CO2近零排放的光煤互补耦合SOFC发电系统热力学分析

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20230948

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于超临界水煤气化合成气的成分特征，提出了一种新型CO₂近零排放的太阳能驱动超临界水煤气化耦合固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)发电系统。太阳能用于加热气化室给水以及提供煤气化反应热，气化合成气进入SOFC发电，SOFC阳极排气与纯氧在燃气轮机燃烧室内发生燃烧反应，产物为CO₂/H₂O混合物，易于实现CO₂的分离捕集。研究了气化室内煤浆浓度、SOFC工作温度以及重整温度等关键参数对系统性能的影响规律，揭示了系统能量能质的分布规律及转移转化机制，上述参数分别为11.3%(质量)、1000℃以及750℃时，系统的发电效率可达到47.59%。该研究通过煤炭化学能与太阳能的互补梯级利用，结合SOFC内电化学反应及燃烧室内富氧燃烧技术，实现了CO₂近零排放，对实现双碳目标具有重要意义。

关键词: 过程系统, 太阳能, 超临界水煤气化, 集成, SOFC, 计算机模拟

Abstract:

Based on the composition characteristic of the syngas produced through supercritical water gasification of coal, a novel CO₂near-zero-emission power system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal with solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is proposed. Solar energy is used to heat the gasification chamber water supply and provide coal gasification reaction heat. The gasified syngas enters the SOFC to generate electricity. The exhaust gas from the anode of the SOFC is combusted with pure oxygen in the combustor of the gas turbine, and CO₂/H₂O mixture is produced. CO₂ can be easily separated and captured. The influences of key parameters such as coal-water-slurry concentration in the gasifier, working temperature of the SOFC, and reforming temperature on the system performances are studied. The distribution pattern, transfer and transformation mechanisms of the energy and exergy in the system are revealed. As the previously mentioned key parameters are 11.3%(mass), 1000℃, and 750℃, respectively, the power efficiency can reach 47.59%. This research achieves near-zero CO₂emissions through the complementary cascade utilization of coal chemical energy and solar energy, combined with electrochemical reactions in SOFC and oxygen-rich combustion technology in the combustion chamber, which is of great significance to achieving the dual-carbon goal.

Key words: process systems, solar energy, supercritical water gasification of coal, integration, SOFC, computer simulation

中图分类号:

TK 123

陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明, 张炜, 李家州. CO₂近零排放的光煤互补耦合SOFC发电系统热力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(11): 4688-4701.

Zhewen CHEN, Junjie WEI, Yuming ZHANG, Wei ZHANG, Jiazhou LI. Thermodynamic analysis of CO₂ near-zero-emission power system with integrated solar energy, supercritical water gasification of coal and SOFC[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(11): 4688-4701.

图/表 18

图1 超临界水煤气化发电系统集成路线

Fig.1 The technical routes of the supercritical water gasification of coal

图2 太阳能驱动超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统全流程能量转移转化

Fig.2 The energy conversion and transformation in the power system integrated solar-driven supercritical water-coal gasification and SOFC

图3 太阳能驱动超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统流程图

Fig.3 Flow chart of solar-driven supercritical water coal gasification coupled SOFC power generation system

表1 系统设计参数取值［25， 32］

Table 1 System key parameter and the value［25，32］

参数	取值
环境温度/℃	25
镜场开口面积/m²	5.21×10⁴
太阳能辐照强度/(W/m²)	700
总光学效率/%	73.76
太阳能气化炉温度/℃，压力/bar	660，250
换热器夹点温度/℃	10
水泵效率/%	80
重整反应器温度/℃，压力/bar	750，15
变换反应器温度/℃，压力/bar	220，15
SOFC反应温度/℃，压力/bar	1000，15
膨胀机等熵效率/%	90
燃气透平等熵效率/%	89
压气机等熵效率/%	88
燃气透平压比	15

表2 气化煤的工业分析和元素分析

Table 2 Proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of gasification coal

工业分析/%（质量，收到基）				元素分析/%（质量，收到基）
水分	灰分	挥发分	固定碳	碳	氢	氧	氮	硫
2.79	6.84	33.19	57.18	74.29	4.69	9.26	1.00	1.12

