Research progress of hydrogen sulfide deep adsorption materials

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201063

Abstract

Abstract:

At present, hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has increasingly become an important factor restricting the development of industrialization. Even at a low concentration, it will still damage the environment and corrode equipment. The deep purification of sulfur-containing gas by using an environmental and efficient method has gained the attention of researchers on domestic and overseas. Adsorption desulfurization has a good prospective because of its deep removal, high efficiency, environmental-friendly performance and good regeneration. The key of adsorption desulfurization is to develop an adsorbent with good selectivity, large adsorption capacity, stable performance and good reproducibility. This paper summarizes the recent advances in several adsorbent materials such as carbon-based materials, porous metal oxides, zeolite and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), making a comment on the future development directions of deep removal of H₂S, aiming at providing a reference for further research.

Key words: desulfurization, H₂S, adsorbent, adsorption, gas purification, separation

摘要：

目前硫化氢（H₂S）日益成为制约工业化发展的一个重要因素，即使在较低的浓度下仍会破坏环境、腐蚀设备。如何能将含硫气体清洁、高效、深度脱除已成为国内外学者的研究重点。吸附法脱硫以其脱硫程度高、高效环保、操作简单和吸附剂可重复利用等优点具有良好的发展前景。研制一种选择性好、吸附容量大、性能稳定、再生性好的吸附剂是吸附法脱硫的关键。本文以深度脱除H₂S为目标，综述了碳基材料、多孔金属氧化物、沸石分子筛、金属有机框架（MOFs）等几种不同吸附材料的研究进展，总结深度脱硫今后的发展方向，旨在为后续的研究提供借鉴。

关键词: 脱硫, H₂S, 吸附剂, 吸附, 气体净化, 分离

CLC Number:

TQ 028.2

YU Tao, WANG Yundong, LIU Zuohua, MA Jianxiu, JING Yu. Research progress of hydrogen sulfide deep adsorption materials[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(2): 748-760.

于涛, 王运东, 刘作华, 马建修, 靖宇. 硫化氢深度吸附材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 748-760.

