改性磁性纳米粒子稳定的稠油O/W型乳状液的流变性影响因素及管输压降预测模型

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240646

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在探讨改性磁性纳米粒子质量分数、溶液酸碱度（pH）、油水比、NaCl浓度、搅拌速度以及乳化温度对稠油O/W型乳状液流变特性的影响规律，并结合Zeta电位、界面张力和油滴分布揭示了其作用机制。为了更深入且精确地分析以上因素对乳状液流动特性的影响，开展了六因素三水平的正交流变实验，采用幂律流体压降公式计算了各组条件下单位管长压降，并应用SPSS软件进行了方差分析和非线性回归分析，构建了一个适用于O/W型乳状液的管输压降预测模型。最后，使用Matlab软件对压降进行了最优解的求解。研究结果显示，油水比对乳状液流变特性影响最为显著，且改性磁性纳米粒子可以成功制备出油水比为8∶2的稠油O/W型乳状液。当改性磁性纳米粒子质量分数控制在0.07%，含油率维持在50.38%，NaCl浓度为0.12 mol/L，搅拌速度设置为664.10 r/min，且乳化温度保持在16.92℃时，该稠油O/W型乳状液的单位长度管输压降能达到最小值，即66.93 Pa/m，该最优方案表明较低质量分数的改性磁性纳米粒子能在低温条件下实现稠油大幅度减阻输送。此外，通过实证研究，所构建的模型在严格的正交实验条件下展现出较好的管输压降预测能力，从而提供了一种可靠的方法来评估和优化稠油O/W型乳状液的输送性能。

关键词: 纳米粒子, 聚合物, 稠油O/W型乳状液, 流变性, 预测, 压降模型

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of modified magnetic nanoparticle mass fraction, solution acidity and alkalinity (pH), oil-water ratio, NaCl concentration, stirring speed and emulsification temperature on the rheological properties of thick oil O/W emulsions, and to reveal the mechanism of their effects in combination with zeta potential, interfacial tension and oil droplet distribution. In order to more deeply and precisely analyze the influence of the above factors on the flow characteristics of emulsion, a six-factor and three-level positive alternating current experiment was carried out, and the power law fluid pressure drop formula was used to calculate the pressure drop per unit pipe length under each group of conditions, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonlinear regression (NLR) analysis was carried out by applying the SPSS software, and a prediction model of the pressure drop in tubing transport was constructed for the O/W-type emulsions. Finally, the optimal solution for pressure drop was solved using Matlab software. The results show that the oil-water ratio has the most significant effect on the rheological properties of emulsions, and the modified magnetic nanoparticles can successfully prepare thick oil O/W emulsions with an oil-water ratio of 8∶2. When the mass fraction of modified magnetic nanoparticles was controlled at 0.07%, the oil content was maintained at 50.38%, the NaCl concentration was 0.12 mol/L, the stirring speed was set at 664.10 r/min, and the emulsification temperature was maintained at 16.92℃, the tubing pressure drop per unit length of this thick-oil O/W-type emulsion could reach the minimum value, i.e., 66.93 Pa/m, which is an optimal solution. This optimal solution indicates that the lower mass fraction of modified magnetic nanoparticles can realize the thick oil substantial drag reduction transport under low temperature conditions. In addition, the model constructed in this paper shows a good ability to predict the pressure drop under strict orthogonal experimental conditions, which provides a reliable method to evaluate and optimize the conveying performance of thick oil O/W emulsions.

Key words: nanoparticles, polymer, thick oil O/W emulsions, rheological properties, prediction, pressure drop model

中图分类号:

TE 832

孙娜娜, 董红妹, 郭文豪, 柳健, 胡建波, 靳爽. 改性磁性纳米粒子稳定的稠油O/W型乳状液的流变性影响因素及管输压降预测模型[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 143-157.

Nana SUN, Hongmei DONG, Wenhao GUO, Jian LIU, Jianbo HU, Shuang JIN. Rheological property influencing factors and a pressure drop prediction model for pipeline transportation in thick oil O/W emulsions stabilized by modified magnetic nanoparticles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(S1): 143-157.

