(火用)方法在垃圾气化剂选取中的应用

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151600

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (6): 2583-2590.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151600

(火用)方法在垃圾气化剂选取中的应用

董韶峰^1,2,3, 袁浩然¹, 王亚琢¹, 鲁涛^1,2, 陈勇¹

1. 中国科学院广州能源研究所, 广东广州 510640;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 华北水利水电大学, 河南郑州 450045

收稿日期:2015-10-22 修回日期:2015-12-02 出版日期:2016-06-05 发布日期:2016-06-05
通讯作者: 袁浩然
基金资助:
广东省省院合作项目(2013B091500086);广东省专业镇项目(2012B091400011);佛山市市院合作项目(2013HK100371)。

Exergy method used in selection of waste gasification agents

DONG Shaofeng^1,2,3, YUAN Haoran¹, WANG Yazhuo¹, LU Tao^1,2, CHEN Yong¹

1. Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, Henan, China

Received:2015-10-22 Revised:2015-12-02 Online:2016-06-05 Published:2016-06-05
Supported by:
supported by the Guangdong-CAS Cooperation Project (2013B091500086), the Guangdong Province Professional Town Project (2012B091400011) and the Foshan-CAS Cooperation Project (2013HK100371).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对于垃圾气化的转换效率,传统上采用冷煤气效率来表示,采用(火用)方法并提出了(火用)效率和累积(火用)效率。根据冷煤气效率、(火用)效率和累积(火用)效率对垃圾气化的3种气化剂进行比较,发现依照3种效率选取的最佳气化剂不尽相同。分析可得:(火用)方法要比传统方法更全面更具实践价值,(火用)效率和累积(火用)效率强调了合成气焓(火用)的利用潜力。由于累积(火用)效率兼顾到了气化剂获取的能耗成本,从而可为气化剂的科学选取提供依据。

关键词: (火用), 气化, 合成气, (火用)效率, 累计(火用)效率

Abstract:

As to the conversion efficiency of waste gasification, cold gas efficiency (CGE) has been traditionally used. In this paper the exergy method was adopted, and exergy efficiency and cumulative exergy consumption (CExC) efficiency were put forward. CGE, exergy efficiency and CExC efficiency were compared among three agents for waste gasification. It was found that the best agent was different according to different efficiencies. The exergy method was more comprehensive and had more practical value than traditional method. The exergy efficiency and CExC efficiency emphasized the utilization potential of enthalpy exergy carried by syngas. As the CExC efficiency took the energy cost of acquiring agents into consideration, it can provide proof for the scientific selection of agents.

Key words: exergy, gasification, syngas, exergy efficiency, cumulative exergy efficiency

中图分类号:

X705

董韶峰, 袁浩然, 王亚琢, 鲁涛, 陈勇. (火用)方法在垃圾气化剂选取中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(6): 2583-2590.

DONG Shaofeng, YUAN Haoran, WANG Yazhuo, LU Tao, CHEN Yong. Exergy method used in selection of waste gasification agents[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(6): 2583-2590.

