SO2活化改性石油焦吸附剂的汞吸附特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170621

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用SO₂气体对石化工业副产物石油焦进行活化改性以制成富硫高活性脱汞吸附剂（SAPC）。在固定床实验装置上进行SAPC吸附脱除汞的实验研究，考察吸附温度、入口Hg⁰浓度、烟气成分以及热再生等因素对脱汞特性的影响规律，同时结合比表面积及孔隙度分析、元素分析和X射线光电子能谱（XPS）等表征手段深入分析SAPC的汞吸附机理。结果表明，SO₂活化改性石油焦的物理和化学特性得到极大改善，羰基、酯基以及非氧化态硫是Hg⁰的主要活性吸附位。吸附温度的升高会抑制对Hg⁰的吸附脱除，烟气中较高的Hg⁰浓度会降低汞脱除效率，但对其汞吸附速率有促进作用。SO₂对SAPC的脱汞性能影响较小，O₂易将Hg⁰氧化成为更容易与含氧、含硫官能团结合的氧化态汞，从而促进对Hg⁰的脱除。热再生时吸附态汞化合物受热分解的过程伴随着吸附剂表面化学活性位的损失，导致再生后汞吸附性能大幅下降。

关键词: 石油焦, 汞吸附, 二氧化硫, 硫形态

Abstract:

Petroleum coke as a kind of by-product in petrochemical industry was chosen to prepare the mercury removal adsorbent with high sulfur and activity by SO₂ activation. The effects of adsorption temperature, inlet Hg⁰ concentration, flue gas composition and thermal regeneration on mercury removal characteristic were investigated in a fixed bed reactor system. Meanwhile, the removal mercury mechanism was put forward by applying characterization methods, including surface area and porosity analyzer, elemental analyzer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The experimental results showed that the physical and chemical properties of SAPC were significantly improved. And carbonyl, ester and non-oxidized sulfur were the main active sites of Hg⁰ capture. Furthermore, the mercury removal capacity decreased with increasing adsorption temperature. The mercury adsorption rate was faster, while the initial mercury removal efficiency became lower at elevated initial Hg⁰ concentration. SO₂ had unconspicuous effect on mercury removal. Hg⁰ on or close to surfaces was oxidized by the adsorbed oxygen, and mercuric ions were more readily bound to sulfur via the Hg-S bond, while some will bind to oxygen. The absorption capacity of regenerated petroleum coke was weakened because of the loss of active sites in the regeneration process.

Key words: petroleum coke, mercury adsorption, sulfur dioxide, sulfur forms

中图分类号:

TQ534.9

王晨平, 段钰锋, 佘敏, 朱纯, 杨志忠. SO₂活化改性石油焦吸附剂的汞吸附特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4764-4773.

WANG Chenping, DUAN Yufeng, SHE Min, ZHU Chun, YANG Zhizhong. Mercury adsorption characteristics of petroleum coke activated by SO₂[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4764-4773.

