页岩灰和FCC催化剂调控油页岩热解产物二次反应特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170528

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (10): 3770-3778.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170528

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

页岩灰和FCC催化剂调控油页岩热解产物二次反应特性

黄雷, 张玉明, 张亮, 张晓晨, 孙国刚

中国石油大学(北京)重质油国家重点实验室, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2017-05-02 修回日期:2017-08-03 出版日期:2017-10-05 发布日期:2017-10-05
通讯作者: 张玉明,ymzhcup@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21406264）；国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2014CB744304）；中国石油大学（北京）科研基金项目（2462013YJRC021，C201606）。

Effects of shale ash and FCC catalyst on adjusting secondary reaction of volatiles in oil shale pyrolysis

HUANG Lei, ZHANG Yuming, ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Xiaochen, SUN Guogang

State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2017-05-02 Revised:2017-08-03 Online:2017-10-05 Published:2017-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21406264), the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB744304) and the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum (2462013YJRC021, C201606).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用两段反应器对油页岩热解初级挥发分进行二次催化反应特性研究，考察了第2段反应器内不同的催化载体、反应气氛与停留时间对油气收率及品质的影响。结果表明，在考察的停留时间范围内页岩灰具有相对适中的催化活性来调控热解挥发分产物的二次反应，水蒸气气氛能够进一步提高热解油收率约5%，并能够在一定程度上抑制裂解气体中C₂~C₃组分的生成。页岩灰作为催化载体能够转化热解油中VGO（馏程>350℃）等重质组分，随停留时间增加油品馏程向轻组分转移。油品组分GC-MS结果表明，较短停留时间内（<3 s），水蒸气添加能够有效抑制热解油中脂肪烃类的过度裂解，与氮气相比提高汽柴油馏分含量20%以上。过长的停留时间（3~5 s）会造成VGO等馏分缩聚生成焦炭，从而大幅降低热解油收率。

关键词: 油页岩, 热解, 催化作用, 二次转化, 停留时间

Abstract:

Secondary catalytic reactions of primary volatiles from oil shale pyrolysis were characterized by using a two-stage reactor to study the effects of different catalytic materials,reaction atmospheres and residence time on oil/gas yield and quality.The results showed that comparison with FCC catalyst as bed materials in the 2nd stage,the shale ash possessed relatively moderate activity for adjusting the secondary reaction of pyrolysis volatiles in the applied range of residence time.Using steam as the reaction atmosphere could further enhance the liquid yield by 5% and suppress the C₂-C₃ hydrocarbons in the cracked gas.The heavy oil fractions,such as vacuum gas oil (VGO,>350℃),could be converted into light oil fractions by the catalytic effects of shale ash,and correspondingly the boiling range of pyrolysis oil tended to be lighter with higher residence time.Oil components analyzed with GC-MS demonstrated that steam could effectively inhibit the over-cracking of aliphatic hydrocarbons at shorter residence time (<3 s),and thus increase the gasoline and diesel fractions by over 20% compared with the N₂ atmosphere.However,at higher residence time (3-5 s) the VGO fractions were prone to be condensed as coke,and as a result profoundly decreased the pyrolysis oil yield.

Key words: oil shale, pyrolysis, catalytic effect, secondary conversion, residence time

中图分类号:

TE662

黄雷, 张玉明, 张亮, 张晓晨, 孙国刚. 页岩灰和FCC催化剂调控油页岩热解产物二次反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3770-3778.

HUANG Lei, ZHANG Yuming, ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Xiaochen, SUN Guogang. Effects of shale ash and FCC catalyst on adjusting secondary reaction of volatiles in oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3770-3778.

