用于甲醇重整制氢的铜基催化剂研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20211085

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，随着能源需求与日俱增，化石燃料的燃烧造成的温室效应使得地球气候变得更加恶劣，如何有效实现碳减排成为各国科学家的研究重点。将二氧化碳转化为绿色液体燃料(如甲醇)是一个重要方向。通过甲醇合成(MS)实现碳捕获,再在需要能量时进行甲醇水蒸气重整(MSR)制备氢气,实现二氧化碳的闭路循环和氢能的储存,因此MSR反应具有很高的研究价值。在众多应用于甲醇水蒸气重整的催化剂中，Cu基催化剂因其价格低廉和高活性等优点受到广泛关注。综述了Cu基催化剂在甲醇水蒸气重整中的研究进展，包括机理探索，催化剂优化及未来的发展方向，提出铜基催化剂中铜的高分散、价态调控和复合氧化物与铜的协同是性能优化的关键。

关键词: 制氢, 铜基催化剂, 甲醇水蒸气重整, 掺杂, 氧空位, 协同效应, 二氧化碳捕集

Abstract:

In recent years, with the ever-increasing demand for energy, the greenhouse effect caused by the burning of fossil fuels has made the earth's climate worse. How to effectively reduce carbon emissions has become the research focus of scientists from all over the world. The conversion of carbon dioxide into green liquid fuels (such as methanol) is an important direction. Carbon capture is realized by methanol synthesis (MS), and then methanol steam reforming (MSR) is carried out to prepare hydrogen energy when energy is needed, so as to realize the closed-circuit circulation of carbon dioxide and the storage of hydrogen energy. Among many catalysts used in methanol steam reforming (MSR), Cu-based catalysts have attracted extensive attention because of their low price and high activity. This review summaries the research progress of Cu-based catalysts in methanol steam reforming, including mechanism exploration, catalyst optimization and future development outlooks, highlighting the effect of high dispersion and valence states engineering of Cu, together with synergy between Cu and metal oxides supports in tailoring the performance of Cu-based catalysts.

Key words: hydrogen production, copper-based catalyst, methanol steam reforming, doping, oxygen vacancy, synergy, carbon dioxide capture

中图分类号:

O 643.36⁺4

孙晓明, 沙琪昊, 王陈伟, 周道金. 用于甲醇重整制氢的铜基催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 5975-6001.

Xiaoming SUN, Qihao SHA, Chenwei WANG, Daojin ZHOU. Application of copper-based catalysts for hydrogen production in methanol steam reforming[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(12): 5975-6001.

图/表 12

(25) (a) 基于Jiang等、Peppley等、Iwasa等研究的甲醇水蒸气重整催化循环，包括不同种类的反应性表面位点 A ()和B ()[39]；(b) 经由CH2O中间体的MSR反应网络[44]；(c) 还原的CuO-CeO2在MSR反应中的原位红外谱图[45]；(d) 还原的CuO-CeO2-I在MSR反应中的原位红外谱图[45]

