基于多源异构数据融合的化工安全风险动态量化评估方法

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200749

化工学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (3): 1769-1777.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20200749

• 过程安全 • 上一篇

基于多源异构数据融合的化工安全风险动态量化评估方法

刘庆龙¹(),曲秋影²,赵东风³,刘尚志²,王劲¹

^1.青岛欧赛斯环境与安全技术有限责任公司，山东青岛 266520
^2.中国石油大学（华东）机电工程学院，山东青岛 266580
^3.中国石油大学（华东）化学工程学院，山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2020-06-13 修回日期:2020-07-20 出版日期:2021-03-05 发布日期:2021-03-05
通讯作者: 刘庆龙
作者简介:刘庆龙（1988—），男，硕士，高级工程师，lqlong2008@126.com
基金资助:
山东省重点研发计划重大科技创新工程(2019JZZY020502);青岛市民生科技计划项目(19-6-1-96-nsh)

Dynamic quantitative assessment method of chemical safety risk based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion

LIU Qinglong¹(),QU Qiuying²,ZHAO Dongfeng³,LIU Shangzhi²,WANG Jin¹

^1.Qingdao OASIS Environmental & Safety Technology Co. , Ltd. , Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China
^2.College of Electromechanic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
^3.College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

Received:2020-06-13 Revised:2020-07-20 Online:2021-03-05 Published:2021-03-05
Contact: LIU Qinglong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对石化企业过程安全风险分析缺乏多源异构数据融合、难以解析风险动态时变机理的现状。首先基于改进的模糊Petri网建立风险动态传播模型，考虑初始事件失效、保护层失效和修正因子等参数，得到风险的实时变化概率；然后分析不同保护层失效对事故发生概率的影响，得到不同保护层的重要程度；最后，以正己烷缓冲罐溢流发生火灾爆炸事故为例进行动态风险计算，分析对比其在不同保护层失效下的事故发生概率变化，结果表明安全联锁系统对事故发生起关键作用，日常应加大对其检测力度，防止事故发生。

关键词: 多源异构数据, 知识图谱, 过程系统, 集成, 安全

Abstract:

In view of the lack of multi-source heterogeneous data fusion in process safety risk analysis of petrochemical enterprises, it is difficult to analyze the dynamic time-varying mechanism of risk. First, it is established a dynamic risk propagation model based on the improved fuzzy Petri net, consider parameters such as initial event failure, protection layer failure, and correction factors to obtain the real-time change probability of risk. Then the influence of failure of different protective layers on the probability of accidents is analyzed and the importance degree of different protective layers is obtained. Finally, taking n-hexane buffer tank overflow fire and explosion accident as an example, the dynamic risk calculation was carried out to analyze and compare the change of accident probability under the failure of different protective layers. The results showed that the safety interlock system played a key role in the accident, and the daily detection should be strengthened to prevent the accident.

Key words: multi-source heterogeneous data, knowledge map, process system, integration, safety

中图分类号:

刘庆龙, 曲秋影, 赵东风, 刘尚志, 王劲. 基于多源异构数据融合的化工安全风险动态量化评估方法[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1769-1777.

LIU Qinglong, QU Qiuying, ZHAO Dongfeng, LIU Shangzhi, WANG Jin. Dynamic quantitative assessment method of chemical safety risk based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1769-1777.

