螺旋槽干气密封环端面摩擦试验及其性能分析

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160891

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (1): 208-214.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160891

螺旋槽干气密封环端面摩擦试验及其性能分析

丁雪兴¹, 王平西¹, 张伟政¹, 俞树荣¹, 魏龙²

1 兰州理工大学石油化工学院, 甘肃兰州 730050;
2 南京科技职业学院江苏省流体密封与测控工程技术研究开发中心, 江苏南京 210048

收稿日期:2016-06-29 修回日期:2016-08-29 出版日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2017-01-05
通讯作者: 王平西

Analysis of tribological test and performance under rings end faces of spiral groove dry gas seal

DING Xuexing¹, WANG Pingxi¹, ZHANG Weizheng¹, YU Shurong¹, WEI Long²

1 College of Petrochemical Industry, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China;
2 Fluid Sealing Measurement and Control Engineering Research and Development Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Polytechnic Institute, Nanjing 210048, Jiangsu, China

Received:2016-06-29 Revised:2016-08-29 Online:2017-01-05 Published:2017-01-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160891

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

干气密封环端面在启停阶段和由于制造装配误差等造成非正常运行时存在严重的端面接触摩擦，有必要对干气密封动静环进行摩擦学试验，从而分析并探讨其摩擦学特性。利用端面摩擦磨损试验机，选定合适的工况参数与相应的测试技术对螺旋槽干气密封环进行测试，研究不同工况下的摩擦学特性。结果表明：在特定工况下的试验中，螺旋槽干气密封端面存在明显的磨合现象；当工况从226 N、150 r·min^-1增大至1130 N、500 r·min^-1时，石墨环磨损量最大增加193.3%，摩擦系数最大降低22.3%，说明石墨环的自润滑性影响密封端面的摩擦性能；由于端面间螺旋槽的存在，石墨环内圈磨损大于外圈。试验结果可为今后端面摩擦学性能的优化提供依据。

关键词: 干气密封, 螺旋槽, 摩擦学试验, 摩擦学特性, 自润滑性

Abstract:

There is a serious face contact friction on dry gas seal ring face when it is in the start-up phase and abnormal operation, therefore, to analyze and discuss the tribology performance, the tribological test is necessary for dry gas seal dynamic and static ring.The dynamic and static spiral groove dry gas seal ring was tested to study the tribology performance under different operating mode by using the friction and wear tester with selected reasonable test conditions and the corresponding testing technology.The results of the test indicated that there was the obvious running-in phenomenon for spiral groove dry gas seal face in the special condition test.Moreover, the tribology performance of the face was changed with the test.Besides, when the rotational speed and load increased from 150 r·min^-1 and 226 N to 500 r·min^-1 and 1130 N, the wear mass loss of graphite ring was increased by 193.3% but the friction coefficient was decreased 22.3%.This showed that the self-lubrication of graphite ring affected the friction state of the seal face.Because the spiral groove end face contact was different from the smooth surface, the inner ring was more wear than outer ring of the graphite ring.The test results provided a basis for tribological performance optimization of the spiral groove dry gas seal face.

Key words: dry gas seal, spiral groove, tribology test, tribology performance, self-lubrication

中图分类号:

TH117.1

丁雪兴, 王平西, 张伟政, 俞树荣, 魏龙. 螺旋槽干气密封环端面摩擦试验及其性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1): 208-214.

DING Xuexing, WANG Pingxi, ZHANG Weizheng, YU Shurong, WEI Long. Analysis of tribological test and performance under rings end faces of spiral groove dry gas seal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(1): 208-214.