null

①在纯O₂ 400℃条件下煅烧1 h后再进行反应；②在纯H₂ 300℃条件下预还原1 h后再进行反应；③在纯H₂ 400℃条件下预还原1 h后再进行反应。

参考文献 95

35	Jeong H, Kim K I, Kim T H, et al. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of methanol in a micro-channel reactor coated with Cu/ZnO/ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 159(2): 1296-1299.
36	Peppley B A, Amphlett J C, Kearns L M, et al. Methanol-steam reforming on Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts (Part 2): A comprehensive kinetic model[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1999, 179(1/2): 31-49.
37	Breen J P, Ross J R H. Methanol reforming for fuel-cell applications: development of zirconia-containing Cu-Zn-Al catalysts[J]. Catalysis Today, 1999, 51(3/4): 521-533.
38	Shishido T, Yamamoto Y, Morioka H, et al. Production of hydrogen from methanol over Cu/ZnO and Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts prepared by homogeneous precipitation: steam reforming and oxidative steam reforming[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2007, 268(1/2): 185-194.
39	Frank B, Jentoft F C, Soerijanto H, et al. Steam reforming of methanol over copper-containing catalysts: influence of support material on microkinetics[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 246(1): 177-192.
40	Zhang R, Sun Y H, Peng S Y. In situ FTIR studies of methanol adsorption and dehydrogenation over Cu/SiO₂ catalyst[J]. Fuel, 2002, 81(11/12): 1619-1624.
41	Lin S, Johnson R S, Smith G K, et al. Pathways for methanol steam reforming involving adsorbed formaldehyde and hydroxyl intermediates on Cu(111): density functional theory studies[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, 13(20): 9622-9631.
42	Papavasiliou J, Avgouropoulos G, Ioannides T. Steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis of steam reforming of methanol over Cu-based catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 88(3/4): 490-496.
43	Gu X K, Li W X. First-principles study on the origin of the different selectivities for methanol steam reforming on Cu(111) and Pd(111)[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(49): 21539-21547.
44	Wang S S, Gu X K, Su H Y, et al. First-principles and microkinetic simulation studies of the structure sensitivity of Cu catalyst for methanol steam reforming[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(20): 10811-10819.
45	Chen Y, Li S T, Lv S, et al. A novel synthetic route for MOF-derived CuO-CeO₂ catalyst with remarkable methanol steam reforming performance[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2021, 149: 106215.
46	Wachs I E, Madix R J. The oxidation of H₂CO on a copper(110) surface[J]. Surface Science, 1979, 84(2): 375-386.
1	Cai W J, Borlace S, Lengaigne M, et al. Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(2): 111-116.
2	Massondelmotte V. Towards the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5℃[C]//Egu General Assembly Conference, Austria, 2017.
3	Tong D, Zhang Q, Zheng Y X, et al. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5℃ climate target[J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7769): 373-377.
4	Bednar J, Obersteiner M, Baklanov A, et al. Operationalizing the net-negative carbon economy[J]. Nature, 2021, 596(7872): 377-383.
5	Jacobson M Z, Colella W G, Golden D M. Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles[J]. Science, 2005, 308(5730): 1901-1905.
6	Wulf C, Reuß M, Grube T, et al. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 199: 431-443.
7	Kawamura Y, Ogura N, Igarashi A. Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming using microreactor[J]. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 2013, 56(5): 288-297.
8	Iulianelli A, Ribeirinha P, Mendes A, et al. Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2014, 29: 355-368.
9	Shih C F, Zhang T, Li J H, et al. Powering the future with liquid sunshine[J]. Joule, 2018, 2(10): 1925-1949.
10	Frei M S, Mondelli C, Short M I M, et al. Methanol as a hydrogen carrier: kinetic and thermodynamic drivers for its CO₂-based synthesis and reforming over heterogeneous catalysts[J]. ChemSusChem, 2020, 13(23):6330-6337.
11	Wu C Y, Lin L L, Liu J J, et al. Inverse ZrO₂/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11:5767.
12	舟丹.“液体阳光”是实现低碳能源的主要途径[J]. 中外能源, 2020,25(7):24.
	Zhou D. “Liquid sunlight” is the main way to realize low-carbon energy[J]. Sino-Globa Energy,2020,25(7):24.
13	Lin L L, Zhou W, Gao R, et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts[J]. Nature, 2017, 544(7648): 80-83.
14	Sun Z, Sun Z Q. Hydrogen generation from methanol reforming for fuel cell applications: a review[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(4): 1074-1103.
15	陆晓如.李灿:太阳燃料值得期待[J]. 中国石油石化, 2019(7): 17-19, 16.
	Lu X R.Li Can:solar fuel worth looking forward to[J]. China Petrochem, 2019(7): 17-19, 16.
16	王芳.用“液态阳光”将风电存起来、送出去[J]. 风能,2021(1): 24-25.
	Wang F. Use “liquid sunlight” to store wind power and send it out[J]. Wind Energy,2021(1): 24-25.
17	Yong S T, Ooi C W, Chai S P, et al. Review of methanol reforming-Cu-based catalysts, surface reaction mechanisms, and reaction schemes[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(22): 9541-9552.
18	Xu X H, Shuai K P, Xu B. Review on copper and palladium based catalysts for methanol steam reforming to produce hydrogen[J]. Catalysts, 2017, 7(6): 183.
19	Takezawa N, Iwasa N. Steam reforming and dehydrogenation of methanol: difference in the catalytic functions of copper and group Ⅷ metals[J]. Catalysis Today, 1997, 36(1):45-56.
20	Iwasa N, Takezawa N. New supported Pd and Pt alloy catalysts for steam reforming and dehydrogenation of methanol[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2003, 22(3/4): 215-224.
21	Iwasa N, Mayanagi T, Ogawa N, et al. New catalytic functions of Pd-Zn, Pd-Ga, Pd-In, Pt-Zn, Pt-Ga and Pt-In alloys in the conversions of methanol[J]. Catalysis Letters, 1998, 54(3): 119-123.
22	Iwasa N, Masuda S, Ogawa N, et al. Steam reforming of methanol over Pd/ZnO: effect of the formation of PdZn alloys upon the reaction[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1995, 125(1): 145-157.
23	Hong X L, Ren S Z. Selective hydrogen production from methanol oxidative steam reforming over Zn-Cr catalysts with or without Cu loading[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(2): 700-708.
