膜厚扰动下的非线性效应对干气密封性能影响研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201105

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于气体润滑理论，建立了普通螺旋槽、上游泵送螺旋槽和双列螺旋槽三种典型螺旋槽干气密封（DGS）的稳、瞬态模型，采用有限差分法求解并获得了三种典型螺旋槽DGS的稳、瞬态密封性能参数。研究了三种典型螺旋槽DGS稳态性能差异的产生机理及不同膜厚扰动条件下干气密封瞬态性能的演变规律，定义了瞬态性能参数及其时间平均值相对稳态值的变化率，探究了膜厚扰动下的非线性效应对三种典型螺旋槽DGS瞬态性能的作用规律及稳态理论的适用范围。结果表明：上游泵送螺旋槽的开设对密封性有明显提升但对开启性有一定削弱；非线性效应的影响随膜厚扰动的增大而增大，在膜厚大幅扰动下，基于瞬态理论计算的密封性能参数平均值会明显大于稳态值，此时依靠稳态理论获得的计算结果误差较大；普通螺旋槽DGS受非线性因素的影响最小，在其稳态理论可接受的性能误差范围内，所允许的膜厚扰动相比另外两种螺旋槽DGS更大。

关键词: 干气密封, 螺旋槽, 膜厚扰动, 瞬态性能, 非线性效应

Abstract:

Based on the gas lubrication theory, the steady-state and transient-state theoretical models of the spiral groove, upstream pumping spiral groove and double-row spiral groove dry gas seal(DGS) were established, and were solved by using the finite difference method, and then the steady and transient seal performance parameters of the three typical spiral groove DGSs were obtained. The mechanism of difference in steady performance of the three typical spiral groove DGSs and the evolution rule of transient performance of the DGSs under different film thickness disturbances were studied. On this basis, the change rates of transient performance parameters and its time average values relative to steady values were defined. The influence of nonlinear effect under film thickness disturbance on performance of the DGSs and the suitable range of steady theory were explored. The results show that upstream pumping spiral groove has a significant improvement on the sealing performance, but has a certain weakening on the opening performance. The influence of nonlinear effect increases with the increase of film thickness disturbance, and the average value of performance parameters of the DGSs calculated based on transient theory is obviously larger than that of steady value under large film thickness disturbance, at this time, the error of calculation results based on steady theory is large. Ordinary spiral groove DGS is least affected by nonlinear factors, and within the acceptable performance error range of its steady-state theory, the permissible film thickness disturbance is greater than that of the other two spiral groove DGS.

Key words: dry gas seal, spiral groove, film thickness disturbance, transient-state performance, nonlinear effect

中图分类号:

TH 117.2

商浩, 陈源, 李孝禄, 王冰清, 李运堂, 彭旭东. 膜厚扰动下的非线性效应对干气密封性能影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2213-2222.

SHANG Hao, CHEN Yuan, LI Xiaolu, WANG Bingqing, LI Yuntang, PENG Xudong. Study on the influence of nonlinear effect on performance of dry gas seal under film thickness disturbance[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(4): 2213-2222.

