MIEX和PAC对微污染水源水的水质净化效果比较

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151311

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (4): 1505-1511.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151311

MIEX和PAC对微污染水源水的水质净化效果比较

杨晓明¹, 张朝晖^1,2, 王亮^1,2, 赵斌^1,2, 张敏¹, 郭幸斐^1,2, 曹宏杰¹

1. 天津工业大学环境与化学工程学院, 天津 300387;
2. 天津工业大学省部共建分离膜与膜过程国家重点实验室, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2015-08-19 修回日期:2015-12-23 出版日期:2016-04-05 发布日期:2016-04-05
通讯作者: 张朝晖
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51478314,51138008,51308391,51308390);天津市科技计划项目(14ZCDGSF00128,14JCQNJC09000)。

Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC

YANG Xiaoming¹, ZHANG Zhaohui^1,2, WANG Liang^1,2, ZHAO Bin^1,2, ZHANG Min¹, GUO Xingfei^1,2, CAO Hongjie¹

1. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2015-08-19 Revised:2015-12-23 Online:2016-04-05 Published:2016-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478314, 51138008, 51308391, 51308390) and the Tianjin Science and Technology Projects (14ZCDGSF00128, 14JCQNJC09000).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了MIEX和PAC两种水处理吸附剂对微污染水源水的水质净化性能。实验分别考察了MIEX和PAC对DOC和UV₂₅₄的去除效率,并通过凝胶渗透色谱和三维荧光光谱分析,研究了MIEX和PAC对不同相对分子质量区间以及不同种类有机物的去除规律。在正常的吸附剂投加量下(MIEX 5~8 ml·L^-1,PAC 30~50 mg·L^-1),MIEX对DOC和UV₂₅₄的平均去除率比PAC高23%和20%。但随着吸附剂投加量的增加,两者去除效率差别逐渐减小,MIEX对DOC和UV₂₅₄的最大去除率仅比PAC高6%~8%。与PAC相比,MIEX去除的有机物相对分子质量分布范围更广,特别是对中等分子量(5000~50000)有机物,其去效率明显高于PAC。MIEX对腐殖酸和富里酸类有机物的去除率略高于PAC,而对蛋白质类有机物的去除率则远高于PAC。动力学分析表明,MIEX和PAC对DOC的吸附去除过程符合准二级动力学,MIEX对有机物的吸附速率是PAC的40倍左右。

关键词: 磁性离子交换树脂, 粉末活性炭, 吸附剂, 天然有机物, 饮用水处理

Abstract:

Purification performance on micropolluted source water by magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX) and powder activated carbon (PAC) was studied in this paper. Removal efficiencies of DOC and UV₂₅₄ by MIEX and PAC were compared, respectively. The effluents of MIEX and PAC treatment were analyzed through gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy (3DEEM). The removal characteristics of organic pollutants with different relative molecular weights and composition were discussed. The results showed that under the normal dosages of the both absorbents (where MIEX was 5—8 ml·L^-1 and PAC was 30—50 mg·L^-1), the average removal efficiencies of DOC and UV₂₅₄ by MIEX treatment were 23% and 20% higher than that by PAC treatment, respectively. However, with increasing absorbent dosages, the maximum removals of DOC and UV₂₅₄ for MIEX were only 6%—8% higher than that for PAC. Compared with PAC treatment, organic pollutants with wider range of relative molecular weight distribution was removed by MIEX treatment. In the range of 5000—50000, MIEX had a more excellent removal performance than PAC. On the other hand, a slightly higher removal of humic acid and fulvic acid was obtained for MIEX than PAC, but the removal of protein by MIEX was significantly higher than that by PAC. Kinetic analysis suggested that the adsorption process of both MIEX and PAC fitted the pseudo-second-order model, and the adsorption rate of MIEX was about 40 times higher than PAC.

Key words: MIEX, powder activated carbon, water quality purification, adsorbents, natural organic matter, drinking water treatment

中图分类号:

TU991.2

杨晓明, 张朝晖, 王亮, 赵斌, 张敏, 郭幸斐, 曹宏杰. MIEX和PAC对微污染水源水的水质净化效果比较[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1505-1511.

YANG Xiaoming, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Liang, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Min, GUO Xingfei, CAO Hongjie. Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(4): 1505-1511.

