电子传递能力强的Zn-CuOx/MgO-SiO2气凝胶催化剂的制备及催化臭氧化磺胺甲噁唑机理和毒性评估

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20250824

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

金属催化剂表面电子转移能力的强弱是决定反应速率的关键因素。通常情况下，金属催化剂表面的变价金属在牺牲固有电子的情况下进行电子转移，导致金属氧化物的积累和催化剂的失活。为了提高催化剂的效率，通过掺杂非变价金属Zn制备Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂催化剂（ZnCuMgSiO），以达到加速界面电子迁移和减少固有电子损失的目的；考察Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂催化剂的形貌结构，分析催化臭氧化磺胺甲噁唑（SMX）的效能，评估催化剂本身及SMX降解产物的毒性。结果表明：制备的催化剂呈多孔珊瑚网络结构，在初始pH 7、催化剂用量0.1 g·L^-1、臭氧浓度2.4 mg·L^-1的条件下，催化臭氧化30 min，SMX去除率达到90.39%。淬灭实验、EPR和XPS分析表明，Cu²⁺/Cu⁺和Mg²⁺/Mg之间的价态循环和表面羟基对O₃的吸附是提高催化臭氧化效率的关键步骤，Zn²⁺掺杂能够提高催化剂的电子转移能力，产生的氧空位（O_V）作为O₃分解的活性位点。臭氧分解产生的·OH和¹O₂是降解SMX的活性物种，其中¹O₂占主导作用。结合密度泛函理论（DFT）计算和液质联用（LC-MS）分析，提出了可能的的降解途径和降解机理。通过毒性评估实验表明，ZnCuMgSiO催化剂无毒，SMX的催化臭氧化能够显著降低毒性。

关键词: 催化剂, SiO₂气凝胶, Zn-CuO_x/MgO, 磺胺甲噁唑, 生物毒性, 稳定性, 自由基

Abstract:

The strength of the electron transfer ability on the surface of a metal catalyst is a key factor in determining the reaction rate. Normally, the valence metal on the surface of metal catalyst undergoes electron transfer at the expense of intrinsic electrons, which leads to the accumulation of metal oxides and the deactivation of the catalyst. In order to improve the efficiency of the catalyst, a Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂ catalyst (ZnCuMgSiO) was prepared by doping non-variable metal Zn, achieving the goal of accelerating interfacial electron migration and reducing intrinsic electron loss. The morphology and structure of Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂ catalysts were investigated, catalytic ozonation efficiency of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was analyzed and the toxicity of the catalysts and degradation products of SMX were evaluated. The results showed that the prepared catalyst had a porous coral network structure, and the catalytic ozonation was carried out for 30 min and removal efficiency of SMX reached 90.39% under the conditions of an initial pH 7, catalyst dosage of 0.1 g·L^-1, and ozone concentration of 2.4 mg·L^-1. According to quenching experiments, EPR and XPS analysis, valence cycling between Cu²⁺/Cu⁺ and Mg²⁺/Mg and the adsorption of O₃ by surface hydroxyl groups were the key steps in improving the catalytic ozonation efficiency, and Zn²⁺ doping could further improve electron transfer capacity of the catalysts, and generate oxygen vacancies (O_V) as active sites for O₃ decomposition. The ·OH and ¹O₂ produced by ozone decomposition were active species for degrading SMX, with ¹O₂ playing a dominant role. Possible degradation pathways and degradation mechanisms were proposed by combining density-functional theory (DFT) calculations and liquid-liquid-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. The toxicity assessment experiments showed that ZnCuMgSiO catalyst was non-toxic and catalytic ozonation of SMX was able to significantly reduce the toxicity.

Key words: catalyst, SiO₂ aerogel, Zn-CuOx/MgO, sulfamethoxazole, biological toxicity, stability, radical

中图分类号:

X 703

张兰河, 石冰, 刘慧, 吴嘉明, 张明爽. 电子传递能力强的Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂气凝胶催化剂的制备及催化臭氧化磺胺甲噁唑机理和毒性评估[J]. 化工学报, DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20250824.