图4 太阳能-煤气化过程的能量平衡示意图

Fig.4 Energy balance diagram of solar-coal gasification process

表3 计算欧姆损失所需参数［36］

Table 3 Parameters needed to calculate ohm loss［36］

参数	数值
电池长度/m，直径/m	1.5，0.022
阳极厚度 $δ_{a n}$ /m	0.0001
阴极厚度 $δ_{c a}$ /m	0.0022
电解质厚度 $δ_{e l}$ /m	0.00004
互连厚度 $δ_{i n t}$ /m	0.000085
阳极电阻率 $ρ_{a n}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	2.98 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（-1392/T）
阴极电阻率 $ρ_{c a}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	8.114 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（600/T）
电解液电阻率 $ρ_{e l}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	2.94 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（10350/T）
互连电阻率 $ρ_{i n t}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	1.2 $\times 10^{- 3}$ exp（4690/T）

表3 计算欧姆损失所需参数［36］

Table 3 Parameters needed to calculate ohm loss［36］

参数	数值
电池长度/m，直径/m	1.5，0.022
阳极厚度 $δ_{a n}$ /m	0.0001
阴极厚度 $δ_{c a}$ /m	0.0022
电解质厚度 $δ_{e l}$ /m	0.00004
互连厚度 $δ_{i n t}$ /m	0.000085
阳极电阻率 $ρ_{a n}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	2.98 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（-1392/T）
阴极电阻率 $ρ_{c a}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	8.114 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（600/T）
电解液电阻率 $ρ_{e l}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	2.94 $\times 10^{- 5}$ exp（10350/T）
互连电阻率 $ρ_{i n t}$ / $(Ω ∙ m)$	1.2 $\times 10^{- 3}$ exp（4690/T）

表4 计算活化损失所需参数［37-38］

Table 4 Parameters needed to calculate activation loss［37-38］

参数	数值
阳极指前因子 $γ$ _an/(10⁹A $/$ m²)	7
阴极指前因子 $γ$ _ca/(10⁹A $/$ m²)	7
阳极活化能E_act,an/(10⁴J $/$ mol)	11
阴极活化能E_act,ca/(10⁴J $/$ mol)	12

表4 计算活化损失所需参数［37-38］

Table 4 Parameters needed to calculate activation loss［37-38］

参数	数值
阳极指前因子 $γ$ _an/(10⁹A $/$ m²)	7
阴极指前因子 $γ$ _ca/(10⁹A $/$ m²)	7
阳极活化能E_act,an/(10⁴J $/$ mol)	11
阴极活化能E_act,ca/(10⁴J $/$ mol)	12

表5 计算扩散损失所需参数［39］

Table 5 The parameters required to calculate the diffusion loss［39］

参数	数值
H₂分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	6.12
$O_{2}$ 分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	16.3
$N_{2}$ 分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	18.3
H₂O分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	13.1

表5 计算扩散损失所需参数［39］

Table 5 The parameters required to calculate the diffusion loss［39］

参数	数值
H₂分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	6.12
$O_{2}$ 分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	16.3
$N_{2}$ 分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	18.3
H₂O分子扩散体积/(10^-6m³ $/$ mol)	13.1

图5 文献实验值与模型计算值对比

Fig.5 Comparison of experimental values in literature and calculated values in model

表6 主要计算结果

Table 6 Calculation results and output parameters

参数	数值
Nernst电压/V	0.947
欧姆损失/V	0.113
活化损失/V	0.007
扩散损失/V	0.046
工作电压/V	0.782
电流/A	2.114×10⁷
SOFC电堆功率/kW	16532
系统净发电量/kW	29439.32
系统发电效率/%	47.59

