SBBR反应器中耐冷微生物的驯化与识别

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190731

化工学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (2): 766-776.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20190731

SBBR反应器中耐冷微生物的驯化与识别

吴涵¹(),陈滢¹(),刘敏¹,王淑莹²,张伟³

^1.四川大学建筑与环境学院，四川成都 610065
^2.北京工业大学城镇污水深度处理与资源化利用技术国家工程实验室，北京 100124
^3.四川大学高分子研究所高分子材料工程国家重点实验室，四川成都 610065

收稿日期:2019-07-01 修回日期:2019-07-31 出版日期:2020-02-05 发布日期:2020-02-05
通讯作者: 陈滢
作者简介:吴涵（1998—），女，本科生，1483112422@qq.com
基金资助:
四川大学大学生创新训练计划(C2019104263);城镇污水深度处理与资源化利用技术国家工程实验室开放基金;2018年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金

Domestication and identification of cold-resistant bacteria in SBBR reactor

Han WU¹(),Ying CHEN¹(),Min LIU¹,Shuying WANG²,Wei ZHANG³

^1.College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China
^2.National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
^3.State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Polymer Research Institute at Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, China

Received:2019-07-01 Revised:2019-07-31 Online:2020-02-05 Published:2020-02-05
Contact: Ying CHEN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以模拟生活污水为处理对象，三种不同填料为生物膜载体，运行 A、B、C三个SBBR，通过逐步降温（25、20、15、10、6和5℃）培养驯化处理低温污水的生物膜。运行251周期，三个反应器COD出水浓度均低于50 mg/L；B反应器对氨氮去除效果优于A和C。特别在低温5℃时，A、B和C三个反应器氨氮平均出水浓度分别为14.1、3.79和14.1 mg/L。高通量测序结果显示，5℃时，三个反应器中均以降解有机物的微生物为主；只有B反应器中驯化富集出了嗜冷硝化菌（Candidatus Nitrotoga）；而其他有硝化作用的菌属在B反应器中的丰度也高于A和C反应器；不利于脱氮的类固氮菌（Elstera）在A和C反应器中丰度较高。此结果可从微生物角度解释三个反应器处理效果的差异性，表明B反应器处理低温污水有显著优势，其所用填料可结合低温菌进一步开发利用。

关键词: 废水, 生物膜, 低温, 高通量测序, 微生物群落结构

Abstract:

Taking simulated domestic sewage as the treatment object, three different fillers are biofilm carriers, and three SBBRs of A, B and C are operated, and the biofilm of low temperature sewage is domesticated and treated by gradual cooling (25, 20, 15, 10, 6 and 5℃). During the 251 operating cycles, the COD effluent concentration of the three reactors was less than 50 mg/L. The ammonium removal efficiency of the B reactor was better than A and C. At 5℃, the ammonium concentration of effluent of A, B and C were 14.1, 3.79 and 14.1 mg/L, respectively. The results of high-throughput sequencing showed that the dominant microbial species in SBBR were mainly those can degrade organic matter at 5℃. Psychrophilic nitrifying bacteria (Candidatus Nitrotoga) were found only in B reactor. The abundance of other common nitrifying bacteria in the B reactor is higher than which in the A and C reactors. The nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Elstera), which adverse to remove ammonium，has the minimal distribution in the B reactor. These results can explain the difference of the pollutant removal of the three reactors from point of view of microorganism, which shows that B reactor has significant advantages in treating low temperature wastewater.

Key words: waste water, biofilm, low temperature, high throughput sequencing, microbial community structure

中图分类号:

X 703

吴涵, 陈滢, 刘敏, 王淑莹, 张伟. SBBR反应器中耐冷微生物的驯化与识别[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(2): 766-776.

Han WU, Ying CHEN, Min LIU, Shuying WANG, Wei ZHANG. Domestication and identification of cold-resistant bacteria in SBBR reactor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(2): 766-776.