参考文献 21

[1]	NIKOO M B, MAHINPEY N. Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2008, 32 (12): 1245-1254. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.020.
[2]	PEREIRA E G, DA SILVA J N, DE OLIVEIRA J L, et al. Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16 (7): 4753-4762. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.023.
[3]	BARUAH D, BARUAH D C. Modeling of biomass gasification: a review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 806-815. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.129.
[4]	ARAFT H A, JIJAKLI K. Modeling and comparative assessment of municipal solid waste gasification for energy production [J]. Waste Management, 2013, 33 (8): 1704-1713. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.04.008.
[5]	布罗章斯基. (火用)方法及其应用 [M]. 王加璇, 译. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 1996: 7-10, 77-92. Бродянский B M. Exergy Method and Its Application [M]. WANG J X, trans. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 1996: 7-10, 77-92.
[6]	PRABOWO B, UMEKI K, YAN M, et al. CO2-steam mixture for direct and indirect gasification of rice straw in a downdraft gasifier: laboratory-scale experiments and performance prediction [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 670-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.022.
[7]	LIU H T, FENG C, XIA P, et al. Method of oxygen-enriched two-stage underground coal gasification [J]. Mining Science and Technology (China), 2011, 21 (2): 191-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.mstc.2011.02.018.
[8]	AHMED I, GUPTA A K. Characteristics of cardboard and paper gasification with CO2 [J]. Applied Energy, 2009, 86 (12): 2626-2634. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.002.
[9]	SIRCAR I, SANE A, WANG W, et al. Experimental and modeling study of pinewood char gasification with CO2 [J]. Fuel, 2014, 119: 38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.026.
[10]	COUTO N, SILVA V, MONTEIRO E, et al. Using an Eulerian-granular 2-D multiphase CFD model to simulate oxygen air enriched gasification of agroindustrial residues [J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 77: 174-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.089.
[11]	王正烈, 周亚平. 物理化学: 上册 [M]. 第4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 310-310. WANG Z L, ZHOU Y P. Physical Chemistry:Ⅰ[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 310-310.
[12]	SONG G H, XIAO J, ZHAO H, et al. A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels [J]. Energy, 2012, 40 (1): 164-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.016.
[13]	SZARGUT J. Chemical exergies of the elements [J]. Applied Energy, 1989, 32 (4): 269-286. DOI: 0306-2619/89.
[14]	RIVERO R, GARFIAS M. Standard chemical exergy of elements updated [J]. Energy, 2006, 31 (15): 3310-3326. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.020.
[15]	SZARGUT J. Analysis of cumulative exergy consumption [J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 1987, 11 (4): 541-547. DOI: 10.1002/er.4440110410.
[16]	CORBETTA M, BASSANI A, MANENTI F, et al. Multi-scale kinetic modeling and experimental investigation of syngas production from coal gasification in updraft gasifiers [J]. Energy Fuels, 2015, 29: 3972-3984.
[17]	EGZERGIA S J. Poradnik Obliczania I Stosowania [M/OL]. Widawnictwo Politechniki Shlaskej, Gliwice, 2007. http://web.mit.edu/2.813/www/readings/APPENDIX.pdf
[18]	TANG Y T, MA X Q, LAI Z Y, et al. Energy analysis and environmental impacts of a MSW oxy-fuel incineration power plant in China [J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 60: 132-141. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.073.
[19]	FU C, GUNDERSEN T. Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes [J]. Energy, 2012, 44 (1): 60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.065.
[20]	SUN B X, NIE Z R, GAO F. Cumulative exergy consumption (CExC) analysis of energy carriers in China [J]. International Journal of Exergy, 2014, 15:196-213.
[21]	HE X, HAGG M B. Energy efficient process for CO2 capture from flue gas with novel fixed-site-carrier membranes [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 174-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.018.

(火用)方法在垃圾气化剂选取中的应用

Exergy method used in selection of waste gasification agents

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[3]	葛泽峰, 吴雨青, 曾名迅, 查振婷, 马宇娜, 侯增辉, 张会岩. 灰化学成分对生物质气化特性的影响规律[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2136-2146.
[4]	周必茂, 许世森, 王肖肖, 刘刚, 李小宇, 任永强, 谭厚章. 烧嘴偏转角度对气化炉渣层分布特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1939-1949.
[5]	李鑫, 曾少娟, 彭奎霖, 袁磊, 张香平. CO₂电催化还原制合成气研究进展及趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 313-329.
[6]	仇鹏, 韩洋, 许建良, 王辅臣, 代正华. 用于预测气流床煤气化的EDC模型参数研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 428-437.
[7]	王佳铭, 阮雪华, 贺高红. 面向不同工业二氧化碳分离体系的膜材料研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3417-3432.
[8]	刘振宇. 煤地下气化低效的化学反应工程根源：滞留层及通道中的传质与反应[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3299-3306.
[9]	朱莲峰, 王超, 张梦娟, 刘方正, 贾鑫, 安萍, 许光文, 韩振南. 水蒸气/氧流化床两段煤气化制备低焦油合成气工艺实验[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3720-3730.
[10]	王悦琳, 晁伟, 蓝晓程, 莫志朋, 佟淑环, 王铁峰. 合成气生物发酵法制乙醇的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3448-3460.
[11]	戚新刚, 路利波, 陈渝楠, 葛志伟, 郭烈锦. 造纸黑液超临界水气化制氢与高附加值化学品回收研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3338-3354.
[12]	周乐, 沈程凯, 吴超, 侯北平, 宋执环. 深度融合特征提取网络及其在化工过程软测量中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3156-3165.
[13]	孟博, 刘艳萍, 蒋新科, 韩一帆. Fe₅C₂-MnO _x 尺度调控及催化合成气制烯烃性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2677-2689.
[14]	袁聪, 蒲舸, 高杰, 贾帅辉. 改性BaFe₂O₄载氧体生物质化学链气化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1359-1368.
[15]	叶茂林, 谭烽华, 李宇萍, 廖玉河, 王晨光, 马隆龙. 农林废弃物气化合成混合醇生命周期环境影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1369-1378.