Lanhe ZHANG, Bing SHI, Hui LIU, Jiaming WU, Mingshuang ZHANG. Preparation of Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂ aerogel catalyst with strong electron transfer ability and its catalytic ozonation mechanism and toxicity evaluation on sulfamethoxazole[J]. CIESC Journal, DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20250824.

图/表 15

图1 实验装置示意图

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the experimental device

图2 ZnCuMgSiO催化剂的结构：（a）XRD谱图；（b）EPR-OV谱图；（c）FTIR光谱

Fig. 2 Structure of ZnCuMgSiO catalyst: (a) XRD pattern; (b) EPR-OV spectrum; (c) FTIR spectrum

图3 催化剂的微观形貌和比表面积：（a），（b）SEM图（CuMgSiO）；（c），（d）SEM图（ZnCuMgSiO）；（e）ZnCuMgSiO催化剂的N2吸附脱附曲线；（f）ZnCuMgSiO催化剂的比表面积、孔径和孔容；（g）CuMgSiO催化剂的N2吸附脱附曲线；（h）CuMgSiO催化剂的比表面积、孔径和孔容

Fig. 3 Microstructure and specific surface area of the catalysts: (a), (b) SEM images of CuMgSiO; (c),(d) SEM images of ZnCuMgSiO; (e) N2 adsorption-desorption curve of ZnCuMgSiO; (f) Specific surface area, pore size, and pore volume of ZnCuMgSiO; (g) N2 adsorption-desorption curve of CuMgSiO; (h) Specific surface area, pore size, and pore volume of CuMgSiO

图4 不同催化剂对SMX的催化臭氧化性能：（a）不同体系对SMX去除率的影响；（c）不同掺杂比例的ZnCuMgSiO催化剂对SMX去除率的影响；（b）, （d）不同体系的降解动力学注:Reaction conditions: [catalyst] = 0.1 g·L-1, [SMX] = 20 mg·L-1, pH = 7反应条件:[催化剂]=0.1 g·L-1,[SMX]=20 mg·L-1,pH=7

Fig. 4 Catalytic ozonation performance of SMX under different catalysts: (a) Effects of different systems on removal efficiencies of SMX; (c) Effects of different doping ratios of ZnCuMgSiO catalysts on removal efficiencies of SMX; (b), (d) Degradation kinetics of SMX in different systems

表1 本研究与其他催化剂降解SMX效能对比

Table 1 Comparison of SMX degradation efficiency between this study and other catalysts

催化剂种类	催化剂用量 (g·L^-1)	污染物 (mg⋅L^-1)	反应时间 (min)	去除率 (%)	参考文献
FeSO	1	SMX (20)	30	89.0	[21]
Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂	0.2	SMX (10)	60	89.1	[22]
Mn@CNM	1	SMX (20)	420	81.3	[23]
CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂	0.1	SMX (20)	30	87.9	[24]
Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂	0.1	SMX (20)	30	90.39	本研究

图5 不同因素对SMX去除率的影响和反应的Kobs：（a）O3 浓度；（b）催化剂投加量；（c）初始pH（反应条件：（a），（c）[催化剂]=0.1 g·L-1，（b），（c）[O3]=2.96 mg·L-1，（a），（b）pH=7）；（d）ZnCuMgSiO的Zeta电位与pH值的关系；（e）ZnCuMgSiO在不同pH下对SMX的吸附；（f）CuMgSiO的Zeta电位与pH值的关系

Fig. 5 Effects of various factors on SMX removal efficiency and reaction parameters Kobs: (a) O3 concentration; (b) catalyst dosage; (c) initial pH (Reaction conditions: (a), (c) [catalyst] = 0.1 g L-1, (b), (c) [O3] = 2.96 mg L-1, (a), (b) pH = 7); (d) Zeta potential of ZnCuMgSiO versus pH; (e) SMX adsorption by ZnCuMgSiO at different pH levels; (f) Zeta potential of CuMgSiO versus pH

