多孔介质内超临界CO2流体及泡沫驱油特性的比较实验研究

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180776

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (S1): 58-63.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180776

多孔介质内超临界CO₂流体及泡沫驱油特性的比较实验研究

杜东兴^1,2, 郑利晨^1,2, 张旭^1,2, 孙国龙^1,2, 李莺歌³, 巢昆^1,2

1 青岛科技大学机电工程学院, 山东青岛 266061;
2 青岛科技大学地质能源研究院, 山东青岛 266109;
3 青岛科技大学自动化与电子工程学院, 山东青岛 266061

收稿日期:2018-07-10 修回日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2018-09-30 发布日期:2018-09-30
通讯作者: 杜东兴(1971-),男,博士研究生,教授,E-mail:du-dongxing@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51476081）。

Comparative experimental studies on oil recovery characteristics of supercritical CO₂ and foam fluid in porous media

DU Dongxing^1,2, ZHENG Lichen^1,2, ZHANG Xu^1,2, SUN Guolong^1,2, LI Yingge³, CHAO Kun^1,2

1 College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China;
2 Geo-Energy Research Institute, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China;
3 College of Automation and Electronic Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China

Received:2018-07-10 Revised:2018-07-17 Online:2018-09-30 Published:2018-09-30
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51476081).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

CO₂混相驱替可以提高原油采收率，因此近年来得到研究者们的广泛关注。使用高温高压驱替设备，利用超临界CO₂流体、超临界CO₂泡沫及N₂泡沫作为驱替介质，对油水饱和孔隙介质中的油相驱替特性开展了比较实验研究。通过对驱替过程沿程压力及对驱替增采油量的测量，对不同驱替手段在孔隙介质内的油相增采特性进行深入研究和探讨。研究发现在温度为50℃、压力为13 MPa时，超临界CO₂流体对多孔介质内的油相驱替效果有显著提升，当压力进一步升高到23 MPa时，油相增采效果不明显。说明在本实验条件下超临界CO₂流体与油相在50℃、13 MPa时可达到混相驱替状态；而采用超临界CO₂泡沫及N₂泡沫注入工艺未能进一步提高出油量。沿程压差测量结果则显示，与N₂泡沫相比，超临界CO₂泡沫在多孔介质试样内的驱替压差较小，起泡性能较差。实验结果对于筛选及评价超临界CO₂驱油工艺具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 超临界二氧化碳, 泡沫, 多相流, 驱油特性

Abstract:

CO₂ miscible displacement process has attracted wide attention of researchers in recent years due to its capacity on enhancing oil recovery. Comparative experimental investigations were carried out for oil recovery characteristics from water/oil pre-saturated porous medium with various displacement fluids of supercritical CO₂, supercritical CO₂ foam and N₂ foam. Referring to the reservoir temperature and pressure conditions, the enhanced oil recovery characteristics are analyzed and discussed in detail based on the displacement pressure drop along the core together with the extracted amount of oil from the porous medium. It is found the supercritical CO₂ fluid could achieve obviously higher oil recovery at the condition of 50℃ and 13 MPa. The fact that elevating the system pressure up to 23 MPa couldn't produce extra oil indicates the CO₂ displacing oil process achieves miscibility under the condition of 50℃ and 13 MPa in the porous media. The employments of other EOR methods of supercritical CO₂ foam and N₂ foam didn't produce more oil component from the sample. Compared to the result of 0.8 MPa for N₂ foam, the pressure drop for supercritical CO₂ foam flooding process is much lower at 0.3 MPa with poorer bubble generation performance. It is expected the experimental results could be employed on screening and evaluating supercritical CO₂ flooding technologies.

Key words: supercritical carbon dioxide, foam, multiphase flow, oil recovery characteristics

中图分类号:

TE341

杜东兴, 郑利晨, 张旭, 孙国龙, 李莺歌, 巢昆. 多孔介质内超临界CO₂流体及泡沫驱油特性的比较实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S1): 58-63.

DU Dongxing, ZHENG Lichen, ZHANG Xu, SUN Guolong, LI Yingge, CHAO Kun. Comparative experimental studies on oil recovery characteristics of supercritical CO₂ and foam fluid in porous media[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 58-63.

