微界面强化重油浆态床低压加氢的传质基础

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200820

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

每年将数亿吨重油加工成轻质馏分或化工原料关系到我国国家能源安全和能源资源的高效利用。然而传统的重油浆态床加氢反应器（TSR）一般都是在高压下运行，这会产生一系列负面影响。本文发展了一种新的加氢方法——微界面强化浆态床加氢反应器（MISR），构建了MISR中气泡Sauter平均直径d₃₂和气-液相界面积a以及能量耗散率ε数学模型，并建立了冷模模拟实验体系d₃₂和a的测试系统。理论计算结果表明，MISR中氢气传质速率远大于TSRs，这为MISR中重油高效、低压加氢提供了理论依据。实验研究表明，在实际操作条件下，当气液比（氢/油）从10变化到150时，MISR中d₃₂在220~420 μm范围内。与高压操作下的TSRs相比，MISR内气液界面面积和氢传质速率分别提高了20～100倍和20～50倍。分析显示，d₃₂和a的理论计算结果与实测值的误差均在15%以内。

关键词: 浆态床反应器, 微界面强化, 重油, 加氢反应, 传质

Abstract:

The processing of hundreds of millions of tons of heavy oil into light distillates or chemical raw materials every year is related to Chinese national energy security and efficient use of energy resources. However, the traditional slurry-bed reactor (TSRs) for heavy oil hydrogenation is generally operated at very high pressure which causes a series of negative effects. Herein a new hydrogenation method called microinterface-intensified slurry-bed reactor (MISR) was developed for the low-pressure hydrogenation. The mathematical models regarding bubble Sauter mean diameter d₃₂ and gas-liquid interfacial area a as well as energy dissipation rate ε in the MISR were proposed for predicting d₃₂ and a. Also a cold-mode simulated experimental system was set up for the measurement of d₃₂ and a. Theoretical results showed that the mass transfer rate of hydrogen and its amount from gas phase into liquid phase in the MISR are much bigger than those in the TSR, which provides a theoretical basis for the efficient and low-pressure hydrogenation of heavy oil in the MISR. Experimental study displayed that d₃₂ in the MISR is in the range of 220 — 420 μm when the gas-liquid ratio (hydrogen/oil) changes from 10 to 150 in the practical operation conditions. Compared with TSR under high pressure operation, the gas-liquid interface area and hydrogen mass transfer rate in MISR are increased by 20 —100 times and 20 —50 times, respectively. Analysis shows that the errors between the theoretical calculation results of d₃₂ and a and the actual measured values ??are both within 15%.

Key words: slurry-bed reactor, microinterface intensification, heavy oil, hydrogenation, mass transfer

中图分类号:

TQ 028.8

田洪舟,杨高东,杨国强,罗华勋,周政,孟为民,曹宇,李磊,张锋,杨建,张志炳. 微界面强化重油浆态床低压加氢的传质基础[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 4927-4935.

Hongzhou TIAN,Gaodong YANG,Guoqiang YANG,Huaxun LUO,Zheng ZHOU,Weimin MENG,Yu CAO,Lei LI,Feng ZHANG,Jian YANG,Zhibing ZHANG. Mass transfer basis of low-pressure hydrogenation for heavy oil in microinterface-intensified slurry-bed reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(11): 4927-4935.

图/表 5

图1 微界面强化浆态床重油加氢模拟实验装置示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of MISR for the simulated experiment