Figures/Tables 10

References 64

65	Shi R H, Zhang Z R, Fan H L, et al. Cu-based metal-organic framework/activated carbon composites for sulfur compounds removal[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 394: 394-402.
66	Li Z J, Xiao Y L, Xue W J, et al. Ionic liquid/metal-organic framework composites for H₂S removal from natural gas: a computational exploration[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(7): 3674-3683.
1	刘新鹏. 用于硫化氢脱除与硫资源回收的绿色脱硫新体系性能研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
	Liu X P. Study on the performance of new green systems for hydrogen sulfide removal and sulfur recovery[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2017.
2	Bao J E, Krishnan G N, Jayaweera P. Effect of various coal contaminants on the performance of solid oxide fuel cells (Ⅱ): ppm and sub-ppm level testing[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 193(2): 617-624.
3	International Standards Organization. Hydrogen fuel—product specification (2): Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell applications for road vehicles: [S]. 2012.
4	高齐. 碳材料表面碱性官能团对于低浓度H₂S的去除机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2018.
	Gao Q. Removal mechanism of low concentration H₂S by surface basic functional groups on carbon materials[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2018.
5	王睿, 石冈, 魏伟胜, 等. 工业气体中H₂S的脱除方法——发展现状与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 1999, 19(3): 84-90.
	Wang R, Shi G, Wei W S, et al. Methods of removing hydrogen sulfide from industrial gas—present situation and prospects[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1999, 19(3): 84-90.
6	Westmoreland P R, Harrison D P. Evaluation of candidate solids for high-temperature desulfurization of low-Btu gases[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1976, 10(7): 659- 661.
7	Cazorla-Amorós D, Alcañiz-Monge J, Linares-Solano A. Characterization of activated carbon fibers by CO₂ adsorption[J]. Langmuir, 1996, 12(11): 2820-2824.
67	Liu G P, Cadiau A, Liu Y, et al. Enabling fluorinated MOF-based membranes for simultaneous removal of H₂S and CO₂ from natural gas[J]. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2018, 57(45): 14811-14816.
8	Peluso A, Gargiulo N, Aprea P, et al. Nanoporous materials as H₂S adsorbents for biogas purification: a review[J]. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2019, 48(1): 78-89.
9	Wu X X, Schwartz V, Overbury S H, et al. Desulfurization of gaseous fuels using activated carbons as catalysts for the selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2005, 19(5): 1774-1782.
10	Shen F, Liu J, Zhang Z, et al. Density functional study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption mechanism on activated carbon[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 171: 258-264.
11	Bashkova S, Baker F S, Wu X X, et al. Activated carbon catalyst for selective oxidation of hydrogen sulphide: on the influence of pore structure, surface characteristics, and catalytically-active nitrogen[J]. Carbon, 2007, 45(6): 1354-1363.
12	Quan W Y, Jiang X, Wang X X, et al. Influence of loading a tertiary amine on activated carbons and effect of CO₂ on adsorptive H₂S removal from biogas[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(27): 9998-10008.
13	Seredych M, Bandosz T J. Role of microporosity and nitrogen functionality on the surface of activated carbon in the process of desulfurization of digester gas[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(12): 4704-4711.
14	Barelli L, Bidini G, de Arespacochaga N, et al. Biogas use in high temperature fuel cells: enhancement of KOH-KI activated carbon performance toward H₂S removal[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 10341-10353.
15	Tsai J H, Jeng F T, Chiang H L. Removal of H₂S from exhaust gas by use of alkaline activated carbon[J]. Adsorption, 2001, 7: 357-366.
16	Sitthikhankaew R, Predapitakkun S, Kiattikomol R W, et al. Comparative study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by using alkaline impregnated activated carbons for hot fuel gas purification[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 9: 15-24.
17	Siriwardane I W, Udangawa R, de Silva R M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of nano magnesium oxide impregnated granular activated carbon composite for H₂S removal applications[J]. Materials & Design, 2017, 136: 127-136.
18	Cimino S, Lisi L, Erto A, et al. Role of H₂O and O₂ during the reactive adsorption of H₂S on CuO-ZnO/activated carbon at low temperature[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2020, 295: 109949.
19	Monteleone G, de Francesco M, Stefano G, et al. Deep H₂S removal from biogas for molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 173(3): 407-414.
20	Sun M H, Wang X Z, Pan X, et al. Nitrogen-rich hierarchical porous carbon nanofibers for selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 191: 121-128.
21	Qi J, Wei G, Li Y, et al. Porous carbon spheres for simultaneous removal of benzene and H₂S[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 339: 499-508.
22	Zhang Z, Wang J, Li W, et al. Millimeter-sized mesoporous carbon spheres for highly efficient catalytic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide at room temperature[J]. Carbon, 2016, 96: 608-615.
23	Chen Q J, Wang J T, Liu X J, et al. Alkaline carbon nanotubes as effective catalysts for H₂S oxidation[J]. Carbon, 2011, 49(12): 3773-3780.
24	Khabazipour M, Anbia M. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using porous materials: a review[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(49): 22133-22164.
25	Fan H L, Sun T, Zhao Y P, et al. Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous iron oxide for removal of H₂S at medium temperatures[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(9): 4859-4865.
26	Bao W R, Zhang Z Y, Ren X R, et al. Desulfurization behavior of iron-based sorbent with MgO and TiO₂ additive in hot coal gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(7): 3600-3604.
27	Novochinskii I I, Song C S, Ma X L, et al. Low-temperature H₂S removal from steam-containing gas mixtures with ZnO for fuel cell application(1): ZnO particles and extrudates[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18(2): 576-583.
28	Yang C, Yang S, Fan H L, et al. A sustainable design of ZnO-based adsorbent for robust H₂S uptake and secondary utilization as hydrogenation catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122892.
29	Habeeb O A, Kanthasamy R, Ali G A M, et al. Hydrogen sulfide emission sources, regulations, and removal techniques: a review[J]. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2018, 34(6): 837-854.
30	Pahalagedara L R, Poyraz A S, Song W Q, et al. Low temperature desulfurization of H₂S: high sorption capacities by mesoporous cobalt oxide via increased H₂S diffusion[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2014, 26(22): 6613-6621.
31	Liu X, Meng X, Zhao J. Synthesis of nanocrystalline iron oxides with mesostructure as desulfurizer[J]. Materials Letters, 2013, 92: 255-258.
32	Long N Q, Loc T X. Experimental and modeling study on room-temperature removal of hydrogen sulfide using a low-cost extruded Fe₂O₃-based adsorbent[J]. Adsorption, 2016, 22(3): 397-408.
33	Liu D, Chen S Y, Fei X Y, et al. Regenerable CuO-based adsorbents for low temperature desulfurization application[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(14): 3556-3562.
34	Tran D T. Synthesis of porous ZnO based materials using an agarose gel template for H₂S desulfurization[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(2): 1339-1345.
35	Zheng X R, Bao, W R, Jin Q M, et al. Use of high-pressure impregnation in preparing Zn-based sorbents for deep desulfurization of hot coal gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(7): 2997-3001.
36	Zheng X R, Bao W R, Chang L P, et al. Interaction among metal components of Zn-Mn-Cu-based sorbents prepared by high-pressure impregnation method and its effect on the removal of H₂S from hot coal gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(6): 3393-3398.
37	Li L, King D L. H₂S removal with ZnO during fuel processing for PEM fuel cell applications[J]. Catalysis Today, 2006, 116(4): 537-541.
38	Li L, Zhang H B, Zhou P, et al. Three dimensional ordered macroporous zinc ferrite composited silica sorbents with promotional desulfurization and regeneration activity at mid-high temperature[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 470: 177-186.
39	Wei Y, Liu J, Zhao Z, et al. The catalysts of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Ce_1-_xZr_xO₂-supported gold nanoparticles for soot combustion: the metal-support interaction[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2012, 287: 13-29.
40	Wang L J, Fan H L, Shangguan J, et al. Design of a sorbent to enhance reactive adsorption of hydrogen sulfide[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(23): 21167-21177.
41	陈曦. 提高Y型和X型分子筛吸附功能深度净化天然气过程基础研究[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2018.
	Chen X. The fundamental study on enhancing adsorption performance of zeolite Y and X for deep purification of sour natural gas[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2018.
42	王洪国. 清洁燃料选择性吸附脱硫过程中硫化物吸附行为的研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学, 2010.
	Wang H G. Studies of adsorption behavior of sulfur compounds in selective adsorption desulfurization for clean fuel[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2010.
43	Kristóf T. Selective removal of hydrogen sulphide from industrial gas mixtures using zeolite NaA[J]. Hungarian Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 2017, 45(1): 9-15.
44	Alonso-Vicario A, Ochoa-Gómez J R, Gil-Río S, et al. Purification and upgrading of biogas by pressure swing adsorption on synthetic and natural zeolites[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2010, 134(1/2/3): 100-107.
45	Liu X, Wang R. Effective removal of hydrogen sulfide using 4A molecular sieve zeolite synthesized from attapulgite[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 326: 157-164.
46	Yang K, Su B, Shi L, et al. Adsorption mechanism and regeneration performance of 13X for H₂S and SO₂[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(12): 12742-12749.
47	Chen X, Shen B, Sun H, et al. Ion-exchange modified zeolites X for selective adsorption desulfurization from Claus tail gas: experimental and computational investigations[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2018, 261: 227-236.
48	Barelli L, Bidini G, Micoli L, et al. 13X Ex-Cu zeolite performance characterization towards H₂S removal for biogas use in molten carbonate fuel cells[J]. Energy, 2018, 160: 44-53.
49	Micoli L, Bagnasco G, Turco M. H₂S removal from biogas for fuelling MCFCs: new adsorbing materials[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(4): 1783-1787.
50	Liu C, Zhang R, Wei S, et al. Selective removal of H₂S from biogas using a regenerable hybrid TiO₂/zeolite composite[J]. Fuel, 2015, 157: 183-190.
51	Abdullah A H, Mat R, Somderam S, et al. Hydrogen sulfide adsorption by zinc oxide-impregnated zeolite (synthesized from Malaysian kaolin) for biogas desulfurization[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2018, 65: 334-342.
52	Fellah M F. Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide as initial step of H₂S removal: a DFT study on metal exchanged ZSM-12 clusters[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 144: 191-196.
53	Yaghi O M, Li H L. Hydrothermal synthesis of a metal-organic framework containing large rectangular channels[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1995, 117: 10401-10402.
54	Furukawa H, Cordova K E, O'Keeffe M, et al. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6149): 1230444.
55	Jiao L, Seow J Y R, Skinner W S, et al. Metal-organic frameworks: structures and functional applications[J]. Materials Today, 2019, 27: 43-68.
56	Hamon L, Serre C, Devic T. Comparative study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption in the MIL-53(Al, Cr, Fe), MIL-47(V), MIL-100(Cr), and MIL-101(Cr) metal-organic frameworks at room temperature[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131: 8775-8777.
57	Peluso A, Gargiulo N, Aprea P, et al. Modeling hydrogen sulfide adsorption on chromium-based MIL-101 metal organic framework[J]. Science of Advanced Materials, 2014, 6(1): 164-170.
58	Joshi J N, Zhu G, Lee J J. et al. Probing metal-organic framework design for adsorptive natural gas purification[J]. Langmuir, 2018, 34(29): 8443-8450.
59	Li Y, Wang L J, Fan H L, et al. Removal of sulfur compounds by a copper-based metal organic framework under ambient conditions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(1): 298-304.
60	Zhang H Y, Yang C, Geng Q, et al. Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide by amine-functionalized metal organic framework (MOF-199): an experimental and simulation study[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 497: 143815.
61	Nickerl G, Leistner M, Helten S, et al. Integration of accessible secondary metal sites into MOFs for H₂S removal[J]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 2014, 1(4): 325-330.
62	Petit C, Bandosz T J. Exploring the coordination chemistry of MOF-graphite oxide composites and their applications as adsorbents[J]. Dalton Transactions, 2012, 41(14): 4027-4035.
63	Ebrahim A M, Jagiello J, Bandosz T J. Enhanced reactive adsorption of H₂S on Cu-BTC/S- and N-doped GO composites[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(15): 8194-8204.
64	Kakaei H, Beygzadeh M, Golbabaei F, et al. Preparation of a sepiolite/Cu-BDC nanocomposite and its application as an adsorbent in respirator cartridges for H₂S removal[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2019, 43(29): 11575-11584.