参考文献 31

1	赵岩, 徐建华. 我国石油化工行业事故风险分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 54(4): 857-864.
	Zhao Y, Xu J H. Analysis of accident risk in China's petrochemical industry[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2018, 54(4): 857-864.
2	姚成玉, 王传路, 陈东宁, 等. 连续时间T-S动态故障树分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(10): 244-256.
	Yao C Y, Wang C L, Chen D N, et al. Continuous-time T-S dynamic fault tree analysis method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(10): 244-256.
3	郭振东, 李金林, 王克巍, 等. 领结分析在收球系统安全管理中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(S1): 259-264.
	Guo Z D, Li J L, Wang K W, et al. Bowtie analysis on pig launcher system safety management[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(S1): 259-264.
4	Zhang L, Wu X, Skibniewski M J, et al. Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 131: 29-39.
5	Xue L N, Fan J C, Rausand M, et al. A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(1): 164-171.
6	Zarei E, Azadeh A, Aliabadi M M, et al. Dynamic safety risk modeling of process systems using bayesian network[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2017, 36(4): 399-407.
7	高妮, 高岭, 贺毅岳, 等. 基于贝叶斯攻击图的动态安全风险评估模型[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2016, 48(1): 111-118.
	Gao N, Gao L, He Y Y, et al. Dynamic security risk assessment model based on Bayesian attack graph[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2016, 48(1): 111-118.
8	张子扬, 任翔, 吕成, 等. 基于贝叶斯模型的安全系统动态风险分析[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2015, 29(3): 642-649.
	Zhang Z Y, Ren X, Lü C, et al. Safety system dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian model simulation[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2015, 29(3): 642-649.
9	姜英, 王政, 秦艳, 等. 基于复杂网络的化工过程层次符号有向图模型建立及关键节点识别[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(2): 444-451.
	Jiang Y, Wang Z, Qin Y, et al. AHP-SDG model establishment and key node identification of chemical process system based on complex network[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(2): 444-451
10	Chen G H, Wang S K, Tan X Q. Evaluation model for safety capacity of chemical industrial park based on acceptable regional risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(1): 121-127.
11	Liu H C, Liu L, Lin Q L, et al. Knowledge acquisition and representation using fuzzy evidential reasoning and dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2013, 43(3): 1059-1072.
12	Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wen F, et al. A fuzzy Petri net based approach for fault diagnosis in power systems considering temporal constraints[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2016, 78: 215-224.
13	吴鹏, 夏海波, 吴建军, 等. 基于模糊Petri网的易流态化货物海上运输风险评估[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2019, 40(3): 63-68.
	Wu P, Xia H B, Wu J J, et al. Risk assessment of shipping liquefiable solid bulk cargoes based on fuzzy Petri nets[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2019, 40(3): 63-68.
14	胡瑾秋, 曹雅琴, 张来斌, 等. 考虑保护层响应的炼化过程系统风险动态转移模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(3): 83-89.
	Hu J Q, Cao Y Q, Zhang L B, et al. Model considering response of protection layers for systematic risk dynamic transfer in refinery process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(3): 83-89.
15	胡瑾秋, 郭家洁. 基于尺度效应的过程安全事故概率估计[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4848-4856.
	Hu J Q, Guo J J. Accident probability estimation of process safety based on scale effect[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4848-4856.
16	华丽, 于海晨, 邵诚, 等. 基于SVM-BOXPLOT的乙烯生产过程异常工况监测与诊断[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 1053-1063.
	Hua L, Yu H C, Shao C, et al. Monitoring and diagnosis of abnormal condition in ethylene production process based on SVM-BOXPLOT[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 1053-1063.
17	李卫星, 王峰, 李智国, 等. 面向多源数据的军事信息系统设计[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2020, 15(3): 237-243.
	Li W X, Wang F, Li Z G, et al. Design of military information system based on multi-source data[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2020, 15(3): 237-243.
18	窦珊, 张广宇, 熊智华, 等. 基于多源数据融合的化工园区危险态势感知[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 460-466.
	Dou S, Zhang G Y, Xiong Z H, et al. Danger situation awareness of chemical industry park based on multiple source data fusion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(2): 460-466.