图/表 34

参考文献 34

1	Martínez-Palou R, de Lourdes Mosqueira M, Zapata-Rendón B, et al. Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy crude oil by pipeline: a review[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011, 75(3/4): 274-282.
2	Fakher S, Ahdaya M, Elturki M, et al. Critical review of asphaltene properties and factors impacting its stability in crude oil[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, 10(3): 1183-1200.
3	Zhang F, Zhang Q, Zhou Z H, et al. Study on the effect of different viscosity reducers on viscosity reduction and emulsification with Daqing crude oil[J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(3): 1399.
4	韩晋晋, 刘渊. 浅谈水包油乳化降黏技术在我国稠油管输中的应用前景[J]. 石化技术, 2016, 23(6): 35-36.
	Han J J, Liu Y. Application prospect of oil-in-water emulsifying and viscosity reducing technology in heavy oil transportation in China[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2016, 23(6): 35-36.
5	檀家桐, 扈海莉, 李爱军. 稠油管道输送技术综述[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2019, 45 (8): 66-68.
	Tan J T, Hu H L, Li A J. Heavy oil transportation technology: a review[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2019, 45(8): 66-68.
6	Frelichowska J, Bolzinger M A, Pelletier J, et al. Topical delivery of lipophilic drugs from O/W Pickering emulsions[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2009, 371(1/2): 56-63.
7	Low L E, Tan L T H, Goh B H, et al. Magnetic cellulose nanocrystal stabilized Pickering emulsions for enhanced bioactive release and human colon cancer therapy[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2019, 127: 76-84.
8	Purcar V, Cinteza O, Donescu D, et al. Surface modification of silica particles assisted by CO₂ [J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2014, 87: 34-39.
9	Liu J, Bin Y Z, Masaru M. Magnetic behavior of Zn-doped Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles estimated in terms of crystal domain size[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116 (1): 134-143.
10	Purcar V, Caprarescu S, Donescu D, et al. Degradation of TiO₂ and/or SiO₂ hybrid films doped with different cationic dyes[J]. Thin Solid Films, 2013, 534: 301-307.
11	Zhao F P, Repo E, Yin D L, et al. One-pot synthesis of trifunctional chitosan-EDTA-β-cyclodextrin polymer for simultaneous removal of metals and organic micropollutants[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 15811.
12	Tang J T, Song Y, Zhao F P, et al. Compressible cellulose nanofibril (CNF) based aerogels produced via a bio-inspired strategy for heavy metal ion and dye removal[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019, 208: 404-412.
13	Peng B L, Tang J T, Luo J H, et al. Applications of nanotechnology in oil and gas industry: progress and perspective[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 96(1): 91-100.
14	Lv T, Zhang S, Qi D M, et al. Enhanced demulsification from aqueous media by using magnetic chitosan-based flocculant[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 518: 76-83.
15	Fang S W, Chen B, Zhang H, et al. The effects of ultrasonic time, temperature, size and polyether type on performances of magnetic flocculants for oily wastewater produced from polymer flooding treatment[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2016, 51: 2991-2999.
16	Huang X F, Xiong Y J, Lu L J, et al. Manipulation of surface hydrophobicity and charge of demulsifying bacteria using functional magnetic nanoparticles: a mechanistic study of demulsification performance[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(3): 3295-3304.
17	Low L E, Tey B T, Ong B H, et al. Palm olein-in-water Pickering emulsion stabilized by Fe₃O₄-cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites and their responses to pH[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 155: 391-399.
18	Jia K L, Guo Y S, Yu Y, et al. pH-responsive Pickering emulsions stabilized solely by surface-inactive nanoparticles via an unconventional stabilization mechanism[J]. Soft Matter, 2021, 17(12): 3346-3357.
19	Mendiratta S, Ali A A A, Hejazi S H, et al. Dual stimuli-responsive Pickering emulsions from novel magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their characterization using a microfluidic platform[J]. Langmuir, 2021, 37(4): 1353-1364.
20	Gálvez-Vergara A, Fresco-Cala B, Cárdenas S. Switchable Pickering emulsions stabilized by polystyrene-modified magnetic nanoparticles[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 606: 125462.
21	Lan Q, Liu C, Yang F, et al. Synthesis of bilayer oleic acid-coated Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles and their application in pH-responsive Pickering emulsions[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 310(1): 260-269.
22	Fu E Y, Chen K M, Wang Q L, et al. Formation and stabilization of Pickering emulsions using salt-sensitive core-shell cationic nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(25): 14019-14034.
23	Xu J J, Xu W, Sun D Y, et al. The stepwise organization of nanoparticles into a Pickering emulsion[J]. Soft Matter, 2021, 17(7): 1796-1801.
24	Fu C, Liu N. Rheology and stability of nanoparticle-stabilized CO₂ foam under reservoir conditions[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 196: 107671.
25	Maurya N K, Mandal A. Investigation of synergistic effect of nanoparticle and surfactant in macro emulsion based EOR application in oil reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2018, 132: 370-384.
26	Heard J, Harvey E, Johnson B B, et al. The effect of filamentous bacteria on foam production and stability[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2008, 63(1): 21-26.
27	Ashrafizadeh S N, Motaee E, Hoshyargar V. Emulsification of heavy crude oil in water by natural surfactants[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 86: 137-143.
28	李明远, 吴肇亮. 石油乳状液[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
	Li M Y, Wu Z L. Petroleum Emulsion[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
29	刘浩民, 邹林, 耿雷, 等. 石油磺酸盐-乙二胺复合驱油体系研究[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2016, 17(3): 35-38.
	Liu H M, Zou L, Geng L, et al. Study on a combined petroleum sulfonate-ethanediamine flooding system[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2016, 17(3): 35-38.
30	刘岩, 王新龙. CO₃O₄纳米颗粒稳定的Pickering乳液的稳定性研究[C]//2013中国化工学会年会论文集. 南京, 2013: 222.
	Liu Y, Wang X L. Stability study of Pickering emulsion stabilized by CO₃O₄ nanoparticles[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Chemical Society. Nanjing, 2013: 222.
31	孙娜娜. 塔河稠油乳化降黏及微波化学破乳研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016.
	Sun N N. Research on the emulsification of Tahe heavy crude oil and its' demulsification by microwave chemical method[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
32	Giovanna B, Karim G, Craig W C. Mesoscale model for ostwald ripening of catalyst nanoparticles[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2021, 168 (5): 054515
33	陈小榆. 工程流体力学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2015.
	Chen X Y. Engineering Fluid Mechanics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2015.
34	蒋华义. 输油管道设计与管理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010.
	Jiang H Y. Design and Management of Oil Pipeline[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	6	0	0	49

