基于颗粒间相互作用的细颗粒粉体料仓下料过程分析

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201934

化工学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (8): 4047-4054.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20201934

基于颗粒间相互作用的细颗粒粉体料仓下料过程分析

陆海峰(),曹嘉琨,郭晓镭,刘海峰

华东理工大学上海煤气化工程技术研究中心，上海 200237

收稿日期:2020-12-29 修回日期:2021-02-23 出版日期:2021-08-05 发布日期:2021-08-05
通讯作者: 陆海峰
作者简介:陆海峰（1984—），男，博士，副教授，luhf@ecust.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51876066);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0808500);上海煤气化工程技术研究中心项目(18DZ2283900);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(222201817018)

Study on fine powders discharged from hopper based on interparticle interactions analysis

Haifeng LU(),Jiakun CAO,Xiaolei GUO,Haifeng LIU

Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2020-12-29 Revised:2021-02-23 Online:2021-08-05 Published:2021-08-05
Contact: Haifeng LU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以玻璃微珠、流化床裂化催化剂颗粒、褐煤和聚氯乙烯颗粒为实验物料，开展粉体流动性表征与料仓下料实验。研究发现，不同粉体的流动性差异较大，相应的料仓重力下料结果也不同；实验所用粉体的下料流率远低于传统Brown and Richards模型的预测值。分析表明，颗粒间相互作用导致的粉体黏附团聚是阻碍细颗粒粉体下料流动的主要原因。基于上述分析，利用剪切测试结合摩尔应力圆理论获得床层拉伸应力，并借助Rumpf方程构建的颗粒间相互作用与粉体床层应力之间的模型来获得不同粉体的颗粒间作用力；继而采用Bond数对粉体床层空隙率进行修正，揭示了颗粒间相互作用对粉体床层结构的影响，并在此基础上建立了粉体下料流率预测模型。新建立的耦合颗粒间作用力的粉体流率模型，有效改善了传统模型对细颗粒粉体流率预测值偏高的弊端，显著降低了流率预测偏差。

关键词: 粉体, 料斗下料, 颗粒间作用, 床层空隙, 流率预测

Abstract:

The fluidity characterization and hopper discharge experiments were carried out with glass beads, fluidized bed cracking catalyst particles, lignite and PVC particles as experimental materials. The study found that the fluidity of different powders is quite different, and the corresponding gravity discharging results are also different. The flow rate of the powder used in the experiment is much lower than that predicted by the traditional Brown and Richards model. The analysis shows that the cohesion and agglomeration caused by the interaction between particles is the main reason that hinders the flow of fine powders. Based on the above analysis, the tensile strength of the bed is obtained by shear test combined with the theory of molar stress circle. Meanwhile, with the help of the model between the interaction between particles and the bed stress of powder constructed by Rumpf equation, the interaction force between particles can be obtained. Finally, the Bond number is used to modify the voidage of the powder bed, and the influence of the interaction between particles on the structure of the powder bed is revealed. On the basis of that the prediction model of powder mass flow rate is established. The newly established powder flow rate model coupled with the force between particles has effectively improved the disadvantage of the traditional model for the high prediction value of the fine particle powder flow rate, and significantly reduced the flow rate prediction deviation.

Key words: powder, hopper discharge, interparticle interaction, bed voidage, mass flow rate prediction

中图分类号:

TQ 536

陆海峰, 曹嘉琨, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 基于颗粒间相互作用的细颗粒粉体料仓下料过程分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4047-4054.

Haifeng LU, Jiakun CAO, Xiaolei GUO, Haifeng LIU. Study on fine powders discharged from hopper based on interparticle interactions analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(8): 4047-4054.