参考文献 37

1	Cassidy D P, Belia E. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from an abattoir wastewater in a SBR with aerobic granular sludge[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(19): 4817-4823.
2	伍海全, 周丽蓉, 孙芬芬, 等. 应用生物强化技术处理高寒地区城市生活污水[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(6): 3511-3517.
	Wu H Q, Zhou L R, Sun F F, et al. Application of biological enhancement technology on treating urban domestic sewage in alpine regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(6): 3511-3517.
3	Antoniou P, Hamilton J, Koopman B, et al. Effect of temperature and pH on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying bacteria[J]. Water Research, 1990, 24(1): 97-101.
4	张巍, 赵军, 郎咸明, 等. 硝化细菌在不同温度下对氮素的去除效能研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2010, 35(6): 83-86.
	Zhang W, Zhao J, Lang X M, et al. Study on nitrogen removal efficiency of nitrifying bacteria at different temperatures[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2010, 35(6): 83-86.
5	王阿华, 杨小丽, 叶峰. 南方地区污水处理厂低温生物脱氮对策研究[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 35(10): 28-33.
	Wang A H, Yang X L, Ye F. Study on the countermeasures of low temperature biological nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants in Southern China[J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2009, 35(10): 28-33.
6	刘海龙, 任宇霞, 张忠民. 低温污水前置强化混凝[J]. 环境科学, 2018, (5): 2239-2248.
	Liu H L, Ren Y X, Zhang Z M. Enhanced coagulation as a pretreatment for low temperature wastewater[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, (5): 2239-2248.
7	袁敏, 刘晓冰, 唐美珍, 等. 生物炭固定菌强化人工湿地对低温污水中氮素去除的模拟研究[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(5): 463-468.
	Yuan M, Liu X B, Tang M Z, et al. Study on removal of nitrogen from low temperature sewage by Pseudomonas flava WD-3 immobilized biochar in constructed wetland[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(5): 463-468.
8	Li G, Zhang Z. Anaerobic biological treatment of alginate production wastewaters in a pilot-scale expended granular sludge bed reactor under moderate to low temperatures[J]. Water Environment Research, 2010, 82(8): 725-732.
9	Tsushima I, Yoochatchaval W, Yoshida H, et al. Microbial community structure and population dynamics of granules developed in expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors for the anaerobic treatment of low-strength wastewater at low temperature[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 2010, 45(6): 754-766.
10	刘锁, 牛川, 李贺. 低温下活性污泥处理废水技术的研究进展[J]. 环境科技, 2019, 32(1): 58-62.
	Liu S, Niu C, Li H. Research progress in wastewater treatment by activated sludge at low temperature[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 32(1): 58-62.
11	巩有奎, 彭永臻. 运行方式对SBBR亚硝酸型同步脱氮及N₂O释放的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2289-2297.
	Gong Y K, Peng Y Z. Effect of operation mode on characteristics and N₂O emissions during simultaneous nitrification and denitrification via nitrite in SBBR[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(6): 2289-2297.
12	Fuks G, Elgart M, Amir A, et al. Combining 16S rRNA gene variable regions enables high-resolution microbial community profiling[J]. Microbiome, 2018, 6(1): 17.
13	吴绍琳, 刘文文, 魏镇欢, 等. 不同时期排泥对培养SBBR生物膜的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(2): 1134-1139.
	Wu S L, Liu W W, Wei Z H, et al. Effects of sludge discharge stage on SBBR biofilm cultivation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(2): 1135-1140.
14	Jin R C, Ma C, Yu J J. Performance of an Anammox UASB reactor at high load and low ambient temperature[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 232: 17-25.
15	艾胜书, 张莉, 王帆, 等. 多段多级AO生物膜反应器处理低温城市污水研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2018, 44(7): 105-109.
	Ai S S, Zhang L, Wang F, et al. Study on low temperature municipal wastewater treatment by AMAO bio-film reactor[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2018, 44(7): 105-109.
16	张斌, 刘波, 罗雅文, 等. 改良型A²/O 工艺在高寒地区污水处理工程中的应用[J]. 给水排水, 2015, (12): 40-44.
	Zhang B, Liu B, Luo Y W, et al. Application of improved A²/O process in sewage treatment project in alpine region[J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2015, (12): 40-44.
17	Feng Y, Qi J, Chi L, et al. Production of sorption functional media (SFM) from clinoptilolite tailings and its performance investigation in a biological aerated filter (BAF) reactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 246/247(4): 61-69.
18	寇海涛, 曹文平, 马天仪, 等. 污水处理系统中原生动物和微型后生动物的作用研究[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2018, 44(5): 42-44.
	Kou H T, Cao W P, Ma T Y, et al. Functions analysis of protozoans and metazoans in wastewater bio-chemical treatment system[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 44(5): 42-44.
19	付欢, 王欢, 李杰. 论钟虫对生化曝气池运行状况的指示作用[J]. 中国储运, 2013, (10): 172-173.
	Fu H, Wang H, Li J. Discussion on the indicative effect of vorticellidae on the operation status of biochemical aeration tank[J]. China Storage and Transportation, 2013, (10): 172-173.
20	Lapinski J, Tunnacliffe A. Reduction of suspended biomass in municipal wastewater using bdelloid rotifers[J]. Water Research, 2003, 37(9): 2027-2034.
21	姚萌, 李晔, 张召基. 低温条件下SBBR中污泥减量的对比研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(5): 98-100.
	Yao M, Li Y, Zhang Z J. Comparative study on sludge reduction of SBBR at low temperature conditions[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 31(5): 98-100.
22	郑向阳, 罗晓, 袁立霞, 等. AO工艺处理淀粉污水效能及微生物群落解析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(3): 804-814.
	Zheng X Y, Luo X, Yuan L X, et al. Performance and bacterial community analysis of AO process treating starch wastewater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(3): 804-814.
23	Kragelund C, Nielsen J L, Thomsen T R, et al. Ecophysiology of the filamentous Alphaproteobacterium Meganemaperideroedes in activated sludge[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2005, 54(1): 111-112.
24	Horňák K, Kasalický V, Šimek K, et al. Strain-specific consumption and transformation of alga-derived dissolved organic matter by members of the Limnohabitans-C and Polynucleobacter-B clusters of Betaproteobacteria[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2017, 19(11): 4519-4535.
25	Oh S, Choi D. Microbial community enhances biodegradation of bisphenol A through selection of sphingomonadaceae[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2019, 77(3): 631-639.
26	端正花, 潘留明, 陈晓欧, 等. 低温下活性污泥膨胀的微生物群落结构研究[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(3): 1070-1074.
	Duan Z H, Pan L M, Chen X O, et al. Changes of microbial community structure in activated sludge bulking at low temperature[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(3): 1070-1074.
27	Bowman J P, McCammon S A, Brown M V, et al. Diversity and association of psychrophilic bacteria in Antarctic sea ice[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(8): 3068-3078.
28	Rahalkar M, Bahulikar R A, Deutzmann J S, et al. Elstera litoralis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from stone biofilms of Lake Constance, Germany[J]. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62(8): 1750-1754.
29	Pan K L, Gao J F, Li H Y, et al. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria dominate ammonia oxidation in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant revealed by DNA-based stable isotope probing[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 256: 152-159.
30	Tsuneda S, Miyauchi R, Ohno T, et al. Characterization of denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms in activated sludge based on nitrite reductase gene[J]. Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering, 2005, 99(4): 403-407.
31	Alawi M, Lipski A, Sanders T, et al. Cultivation of a novel cold-adapted nitrite oxidizing betaproteobacterium from the Siberian Arctic[J]. ISME Journal, 2007, 1(3): 256-264.
32	Wang S, Peng Y, Ma B, et al. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in traditional municipal wastewater treatment plants with low-strength ammonium loading: widespread but overlooked[J]. Water Research, 2015, 84: 66-75.
33	王晓慧, 文湘华, Criddle Craig, 等. 城市污水处理厂活性污泥中氨氧化菌群落结构研究[J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(10): 3002-3006.
	Wang X H, Wen X H, Craig C, et al. Community structures of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge of wastewater treatment plant[J]. Environmental Science, 2009, 30(10): 3002-3006.
34	Igiehon N O, Babalola O O. Rhizosphere microbiome modulators: contributions of nitrogen fixing bacteria towards sustainable agriculture[J]. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(4): 574.
35	Sebastian L, Jasmin S, Christiane G D, et al. Nitrotoga-like bacteria are previously unrecognized key nitrite oxidizers in full-scale wastewater treatment plants[J]. ISME Journal, 2015, 9(3): 708-720.
36	韩梅, 高伟, 崔福义. 对BAF预处理低温水源水系统中硝化细菌的识别[J]. 给水排水, 2017, 53(9): 16-20.
	Han M, Gao W, Cui F Y. Identification of nitrifying bacteria in biological aerated filter in pretreatment of polluted raw water at low temperature[J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2017, 53(9): 16-20.
37	Faith D P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity[J]. Biological Conservation, 1992, 61(1): 1-10.