24	Cao W Q, Chen G W, Li S L, et al. Methanol-steam reforming over a ZnO-Cr₂O₃/CeO₂-ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 119(2/3): 93-98.
25	Sá S, Silva H, Brandão L, et al. Catalysts for methanol steam reforming—a review[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2010, 99(1/2): 43-57.
26	Iwasa N, Kudo S, Takahashi H, et al. Highly selective supported Pd catalysts for steam reforming of methanol[J]. Catalysis Letters, 1993, 19(2/3): 211-216.
27	Shokrani R, Haghighi M, Jodeiri N, et al. Fuel cell grade hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming over CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ nanocatalyst with various oxide ratios synthesized via urea-nitrates combustion method[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(25): 13141-13155.
28	Agrell J, Birgersson H, Boutonnet M, et al. Production of hydrogen from methanol over Cu/ZnO catalysts promoted by ZrO₂ and Al₂O₃[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2003, 219(2): 389-403.
29	Santacesaria E, Carrá S. Kinetics of catalytic steam reforming of methanol in a CSTR reactor[J]. Applied Catalysis, 1983, 5(3): 345-358.
30	Pour V, Bartoň J, Benda A. Kinetics of catalyzed reaction of methanol with water vapour[J]. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, 1975, 40(10): 2923-2934.
31	Lwin Y, Daud W R W, Mohamad A B, et al. Hydrogen production from steam-methanol reforming: thermodynamic analysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2000, 25(1): 47-53.
32	Amphlett J C, Evans M J, Mann R F, et al. Hydrogen production by the catalytic steam reforming of methanol (Part 2): Kinetics of methanol decomposition using girdler G66B catalyst[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 63(4): 605-611.
33	Takahashi K, Takezawa N, Kobayashi H. The mechanism of steam reforming of methanol over a copper-silica catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis, 1982, 2(6): 363-366.
34	Jiang C J, Trimm D L, Wainwright M S, et al. Kinetic mechanism for the reaction between methanol and water over a Cu-ZnO-Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1993, 97(2): 145-158.
47	McCabe R W, DiMaggio C L, Madix R J. Adsorption and reactions of acetaldehyde on Pt(S)-[6(111)× (100)][J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1985, 89(5): 854-861.
48	Shekhar R, Barteau M A. Structure sensitivity of alcohol reactions on (110) and (111) palladium surfaces[J]. Catalysis Letters, 1995, 31(2/3): 221-237.
49	Davis J L, Barteau M A. Spectroscopic identification of alkoxide, aldehyde, and acyl intermediates in alcohol decomposition on Pd(111)[J]. Surface Science, 1990, 235(2/3): 235-248.
50	Herdem M S, Sinaki M Y, Farhad S, et al. An overview of the methanol reforming process: comparison of fuels, catalysts, reformers, and systems[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(10): 5076-5105.
51	Ranjekar A M, Yadav G D. Steam reforming of methanol for hydrogen production: a critical analysis of catalysis, processes, and scope[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(1): 89-113.
52	Hansen P L. Atom-resolved imaging of dynamic shape changes in supported copper nanocrystals[J]. Science, 2002, 295(5562): 2053-2055.
53	Wang S S, Su H Y, Gu X K, et al. Differentiating intrinsic reactivity of copper, copper-zinc alloy, and copper/zinc oxide interface for methanol steam reforming by first-principles theory[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(39): 21553-21559.
54	Yang H H, Chen Y Y, Cui X J, et al. A highly stable copper-based catalyst for clarifying the catalytic roles of Cu⁰ and Cu⁺ species in methanol dehydrogenation[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(7): 1836-1840.
55	Das D, Llorca J, Dominguez M, et al. Methanol steam reforming behavior of copper impregnated over CeO₂-ZrO₂ derived from a surfactant assisted coprecipitation route[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(33): 10463-10479.
56	Turco M, Bagnasco G, Costantino U, et al. Production of hydrogen from oxidative steam reforming of methanol (I): Preparation and characterization of Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts from a hydrotalcite-like LDH precursor[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 228(1): 43-55.
57	Oguchi H, Kanai H, Utani K, et al. Cu₂O as active species in the steam reforming of methanol by CuO/ZrO₂ catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2005, 293: 64-70.
58	Günter M M, Ressler T, Bems B, et al. Implication of the microstructure of binary Cu/ZnO catalysts for their catalytic activity in methanol synthesis[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2001, 71(1/2): 37-44.
59	Klier K. Methanol synthesis[M]//Advances in Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 243-313.
60	Chinchen G C, Waugh K C, Whan D A. The activity and state of the copper surface in methanol synthesis catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis, 1986, 25(1/2): 101-107.
61	Burch R, Golunski S E, Spencer M S. The role of copper and zinc oxide in methanol synthesis catalysts[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 1990, 86(15): 2683.
62	Spencer M S. The role of zinc oxide in Cu/ZnO catalysts for methanol synthesis and the water-gas shift reaction[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 1999, 8(3/4): 259-266.
63	Nakamura J, Choi Y, Fujitani T. On the issue of the active site and the role of ZnO in Cu/ZnO methanol synthesis catalysts[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2003, 22(3/4): 277-285.
64	Topsøe N Y, Topsøe H. On the nature of surface structural changes in Cu/ZnO methanol synthesis catalysts[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 1999, 8(3/4): 267-270.
65	Grunwaldt J D, Molenbroek A M, Topsøe N Y, et al. In situ investigations of structural changes in Cu/ZnO catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2000, 194(2): 452-460.
66	Kasatkin I, Kurr P, Kniep B, et al. Role of lattice strain and defects in copper particles on the activity of Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts for methanol synthesis[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2007, 46(38): 7324-7327.