图6（a） ZnCuMgSiO催化剂的循环实验；（b）ZnCuMgSiO催化剂使用前后的FTIR谱图（反应条件：[催化剂]=0.1 g·L-1，[O3]=2.4 mg·L-1，[SMX]=20 mg·L-1，pH=7）

Fig. 6 (a) The cyclic test results of ZnCuMgSiO catalyst; (b) FTIR spectra before and after ZnCuMgSiO catalyst was utilized (Reaction conditions: [catalyst] = 0.1 g L-1, [O3] = 2.4 mg L-1, [SMX] = 20 mg L-1, pH = 7)

图7（a） 淬灭剂对SMX降解的影响；（b）~（d）CuMgSiO/O3体系的EPR谱图（反应条件：[催化剂]=0.1 g·L-1，[O3]=2.4 mg·L-1，[SMX]=20 mg·L-1，pH=7）

Fig. 7 (a) Effect of quencher on SMX degradation; (b)-(d) EPR spectra of CuMgSiO/O3 system (Reaction conditions: [catalyst] = 0.1 g L-1, [O3] = 2.4 mg L-1, [SMX] = 20 mg L-1, pH = 7)

图8 ZnCuMgSiO催化剂反应前后的XPS谱图；（a）Cu元素分峰图；（b）Mg元素分峰图；（c）Zn元素分峰图；（d）O元素分峰图；（e）ZnCuMgSiO催化剂的CV曲线；（f）催化剂的EIS曲线

Fig. 8 XPS spectra of ZnCuMgSiO catalyst before and after the reaction: (a) Cu; (b) Mg; (c) Zn; (d) O; (e) CV curve; (f) EIS curve

图9 ZnCuMgSiO催化臭氧化降解SMX的机理

Fig. 9 Mechanism of ZnCuMgSiO catalytic ozonation degradation for SMX

图11 植物毒性：（a）~（c）发芽0 d；（d）~（f）发芽2 d；（g）~（i）发芽3 d

Fig. 11 Plant toxicity: (a)-(c) germination for 0 d; (d)-(f) germination for 2 d; (g)-(i) germination for 3 d

图12 急性毒性：（a）鱼类；（b）水蚤；（c）绿藻；慢性毒性：（d）鱼类；（e）水蚤；（f）绿藻

Fig. 12 Acute toxicity: (a) fish; (b) water fleas; (c) green algae; chronic toxicity: (d) fish; (e) water fleas; (f) green algae

表2 SMX降解中间产物

Table 2 Degradation intermediates of SMX

产物	m/z	分子式
SMX	254	C₁₀H₁₁N₃O₃S
M1	284	C₁₀H₉N₃O₅S
M2	317	C₁₀H₁₁N₃O₇S
M3	187	C₆H₅NO₄S
M4	108	C₆H₄O₂
M5	98	C₄H₆N₂O
M6	173	C₆H₇NO₃S
M7	102	C₄H₁₀N₂O
M8	203	C₆H₅NO₅S
M9	143	C₆H₆O₂S
M10	255	C₁₀H₁₁N₃O₃S
M11	249	C₇H₁₀N₃O₄S
M12	274	C₁₀H₁₃N₃O₄S
M13	159	C₆H₇NO₂S
M14	93	C₆H₇N
M15	127	C₆H₉NO₂
丙酮酸	88	C₃H₄O₃
草氨酸	89	C₂H₃NO₃


图10 （a）SMX分子结构；（b）Fukui指数；（c）SMX的降解路径 Fig. 10 (a) SMX molecular structure; (b) Fukui index; (c) Degradation pathway of SMX

表3 大白菜种子在不同培养液中的AL、SR和SGI

Table 3 AL， SR， and SGI of Chinese cabbage seeds in different culture media

样品	AL（mm）	SR（%）	SGI
DW	11.6	66.67	1
CuMgSi	9.83	76.67	0.97
CuZnMgSi	10.16	73.33	0.96

