水工质热泵多种循环的理论研究与性能对比

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201468

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水工质安全、稳定、无毒、不易燃，是一种优秀的高温热泵用制冷工质。为了研究水蒸气热泵系统循环性能，设计了3种具有不同循环方式和辅助设备的水蒸气热泵系统，分别是单级压缩喷水系统、单级压缩带喷射器系统和两级压缩带中间换热器系统。并进行了理论建模与分析，理论分析与对比结果表明两级压缩系统在排气过热度、制热量、系统功耗和COP等方面均具有最优的性能。单级喷水系统比常规循环系统具有更好的性能，尤其是能有效降低排气过热度。在80℃蒸发、140℃冷凝时，常规系统的COP为3.01，而单级喷水系统和两级换热系统的COP分别为3.15和4.07，相比较于常规系统分别提升了4.7%和35.2%。而单级带喷射器系统在大温升工况下比常规循环系统有更优的COP。

关键词: 热泵, 水工质, 压缩机, 系统设计, 状态方程, COP

Abstract:

As the working fluid of heat pump systems, water has the advantages of cheap, safe, stable, no toxicity and no flammability. It is a promising working fluid in the application of heat pumps. To find and study the water vapor heat pump system cycle with the best performance, three water vapor heat pumps with different system cycles and auxiliary equipment (the single-stage system with water-injection, the single-stage system with ejector, the two-stage system with internal heat exchanger) were designed and analyzed with simulation models. In the simulation, the twin-screw compressor was used as the power equipment in these systems. The simulation results indicated that compared with other systems, the two-stage system with internal heat exchanger is the best choice and has the best system performance including the discharge superheat, heating capacity, power consumption and COP. The single-stage system with water-injection has better performance than the conventional cycle, especially it can effectively decrease the discharge superheat. At 80℃ evaporation temperature and 140℃ condensation temperature, COP of the conventional cycle was 3.01. Meanwhile, COP of the single-stage system with water-injection and the two-stage system with internal heat exchanger was 3.15 and 4.07, which are 4.7% and 35.2% higher than that of the conventional cycle, respectively. For the single-stage system with ejector, it has better COP than the conventional cycle at high condensation temperature conditions with higher temperature lift. At 80℃ evaporation temperature and 145℃ condensation temperature, COP of the single-stage system with ejector was 2.53, which is higher than COP of the conventional cycle, 2.42. So it is also a good choice for high temperature lift conditions when used in water vapor heat pumps.

Key words: heat pump, water refrigerant, compressor, system design, equation of state, COP

中图分类号:

TH 45

吴迪, 胡斌, 王如竹, 余京京, 林欣毅, 李子亮. 水工质热泵多种循环的理论研究与性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 236-243.

WU Di, HU Bin, WANG Ruzhu, YU Jingjing, LIN Xinyi, LI Ziliang. Theoretical study and performance comparison of different heat pump cycles using water as working fluid[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(S1): 236-243.

