TE过程闪蒸罐双时间尺度建模与动态特性分析

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20140925

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1): 186-196.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20140925

TE过程闪蒸罐双时间尺度建模与动态特性分析

罗雄麟, 赵晗, 许锋

中国石油大学自动化系, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2014-06-19 修回日期:2014-10-14 出版日期:2015-01-05 发布日期:2015-01-05
通讯作者: 罗雄麟
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CB720500)。

Two-time scale modeling and dynamic characteristics analysis of flash tank in TE process

LUO Xionglin, ZHAO Han, XU Feng

Department of Automation, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2014-06-19 Revised:2014-10-14 Online:2015-01-05 Published:2015-01-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB720500).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

闪蒸罐是工业常用的化工单元设备, 在对其进行动态机理建模时, 气相物质的动态特性方程被拟稳态处理转化为稳态代数方程, 而液相仍为微分方程。由此一来, 与气相相关的压力的真实动态信息无法得到, 而是完全依赖于液相相态的变化。基于闪蒸罐的化工动态学机理和“拟稳态”的系统特点, 通过增加快变量的动态物料守恒关系式, 还原系统的气相快暂态过程, 建立了TE过程闪蒸罐的双时间尺度全阶模型。利用奇异摄动方法将全阶模型精确求解后, 与拟稳态模型进行了仿真对比;最后, 设计了全阶模型的压力控制回路, 得到很好的控制效果, 验证了建模方法的合理性和工业应用价值。

关键词: 动态建模, 动态仿真, 过程控制, 拟稳态, 双尺度建模, 奇异摄动, 控制性能

Abstract:

In establishing the mechanistic dynamic model of flash tank, a commonly used industrial chemical unit, the liquid-phase characteristic equation is differential, while the gas-phase characteristic equation is algebraic, treated as "quasi-steady-state". Therefore, the realistic dynamic response of pressure can not be obtained, but is completely attached to the dynamic response of the liquid-phase. In this paper, the algebraic equation of pressure was replaced with dynamic differential equation and the model to two-time scale was established. The singular perturbation method was used to precisely calculate the full-order model, and compared with the quasi-steady-state model. The control system for the established two-time scale model was designed. Compared with the performance of quasi-steady-state model, the full-order model provided better control performance, which also illustrated the rationality of modeling and its practical significance.

Key words: dynamic modeling, dynamic simulation, process control, quasi-steady-state, two-time scale modeling, singular perturbation, control performance

中图分类号:

罗雄麟, 赵晗, 许锋. TE过程闪蒸罐双时间尺度建模与动态特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(1): 186-196.

LUO Xionglin, ZHAO Han, XU Feng. Two-time scale modeling and dynamic characteristics analysis of flash tank in TE process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(1): 186-196.

