基于混合分块DMICA-PCA的全流程过程监控方法

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161309

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (2): 759-766.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161309

基于混合分块DMICA-PCA的全流程过程监控方法

江伟¹, 王振雷¹, 王昕²

1. 化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 华东理工大学化工过程先进控制和优化技术教育部重点实验室, 上海 200237;
2. 上海交通大学电工与电子技术中心, 上海 200240

收稿日期:2016-09-19 修回日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2017-02-05 发布日期:2017-02-05
通讯作者: 王振雷
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（61134007）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（61403141）；上海市“科技创新行动计划”研发平台建设项目（13DZ2295300）；上海市自然科学基金项目（14ZR1421800）；流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目（PAL-N201404）。

Plant-wide process monitoring based on mixed multiblock DMICA-PCA

JIANG Wei¹, WANG Zhenlei¹, WANG Xin²

1. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Advanced Control and Optimization for Chemical Processes, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. Center of Electrical & Electronic Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2016-09-19 Revised:2016-12-05 Online:2017-02-05 Published:2017-02-05
Supported by:
supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (61134007), the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403141), the Shanghai "Technology Innovation Action Plan" Development Platform for Building Projects (13DZ2295300), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (14ZR1421800) and the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries (PAL-N201404).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分块策略被广泛运用于全流程过程监控领域，以解决全流程过程变量关系复杂性较高的问题，但传统的分块策略与子块建模方法都未考虑过程的动态性问题，并且传统的分块策略都片面依赖于过程知识或过程数据信息，影响了过程监控的效果，为此提出了一种基于混合分块DMICA-PCA的过程监控方法。在分析过程的动态性后，先利用已知的部分过程知识进行变量的初步分块，接着利用各分块变量之间改进的广义Dice's系数（MGDC）进行进一步的分块。然后采用DMICA-PCA方法对每个子块进行建模得到子块的统计量，并通过加权方法得到总的联合指标进行故障检测。同时对每个子块采用改进的故障诊断方法，提高了诊断效果。最后将该方法应用在TE过程的过程监控中，证明了该方法的有效性。

关键词: 主元分析, 过程控制, 过程系统, 混合分块, 全流程, 改进的广义Dice's系数

Abstract:

Multiblock strategy is widely used in plant-wide process monitoring to solve problems with complicated relationships between process variables. Traditional multiblock strategies and sub-block modeling methods are not effective in plant-wide process monitoring, because dynamic characteristics of the process have not been considered and knowledge or data information of the process is exclusively exploited. A mixed multiblock DMICA-PCA method was proposed to improve process monitoring performance. First, variables were sliced into initial sub-blocks by obtained process knowledge after analysis of process dynamics and further sliced into final sub-blocks by modified general Dice's coefficient (MGDC) between variables of initial sub-blocks. Then, the DMICA-PCA method was used to establish model and acquire statistical values of variables in final sub-blocks and a combined overall index from weighted sum was developed for fault detection, which improved performances by simultaneous diagnosis on each sub-block. Effectiveness of the proposed method was validated on monitoring the Tennessee-Eastman (TE) process.

Key words: principal component analysis, process control, process systems, mixed multiblock, plant-wide process, modified general Dice's coefficient

中图分类号:

TP277

江伟, 王振雷, 王昕. 基于混合分块DMICA-PCA的全流程过程监控方法[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(2): 759-766.

JIANG Wei, WANG Zhenlei, WANG Xin. Plant-wide process monitoring based on mixed multiblock DMICA-PCA[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(2): 759-766.