参考文献 34

[1]	AKASH B A, JABER J O. Characterization of shale oil as compared to crude oil and some refined petroleum products[J]. Energy Sources, 2003, 25(12):1171-1182.
[2]	GWYN J E. Oil from shale as a viable replacement of depleted crude reserves:processes and challenges[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 70(1):27-40.
[3]	刘招君, 董清水, 叶松青, 等. 中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6):869-876. LIU Z J, DONG Q S, DONG S Q, et al. The situation of oil shale resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):869-876.
[4]	NA J G, IM C H, CHUNG S H, et al. Effect of oil shale retorting temperature on shale oil yield and properties[J]. Fuel, 2012, 95(1):131-135.
[5]	YUE C T, LIU Y, MA Y, et al. Influence of retorting conditions on the pyrolysis of Yaojie oil shale[J]. Oil Shale, 2014, 31(1):66-78.
[6]	WILLIAMS P T, CHISHTI H M. Influence of residence time and catalyst regeneration on the pyrolysis-zeolite catalysis of oil shale[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2001, 60(2):187-203.
[7]	LAI D G, CHEN Z H, LIN L X, et al. Secondary cracking and upgrading of shale oil from pyrolyzing oil shale over shale ash[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(4):2219-2226.
[8]	ZHANG Y, HAN Z N, WU H, et al. Interactive matching between the temperature profile and secondary reactions of oil Shale pyrolysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(4):2865-2873.
[9]	刘振宇. 煤化学的前沿与挑战:结构与反应[J]. 中国科学:化学, 2014, 44(9):1431-1438. LIU Z Y. The frontier and challenge of coal chemistry:structure and reaction[J]. Scientia Sinica Chimica, 2014, 44(9):1431-1438.
[10]	DIECKMANN V, SCHENK H J, HORSFIELD B. Assessing the overlap of primary and secondary reactions by closed-versus open-system pyrolysis of marine kerogens[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2000, 56(1):33-46.
[11]	YAN J W, JIANG X M, HAN X X. Study on the characteristics of the oil shale and shale char mixture pyrolysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(12):5792-5797.
[12]	DUNG N V, WALL G C, KASTL G. Continuous fluidized bed retorting of condor and Stuart oil shales in a 150 mm diameter reactor[J]. Fuel, 1987, 66(3):372-376.
[13]	刘晓生. 页岩灰在油页岩固体热载体流态化干馏中催化作用试验分析[J]. 广东化工, 2013, 40(4):38-39. LIU X S. Experiment analysis of the catalysis function of shale ash in fluidized retorting of oil shale solid heat carrier[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2013, 40(4):38-39.
[14]	CARTER S D, CITIROGLU M, GALLACHER J, et al. Secondary coking and cracking of shale oil vapor from pyrolysis or hydropyrolysis of a Kentucky Cleveland oil shale in a two-stage reactor[J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(9):1455-1458.
[15]	FAINBERG V, GARBAR A, HETSRONI G. Secondary pyrolysis of the products of the thermal destruction of high-sulfur oil shale[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1997, 11(4):915-919.
[16]	WILLIAMS P T, CHISHTI H M. Two-stage pyrolysis of oil shale using a zeolite catalyst[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2000, 55(2):217-234.
[17]	MINKOVA V, RAZVIGOROVA M, BJORNBOM E, et al. Effect of water vapour and biomass nature on the yield and quality of the pyrolysis products from biomass[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 70(1):53-61.
[18]	HOSOKAI S, KUMABE K, OHSHITA M, et al. Mechanism of decomposition of aromatics over charcoal and necessary condition for maintaining its activity[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(13/14):2914-2922.
[19]	HOSOKAI S, HAYASHI J, SHIMADA T, et al. Spontaneous generation of tar decomposition promoter in a biomass steam reformer[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(9):1093-1102.
[20]	GERGOVA K, PETROV N, ESER S. Adsorption properties and microstructure of activated carbons produced from agricultural by-products by steam pyrolysis[J]. Carbon, 1994, 32(4):693-702.
[21]	XIONG R, DONG L, YU J, et al. Fundamentals of coal topping gasification:characterization of pyrolysis topping in a fluidized bed reactor[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(8):810-817.
[22]	JIA Y B, HUANG J J, WANG Y. Effects of calcium oxide on the cracking of coal tar in the freeboard of a fluidized bed[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18(6):1625-1632.
[23]	CALKINS W H, TYLER R J. Coal flash pyrolysis(Ⅱ):Polymethylene compounds in low temperature flash pyrolysis tars[J]. Fuel, 1984, 63(8):1119-1124.
[24]	XU W C, TOMITA A. Effect of temperature on the flash pyrolysis of various coals[J]. Fuel, 1987, 66(5):632-636.
[25]	ALAYA M N, GIRFIS B S, MOURAD W E. Activated carbon from some agricultural wastes under action of one-step steam pyrolysis[J]. Journal of Porous Materials, 2000, 7(4):509-517.
[26]	NAIK D, KARTHIK V, KUMAR V. Kinetic modeling for catalytic cracking of pyrolysis oils with VGO in a FCC unit[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 170:790-798.
[27]	RUBEL A M, RIMMER S M, KEOGH R, et al. Effect of process solids on secondary reactions during oil shale retorting[J]. Fuel, 1991, 70(11):1352-1356.
[28]	柏静儒, 林卫生, 潘朔, 等. 油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110. BAI J R, LIN W S, PAN S, et al. Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110.
[29]	王世宇. 低温煤焦油化学破乳脱水机理的基础研究[D]. 北京:煤炭科学研究总院, 2010. WANG S Y. Preliminary study on the mechanism of water-oil separation by chemical demulsification of low-temperature coal tar[D]. Beijing:China Coal Research Institute, 2010.
[30]	齐伟, 王世宇. 中低温煤焦油模拟蒸馏曲线解析[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2014, 20(4):65-67. QI W, WANG S Y. Simulated distillation curve of medium and low temperature coal tar[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2014, 20(4):65-67.
[31]	王擎, 许祥成, 迟铭书, 等. 干酪根组成结构及其热解生油特性的红外光谱研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2015, 43(10):1158-1166. WANG Q, XU X C, CHI M S, et al. FT-IR study on composition of oil shale kerogen and its pyrolysis oil generation characteristics[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry & Technology, 2015, 43(10):1158-1166.
[32]	FOOKES C J R, DUFFY G J, UDAJA P, et al. Mechanisms of thermal alteration of shale oils[J]. Fuel, 1990, 69(9):1142-1144.
[33]	CHEN B, HAN X X, LI Q Y, et al. Study of the thermal conversions of organic carbon of Huadian oil shale during pyrolysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 127:284-292.
[34]	秦匡宗, 吴肖令. 抚顺油页岩热解成烃机理——固体13C核磁波谱技术的应用[J]. 石油学报, 1990, 6(1):36-44. QIN K Z, WU X L. Hydrocarbon formation mechanism of Fushun oil shale during pyrolysis-a study with solid state 13C NMR spectroscopic techniques[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1990, 6(1):36-44.

