富氧燃烧方式下煤中砷的挥发行为

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151166

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (12): 5079-5087.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151166

富氧燃烧方式下煤中砷的挥发行为

刘慧敏¹, 王春波¹, 黄星智¹, 张月¹, 孙鑫²

1 华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 河北保定 071003;
2 华北理工大学冶金与能源学院, 河北唐山 063009

收稿日期:2015-07-21 修回日期:2015-09-09 出版日期:2015-12-05 发布日期:2015-12-05
通讯作者: 刘慧敏
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2013AA065404);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2015XS115)。

Volatilization of arsenic in coal during oxy-fuel combustion

LIU Huimin¹, WANG Chunbo¹, HUANG Xingzhi¹, ZHANG Yue¹, SUN Xin²

1 Department of Energy Power＆Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China;
2 College of Metallurgy and Energy, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063009, Hebei, China

Received:2015-07-21 Revised:2015-09-09 Online:2015-12-05 Published:2015-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA065404) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015XS115).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选取SJS烟煤,利用高温管式炉模拟富氧燃烧,在600~1400℃温度范围内研究了O₂浓度、CO₂浓度及温度对砷挥发的影响,并进行了空气燃烧模式下的对比实验。对不同工况下的灰样进行FTIR表征并结合化学热力学软件模拟进行分析,结果表明:富氧气氛和空气气氛下煤中砷的挥发比例均随温度升高不断增大,并在低温区间(<900℃)和高温区间(>900℃)分别出现了砷的剧烈失重,但O₂浓度和CO₂浓度影响了不同气氛下砷的具体挥发行为。低温下(<900℃)O₂浓度是影响砷挥发的主要因素,O₂浓度越高,砷的挥发比例越大;相同O₂浓度下,CO₂浓度越高,砷的挥发比例越低,CO₂的存在抑制了煤中砷的挥发。高温下(>900℃)CO₂浓度是影响砷挥发的主要因素,富氧气氛下高CO₂浓度对热量的阻碍导致相同条件下砷酸盐发生分解需要更高的温度,因此富氧气氛下砷的挥发较空气模式滞后;此外CO₂在煤颗粒表面形成还原性气氛,高价态砷化合物向不稳定的低价态砷化合物转变,低价态砷化合物的快速分解导致高温下富氧气氛中砷的挥发速率较常规空气模式快。

关键词: 富氧燃烧, 砷挥发, 温度, O₂浓度, CO₂浓度

Abstract:

Arsenic volatilization characteristics of SJS bituminous coal were carried out on the high-temperature tube furnace from 600℃ to 1400℃ at different oxy-fuel atmospheres. Combined with FTIR analysis and thermodynamic analysis, and taking air condition into consideration, the effects of O₂, CO₂ and temperature on arsenic volatilization were studied. Results showed that the releasing proportion of arsenic increased with increasing temperature both in oxy-fuel and air combustion. Two arsenic mass loss peaks were observed at ＜900℃ and > 900℃ stages, separately. At temperature lower than 900℃ oxygen content was the major fact. The more O₂ ratio, the larger volatile proportion of arsenic. But at the same O₂ ratio condition, the higher CO₂ concentration brought down the emission of arsenic and thus the volatile proportion was decreased. At temperature higher than 900℃ the content of carbon dioxide was the major fact, The higher CO₂ concentration in oxy-fuel atmosphere hindered heat transfer, and thus higher temperature was needed for the decomposition of arsenates under the same conditions, which led to the delay of the intensive emission of arsenic compared to air condition. Besides, high CO₂ content in oxy-fuel condition resulted in the reductive atmosphere around coal particles, which caused arsenic compounds with high chemical valence being reduced to compounds with lower chemical valence, while the arsenic compounds with lower chemical valence were unstable and their fast decomposition led to the higher mass loss rate of arsenic in oxy-fuel condition than to the air condition.