参考文献 30

[1]	JIA Q L, ZHANG Y W. Quality-related fault detection approach based on dynamic kernel partial least squares[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2016, 106:242-252.
[2]	WANG T, WU H, NI M, et al. An adaptive confidence limit for periodic non-steady conditions fault detection[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 72:328-345.
[3]	SONG B, TAN S, SHI H. Process monitoring via enhanced neighborhood preserving embedding[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2016, 50:48-56.
[4]	LI N, YANG W, YANG Y. Spatial-statistical local approach for improved manifold-based process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(34):8509-8519.
[5]	LI W, YUE H H, VALLE C S, et al. Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2000, 10(5):471-486.
[6]	童楚东, 史旭华. 基于互信息的PCA方法及其在过程监测中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10):4101-4106. TONG C D, SHI X H. Mutual information based PCA algorithm with application in process monitoring[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(10):4101-4106.
[7]	HYVARINEN A, OJA E. Independent component analysis:algorithms and applications[J]. Neural Networks, 2000, 13(4):411-430.
[8]	ZHANG Y W, ZHANG Y. Fault detection of non-Gaussian processes based on modified independent component analysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65:4630-4639.
[9]	WANG B, JIANG Q C, YAN X F. Fault detection and identification using a Kullback-Leibler divergence based multi-block principal component analysis and bayesian inference[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2014, 31(6):930-943.
[10]	MACGREGOR J F, JAECKLE C, KIPARISSIDES C, et al. Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods[J]. AIChE J., 1994, 40:826-838.
[11]	GE Z Q, SONG Z H. Two-level multiblock statistical monitoring for plant-wide processes[J]. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2009, 26:1467-1475.
[12]	WESTERHUIS J A, KOURTI T, MACGREGOR J F. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 1998, 12(5):301-321.
[13]	CHERRY G A, QIN S J. Multiblock principal component analysis based on a combined index for semiconductor fault detection and diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on semiconductor manufacturing, 2006, 19(2):159-172.
[14]	GE Z Q, SONG Z H. Distributed PCA model for plant-wide process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(5):1947-1957.
[15]	衷路生, 何东, 龚锦红, 等. 基于分布式ICA-PCA模型的工业过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11):4546-4554. ZHONG L S, HE D, GONG J H, et al. Fault monitoring of industrial process based on distributed ICA-PCA model[J]. CIESC Journal,2015, 66(11):4546-4554.
[16]	JIANG Q C, WANG B, YAN X F. Multiblock independent component analysis integrated with Hellinger distance and Bayesian inference for non-Gaussian plant-wide process monitoring[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(9):2497-2508.
[17]	JIANG Q C, YAN X F. Plant-wide process monitoring based on mutual information multiblock principal component analysis[J]. ISA Transactions, 2014, 53(5):1516-1527.
[18]	WANG B, YAN X F, JIANG Q C, et al. Generalized Dice's coefficient based multi-block principal component analysis with Bayesian inference for plant-wide process monitoring[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2015, 29(3):165-178.
[19]	WANG B, YAN X F, JIANG Q C. Independent component analysis model utilizing de-mixing information for improved non-Gaussian process monitoring[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 94:188-200.
[20]	HUANG J, YAN X F. Dynamic process fault detection and diagnosis based on dynamic principal component analysis, dynamic independent component analysis and Bayesian inference[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 148:115-127.
[21]	钟丽丽. 基于动态主元分析的故障诊断研究[D]. 青岛:青岛科技大学, 2013. ZHONG L L. Research on fault diagnosis of dynamic principle component analysis[D]. Qingdao:Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 2013.
[22]	ZHANG Y, LIU Y, JI Z. Vector similarity measurement method[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2009, 4(5):532-536.
[23]	张子羿, 胡益, 侍洪波. 一种基于聚类方法的多阶段间歇过程监控方法[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(12):4522-4528. ZHANG Z Y, HU Y,SHI H B.Multi-stage batch process monitoring based on a clustering method[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(12):4522-4528.
[24]	江伟, 王昕, 王振雷. 基于LTSA和MICA与PCA联合指标的过程监控方法及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(12):4895-4903. JIANG W, WANG X, WANG Z L. LTSA and combined index based MICA and PCA process monitoring and application[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015:66(12):4895-4903.
[25]	LI X, YANG Y, ZHANG W. Statistical process monitoring via generalized non-negative matrix projection[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2013, 121:15-25.
[26]	杨正永, 王昕, 王振雷. 基于LTSA和联合指标的非高斯过程监控方法及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 66(4):1370-1377. YANG Z Y,WANG X,WANG Z L. LTSA and combined index based non-Gaussian process monitoring and application[J].CIESC Journal, 2014:66(4):1370-1379.
[27]	YUE H H, QIN S J. Reconstruction-based fault identification using a combined index[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(20):4403-4414.
[28]	XIE L, LI Z, ZENG J, et al. Block adaptive kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear process monitoring[J]. AIChE Journal, 2016, 62(12):4334-4345.
[29]	CHIANG L H, RUSSELL E L, BRAATZ R D. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2001.
[30]	JIANG Q C, YAN X F. Probabilistic weighted NPE-SVDD for chemical process monitoring[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2014, 28:74-89.

基于混合分块DMICA-PCA的全流程过程监控方法

Plant-wide process monitoring based on mixed multiblock DMICA-PCA

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[4]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[5]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[6]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[7]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[8]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[9]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[10]	王子宗, 索寒生, 赵学良. 数字孪生智能乙烯工厂研究与构建[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1175-1186.
[11]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[12]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[13]	王雅琳, 潘雨晴, 刘晨亮. 基于GSA-LSTM动态结构特征提取的间歇过程监测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3994-4002.
[14]	周乐, 沈程凯, 吴超, 侯北平, 宋执环. 深度融合特征提取网络及其在化工过程软测量中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3156-3165.
[15]	王琨, 侍洪波, 谭帅, 宋冰, 陶阳. 局部时差约束邻域保持嵌入算法在故障检测中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3109-3119.