材料	比表面积/(m²/g)	孔体积/ (cm³/g)	平均孔径/nm	气体组成	操作温度/℃	穿透容量^①/(mg/g)	文献
WSC	860	0.40	0.7	50% H₂, 15% CO₂, 9% CO, 2% N₂, 24% H₂O, 10^-3 H₂S 50% H₂, 15% CO₂, 9% CO, 2% N₂, 24% H₂O, 10^-3 H₂S	150 150	71(0.2)	[11]
WSCU	945	0.43	0.8		150 150	133(0.2)	[11]
S208C	898	0.48	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	27.2(ND)	[13]
S-A	905	0.48	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	26.4(ND)	[13]
S-AU	640	0.34	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	34.0(ND)	[13]
S-AM	37	0.02	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	0.4(-)	[13]
S-B	882	0.47	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	17.6(ND)	[13]
S-BU	808	0.43	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	54.1(ND)	[13]
S-BM	732	0.39	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	71.9(ND)	[13]
AC-KOH/KI	1042	0.42	—	2% O₂, 10^-4 H₂S, 90%相对湿度, N₂平衡	45 45	65.6(0.2)	[14]
AC-KOH/KI	1042	0.42	—	10^-4 H₂S, 90%相对湿度, N₂平衡	45 45	34.9(0.2)	[14]
RB₂-NaOH₅₀	758	0.25	1.56	2.5×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	25	43.5(ND)	[15]
AC-NaOH	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	0.4(10)	[16]
AC-KI	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.56(<10)	[16]
AC-Na₂CO₃	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.58(<10)	[16]
AC-KOH	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.58(<10)	[16]
GAC	1678±41	0.75±0.03	0.89±0.16	80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气 80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气	25 25	53(N)	[17]
MgO-GAC	1358±39	0.60±0.01	0.88±0.23	80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气 80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气	25 25	275(N)	[17]
Cu_0.5Zn_0.5/AC	570	0.76	—	10^-4 H₂S, 2.5×10^-3 O₂, 50%相对湿度, N₂平衡	30	25.0(ND)	[18]
NORIT	978	0.30	—	5×10^-5 H₂S, N₂平衡	—	- (<0.5)	[19]