[1]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[2]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[3]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[4]	张艳梅, 袁涛, 李江, 刘亚洁, 孙占学. 高效SRB混合菌群构建及其在酸胁迫条件下的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610.
[5]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[6]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[7]	刘庆超, 贾辉, 许逸飞, 路娜, 尹延梅, 王捷. 基于FBG力学传感的曝气生物滤池中剪切力分布研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1755-1763.
[8]	闫新龙, 黄志刚, 胡清勋, 张新, 胡晓燕. Cu/Co掺杂多孔炭活化过硫酸盐降解水中硝基酚研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1102-1112.
[9]	方辉煌, 程金星, 罗宇, 陈崇启, 周晨, 江莉龙. 氨电氧化催化剂及其低温直接氨碱性膜燃料电池性能的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3802-3814.
[10]	李承威, 骆华勇, 张铭轩, 廖鹏, 方茜, 荣宏伟, 王竞茵. 氢氧化镧交联壳聚糖微球的微流控制备及其除磷性能[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3929-3939.
[11]	贾艳萍, 丁雪, 刚健, 佟泽为, 张海丰, 张兰河. Mn强化Fe/C微电解工艺条件优化及降解油墨废水机理[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2183-2193.
[12]	赵希强, 张健, 孙爽, 王文龙, 毛岩鹏, 孙静, 刘景龙, 宋占龙. 生物质炭改性微球去除化工废水中无机磷的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2158-2173.
[13]	孙铭泽, 马宁, 李浩然, 姜海峰, 洪文鹏, 牛晓娟. 中低温超临界CO₂及其混合工质布雷顿循环热力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1379-1388.
[14]	毛恒, 王月, 王森, 刘伟民, 吕静, 陈甫雪, 赵之平. APTES改性ZIF-L/PEBA混合基质膜强化渗透汽化分离苯酚研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1389-1402.
[15]	王祺, 房阔, 贺聪慧, 王凯军. 流动电极电容去离子技术综述：研究进展与未来挑战[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 975-989.

SBBR反应器中耐冷微生物的驯化与识别

Domestication and identification of cold-resistant bacteria in SBBR reactor

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价