参考文献 31

[1]	MORITIS G. Worldwide EOR survey[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 2002, 100(15):43-47.
[2]	MORITIS G. EOR continues to unlock oil resources[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 2003, 102(14):45-49.
[3]	ORR F M J. Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2004, 56(9):90.
[4]	GASPAR A T F S, LIMA G A C, SUSLICK S B. CO2 capture and storage in mature oil reservoir:physical description, EOR and economic valuation of a case of a Brazilian mature field:SPE 94181[C]//SPE Europe/EAGE Annual Conference. Spain, 2005.
[5]	GASPAR A T F S, SUSLICK S B, FERREIRA D F, et al. Enhanced oil recovery with CO2 sequestration:a feasibility study of a Brazilian mature oil field:SPE 94939[C]//SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Production Environmental Conference. Texas, USA, 2005.
[6]	GODECA M, KUUSKRAAA V, LEEUWEN T V. CO2 storage in depleted oil fields:the worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4(10):2162-2169.
[7]	ETTEHADTAVAKKOL A, LAKE L W, BYRANT S L. CO2-EOR and storage design optimization[J]. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 25:79-92.
[8]	ALVARADO V, MANRIQUE E. Enhanced oil recovery:an update review[J]. Energies, 2010, 3(9):1529-1575.
[9]	FREEMAN D. Effect of stress sensitivity on displacement efficiency in CO2 flooding for fractured low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science, 2009, 6(3):277-283.
[10]	LIU Y, TENG Y, JIANG L, et al. Displacement front behavior of near miscible CO2 flooding in decane saturated synthetic sandstone cores revealed by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017, 37:171-178.
[11]	CHEN S L, WU W X, TANG J B. Study on minimum miscible pressure and oil displacement law for CO2 flooding[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 391/392:1051-1054.
[12]	LIAO X, ZHAO H. The evaluation of CO2 miscible displacement and storage effect in mature oil fields[J]. Liquid Fuels Technology, 2014, 32(1):8-14.
[13]	HOLM L W. Evolution of the carbon-dioxide flooding processes[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1987, 39(11):1337-1342.
[14]	PATZEK T W. Field application of foam for mobility improvement and profile control[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1996, 11(2):79-85.
[15]	ROSSEN W R. Foams in enhanced oil recovery//Foams:Theory, Measurements and Applications[M]. New York:Marcel Dekker, 1996:413-464.
[16]	ROSSEN W R, ZEILINGER S C, SHI J X, et al. Simplified mechanistic simulation of foam processes in porous media[J]. SPE J., 1999, 4:279-287.
[17]	DU D X, SUN S B, ZHANG N, et al. Pressure distribution measurements for CO2 foam flow in porous media[J]. Journal of Porous Media, 2015, 18(11):1119-1125.
[18]	DU D X, WANG D X, JIA N H, et al. Experiments on CO2 foam seepage characteristics in porous media[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3):499-505.
[19]	SINGH R, MOHANTY K K. Foam flow in a layered, heterogeneous medium:a visualization study[J]. Fuel, 2017, 197:58-69.
[20]	CHEN H, YANG S L, REN S S, et al. Crude oil displacement efficiency of produced gas re-injection[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2013, 10(6):566-573.
[21]	WANG X, ZHANG S, GU Y. Four important onset pressures for mutual interactions between each of three crude oils and CO2[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2010, 55(10):4390-4398.
[22]	YANG D Y, GU Y G. Interfacial interactions between crude oil and CO2 under reservoir conditions[J]. Liquid Fuels Technology, 2005, 23(9/10):1099-1112.
[23]	JAEGER P T, EGGERS R, BAUMGARTL H. Interfacial properties of high viscous liquids in a supercritical carbon dioxide atmosphere[J]. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2002, 24(3):203-217.
[24]	JAEGER P T, ALOTAIBI M B, NASRELDIN H A. Influence of compressed carbon dioxide on the capillarity of the gas-crude oil-reservoir water system[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2010, 55(11):5246-5251.
[25]	ZHANG K, JIA N, ZENG F. Application of predicted bubble-rising velocities for estimating the minimum miscibility pressures of the light crude oil-CO2 systems with the rising bubble apparatus[J]. Fuel, 2018, 220:412-419.
[26]	RAO D N, LEE J I. Determination of gas-oil miscibility conditions by interfacial tension measurements[J]. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2003, 262(2):474-482.
[27]	KOGEL A, DAHMAN N, EDERER H. Mass transfer coefficient from pendant water drop measurement in compressed carbon dioxide[J]. J. Supercritical Fluids, 2004, 29:237-249.
[28]	WU B H, JIANG L L, LIU Y, et al. Pore-scale mass transfer experiments in porous media by X-Ray CT scanning[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 105:5079-5084.
[29]	HAAJIZADEH M, FAYERS F J, COCKIN A P, et al. On the importance of dispersion and heterogeneity in the compositional simulation of miscible gas processes:SPE 57264[C]//1999 SPE Asia-Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1999.
[30]	JU B S, WU Y S, QIN J S, et al. Modeling CO2 miscible flooding for enhance oil recovery[J]. Petroleum Science, 2012, 9:192-198.
[31]	韩雷豹. 利用VIT法确定CO2-油相体系相平衡特性的实验研究[D]. 青岛:青岛科技大学, 2018. HAN L B. Experimental studies on phase equilibria characteristics of CO2/oil system with VIT method[D]. Qingdao:Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 2018.

多孔介质内超临界CO₂流体及泡沫驱油特性的比较实验研究

Comparative experimental studies on oil recovery characteristics of supercritical CO₂ and foam fluid in porous media

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[4]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[5]	邢美波, 张中天, 景栋梁, 张洪发. 磁调控水基碳纳米管协同多孔材料强化相变储/释能特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3093-3102.
[6]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[7]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[8]	李新亚, 邢雷, 蒋明虎, 赵立新. 倒锥注气强化井下油水分离水力旋流器性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1134-1144.
[9]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[10]	王帅, 杨富凯, 徐新宇. 阻燃型全生物基多元醇聚氨酯泡沫的制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1399-1408.
[11]	朱兵国, 何吉祥, 徐进良, 彭斌. 冷却条件下渐扩/渐缩管内超临界压力二氧化碳的传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1062-1072.
[12]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[13]	赵焕娟, 刘婧, 周冬雷, 林敏. 多孔材料对氢气爆轰的抑制作用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 968-976.
[14]	熊昊, 梁潇予, 张晨曦, 白浩隆, 范晓宇, 魏飞. 重质油直接制化工品：多级逆流下行催化裂解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 86-104.
[15]	贾海林, 崔博, 陈南, 杨永钦, 王庆银, 朱福敏. 低碳醇改性无氟泡沫的性能分析与扑灭油池火的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4235-4244.