表7 系统关键点物流参数

Table 7 Parameters of the key points in the system

物流	温度/℃	压力/bar	摩尔流量/(kmol/s)	摩尔组成占比/%
气化煤	25.0	1	1 kg/s	—
2	660.0	250	0.484	H₂：10.8、CO：0.5、CO₂：6.9、CH₄：4.0、C₂H₆：0.3、H₂O：77.4
3	92.0	1	0.484	H₂：10.8、CO：0.5、CO₂：6.9、CH₄：4.0、C₂H₆：0.3、H₂O：77.4
4	25.0	1	0.436	H₂O：100
5	54.7	250	0.436	H₂O：100
6	25.0	1	0.112	H₂：46.6、CO：2.3、CO₂：29.3、CH₄：17.1、C₂H₆：1.5、H₂O：3.2
7	990.0	1	0.112	H₂：46.6、CO：2.3、CO₂：29.3、CH₄：17.1、C₂H₆：1.5、H₂O：3.2
8	750.0	15	0.186	H₂：59.3、CO：11.7、CO₂：17.7、C₂H₆：0.9、H₂O：10.4
9	90.0	15	0.186	H₂：59.3、CO：11.7、CO₂：17.7、C₂H₆：0.9、H₂O：10.4
10	220.0	15	0.225	H₂：58.6、CO₂：24.3、C₂H₆：0.7、H₂O：16.4
11	650.0	15	0.225	H₂：58.6、CO₂：24.3、C₂H₆：0.7、H₂O：16.4
12	999.4	15	0.225	H₂：10.0、CO₂：24.3、C₂H₆：0.7、H₂O：65.0
13	25.0	1	0.382	O₂：21.0、N₂：79.0
14	407.9	15	0.382	O₂：21.0、N₂：79.0
15	650.0	15	0.382	O₂：21.0、N₂：79.0
16	999.4	15	0.327	O₂：7.8、N₂：92.2
17	729.4	15	0.327	O₂：7.8、N₂：92.2
18	390.5	15	0.327	O₂：7.8、N₂：92.2
19	222.0	15	0.327	O₂：7.8、N₂：92.2
20	25.0	1	0.017	O₂：100
21	25.0	1	0.327	O₂：7.8、N₂：92.2
22	211.9	250	0.436	H₂O：100
23	253.0	250	0.436	H₂O：100
24	1245.9	15	0.232	CO₂：25.0、H₂O：75.0
25	734.0	1	0.232	CO₂：25.0、H₂O：75.0
26	120.0	1	0.232	CO₂：25.0、H₂O：75.0
27	542.6	15	0.225	H₂：10.0、CO₂：24.3、C₂H₆：0.7、H₂O：65.0

图6 太阳能驱动超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统能流图

Fig.6 The energy flow diagram of solar-driven supercritical water coal gasification coupled SOFC power generation system

表8 系统㶲平衡分析

Table 8 Exergic balance analysis of system

项目	数值/kW	占比/%
㶲输入
气化煤	26015.83	41.97
太阳能	35973.04	58.03
总计	61988.87	100
㶲输出
气化室未反应碳	1415.26	2.28
系统净发电量	29439.32	47.49
冷凝器	2500.53	4.03
燃气轮机排烟	1266.72	2.04
㶲损失
未吸收太阳能的㶲	9439.33	15.23
太阳能气化室	8889.86	14.34
膨胀机	964.28	1.56
燃气透平	214.86	0.35
燃烧室	1668.55	2.69
压气机	238.05	0.38
换热器1	633.89	1.02
换热器2	896.28	1.45
换热器3	250.15	0.40
换热器4	326.68	0.53
省煤器1	1678.28	2.71
省煤器2	123.52	0.20
重整反应器	364.47	0.59
变换反应器	263.55	0.43
SOFC	1196.42	1.93
SOFC阴极空气透平	218.76	0.35
总计	61988.87	100
㶲效率	47.49%

图7 重整温度和SOFC工作温度对发电效率的影响

Fig.7 Influences of reforming temperature and SOFC operating temperature on power generation efficiency

图8 水煤浆浓度和SOFC工作温度对发电效率的影响

Fig.8 Influences of CWSC and SOFC operating temperature on power generation efficiency

图9 SOFC燃料利用率对发电效率的影响

Fig.9 The influences of fuel utilization rate on power generation efficiency

表9 不同煤基碳捕集技术的性能对比

Table 9 The comparison between different coal-based carbon capture and storage technologies

文献	系统类型	碳捕集方法	发电效率/%		CO₂捕集率/%
文献	系统类型	碳捕集方法	不带CCS	带CCS	CO₂捕集率/%
[42]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	45.35	35.16	90.00
[43]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	40.92	35.60	90.00
[44]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	41.27	36.46	96.00
[45]	BIGCC	燃烧前捕集	36.40	26.00	76.40
[45]		燃烧后捕集	38.80	24.70	90.00
[46]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	44.10	35.00	—
[47]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	47.66	38.38	90.80
[47]	IGCC	富氧燃烧	47.66	40.27	97.40
[48]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	50.79	38.71	88.00
[49]	MCFC-MGT	富氧燃烧	55.13	45.41	100.00
[50]	IGCC	富氧燃烧	47.24	40.06	95.67
[51]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	44.00	34.00	85~90
[52]	IGCC	燃烧后捕集	43.00	31.80	90.00
[53]	IGCC	燃烧后捕集	49.30	40.80	81.00
[54]	IGCC	富氧燃烧	44.34	34.76	88.00
[55]	IGCC	富氧燃烧	41.51	32.96	100.00
[56]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	42.10	37.80	92.00
[56]	IGCC	燃烧后捕集	42.10	41.00	92.00
[57]	IGCC	燃烧前捕集	42.15	35.82	92.83
[57]	IGCC	燃烧后捕集	42.15	34.63	90.36
本文系统	光煤互补耦合SOFC	多能互补+富氧燃烧		47.59	100.00