表4 SMX降解产物的ECOSAR毒性分析结果

Table 4 ECOSAR toxicity analysis results of SMX degradation products

化合物	m/z	急性毒性			慢性毒性
		鱼类	水蚤	绿藻	鱼类	水蚤	绿藻
		(96 h-LC₅₀)	(48 h-LC₅₀)	(96 h-EC₅₀)	(ChV)	(ChV)	(ChV)
SMX	254	267	6.43	21.8	5.00	0.068	11.1
M1	284	1170	619	342	105	49.3	76.2
M2	317	3070	271	405	448	16.6	108
M3	187	13600	6310	2060	1050	353	345
M4	108	3330	1610	614	269	100	112
M5	98	270	3.63	13.8	6.59	0.036	9.116
M6	173	86300	200	1060	4650	1.67	1570
M7	102	26300	1800	4440	8260	86.4	989
M8	203	1690000	706000	146000	115000	29100	19300
M9	143	81600	34600	7690	5650	1490	1050
M10	255	1120	28.1	146	584	0.236	209
M11	249	140000	71.8	505	14900	0.510	1480
M12	274	2080	15.0	64.1	67.3	0.141	56.6
M13	159	1330	9.05	39.0	44.0	0.084	35.4
M14	93	517	270	141	45.7	20.7	30.6
M15	127	3820	309	549	726	17.4	138