参考文献 24

[1]	Liu Huaping (刘华平), Sun Fuchun (孙富春), He Kezhong (何克忠), Sun Zengqi (孙增圻). Survey of singularly perturbed control system: theory and applications [J]. Journal of Control Theory and Applications (控制理论与应用), 2003, 20 (1): 1-7
[2]	Dai Shizheng (戴诗正). Singular perturbed theory [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics (系统工程与电子技术), 1988, 2: 1-11
[3]	Huang Yanlong (黄艳龙). Frequency dividing control for singularly perturbed systems [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2010
[4]	Liu Yongqiang (刘永强), Xu Peng (徐鹏). Model reduction and stability consistency of a class of multi-time scale electromechenical coupling system [J]. Journal of Control Theory and Applications (控制理论与应用), 2008, 25 (1): 139-140
[5]	Ma Fan (马凡), Ma Weiming (马伟明), Fu Lijun (付立军), Kang Jun (康军), Fan Xuexin (范学鑫), Ye Zhihao (叶志浩), Wang Gang (王刚). A model order reduction method for nonlinear multi-time scale systems [J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering (中国电机工程学报), 2013, 33 (16): 162-170
[6]	Kokotovic P V. A Riccati equation for block-diagonalization of ill-conditioned systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1975, 20 (6): 812-814
[7]	Christofides P D. Output feedback control of nonlinear two-time-scale processes [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37 (5): 1893-1909
[8]	Li Xianyun (李先允). The research based on multi-time scale model of the large wind farms DC parallel operation characteristics [D]. Jiangsu: Southeast University, 2009
[9]	Luo Xionglin (罗雄麟), Zhao Juezheng (赵决正), Wang Juan (王娟). Dual time scales based dynamic simulation of surge control in FCCU rich gas compressor [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2012, 63 (S2): 118-125
[10]	Chen Hongfang (陈洪钫), Liu Jiaqi (刘家祺). Chemical Seperation Process (化工分离过程)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004: 38-48
[11]	Downs J J, Vogel E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem [J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 1993, 17 (3): 245-255
[12]	Ricker N L, Lee J H. Nonlinear modeling and state estimation for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process [J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 1995, 19 (9): 983-1005
[13]	Luyben W L. Simple regulatory control of the Eastman process [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1996, 35 (10): 3280-3298
[14]	Sriniwas G R, Arkun Y. Control of the Tennessee Eastman process using input-output models [J]. Journal of Process Control, 1997, 7 (5): 387-400
[15]	McAvoy T J, Ye N, Gang C. An improved base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem//Proceedings of the American Control Conference[C]. Chicago: IEEE, 1995: 240-244
[16]	Ricker N L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process [J]. Journal of Process Control, 1996, 6 (4): 205-221
[17]	Molina G D, Zumoffen D A R, Basualdo M S. Plant-wide control strategy applied to the Tennessee Eastman process at two operating points [J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2011, 35 (10): 2081-2097
[18]	Skogestad S. Control structure design for complete chemical plants [J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2004, 28 (1): 219-234
[19]	Jockenhövel T, Biegler L T, Wächter A. Dynamic optimization of the Tennessee Eastman process using the OptControlCentre [J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2003, 27 (11): 1513-1531
[20]	Liu Yubo (刘雨波), Luo Xionglin (罗雄麟), Xu Feng (许锋). Global coordination and stability analysis for distributed model predictive control system [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64 (4): 1318-1331
[21]	Wu Yuanyuan (吴媛媛). Process dynamic simulation based on GPROMS [D]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang University, 2006
[22]	Yang Youqi (杨友麒), Xiang Shuguang (项曙光). Chemical Process Simulation and Optimization (化工过程模拟与优化)[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006: 147-149
[23]	Chang K W. Singular perturbation of a general boundary value problem [J]. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 1972, 3 (3): 520-526
[24]	ChenYuliu (陈禹六). Large System Theory and Application (大系统理论及其应用) [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988: 46-52

TE过程闪蒸罐双时间尺度建模与动态特性分析

Two-time scale modeling and dynamic characteristics analysis of flash tank in TE process

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[3]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[4]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[5]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[6]	邵伟明, 韩文学, 宋伟, 杨勇, 陈灿, 赵东亚. 基于分布式贝叶斯隐马尔可夫回归的动态软测量建模方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2495-2502.
[7]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[8]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[9]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[10]	周乐, 沈程凯, 吴超, 侯北平, 宋执环. 深度融合特征提取网络及其在化工过程软测量中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3156-3165.
[11]	王琨, 侍洪波, 谭帅, 宋冰, 陶阳. 局部时差约束邻域保持嵌入算法在故障检测中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3109-3119.
[12]	赵涛岩, 曹江涛, 李平, 冯琳, 商瑀. 区间二型模糊免疫PID在环己烷无催化氧化温度控制系统中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3166-3173.
[13]	戚子豪, 钟文琪, 陈曦, 周冠文, 赵小亮, 辛美静, 陈翼, 朱永长. 基于混合建模的水泥生料分解过程动态特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2039-2051.
[14]	王建松, 许锋, 罗雄麟. 化工过程多回路PID控制系统模式切换参数自整定[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1647-1657.
[15]	高欢, 丁国良, 周发贤, 庄大伟. R410A制冷剂在润滑油中的动态析出特性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1054-1062.