参考文献 21

[1]	CHEN J, GU B, LEBOENF E J, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions[J]. Chemosphere, 2002, 48 (1): 59-68.
[2]	FANG J, YANG X, MA J, et al. Characterization of algal organic matter and formation of DBPs from chlor (am) ination[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44 (20): 5897-5906.
[3]	HONG H C, HUANG F Q, WANG F Y, et al. Properties of sediment NOM collected from a drinking water reservoir in South China, and its association with THMs and HAAs formation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 476: 274-279.
[4]	赵英, 顾平. 利用分子量分布探讨粉末活性炭对膜生物反应器的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60 (12): 3117-3121. ZHAO Y, GU P. Influence of PAC on MBR through molecular weight distribution measurement[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60 (12): 3117-3121.
[5]	TOMASZEWSKA M, MOZIA S. Removal of organic matter from water by PAC/UF system[J]. Water Research, 2002, 36 (16): 4137-4143.
[6]	董秉直, 曹达文, 范瑾初, 等. UF膜与混凝粉末活性炭联用处理微污染原水[J]. 环境科学, 2001, 22 (1): 37-40. DONG B Z, CAO D W, FAN J C, et al. Ultrafiltration of micropolluted water in combination with coagulationand PAC process[J]. Environmental Science, 2001, 22 (1): 37-40.
[7]	李德生, 姚智文, 王占生. 原水深度处理过程中的生物稳定性和分子量分布[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61 (11): 2944-2950. LI D S, YAO Z W, WANG Z S. Biological stability and molecular weight distribution during advanced water treatment processes of source water[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61 (11): 2944-2950.
[8]	BOYER T H, SINGER P C. Stoichiometry of removal of natural organic matter by ion exchange[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 42 (2): 608-613.
[9]	BOYER T H, SINGER P C, AIKEN G R. Removal of dissolved organic matter by anion exchange: effect of dissolved organic matter properties[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42 (19): 7431-7437.
[10]	WALKER K M, BOYER T H. Long-term performance of bicarbonate-form anion exchange: removal of dissolved organic matter and bromide from the St. Johns River, FL, USA[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45 (9): 2875-2886.
[11]	DRIKAS M, DIXON M, MORRAN J. Long term case study of MIEX pre-treatment in drinking water: understanding NOM removal[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45 (4): 1539-1548.
[12]	李为兵, 陈卫, 戴鸣, 等. 新型MIEX 离子交换树脂在饮用水处理中的应用研究[J]. 净水技术, 2009, 28 (5): 47-51. LI W B, CHEN W, DAI M, et al. Novel magnetic ion exchange resin treatment of potable water[J]. Water Purification Technology, 2009, 28 (5): 47-51.
[13]	袁哲, 陈卫, 陶辉, 等. MIEX/超滤一体化工艺净化长江原水的研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2010, 26 (5): 33-37. YUAN Z, CHEN W, TAO H, et al. Combined process of MIEX and ultrafiltration membrane for purification of Yangtze River raw water[J].China Water & Wastewater, 2010, 26 (5): 33-37.
[14]	BOYER T H, SINGER P C. Bench-scale testing of a magnetic ion exchange resin for removal of disinfection by-product precursors[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39 (7): 1265-1276.
[15]	BOYER T H, SINGER P C. A pilot-scale evaluation of magnetic ion exchange treatment for removal of natural organic material and inorganic anions[J]. Water Research, 2006, 40 (15): 2865-2876.
[16]	金伟, 徐祖信, 曹达文. 粉末活性炭处理原水中溶解性有机物的试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报 (自然科学版), 2008, 36 (12): 1670-1673. JIN W, XU Z X, CAO D W. Study on removal of dissolved organic compounds in raw water by powdered activated carbon[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2008, 36 (12): 1670-1673.
[17]	CHEN W, WESTERHOFF P, LEENHEER J A, et al. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter[J]. Environmental Science &Technology, 2003, 37 (24): 5701-5710.
[18]	HE X S, XI B D, WEI Z M, et al. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy with regional integration analysis for characterizing composition and transformation of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachates[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 190 (1): 293-299.
[19]	HUANG H, CHO H H, SCHWAB K J, et al. Effects of magnetic ion exchange pretreatment on low pressure membrane filtration of natural surface water[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46 (17): 5483-5490.
[20]	HUANG H, CHO H H, JACANGELO J G, et al. Mechanisms of membrane fouling control by integrated magnetic ion exchange and coagulation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46 (19): 10711-10717.
[21]	AL-HALBOUNI D, DOTT W, HOLLENDER J. Occurrence and composition of extracellular lipids and polysaccharides in a full-scale membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43 (1): 97-106.

MIEX和PAC对微污染水源水的水质净化效果比较

Comparison of purification of micropolluted source water by MIEX and PAC

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[2]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[3]	肖川宝, 李林洋, 刘武锋, 钟年丙, 解泉华, 钟登杰, 常海星. 光催化与离子交换吸附耦合有效去除2，4，6-三氯苯酚[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1587-1597.
[4]	潘煜, 王子航, 王佳韵, 王如竹, 张华. 基于可得然-氯化锂复合吸附剂的除湿换热器热湿性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1352-1359.
[5]	李敏, 阎雪茹, 刘新磊. 苯并咪唑连接聚合物吸附剂和膜研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 599-616.
[6]	王玉杰, 李申辉, 赵之平. M-MOF-74吸附分离H₂/He混合物的分子模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4507-4517.
[7]	罗伟莉, 王雯雯, 潘权稳, 葛天舒, 王如竹. 基于活性碳纤维毡复合吸附剂的储热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 554-559.
[8]	吴俊晔, 葛天舒, 吴宣楠, 代彦军, 王如竹. 基于吸附剂/木浆纤维纸耦合材料的空气净化[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 520-529.
[9]	冯宇, 张鑫, 张曼, 王建成, 阎智锋, 李甫, 费鹏飞, 卢建军, 米杰. 静电纺丝纤维对煤基气体污染物脱除研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 3933-3945.
[10]	邓超和, 王佳韵, 李金凤, 刘业凤, 王如竹. 可低温驱动的凝胶复合吸附剂的制备及吸/脱附性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4401-4409.
[11]	梁苏卓成, 姬国勋, 孙新利, 王波, 张仕通, 代星. 硅杂原子提升冠醚对锂离子络合能力的机理理论研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 3149-3159.
[12]	张瑞, 陆旗玮, 林森, 于建国. 铝系成型锂吸附剂性能测试评价与对比[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 3053-3062.
[13]	王琪, 赵有璟, 刘洋, 王云昊, 王敏, 项顼. 高镁锂比盐湖镁锂分离与锂提取技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 2905-2921.
[14]	李威, 王秋旺, 曾敏. 水合盐基中低温热化学储热材料性能测试及数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2763-2772.
[15]	于涛, 王运东, 刘作华, 马建修, 靖宇. 硫化氢深度吸附材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 748-760.