材料	比表面积/(m²/g)	孔体积/ (cm³/g)	平均孔径/nm	气体组成	操作温度/℃	穿透容量^①/(mg/g)	文献
WSC	860	0.40	0.7	50% H₂, 15% CO₂, 9% CO, 2% N₂, 24% H₂O, 10^-3 H₂S 50% H₂, 15% CO₂, 9% CO, 2% N₂, 24% H₂O, 10^-3 H₂S	150 150	71(0.2)	[11]
WSCU	945	0.43	0.8		150 150	133(0.2)	[11]
S208C	898	0.48	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	27.2(ND)	[13]
S-A	905	0.48	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	26.4(ND)	[13]
S-AU	640	0.34	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	34.0(ND)	[13]
S-AM	37	0.02	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	0.4(-)	[13]
S-B	882	0.47	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	17.6(ND)	[13]
S-BU	808	0.43	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	54.1(ND)	[13]
S-BM	732	0.39	—	60% CH₄, 40% CO₂, 10^-3 H₂S, 70% H₂O预加湿	—	71.9(ND)	[13]
AC-KOH/KI	1042	0.42	—	2% O₂, 10^-4 H₂S, 90%相对湿度, N₂平衡	45 45	65.6(0.2)	[14]
AC-KOH/KI	1042	0.42	—	10^-4 H₂S, 90%相对湿度, N₂平衡	45 45	34.9(0.2)	[14]
RB₂-NaOH₅₀	758	0.25	1.56	2.5×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	25	43.5(ND)	[15]
AC-NaOH	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	0.4(10)	[16]
AC-KI	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.56(<10)	[16]
AC-Na₂CO₃	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.58(<10)	[16]
AC-KOH	—	—	—	3×10^-3 H₂S, He平衡	30	1.58(<10)	[16]
GAC	1678±41	0.75±0.03	0.89±0.16	80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气 80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气	25 25	53(N)	[17]
MgO-GAC	1358±39	0.60±0.01	0.88±0.23	80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气 80% H₂O, 1% H₂S, 空气	25 25	275(N)	[17]
Cu_0.5Zn_0.5/AC	570	0.76	—	10^-4 H₂S, 2.5×10^-3 O₂, 50%相对湿度, N₂平衡	30	25.0(ND)	[18]
NORIT	978	0.30	—	5×10^-5 H₂S, N₂平衡	—	- (<0.5)	[19]