图/表 8

图1 单级压缩水蒸气热泵系统常规循环

Fig.1 Single-stage water vapor heat pump system with conventional cycle

图2 单级压缩喷水热泵系统循环

Fig.2 Single-stage water vapor heat pump system with water-injection

图3 单级压缩带喷射器热泵系统循环

Fig.3 Single-stage water vapor heat pump system with ejector

图4 两级压缩带中间换热器热泵系统循环

Fig.4 Two-stage water vapor heat pump system with internal heat exchanger

图5 不同冷凝温度下的排气过热度对比

Fig.5 Comparison of discharge superheat at different condensing temperatures

图6 不同冷凝温度下系统耗功对比

Fig.6 Comparison of power consumption at different condensing temperatures

图7 不同冷凝温度下制热量对比

Fig.7 Comparison of heating capacity at different condensing temperatures

图8 不同冷凝温度下COP对比

Fig.8 Comparison of COP at different condensing temperatures

参考文献 29

1	Arpagaus C, Bless F, Uhlmann M, et al. High temperature heat pumps: market overview, state of the art, research status, refrigerants, and application potentials [J]. Energy, 2018, 152: 985-1010.
2	Zhang J, Zhang H H, He Y L, et al. A comprehensive review on advances and applications of industrial heat pumps based on the practices in China [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 178: 800-825.
3	Bamigbetan O, Eikevik T M, Nekså P, et al. Review of vapour compression heat pumps for high temperature heating using natural working fluids [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2017, 80: 197-211.
4	Calm J M. The next generation of refrigerants - historical review, considerations, and outlook [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2008, 31(7): 1123-1133.
5	Calm J M, Hourahan G C. Physical, safety, and environmental data for refrigerants [J]. Heating, Piping, Air Conditioning, 1999, 71(8): 27-29.
6	Heath E A. Amendment to the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Kigali amendment) [J]. International Legal Materials, 2017, 56(1): 193-205.
7	Bamigbetan O, Eikevik T M, Nekså P, et al. Theoretical analysis of suitable fluids for high temperature heat pumps up to 125℃ heat delivery [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2018, 92: 185-195.
8	Schlemminger C, Starheim S E, Steffanussen F S, et al. Performance of high temperature heat pump for simultaneous and efficient production of ice water and process heat [C]// The 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration. Montreal, Canada, 2019.
9	Watanabe C, Nakamura T, Yamada M, et al. Experimental study on a water and air source high-temperature heat pump using a low GWP refrigerant [C]// The 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration. Montreal, Canada, 2019.
10	Arpagaus C, Kuster R, Prinzing M, et al. High temperature heat pump using HFO and HCFO refrigerants - system design and experimental results [C]// The 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration. Montreal, Canada, 2019.
11	Arpagaus C, Bertsch S S. Experimental results of HFO/HFCO refrigerants in a laboratory scale HTHP with up to 150 °C supply temperature [C]// 2nd Conference on High Temperature Heat Pumps. Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019.
12	Hu B, Wu D, Wang R Z. Water vapor compression and its various applications [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 98: 92-107.
13	舒建国, 白单英. 基于冷凝废热回收的氨高温热泵系统性能分析[J]. 制冷技术, 2018, 38(2): 22-26.
	Shu J G, Bai D Y. Analysis on performance of high temperature heat pump system with ammonia based on condensate waste heat recovery [J]. Chinese Journal of Refrigeration Technology, 2018, 38(2): 22-26.
14	桑宪辉, 徐树伍, 于志强. NH₃螺杆式全热回收高温热泵系统研究[J]. 制冷与空调, 2016, 16(1): 41-44.
	Sang X H, Xu S W, Yu Z Q. Research on NH₃ screw high-temperature heat pump system with total heat recovery [J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2016, 16(1): 41-44.
15	Zhu Y H, Huang Y L, Li C H, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of transcritical CO₂ ejector-expansion heat pump water heater system [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 167: 147-155.
16	王丹东, 陈江平, 俞彬彬, 等. CO₂车用热泵空调系统技术研发及性能提升[J]. 制冷学报, 2018, 39(5): 47-52.
	Wang D D, Chen J P, Yu B B, et al. Technology development and performance improvement of CO₂ automobile heat pump air-conditioning system [J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2018, 39(5): 47-52.
17	孔祥强, 乔尚游, 李俊枭. 不同工质的热泵热水器热力学性能分析[J]. 制冷, 2017, 36(1): 77-82.
	Kong X Q, Qiao S Y, Li J X. Thermodynamic performance analysis of heat pump water heater with different refrigerants [J]. Refrigeration, 2017, 36(1): 77-82.
18	Cai D H, Niu L J, He G G, et al. Experimental analysis on the thermal performance of a R290 air source heat pump water heater [C]// The 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration. Montreal, Canada, 2019.
19	Madsboell H, Weel M, Kolstrup A. Development of a water vapor compressor for high temperature heat pump applications [C]// 11th IIR Gustav Lorentzen Conference on Natural Refrigerants. Hangzhou, China, 2014.
20	Chamoun M, Rulliere R, Haberschill P, et al. Dynamic model of an industrial heat pump using water as refrigerant [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2012, 35(4): 1080-1091.
21	Chamoun M, Rulliere R, Haberschill P, et al. Experimental investigation of a new high temperature heat pump using water as refrigerant for industrial heat recovery [C]// International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. West Lafayette, 2012.
22	Chamoun M, Rulliere R, Haberschill P, et al. Modelica-based modeling and simulation of a twin screw compressor for heat pump applications [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 58(1/2): 479-489.
23	Chamoun M, Rulliere R, Haberschill P, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of a new high temperature heat pump for industrial heat recovery using water as refrigerant [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 44: 177-188.
24	沈九兵, 何志龙, 邢子文. 采用喷水螺杆式水蒸气压缩机的高温热泵设计及性能分析[J]. 制冷与空调, 2014, 14(2): 95-98.
	Shen J B, He Z L, Xing Z W. Design and performance analysis of high temperature heat pump using water-jet screw type steam compressor [J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2014, 14(2): 95-98.
25	Wu D, Yan H Z, Hu B, et al. Modeling and simulation on a water vapor high temperature heat pump system [J]. Energy, 2019, 168: 1063-1072.
26	Wu D, Hu B, Wang R Z. Theoretical and experimental investigation on a very high temperature heat pump with water refrigerant [C]// The 25th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration. Montreal, Canada, 2019.
27	黄忠, 丁勇, 孙纯武. 螺杆式压缩机容积效率计算方法的探讨[J]. 重庆大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 25(8): 118-119.
	Huang Z, Ding Y, Sun C W. A method of calculating the volumetric flow rate for screw refrigerating compressor [J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 25(8): 118-119.
28	Tian Y F, Shen J B, Wang C, et al. Modeling and performance study of a water-injected twin-screw water vapor compressor [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2017, 83: 75-87.
29	Šarevski V N, Šarevski M N. Energy efficiency of the thermocompression refrigerating and heat pump systems [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2012, 35(4): 1067-1079.