图2 模拟实验体系的照片和气泡粒径分布

Fig.2 Image and bubble size distribution of the simulated experimental system

图3 气液比对模拟体系气泡大小的影响

Fig. 3 Effect of gas-liquid ratio on bubble size of the simulated system

图4 气液比对气-液相界面积的影响

Fig.4 Effect of gas-liquid ratio on gas-liquid interfacial area in MISR

图5 气泡大小和操作压力对MISR内传质的影响

Fig.5 Effect of bubble size and operating pressure on mass transfer in MISR

参考文献 43

1	Sahu R, Song B J, Im J S, et al. A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2015, 27: 12-24.
2	靳爱民. 浆态床渣油加氢技术新进展——CLG公司推出LC-SLURRY工艺[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2016, 47(8): 92.
	Jin A M. New progress in slurry-bed residual oil hydrogenation technology-CLG launched the LC-SLURRY process[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2016, 47(8): 92.
3	陶梦莹, 侯焕娣, 董明, 等. 浆态床加氢技术的研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2015, 35(5): 34-37+39.
	Tao M Y, Hou H D, Dong M, et al. Research progress of slurry bed hydrocracking technology[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2015, 35(5): 34-37+39.
4	李雪静, 任文坡. 国内外渣油悬浮床加氢裂化技术进展[J]. 石化技术, 2012, 19(1): 65-70.
	Li X J, Ren W P. Progress in suspension bed hydrocracking technology for residue slurry in oil from domestic and abroad[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2012, 19(1): 65-70.
5	刘美, 刘金东, 张树广, 等. 悬浮床重油加氢裂化技术进展[J]. 应用化工, 2017, 46(12): 2435-2440.
	Liu M, Liu J D, Zhang S G, et al. Advances of heavy oil hydrocracking in suspended bed[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(12): 2435-2440.
6	李雪静, 乔明, 魏寿祥, 等. 劣质重油加工技术进展与发展趋势[J]. 石化技术与应用, 2019, 37(1): 1-8.
	Li X J, Qiao M, Wei S X, et al. Technical progress and development trend of inferior heavy oil processing[J]. Petrochemical Technology and Application, 2019, 37(1): 1-8.
7	Rana M S, Sámano V, Ancheyta J, et al. A review of recent advances on process technologies for upgrading of heavy oils and residua[J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(9): 1216-1231.
8	Zhang S, Liu D, Deng W, et al. A review of slurry-phase hydrocracking heavy oil technology[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(6): 3057-3062.
9	Liu Y, Gao L, Wen L, et al. Recent advances in heavy oil hydroprocessing technologies[J]. Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering, 2009, 2(1): 22-36.
10	Bellussi G, Rispoli G, Landoni A, et al. Hydroconversion of heavy residues in slurry reactors: developments and perspectives[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 308: 189-200.
11	Castaneda L C, Munoz J A D, Ancheyta J. Current situation of emerging technologies for upgrading of heavy oils[J]. Catalysis Today, 2014, 220: 248-273.
12	Speight J G. The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum[M]. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014: 433-454.
13	Zecevic J, Vanbutsele G, Jong K P, et al. Nanoscale intimacy in bifunctional catalysts for selective conversion of hydrocarbons[J]. Nature, 2015, 528(7581): 245-254
14	Jacobs P A, Dusselier M, Sels B F. Will zeolite‐based catalysis be as relevant in future biorefineries as in crude oil refineries?[J]. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2014, 53(33): 8621-8626.
15	Primo A, Garcia H. Zeolites as catalysts in oil refining[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(22): 7548-7561.
16	Jong K P, Zečević J, Friedrich H, et al. Zeolite Y crystals with trimodal porosity as ideal hydrocracking catalysts[J]. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2010, 49(52): 10074-10078.
17	Bell A T. The impact of nanoscience on heterogeneous catalysis[J]. Science, 2003, 299(5613): 1688-1691.
18	Yang R T, Hernandez- Maldonado A J, Yang F H. Desulfurization of transportation fuels with zeolites under ambient conditions[J]. Science, 2003, 301(5629): 79-81.
19	Corma A, Díaz-cabañas M J, Martínez-triguero J, et al. A large-cavity zeolite with wide pore windows and potential as an oil refining catalyst[J]. Nature, 2002, 418(6897): 514-517.
20	Corma A. Inorganic solid acids and their use in acid-catalyzed hydrocarbon reactions[J]. Chemical Reviews, 1995, 95(3): 559-614.
21	张志炳, 田洪舟, 张锋, 等. 多相反应体系的微界面强化简述[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 44-49.
	Zhang Z B, Tian H Z, Zhang F, et al. Overview of microinterface intensification in multiphase reaction systems[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1): 44-49.
22	Joosten G E H, Danckwerts P V. Chemical reaction and effective interfacial areas in gas absorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1973, 28(2): 453-461.
23	Puranik S S, Vogelpohl A. Effective interfacial area in irrigated packed columns[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1974, 29(2): 501-507.
24	Nicklin D J. Two-phase bubble flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1962, 17(9): 693-702.
25	Tian H Z, Pi S F, Feng Y C, et al. One-dimensional drift-flux model of gas holdup in fine-bubble jet reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 386: 121222
26	Fan L S, Tsuchiya K. Bubble Wake Dynamics in Liquids and Liquid-solid Suspensions[M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990: 39-48.
27	Wang B, Yang G, Tian H, et al. A new model of bubble sauter mean diameter in fine bubble-dominated columns[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020: 124673.
28	Hinze J O. Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes[J]. AIChE Journal, 1955, 1(3): 289-295.
29	Sevik M, Park S H. The splitting of drops and bubbles by turbulent fluid flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1973, 95(1): 53-60.
30	Atkinson B W, Jameson G J, Nguyen A V, et al. Bubble breakup and coalescence in a plunging liquid jet bubble column[J]. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, 81(3/4): 519-527.
31	Xing C T, Wang T F, Guo K Y, et al. A unified theoretical model for breakup of bubbles and droplets in turbulent flows[J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(4): 1391-1403.
32	南京大学. MIHA纯气动操作条件下能量耗散调控模型建模方法: 109887550A[P].2019.
	Nanjing University. Modeling method of energy dissipation regulation model under MIHA pure aerodynamic operating conditions: 109887550A[P]. 2019.
33	Riazi M R. Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions [M]. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2005: 111-115.
34	Poling B E, Prausnitz J M, O’Connell J P. The Properties of Gases and Liquids[M]. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2001.
35	Quayle O R. The parachors of organic compounds. An interpretation and catalogue[J]. Chemical Reviews, 1953, 53(3): 439-589.
36	The American Petroleum Institute Subcommittee on Technical Data. API Technical Data Book 10th Edition: Introduction[M]. The American Petroleum Institute and EPCON International, 2016.
37	Miqueu C, Satherley J, Mendiboure B, et al. The effect of P/N/A distribution on the parachors of petroleum fractions[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2001, 180(1/2): 327-344.
38	Liao Y, Lucas D. A literature review on mechanisms and models for the coalescence process of fluid particles [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(10): 2851-2864.
39	Khuntia S, Majumder S K, Ghosh P. Microbubble-aided water and wastewater purification: a review[J]. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2012, 28(4/5/6): 191-221.
40	O’dowd W, Smith D N, Ruether J A, et al. Gas and solids behavior in a baffled and unbaffled slurry bubble column[J]. AIChE Journal, 1987, 33(12): 1959-1970.
41	Sada E, Kumazawa H, Lee C H, et al. Gas-liquid interfacial area and liquid-side mass-transfer coefficient in a slurry bubble column[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(1): 112-116.
42	Fukuma M, Muroyama K, Yasunishi A. Specific gas-liquid interfacial area and liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in a slurry bubble column[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1987, 20(3): 321-324.
43	张志炳.微界面传质强化技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2020: 295.
	Zhang Z B. Microinterface Mass Transfer Intensification [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2020: 295.