参考文献 42

[1]	ZHOU Q, DUAN Y F, ZHU C, et al. In-flight mercury removal and cobenefit of SO2 and NO reduction by NH4Br impregnated activated carbon injection in an entrained flow reactor[J]. Energy & Fuel, 2015, 29:8118-8125.
[2]	LEE S H, RHIM Y J, CHO S P, et al. Carbon-based novel sorbent for removing gas-phase mercury[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(2):219-226.
[3]	缪超, 宋爱萍. 我国高硫石油焦市场现状及预测[J]. 石油规划设计, 2012, 23(1):16-22. LIAO C, SONG A P. Situation and forecast of high sulfur petroleum coke market in China[J]. Petroleum Planning & Engineering, 2012, 23(1):16-22.
[4]	Zhuang Y, Thompson J S, Zygarlicke C J, et al. Impact of calcium chloride addition on mercury transformations and control in coal flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(15):2351-2359.
[5]	赵可, 张华伟, 陈江艳, 等. 改性石油焦脱除单质汞的实验研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(4):69-73. ZHAO K, ZHANG H W, CHEN J Y, et al. Removal of elemental mercury by the modified petroleum coke[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2016, 35(4):69-73.
[6]	洪亚光, 段钰锋, 朱纯, 等. 载溴高硫石油焦活性炭脱汞实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(11):1762-1768. HONG Y g, DUAN Y f, ZHU C, et al. Experimental study on mercury removal of high-sulfur petroleum coke activated carbon impregnated with bromine[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(11):1762-1768.
[7]	卓海波. 石油焦制备活性炭工艺条件的优化及孔结构表征[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学, 2007. ZHUO H B. Optimizing process for preparation of activated carbon from petroleum coke and characterization of its porosity[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum, 2007.
[8]	Gaur v, Asthana r, Verma n. Removal of SO2 by activated carbon fibers in the presence of O2 and H2O[J]. Carbon, 2006, 44:46-60.
[9]	纪罗军, 金苏闵. 我国有色金属及烟气制酸环保技术进展与展望[J]. 硫酸工业, 2016, (4):1-8. JI L J, JIN S M. Environmental protection technical progress and outlook of China's nonferrous metallurgy and metallurgical acid production[J]. Sulphuric Acid Industry, 2016, (4):1-8.
[10]	Stacy W O, Vastola F J, Walker Jr P L. Interaction of sulfur dioxide with active carbon[J]. Carbon, 1968, 6(6):917-923.
[11]	Asasian N, Kaghazchi T, Faramarzi A, et al. Enhanced mercury adsorption capacity by sulfurization of activated carbon with SO2 in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014, (45):1588-1596.
[12]	Yang C. Preparation, characterization and application of novel adsorbent from petroleum coke activated by sulfur dioxide[D]. Toronto:University of Toronto, 2002.
[13]	Morris E A, Jia C Q. Effects of O2 on characteristics of sulfur added to petroleum coke through reaction with SO2[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49:12709-12717.
[14]	Morris E A, Choi R, Jia C Q. Sulfur dioxide as an activating agent for sulfur-impregnated activated carbon produced from dense petroleum coke[J]. Journal of Sulfur Chemistry, 2013, 34(4):358-369.
[15]	Wei Y Y, Yu D Q, Tong S T, et al. Effects of H2SO4 and O2 on Hg0 uptake capacity and reversibility of sulfur-impregnated activated carbon under dynamic conditions[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 49:1706-1712.
[16]	杜鸿飞, 段钰锋, 佘敏. 高硫石油焦热解过程及硫形态的变化特性[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(8):2420-2426. DU H F, DUAN Y F, SHE M. Research on pyrolysis process of high sulfur petroleum coke and the changes of sulfur species[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(8):2420-2426.
[17]	Humeres E, Moreira R F P M, Peruch M G B. Reduction of SO2 on different carbons[J]. Carbon, 2002, 40(5):751-760.
[18]	Humeres E, Moreira R F P M. Kinetics and mechanisms in flow systems:reduction of SO2 on carbons[J]. Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry, 2012, 25(11):1012-1026.
[19]	Humeres E, Debacher N A, Smaniotto A, et al. Selective insertion of sulfurdioxide reduction intermediates on grapheme oxide[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(15):4301-4309.
[20]	Smaniotto A, Humeres E, Debacher N A, et al. Interconversion and selective reactivity of sulfur dioxide reduction intermediates inserted on graphene oxide[C]//15th European Symposium on Organic Reactivity (ESOR). Kiel, Germany, 2015.
[21]	Humeres E, Peruch M D B, Moreira R F P M, et al. Reduction of sulfur dioxide on carbons catalyzed by salts[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2005, 6(1/2):130-142.
[22]	Humeres E, Castro K M, Moreira R F P M, et al. Reactivity of the thermally stable intermediates of the reduction of SO2 on carbons and mechanisms of insertion of organic moieties in the carbon matrix[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2008, 112(2):581-589.
[23]	Aronniemi M, Sainio J, Lahtinen J. Chemical state quantification of iron and chromium oxides using XPS the effect of the background subtraction method[J]. Surface Science, 2005, 578(1/2/3):108-123.
[24]	Pietrzakr, Wachowska H. The influence of oxidation with HNO3 on the surface composition of high sulphur coals XPS study[J]. Fuel Process. Technol., 2006, 87(11):1021-1029.
[25]	Puziy A M, Poddubnaya O I, Socha R P, et al. XPS and NMR studies of phosphoric acid activated carbons[J]. Carbon, 2008, 46(15):2113-2123.
[26]	何川. 高硫石油焦脱硫技术研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2013. HE C. Study on desulfurization technology of high-sulfur petroleum coke[D]. Changsha:Central South University, 2013.
[27]	Zhang H, Zhao J T, Fang Y T, et al. Catalytic oxidation and stabilized adsorption of elemental mercury from coal-derived fuel gas[J]. Energy and Fuel, 2012, 26:1629-1637.
[28]	Yao Y X, Velpari V, Economy J. Design of sulfur treated activated carbon fibers for gas phase elemental mercury removal[J]. Fuel, 2014, 116:560-565.
[29]	Zhang B, Xu P, Qiu Y, et al. Increasing oxygen functional groups of activated carbon with non-thermal plasma to enhance mercury removal efficiency for flue gases[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 263:1-8.
[30]	Tong Li, XU W Q, QI H, et al. Enhanced effect of O/N groups on the Hg0 removal efficiency over the HNO3-modified activated carbon[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(3):512-518.
[31]	Liu J, Cheney M A, Wu F, et al. Effects of chemical functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption on carbonaceous surfaces[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 186(1):108-133.
[32]	Liu W, Vidic R D. Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 34:154-159.
[33]	SUN P, ZHANG B, ZENG X B, et al. Deep study on effects of activated carbon's oxygen functional groups for elemental mercury adsorption using temperature programmed desorption method[J]. Fuel, 2017, 200:100-106.
[34]	沈彩琴. 活性炭纤维表面吸附汞机理的密度泛函理论研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015. SHEN C Q. Density functional theory study on the mechanism of mercury adsorption by activated carbon fiber[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2015.
[35]	SHAO H Z, LIU X W, ZHOU Z J, et al. Elemental mercury removal using a novel KI modified bentonite supported by starch sorbent[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 29:306-316.
[36]	Li Y H, Lee C W, Gullett B K. Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption[J]. Fuel, 2008, 82:451-457.
[37]	Karatepe N, Orba I, Yavuz R, et al. Sulfur dioxide adsorption by activated carbon having different textural and chemical properties[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87:3207-3215.
[38]	Rumayor M, Fernandez-Miranda N, Lopez-Anton M A, et al. Application of mercury temperature programmed desorption (HgTPD) to ascertain mercury/char interactions[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 132:9-14.
[39]	Stavropoulous G G, Samaras P, Sakellaropoulos G P. Effect of activated carbons modification on porosity, surface structure and phenol adsorption[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 151(2/3):414-421.
[40]	Hall B, Schager P, Lindqvist O. Chemical reactions of mercury in combustion flue gases[J]. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 1991, 56(1):3-14.
[41]	吕维阳, 刘盛余, 能子礼超, 等. 载硫活性炭脱除天然气中单质汞的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(2):382-389. LÜ W Y, LIU S Y, NENGZI L C, et al. Remove elemental mercury by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon in natural gas[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(2):382-389.
[42]	Yang J P, Zhao Y C, Zhang J Y, et al. Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas by recyclable CuCl2 modified magnetospheres catalyst from fly ash (3):Regeneration performance in realistic flue gas atmosphere[J]. Fuel, 2016, 173:1-7.