参考文献 29

29	Chen Y, Jiang J B, Peng X D, et al. Dynamic performance of dry gas seals and analysis of interactions among its influencing factors[J]. Tribology, 2019, 39(3): 269-278.
30	Gabriel R P. Fundamentals of spiral groove noncontacting face seals[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 1994, 50(3):215-224.
1	彭旭东, 宗聪, 江锦波. 干气密封单向螺旋槽及其衍生结构功能演变进展[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1271-1281.
	Peng X D, Zong C, Jiang J B. Progress in dry gas seal performance evolution of unidirectional spiral groove and its derivative structures[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1271-1281.
2	彭旭东, 王玉明, 黄兴, 等. 密封技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 液压气动与密封, 2009, 29(4): 4-11.
	Peng X D, Wang Y M, Huang X, et al. State-of-the-art and future development of sealing technology[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2009, 29(4): 4-11.
3	Zirkelback N. Parametric study of spiral groove gas face seals[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2000, 43(2): 337-343.
4	Liu Y C, Shen X M, Xu W F, et al. Performance comparison and parametric study on spiral groove gas film face seals[J]. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2004, 47(1): 29-36.
5	彭旭东, 江锦波, 白少先, 等. 中低压干气密封螺旋槽结构参数优化[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(11): 4536-4542.
	Peng X D, Jiang J B, Bai S X, et al. Structural parameter optimization of spiral groove dry gas seal under low or medium pressure[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(11): 4536-4542.
6	蒋小文, 顾伯勤. 螺旋槽干气密封端面间气膜特性[J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(8): 1419-1425.
	Jiang X W, Gu B Q. Characteristic of gas film between spiral groove dry gas s eal faces[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2005, 56(8): 1419-1425.
7	Wang Y, Lu L, Zhang H X, et al. A simulation analysis and experimental research on T groove end face seal under mid-and-low speed[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2017, 18(4): 537-543.
8	江锦波, 彭旭东, 白少先, 等. 仿鸟翼微列螺旋槽干气密封性能分析与选型[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2015, 35(3): 274-281.
	Jiang J B, Peng X D, Bai S X, et al. Performance analysis and selection of a bionic bird wing multi- array spiral groove dry gas seal[J]. Tribology, 2015, 35(3): 274-281.
9	Jiang J B, Peng X D, Li J Y, et al. A comparative study on the performance of typical types of bionic groove dry gas seal based on bird wing[J]. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13(2): 324-334.
10	刘雨川, 徐万孚, 陈国林, 等. 端面气膜密封的高性能端面结构[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21(2): 187-190.
	Liu Y C, Xu W F, Chen G L, et al. Face configuration with high performance for gas film face seal[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2000, 21(2): 187-190.
11	Neuberger S, Bock E, Haas W, et al. Gas-lubricated mechanical face seals reduce CO₂ emissions[J]. Sealing Technology, 2014, 2014, (9): 8-12.
12	李英, 宋鹏云. 单双列螺旋槽干气密封端面气膜刚度比较[J]. 润滑与密封, 2013, 38(10): 39-43.
	Li Y, Song P Y. Comparison of the gas film stiffness between the spiral groove dry gas with single-row grooves and double-row grooves[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2013, 38(10): 39-43.
13	李京泽, 王金刚. 双列螺旋槽机械密封效果对比研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2016, 40(3): 343-347.
	Li J Z, Wang J G. Contrast research of mechanical seal of double spiral groove[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2016, 40(3): 343-347.
14	刘珂, 刘莹, 刘向锋. 新型双螺旋槽端面密封性能对密封腔压力扰动的动态响应分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2007, 32(2): 120-122.
	Liu K, Liu Y, Liu X F. Dynamic response analysis to seal chamber pressure perturbation of a new double spiral groove face seal[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2007, 32(2): 120-122.
15	徐奇超, 江锦波, 陈源, 等. 经典曲线型槽干气密封稳动态密封特性数值分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2018, 38(5): 584-594.
	Xu Q C, Jiang J B, Chen Y, et al. Numerical analysis of steady-state and dynamic characteristics of typical molded line groove dry gas seals[J]. Tribology, 2018, 38(5): 584-594.
16	刘向锋, 徐辰, 黄伟峰. 基于半解析法的极端工况干气密封动态特性研究与参数设计[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54(2): 223-228, 234.
	Liu X F, Xu C, Huang W F. Analysis and parametric design of the dynamics of a dry gas seal for extreme operating conditions using a semi-analytical method[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2014, 54(2): 223-228, 234.
17	江锦波. 高速干气密封端面型槽仿生设计理论与实验研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2016.
	Jiang J B. Theoretical and experimental study of the bionic design of grooved face of a high speed dry gas seal[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology, 2016.
18	Blasiak S, Zahorulko A V. A parametric and dynamic analysis of non-contacting gas face seals with modified surfaces[J]. Tribology International, 2016, 94: 126-137.
19	Green I, Barnsby R M. A simultaneous numerical solution for the lubrication and dynamic stability of noncontacting gas face seals[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2001, 123(2): 388-394.
20	Green I, Barnsby R M. A parametric analysis of the transient forced response of noncontacting coned-face gas seals[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2002, 124(1): 151-157.
21	刘雨川, 徐万孚, 王之栎, 等. 端面气膜密封动力特性系数的计算[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 42(2): 185-189.
	Liu Y C, Xu W F, Wang Z L, et al. Dynamic coefficients for gas film face seal[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2002, 42(2): 185-189.
22	张伟政, 俞树荣, 丁雪兴, 等. 螺旋槽干气密封系统轴向振动响应及结构优化[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2010, 28(3): 228-232.
	Zhang W Z, Yu S R, Ding X X, et al. Dynamic response of axial vibration and structural optimization for dry gas seal system with spiral groove[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2010, 28(3): 228-232.
23	张伟政, 薛建雄, 李金晓, 等. 转子-轴承-干气密封系统轴向振动稳定性分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2019, 44(5): 9-16.
	Zhang W Z, Xue J X, Li J X, et al. Axial vibration dynamic stability analysis of rotor-bearing-dry gas sealing system[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2019, 44(5): 9-16.
24	胡松涛, 黄伟峰, 刘向锋, 等. 螺旋槽干气密封压差扰动下的瞬态特性研究[J]. 流体机械, 2017, 45(2): 22-27.
	Hu S T, Huang W F, Liu X F, et al. Transient response analysis of spiral groove gas face seals under pressure-drop fluctuation[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2017, 45(2): 22-27.
25	Hu S T, Huang W F, Liu X F, et al. Influence analysis of secondary O-ring seals in dynamic behavior of spiral groove gas face seals[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(3): 507-514.
26	Chen Y, Jiang J B, Peng X D. Gas film disturbance characteristics analysis of high-speed and high-pressure dry gas seal[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(6): 1226-1233.
27	Chen Y, Peng X D, Jiang J B, et al. Experimental and theoretical studies of the dynamic behavior of a spiral-groove dry gas seal at high-speeds[J]. Tribology International, 2018, 125: 17-26.
28	Faria M T C. Finite element analysis of the misalignment effects on the dynamic force coefficients of spiral groove gas face seals[J]. JSME International Journal Series C, 2004, 47(1): 289-296.
29	陈源, 江锦波, 彭旭东, 等. 干气密封力学系统动态性能及其影响因素间的交互作用分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2019, 39(3): 269-278.