参考文献 31

[1]	Craig C R, Stitzel R E. Modern Pharmacology with Clinical Applications[M]. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
[2]	Pelalak R, Heidari Z, Forouzesh M, et al. High performance ozone based advanced oxidation processes catalyzed with novel argon plasma treated iron oxyhydroxide hydrate for phenazopyridine degradation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 964.
[3]	Pang C K, Joseph C G, Farm Y Y. Magnetically recoverable copper ferrite for catalytic ozonation of surfactant-containing simulated laundry wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023, 11(6): 111203.
[4]	Turkay O, Inan H, Dimoglo A. Experimental and theoretical investigations of CuO-catalyzed ozonation of humic acid[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2014, 134: 110-116.
[5]	Ma G J, Tang W X, Wang A Q, et al. Heterojunctioned CuO/Cu₂O catalyst for highly efficient ozone removal[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2023, 125: 340-348.
[6]	Ghuge S P, Saroha A K. Ozonation of Reactive Orange 4 dye aqueous solution using mesoporous Cu/SBA-15 catalytic material[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2018, 23: 217-229.
[7]	Zhang F Z, Wei C H, Hu Y, et al. Zinc ferrite catalysts for ozonation of aqueous organic contaminants: phenol and bio-treated coking wastewater[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 156: 625-635.
[8]	Pospelova V, Aubrecht J, Pacultová K, et al. Does the structure of CuZn hydroxycarbonate precursors affect the intrinsic hydrogenolysis activity of CuZn catalysts?[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2020, 10(10): 3303-3314.
[9]	Mazumder P, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad A S. Bio-inherent attributes of water hyacinth procured from contaminated water body–effect of its compost on seed germination and radicle growth[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 257: 109990.
[10]	Kopanja L, Milosevic I, Panjan M, et al. Sol–gel combustion synthesis, particle shape analysis and magnetic properties of hematite (α-Fe₂O₃) nanoparticles embedded in an amorphous silica matrix[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 362: 380-386.
[11]	Meng F Y, Zhang S L, Zhang M J, et al. The mechanism of Ce-MCM-41 catalyzed peroxone reaction into •OH and •O₂ ^- radicals for enhanced NO oxidation[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2022, 518: 112110.
[12]	Zhou X Q, Jawad A, Luo M Y, et al. Regulating activation pathway of Cu/persulfate through the incorporation of unreducible metal oxides: Pivotal role of surface oxygen vacancies[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 286: 119914.
[13]	Karuppusamy I, Samuel M S, Selvarajan E, et al. Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of mixed calcium magnesium oxide (CaMgO₂) nanoflakes for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 584: 770-778.
[14]	Hessien M, Da'na E, AL-Amer K, et al. Nano ZnO (hexagonal wurtzite) of different shapes under various conditions: fabrication and characterization[J]. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6(8): 085057.
[15]	Yang Y L, Fu W Y, Chen X X, et al. Ceramic nanofiber membrane anchoring nanosized Mn₂O₃ catalytic ozonation of sulfamethoxazole in water[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 436: 129168.
[16]	魏健, 徐晓月, 郭壮, 等. 全氟辛酸光催化材料应用及降解机理研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2023, 13(3): 1127-1138.
	Wei J, Xu X Y, Guo Z, et al. Research progress in the application and degradation mechanism of perfluorooctanoic acid photocatalytic materials[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2023, 13(3): 1127-1138.
[17]	Shen T D, Su W T, Yang Q Q, et al. Synergetic mechanism for basic and acid sites of MgMxOy (M = Fe, Mn) double oxides in catalytic ozonation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid and acetic acid[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 279: 119346.
[18]	Guo Y, Zhang Y X, Yu G, et al. Revisiting the role of reactive oxygen species for pollutant abatement during catalytic ozonation: The probe approach versus the scavenger approach[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 280: 119418.
[19]	Luo R, Li M Q, Wang C H, et al. Singlet oxygen-dominated non-radical oxidation process for efficient degradation of bisphenol A under high salinity condition[J]. Water Research, 2019, 148: 416-424.
[20]	Fanaei F, Moussavi G, Srivastava V, et al. The enhanced catalytic potential of sulfur-doped MgO (S-MgO) nanoparticles in activation of peroxysulfates for advanced oxidation of acetaminophen[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 371: 404-413.
[21]	Zhang L S, Meng G H, Liu B H, et al. Heterogeneous photocatalytic ozonation of sulfamethoxazole by Z-scheme Bi₂WO₆/TiO₂ heterojunction: Performance, mechanism and degradation pathway[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 360: 119427.
[22]	Zhang L H, Wu J M, Zhang J, et al. Catalytic ozonation of sulfamethoxazole using loaded CuOx/MgO-SiO₂ silica aerogel catalyst: Performance, mechanisms and toxicity[J]. Environmental Research, 2025, 272: 121155.
[23]	Liu X H, Li H P, Fang Y, et al. Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of sulfamethazine in aqueous solution using maghemite-supported manganese oxides[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 274: 118945.
[24]	Huang Y X, Liang M L, Ma L M, et al. Ozonation catalysed by ferrosilicon for the degradation of ibuprofen in water[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 268: 115722.
[25]	景凌云, 张泽强, 刘莎莎, 等. TiO₂/g-C₃N₄高效固定漆酶光酶协同催化降解毒死蜱[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2024, 14(6): 1847-1856.
	Jing L Y, Zhang Z Q, Liu S S, et al. Effective immobilization of laccase on TiO₂/g-C₃N₄ for enhanced chlorpyrifos degradation via photo-enzyme synergistic catalysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2024, 14(6): 1847-1856.
[26]	Zeng Y Q, Wang T X, Zhang S L, et al. Sol–gel synthesis of CuO-TiO₂ catalyst with high dispersion CuO species for selective catalytic oxidation of NO[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 411: 227-234.
[27]	Zhang L H, Shi B, Liu H, et al. Charge-engineered 2D layered magnetic Cl-CaFe₂O₄/g-C₃N₄ catalyst for catalytic ozonation of norfloxacin: performance, mechanism and ecotoxicological assessment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2025, 525: 170440.
[28]	Zhao J J, Li F C, Wei H X, et al. Superior performance of ZnCoOx/peroxymonosulfate system for organic pollutants removal by enhancing singlet oxygen generation: The effect of oxygen vacancies[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 409: 128150.
[29]	Li S Y, Wang J, Ye Y Y, et al. Composite Si-O-metal network catalysts with uneven electron distribution: Enhanced activity and electron transfer for catalytic ozonation of carbamazepine[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 263: 118311.
[30]	Liu W, Li Y Y, Liu F Y, et al. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of diclofenac by carbon quantum dots modified porous g-C₃N₄: Mechanisms, degradation pathway and DFT calculation[J]. Water Research, 2019, 151: 8-19.
[31]	Chen H, Wang J L. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole by ozonation combined with ionizing radiation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 407: 124377.