材料	比表面积/(m²/g)	孔体积/(cm³/g)	平均孔径/nm	气体组成	操作温度/℃	饱和容量^①/(mg/g)	穿透容量^①/(mg/g)	文献
3DOM-Fe₂O₃	16~44	—	20~33	5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡 5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	350 350	—	37.18(<0.2)	[25]
3DOM-Fe₂O₃/SiO₂	80~220	—	6~17	5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡 5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	350 350	—	38.92(<0.2)	[25]
MFT	—	—	—	39.8% H₂, 32.6% CO₂, 2.5×10^-3 H₂S, N₂平衡	400	216(N)	—	[26]
Engelhard ZnO	53.13	0.28	—	8×10^-6 H₂S, 34.4% H₂, 20% H₂O, N₂平衡	300	—	28.1(0.02)	[27]
ZSCo-0	151.3	0.42	7.40	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	174.6	117.8(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.05	188.7	0.58	7.82	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	195.2	146.4(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.15	206.4	0.63	9.58	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	208.4	169.8(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.3	192.1	0.55	9.24	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	230.5	188.4(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.50	161.5	0.46	7.53	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	194.1	143.4(ND)	[28]
Extruded-Fe₂O₃	60.6	13.90	99.0	6×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体	30 ± 2	22.4	16.0(N)	[32]
Fe-Cu-Al-O	96.7	—	—	10^-3 H₂S, CO₂	40	—	113.9(ND)	[33]
ZnO	10.2	0.029	介-大孔	51% H₂, 30% He, 10% H₂O, 4×10^-4 H₂S	400	457.3(2)	—	[34]
Ni-ZnO	6.8	0.025	介-大孔	51% H₂, 30% He, 10% H₂O, 4×10^-4 H₂S	400	730.0(2)	—	[34]
HZn20SC	272.59	0.17	—	33% CO, 39% H₂, 5% H₂O,3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	450	—	44.6(ND)	[35]
Z20M4C6SC	207.33	0.03	—	33% CO, 39% H₂, 5×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	500	—	138.4(ND)	[36]
ZnO	—	—	—	54% H₂, 21%CO₂, 2.5×10^-5 H₂S, He 平衡	150	—	131(<0.1)	[37]
ZnO	—	—	—	54% H₂, 21%CO₂, 2.5×10^-5 H₂S, He 平衡	200	—	110(<0.1)	[37]
3DOM-ZnFe₂O₄/SiO₂	213.10	0.39	7.40	5% H₂, 3% H₂O, 0.1% H₂S, N₂平衡	500	—	92(<0.5)	[38]
3DOM-ZnO/SiO₂	336	0.244	1.436	3% H₂O, 500 mg/m³ H₂S, N₂平衡	室温	—	135(<0.72)	[40]