[1]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[2]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[3]	常明慧, 王林, 苑佳佳, 曹艺飞. 盐溶液蓄能型热泵循环特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 329-337.
[4]	吴迪, 胡斌, 王如竹, 梁俊宇. 水蒸气准饱和压缩高温热泵循环性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 45-52.
[5]	张化福, 童莉葛, 张振涛, 杨俊玲, 王立, 张俊浩. 机械蒸汽压缩蒸发技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 8-24.
[6]	邹启宏, 李乾, 葛天舒. 基于多目标下的两级并联除湿热泵系统实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 265-271.
[7]	杨天阳, 邹慧明, 周晖, 王春磊, 田长青. -30℃电动汽车补气式CO₂热泵制热性能实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 272-279.
[8]	徐野, 黄文君, 米俊芃, 申川川, 金建祥. 多源信息融合的离心式压缩机喘振诊断方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2979-2987.
[9]	雷博雯, 吴建华, 吴启航. R290低压比热泵高补气过热度循环研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1875-1883.
[10]	毛元敬, 杨智, 莫松平, 郭浩, 陈颖, 罗向龙, 陈健勇, 梁颖宗. C₆~C₁₀烷醇的SAFT-VR Mie状态方程参数回归及其热物性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1033-1041.
[11]	董益秀, 王如竹. 高温热泵的循环、工质研究及应用展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 133-144.
[12]	吴子睿, 孙瑞, 石凌峰, 田华, 王轩, 舒歌群. CO₂混合工质的气液相平衡的混合规则对比与预测研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1483-1492.
[13]	刘碧强, 曹海山. 基于流量校准的吸附测量方法及误差分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1597-1605.
[14]	张兴硕, 罗雄麟, 许锋. 催化裂化装置反再系统动态模拟精细化与控制系统“工艺优先”配对设计[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 747-758.
[15]	张家庆, 刘朝晖, 李宇, 宋晨阳. 碳氢燃料JP-10高温液态黏度测量和推算模型构建方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 153-161.