参考文献 57

1	He G, Lin J, Zhang Y, et al. Enabling a rapid and just transition away from coal in China[J]. One Earth, 2020, 3(2): 187-194.
2	Dai S F, Finkelman R B. Coal as a promising source of critical elements: progress and future prospects[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 186: 155-164.
3	IEA. Global energy and CO₂ status report 2018[R]. IEA, 2018.
4	国家统计局. 中国第三产业统计年鉴—2019[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook of the Tertiary Industry—2019[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2020.
5	Zhou L Y, Xu G, Zhao S F, et al. Parametric analysis and process optimization of steam cycle in double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 99: 652-660.
6	高嵩, 赵洁, 黄迪南. 1000 MW超超临界二次再热燃煤发电技术[J]. 中国电力, 2017, 50(6): 6-11.
	Gao S, Zhao J, Huang D N. Double-reheat coal-fired power generation technologies for 1000 MW ultra-supercritical units[J]. Electric Power, 2017, 50(6): 6-11.
7	Xu J L, Sun E H, Li M J, et al. Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant[J]. Energy, 2018, 157: 227-246.
8	Sun E H, Xu J L, Li M J, et al. Connected-top-bottom-cycle to cascade utilize flue gas heat for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 172: 138-154.
9	IEA. China’s Emissions Trading Scheme: Designing Efficient Allowance Allocation[M]. International Energy Agency: OECD, 2020.
10	帅永, 赵斌, 蒋东方, 等. 中国燃煤高效清洁发电技术现状与展望[J]. 热力发电, 2022, 51(1): 1-10.
	Shuai Y, Zhao B, Jiang D F, et al. Status and prospect of coal-fired high efficiency and clean power generation technology in China[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2022, 51(1): 1-10.
11	胡玥, 徐钢, 段栋伟, 等. 碳减排技术发展现状[J]. 热力发电, 2017, 46(2): 1-6, 14.
	Hu Y, Xu G, Duan D W, et al. Current situation and performance comparison of carbon capture technologies[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2017, 46(2): 1-6, 14.
12	郭烈锦, 赵亮, 吕友军, 等. 煤炭超临界水气化制氢发电多联产技术[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(3): 678-679.
	Guo L J, Zhao L, Lyu Y J, et al. Multi-generation technology of hydrogen production and power generation by coal supercritical water gasification[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2017, 38(3): 678-679.
13	Ge Z W, Jin H, Guo L J. Hydrogen production by catalytic gasification of coal in supercritical water with alkaline catalysts: explore the way to complete gasification of coal[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(34): 19583-19592.
14	Jin H, Lu Y J, Liao B, et al. Hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(13): 7151-7160.
15	Azadi P, Farnood R, Vuillardot C. Estimation of heating time in tubular supercritical water reactors[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2011, 55(3): 1038-1045.
16	Jin H, Guo S M, Guo L J, et al. A mathematical model and numerical investigation for glycerol gasification in supercritical water with a tubular reactor[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2016, 107: 526-533.
17	Chen J W, Wang Q T, Xu Z Y, et al. Process in supercritical water gasification of coal: a review of fundamentals, mechanisms, catalysts and element transformation[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 237: 114122.
18	Bermejo M D, Cocero M J, Fernández-Polanco F. A process for generating power from the oxidation of coal in supercritical water[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(2): 195-204.
19	Yan Q H, Hou Y W, Luo J R, et al. The exergy release mechanism and exergy analysis for coal oxidation in supercritical water atmosphere and a power generation system based on the new technology[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 129: 122-130.
20	Briola S, Gabbrielli R, Schiavetti M, et al. Supercritical water oxidation of coal in power plants with low CO₂ emissions[C]//The International Conference ECOS 2007 (Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems). Padova, Italy, 2007.
21	Guo L J, Jin H. Boiling coal in water: hydrogen production and power generation system with zero net CO₂ emission based on coal and supercritical water gasification[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(29): 12953-12967.
22	Chen Z W, Zhang X S, Han W, et al. A power generation system with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and CO₂ capture[J]. Energy, 2018, 142: 723-730.
23	Chen Z W, Zhang X S, Li S, et al. Novel power generation models integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and parallel partial chemical heat recovery[J]. Energy, 2017, 134: 933-942.
24	El-Emam R S, Dincer I, Naterer G F. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated SOFC and coal gasification system[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1689-1697.
25	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制 [J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
	Chen Z W, Wei J J, Zhang Y M. The system integration and energy conversion mechanism of the power technology with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and SOFC[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
26	Romano M C, Spallina V, Campanari S. Integrating IT-SOFC and gasification combined cycle with methanation reactor and hydrogen firing for near zero-emission power generation from coal[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1168-1175.
27	Chen Z W, Zhang X S, Gao L, et al. Thermal analysis of supercritical water gasification of coal for power generation with partial heat recovery[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 111: 1287-1295.
28	卢立宁, 李素芬, 沈胜强, 等. 固体氧化物燃料电池与燃气轮机联合发电系统模拟研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2004, 19(4): 358-362, 436.
	Lu L N, Li S F, Shen S Q, et al. Simulation study of a combined power generation system incorporating a solid-oxide fuel cell and a gas turbine[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2004, 19(4): 358-362, 436.
29	Doherty W, Reynolds A, Kennedy D. Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen Plus[J]. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 4545-4555.