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	31	24
比例	56%	44%

摘要

105

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	105

温度/℃	稠油密度/(kg/m³)
20	954.71
30	953.59
40	953.38
50	952.37
60	950.17
70	947.85

温度/℃	稠油密度/(kg/m³)
20	954.71
30	953.59
40	953.38
50	952.37
60	950.17
70	947.85

水平	改性磁性纳米粒子质量分数/%	pH	含油率/%	NaCl浓度/(mol/L)	搅拌速度/(r/min)	乳化温度/℃
1	0	5	50	0.02	200	14.3
2	0.06	7.5	65	0.08	900	22.5
3	0.12	10	80	0.14	1600	35

水平	改性磁性纳米粒子质量分数/%	pH	含油率/%	NaCl浓度/(mol/L)	搅拌速度/(r/min)	乳化温度/℃
1	0	5	50	0.02	200	14.3
2	0.06	7.5	65	0.08	900	22.5
3	0.12	10	80	0.14	1600	35

序号	剪切应力/Pa
序号	10 s^-1	50 s^-1	90 s^-1	130 s^-1	170 s^-1	210 s^-1	250 s^-1	290 s^-1
1	8.120	14.416	19.998	28.615	36.385	43.299	50.298	54.963
2	0.110	0.798	1.793	2.350	2.863	3.478	4.052	4.709
3	5.780	21.735	31.671	41.247	49.985	59.263	70.399	80.561
4	5.630	14.691	22.897	31.078	39.834	48.942	57.495	66.907
5	3.190	10.976	16.592	20.553	24.109	27.098	29.669	32.442
6	0.440	2.514	5.010	7.654	9.730	11.536	14.109	16.405
7	0.270	1.169	2.483	3.776	5.153	6.184	7.147	7.812
8	1.950	6.007	8.848	10.866	12.462	13.101	14.644	15.149
9	0.460	2.280	3.916	5.171	6.196	7.308	8.075	8.986
10	8.500	26.829	39.715	49.049	56.401	63.215	70.858	77.088
11	0.340	2.472	5.017	7.164	9.196	11.657	14.353	15.869
12	1.160	4.573	7.497	9.937	12.268	14.431	16.182	17.794
13	3.420	13.364	21.265	28.689	35.271	41.368	47.997	54.530
14	4.040	8.922	10.825	11.524	16.297	20.431	20.938	21.571
15	1.350	1.806	2.845	3.964	4.933	5.789	6.504	6.595
16	3.340	13.383	20.301	27.012	33.049	39.440	45.802	52.008
17	0.150	0.262	0.274	0.374	0.703	0.928	1.201	1.376
18	0.520	2.691	4.702	5.964	6.782	7.471	8.095	8.879