[1]	丁俊华, 俞树荣, 王世鹏, 洪先志, 包鑫, 丁雪兴. 多重效应下超高速干气密封流场模拟及密封性能试验[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099.
[2]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[3]	刘献飞, 王恒, 王方, 李志强, 朱彩霞, 张浩飞. 单螺杆膨胀机螺旋槽道内液膜分布均匀特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 336-341.
[4]	江鹏, 江锦波, 彭旭东, 孟祥铠, 马艺. 传热模型对近临界工况CO₂干气密封温压分布和稳态性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4239-4254.
[5]	严如奇, 丁雪兴, 徐洁, 洪先志, 包鑫. 基于湍流模型的S-CO₂干气密封流场与稳态性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4292-4303.
[6]	孙雪剑, 宋鹏云, 毛文元, 邓强国, 许恒杰, 陈维. 考虑密封环材料属性和表面形貌干气密封启停阶段的动态接触特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4279-4291.
[7]	陆俊杰, 张炜, 马浩. 基于F-K滑移流模型的柱面微槽气浮密封浮升能力分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4267-4278.
[8]	江锦波, 滕黎明, 孟祥铠, 李纪云, 彭旭东. 基于多变量摄动的超临界CO₂干气密封动态特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2190-2202.
[9]	于辰,江锦波,赵文静,李纪云,彭旭东,王玉明. 基于微段组合的干气密封端面型槽结构模型及其参数影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5294-5309.
[10]	严如奇, 洪先志, 包鑫, 徐洁, 丁雪兴. 超临界二氧化碳干气密封相态分布规律与密封性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3681-3690.
[11]	范瑜, 宋鹏云, 许恒杰. 水蒸气润滑干气密封启动过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3671-3680.
[12]	陈维, 宋鹏云, 许恒杰, 孙雪剑. 含杂质二氧化碳实际气体干气密封性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2215-2229.
[13]	车健, 江锦波, 李纪云, 彭旭东, 马艺, 王玉明. 节流孔出气模式对静压干气密封稳态性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1734-1743.
[14]	沈伟, 彭旭东, 江锦波, 李纪云. 高速超临界二氧化碳干气密封实际效应影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2645-2659.
[15]	孟祥铠, 江莹莹, 赵文静, 彭旭东. 螺旋槽液膜密封热流体动力润滑性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1512-1521.