67	Behrens M, Studt F, Kasatkin I, et al. The active site of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ industrial catalysts[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6083): 893-897.
68	Zeng S H, Zhang W L, Guo S L, et al. Inverse rod-like CeO₂ supported on CuO prepared by hydrothermal method for preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2012, 23: 62-66.
69	Yang S Q, Zhou F, Liu Y J, et al. Morphology effect of ceria on the performance of CuO/CeO₂ catalysts for hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(14): 7252-7261.
70	Yao X J, Gao F, Yu Q, et al. NO reduction by CO over CuO-CeO₂ catalysts: effect of preparation methods[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2013, 3(5): 1355-1366.
71	Li G S, Li L P, Zheng J. Understanding the defect chemistry of oxide nanoparticles for creating new functionalities: a critical review[J]. Science China Chemistry, 2011, 54(6): 876-886.
72	Varmazyari M, Khani Y, Bahadoran F, et al. Hydrogen production employing Cu(BDC) metal-organic framework support in methanol steam reforming process within monolithic micro-reactors[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(1): 565-580.
73	Baneshi J, Haghighi M, Jodeiri N, et al. Homogeneous precipitation synthesis of CuO-ZrO₂-CeO₂-Al₂O₃ nanocatalyst used in hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming for fuel cell applications[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 87: 928-937.
74	Qiao W J, Yang S Q, Zhang L, et al. Performance of Cu-Ce/M-Al (M = Mg, Ni, Co, Zn) hydrotalcite derived catalysts for hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 45(9): 12773-12783.
75	Ribeirinha P, Mateos-Pedrero C, Boaventura M, et al. CuO/ZnO/Ga₂O₃ catalyst for low temperature MSR reaction: synthesis, characterization and kinetic model[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 221: 371-379.
76	Ruano D, Cored J, Azenha C, et al. Dynamic structure and subsurface oxygen formation of a working copper catalyst under methanol steam reforming conditions: an in situ time-resolved spectroscopic study[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(4): 2922-2930.
77	Tong W Y, West A, Cheung K, et al. Dramatic effects of gallium promotion on methanol steam reforming Cu-ZnO catalyst for hydrogen production: formation of 5 Å copper clusters from Cu-ZnGaO_x[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2013, 3(6): 1231-1244.
78	Chang C C, Wang J W, Chang C T, et al. Effect of ZrO₂ on steam reforming of methanol over CuO/ZnO/ZrO₂/Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 192: 350-356.
79	Matsumura Y. Stabilization of Cu/ZnO/ZrO₂ catalyst for methanol steam reforming to hydrogen by coprecipitation on zirconia support[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 238: 109-116.
80	Patel S, Pant K K. Influence of preparation method on performance of Cu(Zn)(Zr)-alumina catalysts for the hydrogen production via steam reforming of methanol[J]. Journal of Porous Materials, 2006, 13(3/4): 373-378.
81	Mateos-Pedrero C, Azenha C, Pacheco Tanaka D A, et al. The influence of the support composition on the physicochemical and catalytic properties of Cu catalysts supported on zirconia-alumina for methanol steam reforming[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 277:119243.
82	Sanches S G, Flores J H, Da Silva M I P. Cu/ZnO and Cu/ZnO/ZrO₂ catalysts used for methanol steam reforming[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2018, 454: 55-62.
83	Ploner K, Schlicker L, Gili A, et al. Reactive metal-support interaction in the Cu-In₂O₃ system: intermetallic compound formation and its consequences for CO₂-selective methanol steam reforming[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2019, 20(1): 356-366.
84	Lu P J, Cai F F, Zhang J, et al. Hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming over B-modified CuZnAlO_x catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2019, 47(7): 791-798.
85	Kuo M T, Chen Y Y, Hung W Y, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous CuFe/silicates catalyst for methanol steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(28): 14416-14423.
86	Khani Y, Bahadoran F, Safari N, et al. Hydrogen production from steam reforming of methanol over Cu-based catalysts: the behavior of Zn_xLa_xAl_1-_xO₄ and ZnO/La₂O₃/Al₂O₃ lined on cordierite monolith reactors[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 11824-11837.
87	Hwang B Y, Sakthinathan S, Chiu T W. Production of hydrogen from steam reforming of methanol carried out by self-combusted CuCr_1-_xFe_xO₂ (x=0-1) nanopowders catalyst[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(5): 2848-2856.
88	Shen J P, Song C S. Influence of preparation method on performance of Cu/Zn-based catalysts for low-temperature steam reforming and oxidative steam reforming of methanol for H₂ production for fuel cells[J]. Catalysis Today, 2002, 77(1/2): 89-98.
89	Hughes R. Deactivation of Catalysts[M].London Orlando: Academic Press, 1984.
90	Kurtz M, Wilmer H, Genger T, et al. Deactivation of supported copper catalysts for methanol synthesis[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2003, 86(1/2/3): 77-80.
91	Zhang X R, Shi P F. Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of methanol on CeO₂ promoted Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2003, 194(1/2): 99-105.
92	Choi Y, Stenger H G. Fuel cell grade hydrogen from methanol on a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2002, 38(4): 259-269.
93	Thurgood C P, Amphlett J C, Mann R F, et al. Deactivation of Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst: evolution of site concentrations with time[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2003, 22(3/4): 253-259.
94	Liu Y Y, Hayakawa T, Suzuki K, et al. Highly active copper/ceria catalysts for steam reforming of methanol[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2002, 223(1/2): 137-145.
95	Twigg M V, Spencer M S. Deactivation of copper metal catalysts for methanol decomposition, methanol steam reforming and methanol synthesis[J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2003, 22(3/4): 191-203.