参考文献 22

[1]	WANG Y M. Theoretical analyses and field applications of gas-film lubricated mechanical face seals with herringbone spiral grooves[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2009, 52(6):800-806.
[2]	王和顺, 陈次昌, 黄泽沛, 等. 干气密封启动过程研究[J]. 润滑与密封, 2006, 173:14-19. WANG H S, CHEN C C, HUANG Z P, et al. Research on start-up process of dry gas seal[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2006, 173:14-19.
[3]	SAXENA M N. Dry gas seals and support systems:benefits and options[J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 2003, 82(11):37-41.
[4]	钟桂香, 罗潇, 郗祥远. 干气密封失效原因分析与有效性措施[J]. 油气储运, 2014, 33(3):335-339. ZHONG G X, LUO X, XI X Y. Cause analysis and effective measures for dry gas seal failure[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2014, 33(3):335-339.
[5]	CAO H, LIU Y, LIN C J. Failure analysis and transformation of hydrogen compressor dry gas seal[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 331:98-101.
[6]	ZARDYNEZHAD S. Achieve successful compressor startup by addressing dry-gas seal failure[J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 2015, 94:63-68.
[7]	BO R. Numerical modeling of dynamic sealing behaviors of spiral groove gas face seals[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2002, 124(1):186-195.
[8]	MILLER B A, GREEN I. Semi-analytical dynamic analysis of spiral-grooved mechanical gas face seals[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2003, 125(2):403-413.
[9]	宋鹏云, 胡晓鹏, 许恒杰. 实际气体对T槽干气密封动态特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(4):1344-1352. SONG P Y, HU X P, XU H J. Effect of real gas on dynamic performance of T-groove dry gas seal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(4):1344-1352.
[10]	蒋小文, 顾伯勤. 螺旋槽干气密封端面间气膜特性[J]. 化工学报, 2005, 56(8):1419-1425. JIANG X W, GU B Q. Characteristic of gas film between spiral groove dry gas seal faces[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2005, 56(8):1419-1425.
[11]	梁春阳, 徐子晴, 王平. 焦化富气压缩机干气密封磨损原因探讨[J]. 石化技术, 2015, 5:17, 30. LIANG C Y, XU Z Q, WANG P. Coking rich gas compressor dry gas seal wear reasons discussed in this paper[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2015, 5:17, 30.
[12]	王泽平, 毕晓明. 循环氢压缩机高压干气密封"硬对硬"摩擦副国产化技术分析[J]. 化工设备与管道, 2015, 52(3):57-61. WANG Z P, BI X M. Analysis of self-production technology used for "hard-to-hard" friction pair in high pressure dry gas seal in recycle hydrogen compressor[J]. Process Equipment & Piping, 2015, 52(3):57-61.
[13]	高志, 林尤滨, 黄伟峰, 等. 干气密封启动过程中的声发射信号特征[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 53(3):319-329. GAO Z, LIN Y B, HUANG W F, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of dry gas seals during startup[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2013, 53(3):319-329.
[14]	HUANG W F, LIN Y B, GAO Z, et al. An acoustic emission study on the starting and stopping processes of a dry gas seal for pumps[J]. Tribol. Lett., 2013, 49(2):379-384.
[15]	彭旭东, 刘坤, 白少先, 等. 典型螺旋槽端面干式气体密封动压开启性能[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):328-333. PENG X D, LIU K, BAI S X, et al. Dynamic opening characteristics of dry gas seals with typical types of spiral grooves[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):328-333.
[16]	令成君. 干气密封接触摩擦机理研究[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学, 2008. LIN C J. Mechanism study on contacting friction of dry gas seal[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum, 2008.
[17]	姚新华, 何耀辉. 干气密封的选用及失效分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2011, 36(4):116-124. YAO X H, HE Y H. The choice and failure analysis of dry gas seal[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2011, 36(4):116-124.
[18]	李双喜, 宋文博, 张秋翔, 等. 干式气体端面密封的开启特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1):766-772. LI S X, SONG W B, ZHANG Q X, et al. Opening characteristics of dry gas seal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1):766-772.
[19]	SALANT R F, CAO B. Unsteady analysis of a mechanical seal using Duhamel's method[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2005, 127(3):623-631.
[20]	LINGARD S, YU C W, YAU C F. Sliding wear studies using acoustic emission[J]. Wear, 1993, 162-164(A):597-604.
[21]	YIBO F, GU F S, ANDREW B. Modelling acoustic emissions generated by sliding friction[J]. Wear, 2010, 268(5-6):811-815.
[22]	WU W, SHAO T M, CHEN G M. Influence of groove surface texture on temperature rise under dry sliding friction[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2016, 59(2):183-190.

螺旋槽干气密封环端面摩擦试验及其性能分析

Analysis of tribological test and performance under rings end faces of spiral groove dry gas seal

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	丁俊华, 俞树荣, 王世鹏, 洪先志, 包鑫, 丁雪兴. 多重效应下超高速干气密封流场模拟及密封性能试验[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099.
[2]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[3]	刘献飞, 王恒, 王方, 李志强, 朱彩霞, 张浩飞. 单螺杆膨胀机螺旋槽道内液膜分布均匀特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 336-341.
[4]	严如奇, 丁雪兴, 徐洁, 洪先志, 包鑫. 基于湍流模型的S-CO₂干气密封流场与稳态性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4292-4303.
[5]	陆俊杰, 张炜, 马浩. 基于F-K滑移流模型的柱面微槽气浮密封浮升能力分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4267-4278.
[6]	江鹏, 江锦波, 彭旭东, 孟祥铠, 马艺. 传热模型对近临界工况CO₂干气密封温压分布和稳态性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4239-4254.
[7]	孙雪剑, 宋鹏云, 毛文元, 邓强国, 许恒杰, 陈维. 考虑密封环材料属性和表面形貌干气密封启停阶段的动态接触特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4279-4291.
[8]	江锦波, 滕黎明, 孟祥铠, 李纪云, 彭旭东. 基于多变量摄动的超临界CO₂干气密封动态特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2190-2202.
[9]	商浩, 陈源, 李孝禄, 王冰清, 李运堂, 彭旭东. 膜厚扰动下的非线性效应对干气密封性能影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2213-2222.
[10]	于辰,江锦波,赵文静,李纪云,彭旭东,王玉明. 基于微段组合的干气密封端面型槽结构模型及其参数影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(10): 5294-5309.
[11]	严如奇, 洪先志, 包鑫, 徐洁, 丁雪兴. 超临界二氧化碳干气密封相态分布规律与密封性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3681-3690.
[12]	范瑜, 宋鹏云, 许恒杰. 水蒸气润滑干气密封启动过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3671-3680.
[13]	陈维, 宋鹏云, 许恒杰, 孙雪剑. 含杂质二氧化碳实际气体干气密封性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2215-2229.
[14]	车健, 江锦波, 李纪云, 彭旭东, 马艺, 王玉明. 节流孔出气模式对静压干气密封稳态性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1734-1743.
[15]	沈伟, 彭旭东, 江锦波, 李纪云. 高速超临界二氧化碳干气密封实际效应影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2645-2659.