19	袁亮, 俞啸, 丁恩杰, 等. 矿山物联网人-机-环状态感知关键技术研究[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(2): 1-12.
	Yuan L, Yu X, Ding E J, et al. Research on key technologies of human-machine-environment states perception in mine Internet of Things[J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(2): 1-12.
20	侯慧, 于士文, 肖祥, 等. 基于空间多源异构数据的台风下输电杆塔风险评估[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2020, 44(10): 127-134.
	Hou H, Yu S W, Xiao X, et al. Risk assessment of transmission tower in typhoon based on spatial multi-source heterogeneous data[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44(10): 127-134.
21	何一帆. 基于多源异构数据融合的深度学习故障诊断[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2019.
	He Y F. Deep learning fault diagnosis based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2019.
22	孔岱, 李红伟. 模糊Petri网在压缩机故障诊断中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2018, 39(1): 271-275.
	Kong D, Li H W. Fuzzy Petri nets and its application in fault diagnosis of compressor[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2018, 39(1): 271-275.
23	李娜, 孙文勇, 李佳宜. 保护层分析方法研究及其在风险分析中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2013, 42(6): 663-666.
	Li N, Sun W Y, Li J Y. Layers of Protection Analysis(LOPA)method and application of risk analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2013, 42(6): 663-666.
24	孙国豪, 鹿剑, 马斌良, 等. 石化装置静设备动态风险计算方法浅析[J]. 中国特种设备安全, 2017, 33(4): 24-29.
	Sun G H, Lu J, Ma B L, et al. Discussion of dynamic risk assessment calculation method for petrochemical static equipment[J]. China Special Equipment Safety, 2017, 33(4): 24-29.
25	刘俊芳. 石化行业人因可靠性分析及其在LOPA中的应用研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
	Liu J F. Research on human reliability and its application in LOPA for petrochemical industry[D]. Dongying, China: China University of Petroleum, 2015.
26	谢红卫, 孙志强, 李欣欣, 等. 典型人因可靠性分析方法评述[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2007, 29(2): 101-107.
	Xie H W, Sun Z Q, Li X X, et al. An overview of typical methods for human reliability analysis[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2007, 29(2): 101-107.
27	王洪德, 高玮. 基于人的认知可靠性(HCR)模型的人因操作失误研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(7): 51-56.
	Wang H D, Gao W. Study on erroneous operation due to human factor based on human cognitive reliability(HCR) model[J]. China Safety Science Journal (CSSJ), 2006, 16(7): 51-56.
28	王俊, 丁兰蓉. 安全完整性等级SIL的验证方法[J]. 化工与医药工程, 2015, 36(2): 53-57.
	Wang J, Ding L R. Method of safety integrity level validation[J]. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Engineering, 2015, 36(2): 53-57.
29	耿雪梅, 李宏光. 考虑人因指标的过程报警阈值自适应优化方法[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69: 95-101.
	Geng X M, Li H G. An adaptive optimization approach to process alarm thresholds concerning human factors[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69: 95-101.
30	袁雄军, 朱常龙, 葛秀坤, 等. 危险化学品泄漏事故点火概率取值研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(9): 39-45.
	Yuan X J, Zhu C L, Ge X K, et al. Study on values taking of ignition probabilities in hazardous chemical leakage accidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(9): 39-45.
31	Moosemiller M. Development of algorithms for predicting ignition probabilities and explosion frequencies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011, 24(3): 259-265.

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[3]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[4]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[5]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[6]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[7]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[8]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[9]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[10]	肖忠良, 尹碧露, 宋刘斌, 匡尹杰, 赵亭亭, 刘成, 袁荣耀. 废旧锂离子电池回收工艺研究进展及其安全风险分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1446-1456.
[11]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[12]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[13]	张生安, 刘桂莲. 高效太阳能电解水制氢系统及其性能的多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1260-1274.
[14]	王子宗, 索寒生, 赵学良. 数字孪生智能乙烯工厂研究与构建[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1175-1186.
[15]	袁海鸥, 叶方俊, 张硕, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 考虑中间换热器的能量集成精馏序列合成[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 796-806.

基于多源异构数据融合的化工安全风险动态量化评估方法

Dynamic quantitative assessment method of chemical safety risk based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价