油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141312

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3): 1104-1110.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141312

油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性

柏静儒, 林卫生, 潘朔, 王擎

东北电力大学油页岩综合利用教育部工程研究中心, 吉林省吉林市 132012

收稿日期:2014-08-27 修回日期:2014-11-02 出版日期:2015-03-05 发布日期:2015-03-05
通讯作者: 柏静儒
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51276034)。

Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis

BAI Jingru, LIN Weisheng, PAN Shuo, WANG Qing

Engineering Research Centre of Oil Shale Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Education, Northeast Dianli University, Jilin 132012, Jilin, China

Received:2014-08-27 Revised:2014-11-02 Online:2015-03-05 Published:2015-03-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51276034).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性,在热重-红外-质谱三联机上对国内有代表性的4个地区(FS、HD、MM和NM)油页岩以20℃·min^-1的升温速率进行了热解实验研究,考察了H₂、H₂O、CO、CO₂、CH₄和C_nH_m6种轻质气体的析出速率和累积产量随温度变化的规律。实验结果表明:油页岩轻质气体析出的温度范围在180～540℃;H₂、CH₄和C_nH_m的析出速率曲线大致相似,呈高斯分布,CO和CO₂的析出速率则是先缓慢增加随后快速增加,达到最大值后又快速下降,直到析出结束,H₂O的析出速率相对比较复杂,油页岩的内水、矿物质的结晶水和热解水在3个阶段析出,析出速率都是先增大,达到最大值而后减小。

关键词: 油页岩, 热解, 轻质气体, 析出特性

Abstract:

Pyrolysis experiments were conducted on a unit of thermogravimetric-infrared-mass spectrometry at heating rate of 20℃·min^-1to examine the evolution characteristics of light gases from low temperature pyrolysis of oil shale obtained from four locations (FS, HD, MM and NM). The time-resolved light gases including H₂, H₂O, CO, CO₂, CH₄ and C_nH_m were investigated for their release rates and accumulated productions varying with the change of temperature. Light gases evolved at temperatures in the range of 180—540℃. Release rate curves for H₂, CH₄ and C_nH_m mainly resembled each other, appearing in Gaussian distribution. Release rate curves for CO and CO₂ smoothly increased first and then accelerated sharply. After reaching a maximum the curves dropped quickly till the end of evolution. Change of H₂O release rate was complicated. Release rates of internal water, mineral water and pyrolysis water of oil shale in three stages all increased to a maximum and then leveled off.

Key words: oil shale, pyrolysis, light gas, evolution characteristic

中图分类号:

TK16

柏静儒, 林卫生, 潘朔, 王擎. 油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3): 1104-1110.

BAI Jingru, LIN Weisheng, PAN Shuo, WANG Qing. Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3): 1104-1110.