[1]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[2]	杨菲菲, 赵世熙, 周维, 倪中海. Sn掺杂的In₂O₃催化CO₂选择性加氢制甲醇[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3366-3374.
[3]	李凯旋, 谭伟, 张曼玉, 徐志豪, 王旭裕, 纪红兵. 富含零价钴活性位点的钴氮碳/活性炭设计及甲醛催化氧化应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3342-3352.
[4]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[5]	毛磊, 刘冠章, 袁航, 张光亚. 可捕集CO₂的纳米碳酸酐酶粒子的高效制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2589-2598.
[6]	龙臻, 王谨航, 任俊杰, 何勇, 周雪冰, 梁德青. 离子液体协同PVCap抑制天然气水合物生成实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2639-2646.
[7]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[8]	李勇, 高佳琦, 杜超, 赵亚丽, 李伯琼, 申倩倩, 贾虎生, 薛晋波. Ni@C@TiO₂核壳双重异质结的构筑及光热催化分解水产氢[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2458-2467.
[9]	王皓, 唐思扬, 钟山, 梁斌. MEA吸收CO₂富液解吸过程中固体颗粒表面的强化作用分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1539-1548.
[10]	张生安, 刘桂莲. 高效太阳能电解水制氢系统及其性能的多目标优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1260-1274.
[11]	宋悦, 张启成, 彭文朝, 李阳, 张凤宝, 范晓彬. MoS₂基单原子催化剂的合成及其在电催化中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 535-545.
[12]	王煦清, 严圣林, 朱礼涛, 张希宝, 罗正鸿. 填料塔中有机胺吸收CO₂气液传质的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 237-256.
[13]	党迎喜, 谈朋, 刘晓勤, 孙林兵. 辐射冷却和太阳能加热驱动的CO₂变温捕获[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 469-478.
[14]	戚新刚, 路利波, 陈渝楠, 葛志伟, 郭烈锦. 造纸黑液超临界水气化制氢与高附加值化学品回收研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3338-3354.
[15]	徐振和, 李泓江, 高雨, 礼峥, 张含烟, 徐宝彤, 丁茯, 孙亚光. In₂O₃/Ag：ZnIn₂S₄“Type Ⅱ”型异质结构材料的制备及可见光催化性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3625-3635.