基于流形正则化域适应湿式球磨机负荷参数软测量

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170918

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (3): 1244-1251.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170918

• • 上一篇

基于流形正则化域适应湿式球磨机负荷参数软测量

杜永贵, 李思思, 阎高伟, 程兰

太原理工大学信息工程学院, 山西太原 030024

收稿日期:2017-07-17 修回日期:2017-09-08 出版日期:2018-03-05 发布日期:2018-03-05
通讯作者: 阎高伟
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（61450011，61603267）；山西省自然科学基金项目（2015011052）；山西省煤基重点科技攻关项目（MD2014-07）。

Soft sensor of wet ball mill load parameter based on domain adaptation with manifold regularization

DU Yonggui, LI Sisi, YAN Gaowei, CHENG Lan

College of Information Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China

Received:2017-07-17 Revised:2017-09-08 Online:2018-03-05 Published:2018-03-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61450011, 61603267), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (2015011052) and Key Project of Coal Based Science and Technology in Shanxi Province(MD 2014-07).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对多工况条件下球磨机关键负荷参数测量面临的复杂性问题，提出基于流形正则化域适应（domain adaptation with manifold regularization，DAMR）湿式球磨机负荷参数软测量的方法。该方法首先采用集成流形约束、最大方差及最大均值差异寻找特征变换矩阵，然后，将源建模领域和未建模领域的特征信息投射到公共子空间，最后，在子空间建立模型得到球磨机关键负荷参数的预测值。实验结果表明该方法能以较高的精度实现未知工况下湿式球磨机关键负荷参数的预测，且该方法对于流程工业多工况软测量和过程监控研究有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 迁移学习, 流形正则化, 最大均值差异, 湿式球磨机负荷参数, 集成, 过程控制, 预测

Abstract:

Aiming at the challenging problems such as the measurement of key load parameters of ball mill under multi-operating conditions, a soft sensor model based on domain adaptation with manifold regularization (domain adaptation with manifold regularization,DAMR) for measuring wet ball mill load parameters is proposed. Firstly, the feature transformation matrix is found by using the integrated manifold constraints, the maximum variance and the maximum mean discrepancy. Then, the feature information of the source domain and the target domain are projected into the common subspace. Finally, the model established in the subspace is used to predict critical load parameters. The results show that the proposed method can predict the critical load parameters of wet ball mill under the unknown condition with high precision, and this method has some reference value for the soft sensing of mlti-operating conditions in process industry and process monitoring.

Key words: transfer learning, manifold regularization, maximum mean discrepancy, wet ball mill load parameters, integration, process control, prediction

中图分类号:

TP29

杜永贵, 李思思, 阎高伟, 程兰. 基于流形正则化域适应湿式球磨机负荷参数软测量[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(3): 1244-1251.

DU Yonggui, LI Sisi, YAN Gaowei, CHENG Lan. Soft sensor of wet ball mill load parameter based on domain adaptation with manifold regularization[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(3): 1244-1251.