30	Tanim T, Bayless D J, Trembly J P. Modeling a 5 kW_e planar solid oxide fuel cell based system operating on JP-8 fuel and a comparison with tubular cell based system for auxiliary and mobile power applications[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 245: 986-997.
31	李裕, 叶爽, 王蔚国. 基于天然气自热重整的SOFC系统性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1557-1564.
	Li Y, Ye S, Wang W G. Performance analysis of SOFC system based on natural gas autothermal reforming[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(4): 1557-1564.
32	郑志美, 刘泰秀, 刘启斌. 太阳能热化学与燃料电池联合的发电系统[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2020, 41(11): 2627-2634.
	Zheng Z M, Liu T X, Liu Q B. A power generation system with solar thermochemical and fuel cell[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2020, 41(11): 2627-2634.
33	吴海峰, 刘佳维, 刘启斌. 太阳能驱动生物质气化多联产系统研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(1): 465-470.
	Wu H F, Liu J W, Liu Q B. Study on solar-driven biomass gasification polygeneration system[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 465-470.
34	吴海峰. 聚光太阳能与生物质热化学互补机理及系统集成研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2020.
	Wu H F. Study on thermochemical complementary mechanism and system integration of concentrated solar energy and biomass[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2020.
35	US Department of Energy. Fuel Cell Handbook[M]. 5th ed. Morgantown, WV: Federal Energy Technology Center, 2000.
36	Akkaya A V. Electrochemical model for performance analysis of a tubular SOFC[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2007, 31(1): 79-98.
37	Selimovic A. Modelling of solid oxide fuel cells applied to the analysis of integrated systems with gas turbines[D]. Lund University, 2002.
38	Costamagna P, Honegger K. Modeling of solid oxide heat exchanger integrated stacks and simulation at high fuel utilization[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1998, 145(11): 3995-4007.
39	罗丽琦, 谢广元, 王绍荣. 以气化煤气为燃料的固体氧化物燃料电池热电联供系统设计[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2023, 29(5): 68-79.
	Luo L Q, Xie G Y, Wang S R. Design of combined heat and power supply system based on coal gas SOFC(IGFC-CHP) system[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2023, 29(5): 68-79.
40	Abraham F, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis of direct urea solid oxide fuel cell in combined heat and power applications[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 299: 544-556.
41	Guo L J, Jin H, Lu Y J. Supercritical water gasification research and development in China[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2015, 96: 144-150.
42	陈新明, 史绍平, 闫姝, 等. 燃烧前CO₂捕集技术在IGCC发电中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(8): 3193-3201.
	Chen X M, Shi S P, Yan S, et al. Application of CO₂ capture technology before burning in IGCC power generation system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(8): 3193-3201.
43	Shisir A, Ting W. Investigation of air extraction and carbon capture in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) system[C]//ASME 2021 Power Conference. 2021.
44	Li X W, Wang T. A parametric investigation of integrated gasification combined cycles with carbon capture[C]//Asme Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference & Exposition. 2012.
45	Zang G Y, Jia J X, Tejasvi S, et al. Techno-economic comparative analysis of biomass integrated gasification combined cycles with and without CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 78: 73-84.
46	Huang Y, Rezvani S, McIlveen-Wright D, et al. Techno-economic assessment of pulverized coal boilers and IGCC power plants with CO₂ capture[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(2): 196-206.
47	Lozza G G, Romano M, Giuffrida A. Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxy-combustion CO₂ capture[C]//1st International Conference on Sustainable Fossil Fuels for Future Energy. 2023.
48	Sanz W, Mayr M, Jericha H. Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of an IGCC plant based on the Graz cycle for CO₂ capture[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Glasgow, UK, 2010: 493-503.
49	Ahn J H, Seop Kim T. Performance evaluation of a molten carbonate fuel cell/micro gas turbine hybrid system with oxy-combustion carbon capture[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2018, 140(4): 041502.
50	Spallina V, Romano M C, Campanari S, et al. A SOFC-based integrated gasification fuel cell cycle with CO₂ capture[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2011, 133(7): 1-10.
51	Kanniche M, Gros-Bonnivard R, Jaud P, et al. Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(1): 53-62.
52	Kawabata M, Iki N, Kurata O, et al. Energy flow of advanced IGCC with CO₂ capture option[C]//Proceedings of ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012: 551-558.
53	Kawabata M, Kurata O, Iki N, et al. System modeling of exergy recuperated IGCC system with pre- and post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 54(1): 310-318.
54	Duan L Q, Sun S Y, Yue L, et al. Study on a new IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) system with CO₂ capture by integrating MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cell)[J]. Energy, 2015, 87: 490-503.
55	Duan L Q, Sun S Y, Yue L, et al. Study on different zero CO₂ emission IGCC systems with CO₂ capture by integrating OTM[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(10): 1410-1427.
56	Asif M, Bak C U, Saleem M W, et al. Performance evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) utilizing a blended solution of ammonia and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) for CO₂ capture[J]. Fuel, 2015, 160: 513-524.
57	Cormos C C, Cormos A M, Agachi S. Power generation from coal and biomass based on integrated gasification combined cycle concept with pre- and post-combustion carbon capture methods[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 4(6): 870-877.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

