基于声发射技术的垂直管气液两相流动检测方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.04.013

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (4): 1243-1250.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.04.013

基于声发射技术的垂直管气液两相流动检测方法

方立德, 张垚, 张万岭, 梁玉娇, 何青

河北大学质量技术监督学院, 河北保定 071002

收稿日期:2013-07-24 修回日期:2013-09-26 出版日期:2014-04-05 发布日期:2013-11-28
通讯作者: 张垚
作者简介:方立德（1974—），男，博士研究生，副教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（61074174）；河北省自然科学基金项目（F2011201040）；河北省教育厅重点项目（ZH2012064）。

Flow detection technology based on acoustic emission of gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipe

FANG Lide, ZHANG Yao, ZHANG Wanling, LIANG Yujiao, HE Qing

School of Quality and Technology Supervising, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China

Received:2013-07-24 Revised:2013-09-26 Online:2014-04-05 Published:2013-11-28
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61074174), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (F2011201040) and the Key Projects of the Education Department in Hebei Province(ZH2012064).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 声发射（AE）作为一种无损检测手段，用于气液两相流的测量具有非侵入式、测量不破坏被测管道及流场分布，信号强、灵敏度高等优点。利用声发射技术在河北大学垂直管气液两相流管道上进行了大量实验，运用现代信息数据处理方法对气液两相流垂直管道流型特征参数进行了提取。分析结果表明利用声发射手段提取出的流型特征参数可以反映出典型流型下的动力学特征。垂直管道中，泡状流、弹状流、环状流以及过渡状态下的乳沫状流在时域和频域信号中有着明显区别，小波能量和小波包分解后的信息熵的值也存在较大的差异性，从另一角度验证了在不同流型下两相流体在管道内部不同的运动状态，利用模式识别的思想，对垂直管4种典型流型进行了流型识别，取得了较好的效果，研究结果表明声发射技术可以作为一种技术手段用于气液两相流流动的检测。

关键词: 声发射, 多相流, 信息熵, 流型识别, 测量

Abstract: Acoustic emission (AE) as a technology of non-destructive detection for measuring the gas-liquid two-phase flow is superior to traditional method in non-invasiveness, no destruction of test pipe and flow field distribution, strong signal, and high sensitivity. The experiment was operated on a multiphase flow experimental device in Hebei University. Experiments based on the data processing method collected the features of gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipe. The acoustic emission technology could reflect the dynamic characteristics of the typical flow patterns: bubbly flow, slug flow, annular flow, and the transition state of emulsified foam had some obviously differences in the time domain and frequency domain signals. There was a big difference between the values of Shannon entropy of wavelet energy and wavelet packet decomposition. The state of two-phase flow in vertical pipe was verified, and four typical flow patterns were accurately identified with pattern recognition. The acoustic emission technology is likely to be a new method for detection of gas-liquid two-phase flow.

Key words: acoustic emission, multiphase flow, Shannon entropy, flow pattern identification, measurement

中图分类号:

TH814
O359

方立德, 张垚, 张万岭, 梁玉娇, 何青. 基于声发射技术的垂直管气液两相流动检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(4): 1243-1250.

FANG Lide, ZHANG Yao, ZHANG Wanling, LIANG Yujiao, HE Qing. Flow detection technology based on acoustic emission of gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipe[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(4): 1243-1250.