参考文献 22

[1]	James W Bunger, Peter M Crawford, Harry R Johnson. Is oil shale America's answer to peak-oil challenge? [J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2004, 102 (36): 10-12
[2]	Zhang Lidong(张立栋), Liu Hongpeng(刘洪鹏), Jia Chunxia(贾春霞), Qin Hong(秦宏), Bai Jingru(柏静儒), Sun Baizhong(孙佰仲), Wang Qing(王擎), Li Shaohua(李少华), Sun Jian (孙键). Research progress of comprehensive utilization of oil shale in China [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress(化工进展), 2012, 31(11): 6-10
[3]	Dyni J R. Geology and resources of some world oil shale oil deposits [J]. Shale, 2003, 20(3): 193-252
[4]	Qian Jialin(钱家麟), Wang Jianqiu(王剑秋), Li Shuyuan(李术元). World oil shale utilization and its future [J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition(吉林大学学报:地球科学版), 2006,36(6): 877-887
[5]	UN Oil Shale and Tar Sands Panel. Final report of the technical panel on oil shale and tar sands[R]. A/Conf. 100/PC/26. Geneva: United National General Assembly, 1981
[6]	Qian Jialin(钱家麟), Yin Liang(尹亮). Oil Shale—Petroleum Alternative(油页岩——石油的补充能源)[M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2008: 22-85
[7]	Zhao Y H, He Y G . Utilization of retort gas as fuel for internal combustion engine for producing power [J]. Oil Shale, 2005, 22(1): 21-24
[8]	Colubev N. Solid oil shale heat carrier technology for oil shale retorting [J]. Oil Shale, 2003, 20(3S): 324-332
[9]	Kann J, Elenurm A, Rohtla I. About thermal low-temperature processing of oil shale heat carrier method [J]. Oil Shale, 2008, 21(3): 195-203
[10]	Martignoni W P, Rodrigues W J B. Petrosix oil shale technology learning curve//26th Oil Shale Symposium[C]. Poster 18. Golden, Colorado:Colorado School of Mines, 2006
[11]	Rezende J. Present state of development of the Petrosix process [J]. Oil Shale Processing Technology, 1982, 4(8): 121-135
[12]	Hohmann P J. Martignoni W P, Novicki R E M. Petrosix—a successful oil shale operational complex, proceedings //1992 Eastern Oil Shale Symposium[C]. Lexington, Kentucky, 1992
[13]	Schmidt S J. New directions for shale oil: path to a secure new oil supply well into this century [J]. Oil Shale, 2008, 20(3S): 333-346
[14]	Zhang Lili(张丽丽). The study of Tongchuan oil shale pyrolysis behavior[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2012
[15]	Yan J W, Jiang X M, Han X X, Liu J G. A TG-FTIR investigation to the catalytic effect of mineral matrix in oil shale on the pyrolysis and combustion of kerogen [J]. Fuel, 2013, 104(1): 307-317
[16]	Charland J P, MacPhee J A. Application of TG-FTIR to the determination of oxygen content of coals [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 81(2): 211-221
[17]	Wang Qing(王擎), Wang Rui(王锐), Jia Chunxia(贾春霞), Ren Liguo(任立国), Wang Haotian(王浩添), Yan Yuhe(闫宇赫). FG-DVC model for oil shale pyrolysis [J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2014, 65(6): 2308-2315
[18]	Xie Kechang(谢克昌). The Structure and Reactivity of Coal(煤的结构与反应性)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002
[19]	Zhao Lihong(赵丽红), Guo Huiqing(郭慧卿), Ma Qinglan(马青兰). Study on gaseous products distributions during coal pyrolysis [J]. Coal Conversion(煤炭转化), 2007, 30(1): 5-9
[20]	Jiang Wenping(降文萍). Study on the kinetics and devolatilization of coal pyrolysis[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2004
[21]	Sun Shaozeng(孙绍增), Zeng Guang(增光), Wei Lai(魏来), Zhao Zhiqiang(赵志强), Qian Juan (钱娟). Quantitative analysis and study on pyrolysis component of typical anthracite [J]. Fuel & Chemical Processes(燃料与化工), 2011, 42(4): 1-4
[22]	Liu Shengyu(刘生玉). Fundamental study on pyrolysis of Chinese steam coals and model compounds containing oxygen[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2004

油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性

Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[2]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[3]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.
[4]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[5]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[6]	张娜, 潘鹤林, 牛波, 张亚运, 龙东辉. 酚醛树脂热裂解反应机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 843-860.
[7]	郝泽光, 张乾, 高增林, 张宏文, 彭泽宇, 杨凯, 梁丽彤, 黄伟. 生物质与催化裂化油浆共热解协同作用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4070-4078.
[8]	邵健, 冯军宗, 柳凤琦, 姜勇刚, 李良军, 冯坚. 酚醛树脂基炭微球结构调控与功能化制备研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3787-3801.
[9]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.
[10]	肖皓宇, 杨海平, 张雄, 陈应泉, 王贤华, 陈汉平. 塑料催化热解制备高附加值产品的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3461-3471.
[11]	唐恺鸿, 何晓峰, 徐桂秋, 于洋, 刘啸凤, 葛铁军, 张爱玲. 酚醛泡沫的燃烧行为及阻燃研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3483-3500.
[12]	陈玉弓, 陈昊, 黄耀松. 基于分子反应动力学模拟的六甲基二硅氧烷热解机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2844-2857.
[13]	陈永安, 周安宁, 李云龙, 石智伟, 贺新福, 焦卫红. 磁性MgFe₂O₄及其核壳催化剂制备与煤热解性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3026-3037.
[14]	郑默, 李晓霞. ReaxFF MD模拟揭示的煤热解挥发分自由基反应的竞争与协调[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2732-2741.
[15]	陈冠益, 童图军, 李瑞, 王燕杉, 颜蓓蓓, 李宁, 侯立安. 热解时间对污泥生物炭活化过硫酸盐的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2111-2119.