Key words: oxy-fuel combustion, arsenic volatilization, temperature, O₂ concentration, CO₂ concentration

中图分类号:

X511

刘慧敏, 王春波, 黄星智, 张月, 孙鑫. 富氧燃烧方式下煤中砷的挥发行为[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(12): 5079-5087.

LIU Huimin, WANG Chunbo, HUANG Xingzhi, ZHANG Yue, SUN Xin. Volatilization of arsenic in coal during oxy-fuel combustion[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(12): 5079-5087.

参考文献 26

[1]	Agency E P. Locating and estimating air emissions from sources of arsenic and arsenic compounds [R]. United States: Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
[2]	Shah P, Strezov V, Prince K, Nelson P F. Speciation of As, Cr, Se and Hg under coal fired power station conditions [J]. Fuel, 2008, 87 (10): 1859-1869.
[3]	Liu Huimin (刘慧敏), Wang Chunbo (王春波), ZhangYue (张月). Effect of temperature and occurrence form of arsenic on its migration and volatilization during coal combustion [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2015, 66 (11): 4643-4651.
[4]	Tang Q, Liu G, Yan Z, Sun R. Distribution and fate of environmentally sensitive elements (arsenic, mercury, stibium and selenium) in coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China [J]. Fuel, 2012, 95: 334-339.
[5]	Chen Guanyi (陈冠益), Wang Qin (王钦), Yan Beibei (颜蓓蓓). Mobility and enrichment of trace elements in a coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology (燃料化学学报), 2013, 41 (9): 1050-1055.
[6]	Tian H, Lu L, Hao J, Gao J, Cheng K, Liu K, Qiu P, Zhu C. A review of key hazardous trace elements in Chinese coals: abundance, occurrence, behavior during coal combustion and their environmental impacts [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27 (2): 601-614.
[7]	Hu H, Liu H, Chen J, Li A, Yao H. Speciation transformation of arsenic during municipal solid waste incineration [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35: 2883-2890.
[8]	Chen L, Yong S Z, Ghoniem A F. Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal: characterization, fundamentals, stabilization and CFD modeling [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38 (2): 156-214.
[9]	Yan R, Gauthier D, Flamant G. Possible interactions between As, Se, and Hg during coal combustion [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 120 (1/2): 49-60.
[10]	Wang Quanhai (王泉海), Qiu Jianrong (邱建荣), Wen Cun (温存). A experimental and simulative study on the morpho-logical transformation of the trace elements under oxygen-combustion atmosphere [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics (工程热物理学报), 2006, 27 (S2): 199-202.
[11]	Lu Junying (卢骏营), Chen Xiaoping (陈晓平), Duan Lunbo (段伦博). Trace elements occurrence and migration characteristics in O2/CO2 atmosphere [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE (中国电机工程学报), 2009, 29 (23): 40-44.
[12]	Wang Chao (王超), Liu Xiaowei (刘小伟), Wu Wangchen (吴望晨). The distribution characteristics of As and Pb in particulate matters under O2/CO2 combustion of coal [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics (工程热物理学报), 2013, 34 (4): 783-786.
[13]	Low F, Zhang L. Arsenic emissions and speciation in the oxy-fuel fly ash collected from lab-scale drop-tube furnace [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34 (2): 2877-2884.
[14]	Contreras M L, García-Frutos F J, Bahillo A. Oxy-fuel combustion effects on trace metals behaviour by equilibrium calculations [J]. Fuel, 2013, 108: 474-483.
[15]	Wang Chunbo (王春波), Zhang Bin (张斌), Chen Liang (陈亮). Characterization and modeling of limestone calcination and sulfation in oxy-fuel combustion atmosphere [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2015, 66 (4): 1537-1543.
[16]	Wang C, Zhou X, Jia L, Tan Y. Sintering of limestone in calcination/carbonation cycles [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53 (42): 16235-16244.
[17]	Wang Chunbo (王春波), Feng Tao (冯涛), Lei Ming (雷鸣). Experimental study on coupling and NO emission of volatiles and coal char during the isothermal combustion of pulverized coal [J]. Journal of China Coal Society (煤炭学报), 2015, 40 (3): 665- 670.
[18]	Zeng T, Sarofim A F, Senior C L. Vaporization of arsenic, selenium and antimony during coal combustion [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 126 (3): 1714-1724.
[19]	Zhao Fenghua (赵峰华). Study on the mechanism of distributions and occurrenees of hazardous minor and trace elements in coal and leaching experiments of coal combustion residues[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), 1997.
[20]	Senior C L, Lignell D O, Sarofim A F, Mehta A. Modeling arsenic partitioning in coal-fired power plants [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 147 (3): 209-221.
[21]	Li Wen (李文), Bai Jin (白进). Chemistry of Ash from Coal (煤的灰化学) [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
[22]	van Dyk J C, Melzer S, Sobiecki A. Mineral matter transformation during Sasol-Lurgi fixed bed dry bottom gasification-utilization of HT-XRD and FactSage modelling [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19 (10): 1126-1135.
[23]	Tan Y, Croiset E, Douglas M A, Thambimuthu K V. Combustion characteristics of coal in a mixture of oxygen and recycled flue gas [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85 (4): 507-512.
[24]	Wang Xiaoqin (王晓琴). Coking Process (炼焦工艺) [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010: Chapter 11.
[25]	Wu Le (吴乐), Wu Jianqun (吴建群), Yu Dunxi (于敦喜). Influence of O2/CO2 combustion on interaction of Ca and Fe in Shenhua coal [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2015, 66 (2):753-758.
[26]	Wang J, Tomita A. A chemistry on the volatility of some trace elements during coal combustion and pyrolysis [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17(4): 954-960.