参考文献

[1] Bai B F, Guo L J, Chen X J.Fluctuating differential pressure for air-water two-phase flow[J].Chin. Soc. Elec. Eng. ,2002,22:22-26
[2] Bai B F, Guo L J, Chen X J. Pressure fluctuation for air-water two-phase flow[J]. J. Hydrodynamics, 2003, 18: 476-482
[3] César M S, Cláudio M P, Roberto S, Luis E B. Flow regime identification and volume fraction prediction in multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks[J]. Prog. Nuclear Energy, 2010,52:555-562
[4] Chen L J, Wang H, Wang K Q, Sui X. The confirmation of wavelet base and decomposition progression in wood texture analysis[J]. Forestry Machinery & Woodworking Equipment,2007,35: 25-27
[5] Donga H Y, Zhao X Y. Chaos generation and identification based on virtual instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators，2006，19: 419-421
[6] Dongb H Y, Zhao X Y. Study on generation and identification of chaos based on nonlinear differential equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2006, 19:244-247
[7] Roitberg E, Shemer L, Barnea D. Measurements of cross-sectional instantaneous phase distribution in gas-liquid pipe flow[J]. Exp. Thermal and Fluid Sci., 2007, 31: 867-875
[8] Grassberger P, Procaccia I.Characterization of strange attractors[J]. Phys. Rev. Let.,1983, 50: 346-349
[9] Letel H M, Schouten J C, Krishna R, van den Bleek C M. Characterization of regimes and regime transitions in bubble columns by chaos analysis of pressure signals[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 1997, 52: 4447-4459
[10] Jin Ningde(金宁德),Nie Xiangbin(聂向斌), Ren Yingyu(任英玉),Zhang Mingxue(张明学). Characterization of oil/water two-phase flow patterns in vertical upward pipes based on Kolmogorov entropy time series analysis[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China)(化工学报),2003, 54:936-941
[11] Langford H M, Beasley D E, Ochterbeck J M. Chaos analysis of pressure signals in upward air-water flows// Int. Conf. Multiphase Flow, ICMF 98[C]. Lyon, France, 1998
[12] Marco D, Vittorio F, Domenico S. A sensor system for oil fraction estimation in a two-phase oil-water flow[J]. Procedia Chem., 2009, 1:1247-1250
[13] Mena P C, Rocha F A, Teixeira J A, Sechet P, Cartellier A. Measurement of gas phase characteristics using a monofibre optical probe in a three-phase flow[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2008, 63:4100-4115
[14] Peter G, Itamar P. Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors[J]. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1983, 9: 189-208
[15] Shi G, Geng Y F. Time-frequency feature analysis on differential pressure signals of gas-liquid two-phase flow with high void fraction[J]. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2010,37: 52-55
[16] Sun Bin（孙斌），Bai Hongzhen（白宏震），Huang Yongmei(黄咏梅).Application of AR model based on EMD and ICA in flow regime identification for gas-liquid two-phase flow[J]. CIESC Journal(化工学报), 2010，61：2789-2795
[17] Sun B, Zhou Y L. Characterization of flow regimes of air-water two-phase flow in horizontal pipe using chaotic analysis[J]. J.Harbin Inst. Technol., 2006, 38:1963-1967
[18] Van T N, Dong J E, Chul-Hwa S. An application of the wavelet analysis technique for the objective discrimination of two-phase flow patterns[J]. Int. J.Multiphase Flow, 2010, 36:755-768
[19] Yang J, Guo L J. A nonlinear analysis on differential pressure drop signal for gas-liquid two-phase flow[J]. Chin. Soc. for Elec. Eng., 2002, 22:134-139
[20] Zhao X Y, Liu H J, Zhu C C.Identification of white noise and chaotic time series caused from Logist equation[J]. PR & AI, 2002, 15: 419-423

基于声发射技术的垂直管气液两相流动检测方法

Flow detection technology based on acoustic emission of gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipe

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[2]	仪显亨, 周骛, 蔡小舒, 蔡天意. 光纤后向动态光散射测量纳米颗粒的浓度适用范围研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3320-3328.
[3]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[4]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[5]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[6]	邵伟明, 韩文学, 宋伟, 杨勇, 陈灿, 赵东亚. 基于分布式贝叶斯隐马尔可夫回归的动态软测量建模方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2495-2502.
[7]	郑志航, 马郡男, 闫子涵, 卢春喜. 提升管射流影响区内压力脉动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2335-2350.
[8]	陈俊先, 姬忠礼, 赵瑜, 张倩, 周岩, 刘猛, 刘震. 基于微波技术的天然气管道内颗粒物在线检测方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1042-1053.
[9]	李新亚, 邢雷, 蒋明虎, 赵立新. 倒锥注气强化井下油水分离水力旋流器性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1134-1144.
[10]	颜少航, 赖天伟, 王彦武, 侯予, 陈双涛. 微间隙内R134a空化可视化实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1054-1061.
[11]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[12]	熊昊, 梁潇予, 张晨曦, 白浩隆, 范晓宇, 魏飞. 重质油直接制化工品：多级逆流下行催化裂解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 86-104.
[13]	王永倩, 王平, 程康, 毛晨林, 刘文锋, 尹智成, Ferrante Antonio. 氨气/甲烷贫预混旋转湍流火焰稳定性及NO生成[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4087-4094.
[14]	郭金玉, 王哲, 李元. 基于核熵独立成分分析的故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3647-3658.
[15]	范小强, 黄正梁, 孙婧元, 王靖岱, 王晓飞, 胡晓波, 韩国栋, 阳永荣, 吴文清. 气液法流化床乙烯云聚合工艺开发及产品高性能化[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2742-2747.