图/表 1

参考文献 30

1	Sun D, Lu H F, Cao J K, et al. Flow mechanisms and solid flow rate prediction of powders discharged from hoppers with an insert[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 367: 277-284.
2	Lu H F, Guo X L, Gong X, et al. Prediction of solid discharge rates of pulverized coal from an aerated hopper[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 286: 645-653.
3	Huang W J, Gong X, Guo X L, et al. Discharge characteristics of cohesive fine coal from aerated hopper[J]. Powder Technology, 2009, 194(1/2): 126-131.
4	孙栋, 陆海峰, 曹嘉琨, 等. 复杂流道结构料仓的下料流率预测[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(3): 974-982.
	Sun D, Lu H F, Cao J K, et al. Solid flow rate prediction in hoppers with complicated flow channels[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 974-982.
5	赵伟, 陆海峰, 郭晓镭, 等. CPFD在细颗粒料仓下料中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2): 512-521.
	Zhao W, Lu H F, Guo X L, et al. Application of CPFD in hopper discharge of fine granular material[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(2): 512-521.
6	Beverloo W A, Leniger H A, van de Velde J. The flow of granular solids through orifices[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1961, 15(3/4): 260-269.
7	Weir G J. A mathematical model for dilating, non-cohesive granular flows in steep-walled hoppers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(1): 149-161.
8	Barletta D, Donsı̀ G, Ferrari G, et al. On the role and the origin of the gas pressure gradient in the discharge of fine solids from hoppers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(23/24): 5269-5278.
9	Datta A, Mishra B K, Das S P, et al. A DEM analysis of flow characteristics of noncohesive particles in hopper[J]. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2008, 23(2): 195-202.
10	Brown R L. Minimum energy theorem for flow of dry granules through apertures[J]. Nature, 1961, 191(4787): 458-461.
11	Lu H, Zhong J, Cao G P, et al. Gravitational discharge of fine dry powders with asperities from a conical hopper[J]. AIChE Journal, 2018, 64(2): 427-436.
12	Leung L Y, Mao C, Chen L P, et al. Precision of pharmaceutical powder flow measurement using ring shear tester: high variability is inherent to powders with low cohesion[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 301: 920-926.
13	Jenike A W. Principles of powder mechanics: by R. L. Brown and J. C. Richards, international series of monographs in chemical engineering, vol.10, pergamon press, Oxford, 1970; 223 pages; price: 60s[J]. Powder Technology, 1971, 4(2): 114.
14	Freeman R. Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders—a comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell[J]. Powder Technology, 2007, 174(1/2): 25-33.
15	Tomasetta I, Barletta D, Poletto M. Correlation of powder flow properties to interparticle interactions at ambient and high temperatures[J]. Particuology, 2014, 12: 90-99.
16	Brown R L, Richards J C. Flow patterns and segregation[M]//Principles of Powder Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1970: 116-134.
17	Anand A, Curtis J S, Wassgren C R, et al. Predicting discharge dynamics of wet cohesive particles from a rectangular hopper using the discrete element method (DEM)[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(24): 5268-5275.
18	Verghese T M, Nedderman R M. The discharge of fine sands from conical hoppers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1995, 50(19): 3143-3153.
19	Zheng Q J, Xia B S, Pan R H, et al. Prediction of mass discharge rate in conical hoppers using elastoplastic model[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 307: 63-72.
20	赵海亮, 由长福, 祁海鹰, 等. 细颗粒间相互作用力的研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2008, 29(1): 78-80.
	Zhao H L, You C F, Qi H Y, et al. Mechanism of interactions between fine particles[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2008, 29(1): 78-80.
21	Lu H F, Guo X L, Liu Y, et al. Effect of particle size on flow mode and flow characteristics of pulverized coal[J]. KONA Powder and Particle Journal, 2015, 32: 143-153.
22	Emeriault F, Chang C S. Interparticle forces and displacements in granular materials[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1997, 20(3/4): 223-244.
23	Landi G, Barletta D, Poletto M. Modelling and experiments on the effect of air humidity on the flow properties of glass powders[J]. Powder Technology, 2011, 207(1/2/3): 437-443.
24	LaMarche K R, Muzzio F J, Shinbrot T, et al. Granular flow and dielectrophoresis: the effect of electrostatic forces on adhesion and flow of dielectric granular materials[J]. Powder Technology, 2010, 199(2): 180-188.
25	Hsu W Y, Huang A N, Kuo H P. Analysis of interparticle forces and particle-wall interactions by powder bed pressure drops at incipient fluidization[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 325: 64-68.
26	Hamaker H C. The London-van der Waals attraction between spherical particles[J]. Physica, 1937, 4(10): 1058-1072.
27	Lu H F, Cao J K, Guo X L, et al. Evaluation of powder tensile strength by compression, shear and fluidization modules of the powder rheometer[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2020, 160: 1-10.
28	García-Triñanes P, Luding S, Shi H. Tensile strength of cohesive powders[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2019, 30(12): 2868-2880.
29	张正德, 陆海峰, 郭晓镭, 等. 粒径对石油焦粉及煤粉的堆积与流动特性的影响[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 42(3): 321-328.
	Zhang Z D, Lu H F, Guo X L, et al. Effect of particle size on packing characteristics and flowability of petroleum coke and coal[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 42(3): 321-328.
30	Yu A B, Feng C L, Zou R P, et al. On the relationship between porosity and interparticle forces[J]. Powder Technology, 2003, 130(1/2/3): 70-76.

[1]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[2]	何汉兵, 刘真, 陈勇, 王小锋, 曾婧. 直写成型电极锰氧化物粉末的合成与浆料调控[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2239-2247.
[3]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[4]	王燕, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 林晨迪, 纪文涛. 草酸盐和碳酸氢盐抑制聚乙烯粉尘爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216.
[5]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[6]	葛世轶, 杨遥, 黄正梁, 孙婧元, 王靖岱, 阳永荣. 基于静电分选解析聚乙烯颗粒生长与形貌演变[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1585-1596.
[7]	尚慧俊, 黎亨利, 刘家义, 潘锋, 杜占, 孙林兵. Co对WO₃-Co₃O₄预还原的影响及其产物碳化性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5592-5604.
[8]	纪文涛, 李璐, 李忠, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 王燕. 聚磷酸铵抑制PMMA粉尘爆炸特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 461-469.
[9]	向茂乔, 耿玉琦, 朱庆山. 氮化硅粉体制备技术及粉体质量研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 73-84.
[10]	侯玉洁, 梁琳, 江子旭, 闫兴清, 于小哲, 吕先舒, 喻健良. 惰性气体对粉尘爆炸泄放特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2887-2895.
[11]	周剑, 江倩, 杨怡, 冯厦厦, 仲兆祥, 邢卫红. 烧结助剂对低温制备碳化硅多孔陶瓷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2293-2299.
[12]	田逢时, 董欣欣, 疏学明, 赵金龙. 蛭石粉末及离子溶液改性后膨胀率和灭火有效性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1761-1768.
[13]	魏娟, 王玉军, 骆广生. 铝源孔容和焙烧升温过程对碳热还原法制备氮化铝粉体的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 1156-1168.
[14]	谢春杰, 何然, 庹新林, 杨万泰. 对位芳纶气凝胶粉体的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 6361-6370.
[15]	潘锋,刘家义,杜占,朱庆山. 超细碳化钨制备过程及机理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5455-5467.

基于颗粒间相互作用的细颗粒粉体料仓下料过程分析

Study on fine powders discharged from hopper based on interparticle interactions analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价