材料	比表面积/(m²/g)	孔体积/(cm³/g)	平均孔径/nm	气体组成	操作温度/℃	饱和容量^①/(mg/g)	穿透容量^①/(mg/g)	文献
3DOM-Fe₂O₃	16~44	—	20~33	5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡 5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	350 350	—	37.18(<0.2)	[25]
3DOM-Fe₂O₃/SiO₂	80~220	—	6~17	5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡 5% H₂, 3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	350 350	—	38.92(<0.2)	[25]
MFT	—	—	—	39.8% H₂, 32.6% CO₂, 2.5×10^-3 H₂S, N₂平衡	400	216(N)	—	[26]
Engelhard ZnO	53.13	0.28	—	8×10^-6 H₂S, 34.4% H₂, 20% H₂O, N₂平衡	300	—	28.1(0.02)	[27]
ZSCo-0	151.3	0.42	7.40	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	174.6	117.8(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.05	188.7	0.58	7.82	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	195.2	146.4(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.15	206.4	0.63	9.58	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	208.4	169.8(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.3	192.1	0.55	9.24	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	230.5	188.4(ND)	[28]
ZSCo-0.50	161.5	0.46	7.53	8×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体(N₂, H₂O)	30	194.1	143.4(ND)	[28]
Extruded-Fe₂O₃	60.6	13.90	99.0	6×10^-4 H₂S, 混合气体	30 ± 2	22.4	16.0(N)	[32]
Fe-Cu-Al-O	96.7	—	—	10^-3 H₂S, CO₂	40	—	113.9(ND)	[33]
ZnO	10.2	0.029	介-大孔	51% H₂, 30% He, 10% H₂O, 4×10^-4 H₂S	400	457.3(2)	—	[34]
Ni-ZnO	6.8	0.025	介-大孔	51% H₂, 30% He, 10% H₂O, 4×10^-4 H₂S	400	730.0(2)	—	[34]
HZn20SC	272.59	0.17	—	33% CO, 39% H₂, 5% H₂O,3×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	450	—	44.6(ND)	[35]
Z20M4C6SC	207.33	0.03	—	33% CO, 39% H₂, 5×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	500	—	138.4(ND)	[36]
ZnO	—	—	—	54% H₂, 21%CO₂, 2.5×10^-5 H₂S, He 平衡	150	—	131(<0.1)	[37]
ZnO	—	—	—	54% H₂, 21%CO₂, 2.5×10^-5 H₂S, He 平衡	200	—	110(<0.1)	[37]
3DOM-ZnFe₂O₄/SiO₂	213.10	0.39	7.40	5% H₂, 3% H₂O, 0.1% H₂S, N₂平衡	500	—	92(<0.5)	[38]
3DOM-ZnO/SiO₂	336	0.244	1.436	3% H₂O, 500 mg/m³ H₂S, N₂平衡	室温	—	135(<0.72)	[40]

材料	比表面积/(m²/g)	孔体积/(cm³/g)	平均孔径/nm	气体组成	操作温度/℃	饱和容量/(mg/g)	穿透容量^①/ (mg/g)	文献
天然斜发沸石	34.2	0.12	17.9	59.95% CH₄, 39.95% CO₂, 0.1% H₂S	25	—	1.4(<3)	[44]
4A	49.5	—	—	10^-3 H₂S, N₂平衡	50	—	8.36(~0)	[45]
13X	567	0.34	—	2×10^-2 H₂S, 10^-2 SO₂, 15% H₂O, N₂平衡	150	—	179.7(ND)	[46]
NaX	503	0.255	—	63% N₂, 35% CO₂, 2% H₂S, 2×10^-4 COS	25	24.96	21.44(ND)	[47]
ZnX	538	0.307	—	63% N₂, 35% CO₂, 2% H₂S, 2×10^-4 COS	25	48.96	45.44(ND)	[47]
CoX	511	0.288	—	63% N₂, 35% CO₂, 2% H₂S, 2×10^-4 COS	25	44.16	41.28(ND)	[47]
AgX	333	0.169	—	63% N₂, 35% CO₂, 2% H₂S, 2×10^-4 COS	25	51.84	48.96(ND)	[47]
13X Ex-Cu	239	—	—	2×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	120	—	40.12±0.6(ND)	[48]
13X-Ex-Cu (2.3mmol/g Cu)	370	—	—	8×10^-6 H₂S, He平衡	40	—	39.8(0)	[49]
5-TiO₂/zeolite	93.42±0.06	0.59±0.06	—	65% CH₄, 35% N₂, 0.1% H₂S	25	—	4.43(ND)	[50]
20Zn/NaA zeolite	7.99	—	2.43	2×10^-4 H₂S, N₂平衡	28	—	15.75(0)	[51]