电子传递能力强的Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂气凝胶催化剂的制备及催化臭氧化磺胺甲噁唑机理和毒性评估

Preparation of Zn-CuO_x/MgO-SiO₂ aerogel catalyst with strong electron transfer ability and its catalytic ozonation mechanism and toxicity evaluation on sulfamethoxazole

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张圣美, 李明, 张莹, 易茜, 杨依婷, 刘雅莉. 乳化剂和温度对相变微胶囊性能的影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(S1): 444-452.
[2]	赵维, 邢文乐, 韩朝旭, 袁兴中, 蒋龙波. g-C₃N₄基非金属异质结光催化降解水中有机污染物的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4752-4769.
[3]	佟丽丽, 陈英, 艾敏华, 舒玉美, 张香文, 邹吉军, 潘伦. ZnO/WO₃异质结光催化环烯烃［2+2］环加成制备高能量密度燃料[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4882-4892.
[4]	钱慧慧, 王文婕, 陈文尧, 周兴贵, 张晶, 段学志. 聚丙烯定向转化制芳烃：金属-分子筛协同催化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(9): 4838-4849.
[5]	巢欣旖, 陈文尧, 张晶, 钱刚, 周兴贵, 段学志. 甲醇和乙酸甲酯一步法制丙酸甲酯催化剂的可控制备与性能调控[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(8): 4030-4041.
[6]	张淇栋, 艾立强, 马原, 吴胜宝, 王磊, 厉彦忠. 基于一维漂移流模型的低温管路预冷过程两相流动与换热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(8): 3842-3852.
[7]	范夏雨, 孙建辰, 李可莹, 姚馨雅, 商辉. 机器学习驱动液态有机储氢技术的系统优化[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(8): 3805-3821.
[8]	杨宁, 李皓男, LIN Xiao, GEORGIADOU Stella, LIN Wen-Feng. 从塑料废弃物到能源催化剂：塑料衍生碳@CoMoO₄复合材料在电解水析氢反应中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(8): 4081-4094.
[9]	陆学瑞, 周帼彦, 方琦, 俞孟正, 张秀成, 涂善东. 固体氧化物燃料电池外重整器积炭效应数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(7): 3295-3304.
[10]	赵世颖, 左志帅, 贺梦颖, 安华良, 赵新强, 王延吉. Co-Pt/HAP的制备及其催化1，2-丙二醇氨化反应[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(7): 3305-3315.
[11]	李愽龙, 蒋雨希, 任傲天, 秦雯琪, 傅杰, 吕秀阳. TS-1/In-TS-1催化果糖一步法醇解制备乳酸甲酯连续化试验[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 2678-2686.
[12]	孙文浩, 田君, 张锟, 刘娜, 曹宝森, 梁晓嫱. 锂离子电池用高热稳定性新型隔膜的研究新进展[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 2524-2543.
[13]	李子阳, 申沛鑫, 张孝阿, 王成忠, 史翎, 张军营. α， ω-端羟基苯基/亚苯基高乙烯基聚硅氧烷的合成及热稳定性[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 3041-3052.
[14]	杨浩杰, 刘春雨, 李雪娇, 于亮, 吕兴才. 低旋流配置下氨-甲烷-空气预混旋流火焰稳定性和排放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 3029-3040.
[15]	何军, 李勇, 赵楠, 何孝军. 碳负载硒掺杂硫化钴在锂硫电池中的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2025, 76(6): 2995-3008.