immobilization of arsenic [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2016, 174: 258-281.
7	刘鹏程, 肖利, 陈艺锋, 等 . 预氧化-亚铁盐除砷工艺研究[J]. 湖南工业大学学报, 2018, 32(5): 60-65.
	Liu P C , Xiao L , Chen Y F , et al . Study on the arsenic removal process by pre-oxidation ferrous salt [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2018, 32(5): 60-65.
8	Müller K , Ciminelli V S , Dantas M S , et al . A comparative study of As (III) and As (V) in aqueous solutions and adsorbed on iron oxy-hydroxides by spectroscopy [J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(19): 5660-5672.
9	Ladeira A C , Ciminelli V S . Adsorption and desorption of arsenic on an oxisol and its constituents [J]. Water Research, 2004, 38(8): 2087-2094.
10	Min X , Liao Y , Chai L , et al . Removal and stabilization of arsenic from anode slime by forming crystal scorodite [J]. Transaction Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25: 1298-1306.
11	Majzlan J , Drahotaa P , Filippi M , et al . Thermodynamic properties of scorodite and parascorodite (FeAsO₄·2H₂O), kaňkite (FeAsO₄·3.5H₂O), and FeAsO₄ [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2012, 117/118: 47-56.
12	Fujita T , Taguhi R , Abumiya M , et al . Effect of pH on atmospheric scorodite synthesis by oxidation of ferrous ions: physical properties and stability of the scorodite [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 96: 189-198.
13	Berre J F , Gauvin R , Demopoulos G P . Characterization of poorly-crystalline ferric arsenate precipitated from equimolar Fe(Ⅲ)-As(Ⅴ) solutions in the pH range 2 to 8 [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2007, 38B: 751-762.
14	Wang Y , Lv C , Xiao L , et al . Arsenic removal from alkaline leaching solution using Fe(Ⅲ) precipitation [J]. Environmental Technology, 2018, 21: 1-7.
15	Cui J , Du Y , Xiao H , et al . A new process of continuous three-stage co-precipitation of arsenic with ferrous iron and lime [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2014, 146: 169-174.
16	Klerk R J , Jia Y , Daenzer R , et al . Continuous circuit coprecipitation of arsenic(Ⅴ) with ferric iron by lime neutralization: process parameter effects on arsenic removal and precipitate quality [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2014, 111/112: 65-72.
17	Jia Y , Demopoulos G P . Coprecipitation of arsenate with iron(Ⅲ) in aqueous sulfate media: effect of time, lime as base and co-ions on arsenic retention [J]. Water Research, 2008, 42: 661-668.
18	Otgon N , Zhang G , Zhang K , et al . Removal and fixation of arsenic by forming a complex precipitate containing scorodite and ferrihydrite [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2019, 186: 58-65.
19	Paktunc D , Bruggeman K . Solubility of nanocrystalline scorodite and amorphous ferric arsenate: implications for stabilization of arsenic in mine wastes [J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2010, 25(5): 674-683.
20	Wang Y , Xiao L , Liu H , et al . Acid leaching pretreatment on two-stage roasting pyrite cinder for gold extraction and co-precipitation of arsenic with iron [J]. Hydrometrallurgy, 2018, 179: 192-197.
21	Paktunc D , Dutrizac J , Gertsman V . Synthesis and phase transformations involving scorodite, ferric arsenate and arsenical ferrihydrite: implications for arsenic mobility [J]. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 2008, 72: 2649–2672.
22	Singhania S , Wang Q , Filippou D , et al . Acidity, valency and third-ion effects on the precipitation of scorodite from mixed sulfate solutions under atmospheric-pressure conditions[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2006, 37B: 189-197.
23	Fernández-Martínez A , Guello G J , Johnson M R , et al . Arsenate incorporation in gypsum probed by neutron, X-ray scattering and density functional theory modeling [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2008, 112: 5159-5166.
24	Zhang D , Yuan Z , Wang S , et al . Incorporation of arsenic into gypsum: relevant to arsenic removal and immobilization process in hydrometallurgical industry [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 300: 272-280.
25	Du Y , Lu Q , Chen H , et al . A novel strategy for arsenic removal from dirty acid wastewater via CaCO₃-Ca(OH)₂-Fe(Ⅲ) processing [J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2016, 12: 41-46.
26	Wang S , Zhang D , Li X , et al . Arsenic associated with gypsum produced from Fe(Ⅲ)-As(Ⅴ) coprecipitation: implications for the stability of industrial As-bearing waste [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 360: 311-318.
27	Bothe J V , Brown P W . Arsenic immobilization by calcium arsenate formation [J]. Environmental Science Technology, 1999, 33(21): 3806-3811.
28	Lei J , Peng B , Min X B , et al . Modeling and optimization of lime-based stabilization in high alkaline arsenic-bearing sludges with a central composite design [J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2017, 52(5): 449-458.
29	赵宗异 . 氧化铁砷体系除砷机理探讨[J]. 中国环境科学, 1995, 15(1): 18-21.
	Zhao Z Y . Mechanism of arsenic removal in oxidized Fe-As system [J]. China Environmtal Science, 1995, 15(1): 18-21.
30	闫蔚, 曾柏淋, 孟江, 等 . 石膏红外图谱鉴定研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36(7): 2098-2103.
	Yan W , Zeng B L , Meng J , et al . Study on the identification of gypsum fibrosum with FTIR [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2016, 36(7): 2098-2013.

[1]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[2]	孟令玎, 崇汝青, 孙菲雪, 孟子晖, 刘文芳. 改性聚乙烯膜和氧化硅固定化碳酸酐酶[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3472-3484.
[3]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[4]	段重达, 姚小伟, 朱家华, 孙静, 胡南, 李广悦. 环境因素对克雷白氏杆菌诱导碳酸钙沉淀的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3543-3553.
[5]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[6]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[7]	陈雅鑫, 袁航, 刘冠章, 毛磊, 杨纯, 张瑞芳, 张光亚. 蛋白质纳米笼介导的酶自固定化研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2773-2782.
[8]	张艳梅, 袁涛, 李江, 刘亚洁, 孙占学. 高效SRB混合菌群构建及其在酸胁迫条件下的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610.
[9]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[10]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[11]	闫新龙, 黄志刚, 胡清勋, 张新, 胡晓燕. Cu/Co掺杂多孔炭活化过硫酸盐降解水中硝基酚研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1102-1112.
[12]	查坦捷, 杨涵, 秦荷杰, 关小红. 仿生材料的构建及其在水环境化学领域中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 585-598.
[13]	李承威, 骆华勇, 张铭轩, 廖鹏, 方茜, 荣宏伟, 王竞茵. 氢氧化镧交联壳聚糖微球的微流控制备及其除磷性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3929-3939.
[14]	葛旺鑫, 朱以华, 江宏亮, 李春忠. 二氧化碳电还原的电解质研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3433-3447.
[15]	赵希强, 张健, 孙爽, 王文龙, 毛岩鹏, 孙静, 刘景龙, 宋占龙. 生物质炭改性微球去除化工废水中无机磷的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2158-2173.