富氧燃烧方式下煤中砷的挥发行为

Volatilization of arsenic in coal during oxy-fuel combustion

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	代宝民, 王启龙, 刘圣春, 张佳宁, 李鑫海, 宗凡迪. 非共沸工质辅助过冷CO₂冷热联供系统的热力学性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 64-73.
[4]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[5]	邹启宏, 李乾, 葛天舒. 基于多目标下的两级并联除湿热泵系统实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 265-271.
[6]	杨天阳, 邹慧明, 周晖, 王春磊, 田长青. -30℃电动汽车补气式CO₂热泵制热性能实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 272-279.
[7]	魏进家, 刘蕾, 杨小平. 面向高热流电子器件散热的环路热管研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 60-73.
[8]	杨松涛, 李东洋, 牛玉清, 李鑫钢, 康绍辉, 李洪, 叶开凯, 周志全, 高鑫. 氟化物势能函数和热力学性质的分子模拟研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3828-3840.
[9]	陈泉, 郑泽希, 李然, 孙其诚, 杨晖. 散斑能见度光谱法测量筒仓内颗粒流的颗粒温度[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2603-2611.
[10]	刘怡琳, 李钰, 余亚雄, 黄哲庆, 周强. 基于重置温度方法的双参数介尺度气固传热模型构建[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2612-2621.
[11]	任嘉辉, 刘豫, 刘朝, 刘浪, 李莹. 基于分子指纹和拓扑指数的工质临界温度理论预测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1493-1500.
[12]	陆至彬, 李依梦, 何畅, 张冰剑, 陈清林, 潘明. 集成分区耦合策略的物理信息神经网络模拟共轭传热过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5483-5493.
[13]	黄顺进, 张丽, 颜井冲, 王志刚, 雷智平, 李占库, 任世彪, 王知彩, 水恒福. 高碱煤与煤矸石掺烧SO₂和NO减排及结渣抑制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5581-5591.
[14]	张舒蕾, 李冰杰, 蒋健, 董新宇, 刘璐. 凸面恒温基底上固着液滴蒸发特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5537-5546.
[15]	张慧颖, 蔡伟华, 高明, 王宇航, 何锁盈. 质子交换膜燃料电池冷启动堆栈温度预测模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5056-5064.