页岩灰和FCC催化剂调控油页岩热解产物二次反应特性

Effects of shale ash and FCC catalyst on adjusting secondary reaction of volatiles in oil shale pyrolysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[2]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[3]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.
[4]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[5]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[6]	张娜, 潘鹤林, 牛波, 张亚运, 龙东辉. 酚醛树脂热裂解反应机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 843-860.
[7]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.
[8]	郝泽光, 张乾, 高增林, 张宏文, 彭泽宇, 杨凯, 梁丽彤, 黄伟. 生物质与催化裂化油浆共热解协同作用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4070-4078.
[9]	邵健, 冯军宗, 柳凤琦, 姜勇刚, 李良军, 冯坚. 酚醛树脂基炭微球结构调控与功能化制备研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3787-3801.
[10]	肖皓宇, 杨海平, 张雄, 陈应泉, 王贤华, 陈汉平. 塑料催化热解制备高附加值产品的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3461-3471.
[11]	唐恺鸿, 何晓峰, 徐桂秋, 于洋, 刘啸凤, 葛铁军, 张爱玲. 酚醛泡沫的燃烧行为及阻燃研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3483-3500.
[12]	陈玉弓, 陈昊, 黄耀松. 基于分子反应动力学模拟的六甲基二硅氧烷热解机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2844-2857.
[13]	陈永安, 周安宁, 李云龙, 石智伟, 贺新福, 焦卫红. 磁性MgFe₂O₄及其核壳催化剂制备与煤热解性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3026-3037.
[14]	王姝焱, 张瑞阳, 刘润, 刘凯, 周莹. Mn（BO₂）₂/BNO界面结构调控增强催化臭氧分解性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3193-3201.
[15]	郑默, 李晓霞. ReaxFF MD模拟揭示的煤热解挥发分自由基反应的竞争与协调[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2732-2741.