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[3]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.
[4]	王皓, 唐思扬, 钟山, 梁斌. MEA吸收CO₂富液解吸过程中固体颗粒表面的强化作用分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1539-1548.
[5]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[6]	何洋, 高森虎, 吴青云, 张明理, 龙涛, 牛佩, 高景辉, 孟颖琪. 析湿工况下平直开缝翅片传热传质特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1073-1081.
[7]	贾露凡, 王艺颖, 董钰漫, 李沁园, 谢鑫, 苑昊, 孟涛. 微流控双水相贴壁液滴流动强化酶促反应研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1239-1246.
[8]	何万媛, 陈一宇, 朱春英, 付涛涛, 高习群, 马友光. 阵列凸起微通道内气液两相传质特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 690-697.
[9]	张浩, 王子悦, 程钰洁, 何晓辉, 纪红兵. 单原子催化剂规模化制备的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 276-289.
[10]	王煦清, 严圣林, 朱礼涛, 张希宝, 罗正鸿. 填料塔中有机胺吸收CO₂气液传质的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 237-256.
[11]	王悦琳, 晁伟, 蓝晓程, 莫志朋, 佟淑环, 王铁峰. 合成气生物发酵法制乙醇的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3448-3460.
[12]	王凯玥, 马永丽, 李琛, 刘明言. 气液固微型流化床的气液传质系数[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3529-3540.
[13]	刘振宇. 煤地下气化低效的化学反应工程根源：滞留层及通道中的传质与反应[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3299-3306.
[14]	解文潇, 贾胜坤, 张会书, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 受限空间内浮升气泡与液体间传质行为实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2902-2911.
[15]	魏琳, 郭剑, 廖梓豪, Dafalla Ahmed Mohmed, 蒋方明. 空气流量对空冷燃料电池电堆性能的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3222-3231.