SO₂活化改性石油焦吸附剂的汞吸附特性

Mercury adsorption characteristics of petroleum coke activated by SO₂

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	米泽豪, 花儿. 基于DFT和COSMO-RS理论研究多元胺型离子液体吸收SO₂气体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3681-3696.
[2]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[3]	陈宇豪, 陈晓平, 马吉亮, 梁财. 市政污泥回转窑焚烧气态污染物排放特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2170-2178.
[4]	周烨, 肖慧霞, 王亦飞, 于广锁. 基于配煤和表面修饰改善褐煤成浆性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(4): 2233-2240.
[5]	杨小青,廖泉飞,易芸,杨春亮,赵天翔,胡兴邦,刘飞. 三乙二醇二甲醚吸收低浓度SO₂性能及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5052-5058.
[6]	张雅婷,熊文杰,赵天翔,姚晨飞,丁宇宬,张效敏,吴有庭,胡兴邦. 咪唑类离子液体混合物用于二氧化硫高效吸收[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5035-5042.
[7]	邓晓霞, 龚磊, 刘小棒, 邓东顺. 咪唑类三元低共熔溶剂捕集低压SO₂的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(1): 368-375.
[8]	蔡润夏, 黄逸群, 程璐, 李东方, 杨海瑞, 吕俊复, 张缦. 石灰石煅烧与硫化条件下磨耗特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3086-3093.
[9]	陈潇雪, 宋敏, 孟凡跃, 卫月星. Fe _x MnCe₁-AC低温SCR催化剂SO₂中毒机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3000-3010.
[10]	王璐璐, 宋涛, 张将, 段媛媛, 沈来宏. 10MW_th高硫石油焦化学链气化制合成气耦合硫磺回收新系统模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2279-2288.
[11]	安东海, 韩晓林, 程星星, 周滨选, 郑瑛, 董勇. 不同烟气组分对粉状活性焦吸附汞的影响机理[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1575-1582.
[12]	崔健, 段伦博, 赵长遂. 混燃石油焦循环流化床锅炉硫污染物排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(5): 2158-2165.
[13]	陆遥, 刁永发, 陈晨, 李晓诠, 陈珊珊. 溴化石油焦氧化烟气中Hg⁰的机理[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(10): 4394-4401.
[14]	沈文锋, 向柏祥, 张海, 张扬, 吕俊复. 煤粉炉SNCR对SO₃生成影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(8): 3225-3231.
[15]	柳明, 沈中杰, 韩冬, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 刘海峰. 一种石油焦与CO₂高温气化原位反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1622-1628.