462

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
1	0	7	56	0	398

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	68	394
比例	15%	85%

摘要

262

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

44	0	218

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	80	182
比例	31%	69%

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[3]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[4]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[5]	刘远超, 关斌, 钟建斌, 徐一帆, 蒋旭浩, 李耑. 单层XSe₂（X=Zr/Hf）的热电输运特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3968-3978.
[6]	傅予, 刘兴翀, 王瀚雨, 李海敏, 倪亚飞, 邹文静, 雷月, 彭永姗. F₃EACl修饰层对钙钛矿太阳能电池性能提升的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3554-3563.
[7]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[8]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[9]	王光, 单发顺, 钱禹丞, 焦建芳. 基于集成学习传递熵的化工过程微小故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2967-2978.
[10]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[11]	李贵贤, 曹阿波, 孟文亮, 王东亮, 杨勇, 周怀荣. 耦合固体氧化物电解槽的CO₂制甲醇过程设计与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2999-3009.
[12]	邵远哲, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于共同趋势模型的非平稳过程质量相关故障检测方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2522-2537.
[13]	刘尚豪, 贾胜坤, 罗祎青, 袁希钢. 基于梯度提升决策树的三组元精馏流程结构最优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2075-2087.
[14]	贠程, 王倩琳, 陈锋, 张鑫, 窦站, 颜廷俊. 基于社团结构的化工过程风险演化路径深度挖掘[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1639-1650.
[15]	王子宗, 索寒生, 赵学良. 数字孪生智能乙烯工厂研究与构建[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1175-1186.

CO₂近零排放的光煤互补耦合SOFC发电系统热力学分析

Thermodynamic analysis of CO₂ near-zero-emission power system with integrated solar energy, supercritical water gasification of coal and SOFC

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 57

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价