参考文献 30

[1]	KESHAV P, HAAS B D, CLERMONT B, et al. Optimisation of the secondary ball mill using an on-line ball and pulp load sensor-the Sensomag[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2011, 24(3):325-334.
[2]	汤健. 基于频谱数据驱动的旋转机械设备负荷软测量[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2015. TANG J. Soft Sensing of Rotating Machinery Equipment Load based on Spectrum Data Drive[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2015.
[3]	柴天佑. 复杂工业过程运行优化与反馈控制[J]. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(11):1744-1757. CHAI T Y. Operational optimization and feedback control for complex industrial processes[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(11):1744-1757.
[4]	ZHOU P, CHAI T Y, WANG H. Intelligent optimal-setting control for grinding circuits of mineral processing process[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 2009, 6(4):730-743.
[5]	汤健, 柴天佑, 丛秋梅, 等. 选择性融合多尺度筒体振动频谱的磨机负荷参数建模[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2015, 32(12):1582-1591. TANG J, CHAI T Y, CONG Q M, et al. Modeling mill load parameters based on selective fusion of multi-scale shell vibration frequency spectra[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2015, 32(12):1582-1591.
[6]	汤健, 赵立杰, 岳恒, 等. 湿式球磨机筒体振动信号分析及负荷软测量[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 31(11):1521-1524. TANG J, ZHAO L J, YUE H, et al. Analysis of vibration signal of wet ball mill shell and soft sensoring for mill load[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2010, 31(11):1521-1524.
[7]	TANG J, WANG D H, CHAI T Y. Predicting mill load using partial least squares and extreme learning machines[J]. Soft Computing, 2012, 16(9):1585-1594.
[8]	JIN H P, CHEN X G, WANG L, et al. Dual learning-based online ensemble regression approach for adaptive soft sensor modeling of nonlinear time-varying processes[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2016, 151:228-244.
[9]	王通, 高宪文, 刘文芳. 基于改进即时学习算法的动液面软测量建模[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(7):918-922. WANG T, GAO X W, LIU W F. Soft sensor for determination of dynamic fluid levels based on enhanced just-in-time learning algorithm[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2015, 36(7):918-922.
[10]	李元, 张新民. 基于非高斯信息的JITL软测量模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(6):897-901. LI Y, ZHANG X M. Non-Gaussian information based JITL soft sensor model[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(6):897-901.
[11]	牛大鹏, 刘元清. 基于改进即时学习算法的湿法冶金浸出过程建模[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7):2873-2879. NIU D P, LIU Y Q. Modeling hydrometallurgical leaching process based on improved just-in-time learning algorithm[J]. CIESC Jorunal, 2017, 68(7):2873-2879.
[12]	汤健, 柴天佑, 刘卓, 等. 基于更新样本智能识别算法的自适应集成建模[J]. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(7):1040-1052. TANG J, CHAI T Y, LIU Z, et al. Adaptive ensemble modelling approach based on updating sample intelligent identiflcation[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(7):1040-1052.
[13]	SHAO W M, TIAN X M. Adaptive soft sensor for quality prediction of chemical processes based on selective ensemble of local partial least squares models[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2015, 95:113-132.
[14]	YANG K, JIN H, CHEN X G, et al. Soft sensor development for online quality prediction of industrial batch rubber mixing process using ensemble just-in-time Gaussian process regression models[J]. Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2016, 155:170-182.
[15]	SHAO W M, TIAN X M. Semi-supervised selective ensemble learning based on distance to model for nonlinear soft sensor development[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 22:91-104.
[16]	刘佳, 邵诚, 朱理. 基于迁移学习工况划分的裂解炉收率PSO-LS-SVM建模[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(5):1982-1988. LIU J, SHAO C, ZHU L. Modeling of cracking furnace yields with PSO-LS-SVM based on operating condition classification by transfer learning[J]. CIESC Jorunal, 2016, 67(5):1982-1988.
[17]	GRUBINGER T, CHASPARIS G, NATSCHLAEGER T. Generalized online transfer learning forclimate control in residential buildings[J]. Energy and Buildings. 2017, 139:63-71.
[18]	YAN K, ZHANG D. Calibration transfer and drift compensation of e-noses viacoupled task learning[J]. Sensors and Actuators B:Chemical, 2016, 225:288-297.
[19]	PARDOE D, STONE P. Boosting for regression transfer[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 10), Haifa, Israel, 2010:863-870.
[20]	PAN S J, TSANG I W, KWOK J T, et al. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2011, 22(2):199-210.
[21]	KAN M N, WU J T, SHAN S G, et al. Domain adaptation for face recognition:targetize source domain bridged by common subspace[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2014, 109(1):94-109.
[22]	LONG M S, WANG J M, DING G G, et al. Transfer learning with graph co-regularization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(7):1805-1818.
[23]	LONG M S, WANG J M, DING G G, et al. Transfer learning with graph co-regularization[C]//Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
[24]	LONG M S, WANG J M, DING G G, et al. Adaptation regularization:a general framework for transfer learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(5):1076-1089.
[25]	LONG M S, WANG J M, DING G G, et al. Transfer feature learning with joint distribution adaptation[C]//IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2013.
[26]	WANG X Z, SCHNEIDER J. Flexible transfer learning under support and model shift[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27(NIPS 2014), Curran Associates, Inc. 2014:1898-1906.
[27]	SCHÖLKOPF B, PLATT J, HOFMANN T. A kernel method for the two-sample problem[C]//Proceedings of NIPS, 2006.
[28]	SUN Q, CHATTOPADHYAY R, PANCHANATHAN S, et al. A two-stage weighting framework for multi-source domain adaptation[C]//International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc. 2011:505-513.
[29]	TOMAR V S, ROSE R C. Manifold regularized deep neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Singapore:ISCA, 2014:348-352.
[30]	GUAN N, TAO D, LUO Z, et al. Manifold regularized discriminative nonnegative matrix factorization with fast gradient descent[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(7):2030.

基于流形正则化域适应湿式球磨机负荷参数软测量

Soft sensor of wet ball mill load parameter based on domain adaptation with manifold regularization

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[4]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[5]	尹刚, 李伊惠, 何飞, 曹文琦, 王民, 颜非亚, 向禹, 卢剑, 罗斌, 卢润廷. 基于KPCA和SVM的铝电解槽漏槽事故预警方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3419-3428.
[6]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[7]	郭雨莹, 敬加强, 黄婉妮, 张平, 孙杰, 朱宇, 冯君炫, 陆洪江. 稠油管道水润滑减阻及压降预测模型修正[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2898-2907.
[8]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[9]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[10]	李艳辉, 丁邵明, 白周央, 张一楠, 于智红, 邢利梅, 高鹏飞, 王永贞. 非常规服役超临界锅炉的微纳尺度腐蚀动力学模型建立及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2436-2446.
[11]	于源, 陈薇薇, 付俊杰, 刘家祥, 焦志伟. 几何相似涡流空气分级机环形区流场变化规律研究及预测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2363-2373.
[12]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[13]	吴心远, 刘奇磊, 曹博渊, 张磊, 都健. Group2vec：基于无监督机器学习的基团向量表示及其物性预测应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1187-1194.
[14]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[15]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.