基于线性自抗扰的城市污水脱氮控制仿真

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151947

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 1032-1039.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151947

基于线性自抗扰的城市污水脱氮控制仿真

魏伟, 王小艺, 王藩, 刘载文

北京工商大学计算机与信息工程学院, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2015-12-22 修回日期:2015-12-29 出版日期:2016-03-05 发布日期:2016-01-12
通讯作者: 魏伟
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(61403006);北京市属高等学校高层次人才引进与培养计划项目(YETP1449,CIT&TCD201404031);科研基地建设—科技创新平台—现代商科特色项目(PXM2015_014213_000063);北京市教委科技计划重点项目(KZ201510011011)。

Nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment processes based on linear active disturbance rejection control and its dynamic simulation

WEI Wei, WANG Xiaoyi, WANG Fan, LIU Zaiwen

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2015-12-22 Revised:2015-12-29 Online:2016-03-05 Published:2016-01-12
Contact: 67
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403006), the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (YETP1449, CIT&TCD201404031), the Project of Scientific and Technological Innovation Platform (PXM2015_ 014213_000063) and the Major Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission Science and Technology Development Plans (KZ201510011011).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据A/O工艺的脱氮原理,基于城市污水处理的1号基准动力学模型,分析影响脱氮过程的两个重要因素:硝态氮和溶解氧,利用线性自抗扰实现城市污水处理过程的脱氮控制。基于硝态氮和溶解氧分别设计线性自抗扰控制,既避免对复杂数学模型的依赖,又克服影响污水出水水质的波动因素,可获得较好的污水处理效果。动态仿真结果表明,线性自抗扰具有更好的控制性能。基于线性自抗扰的脱氮控制有利于提高污水处理的脱氮效率,改善出水水质。

关键词: 污水, 动力学模型, 脱氮, 线性自抗扰, 控制, 动态仿真

Abstract:

Based on A/O nitrogen removal process and the kinetic model, Benchmark Simulation Model No.1, two significant factors, nitrate nitrogen and dissolved oxygen, affecting nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment process are considered. Linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) is adopted to realize the removal of nitrogen. The control laws designed for nitrate nitrogen and dissolved oxygen do not rely on faithful mathematical models, which make the effluent quality of wastewater be robust enough to uncertainties and fluctuant factors, and nice performance is obtained. Dynamic simulation results show that LADRC has better performance. It can improve the efficiency of nitrogen removal and the effluent quality of wastewater.

Key words: wastewater, kinetic model, nitrogen removal, LADRC, control, dynamic simulation

中图分类号:

TP273

魏伟, 王小艺, 王藩, 刘载文. 基于线性自抗扰的城市污水脱氮控制仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(3): 1032-1039.

WEI Wei, WANG Xiaoyi, WANG Fan, LIU Zaiwen. Nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment processes based on linear active disturbance rejection control and its dynamic simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(3): 1032-1039.

参考文献 25

[1]	国家环境保护总局. 2013年中国环境状况公报污染物排放情况[R]. 北京, 2014. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. The bulletin of discharge of pollutants in China in 2013[R]. Beijing, 2014.
[2]	郑兴灿, 李亚新. 污水除磷脱氮技术[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1998: 221. ZHENG X C, LI Y X. The Technology of Wastewater Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal[M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 1998: 221.
[3]	张景红, 胡海涛. 城市污水氮源与脱氮技术的发展[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2010, 10 (2): 172-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0735.2010. 02.059. ZHANG J H, HU H T. The development of technology of the nitrogen source and nitrogen removal[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2010, 10 (2): 172-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0735.2010.02.059.
[4]	周雪, 刘娜. 浅谈新型除磷脱氮技术[J]. 科学咨询, 2014, 8 (31): 50-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4822.2014.24.031. ZHOU X, LIU N. Discussion on the new nitrogen and phosphorus removal technology[J]. The Scientific Advisory, 2014, 8 (31): 50-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4822.2014.24.031.
[5]	KASHIF R, DAE H A, DAE S L. Simultaneous organic carbon and nitrogen removal in an anoxic-oxic activated sludge system under various operating conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 162 (6): 373-378.
[6]	刘阳, 白莹, 周娜. 城市污水脱氮除磷中的化学问题[J]. 环境保护科学, 2008, 34 (3): 60-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6216.2008.03.019. LIU Y, BAI Y, ZHOU N. Chemical problems during nitrogen and phosphate removal of municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2008, 34 (3): 60-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6216.2008.03.019.
[7]	马勇, 王淑莹, 王晓莲, 等. A/O脱氮工艺的控制策略和应用性研究[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2003, 4 (10): 18-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9108.2003.10.004. MA Y, WANG S Y, WANG X L, et al. Control strategies and application research of A/O nitrogen removal process[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2003, 4 (10): 18-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1673-9108.2003.10.004.
[8]	彭永臻, 王晓莲, 王淑莹. A/O脱氮工艺影响因素及其控制策略的研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2005, 37 (8): 1053-1057. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0367-6234.2005.08.011. PENG Y Z, WANG X L, WANG S Y. Study on influence factors and control strategies A/O nitrogen removal process[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2005, 37 (8): 1053-1057. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0367-6234.2005.08.011.
[9]	ALEX J, BENEDETTI L, COPP J, et al. Benchmark Simulation Model No.1 (BSM1)[R]. Sweden: Dept. of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund University, 2008.
[10]	VRECKO D, HVALA N, KOCIJAN J. Wastewater treatment benchmark: what can be achieved with simple control[C]//Proc. ICA 2001: vol. 1. Malmö, Sweden, 2001: 221-228.
[11]	DAVID J R, XAVIER F A, JEPPSSON U. Application of multivariate virtual reference feedback tuning for wastewater treatment plant control[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2012, 20 (5): 499-510.
[12]	韩京清. 自抗扰控制器及其应用[J]. 控制与决策, 1998, 13 (1): 19-23. DOI: 10.13195/j.cd.1998.01.19.hanjq.004. HAN J Q. Auto disturbances rejection controller and it's applications[J]. Control and Decision, 1998, 13 (1): 19-23. DOI: 10.13195/j.cd.1998. 01.19.hanjq.004.
[13]	韩京清. 从PID技术到自抗扰技术[J]. 控制工程, 2002, 9 (3): 13-18. DOI: 10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc.2002.03.003. HAN J Q. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. Control Engineering, 2002, 9 (3): 13-18. DOI: 10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc. 2002.03.003.
[14]	黄一, 张文革. 自抗扰控制器的发展[J].控制理论与应用, 2002, 19 (4): 486-492. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8152.2002.04.001. HUANG Y, ZHANG W G. Development of active disturbance rejection controller[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2002, 19 (4): 486-492. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8152.2002.04.001.
[15]	高志强. 自抗扰控制思想探究[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2013, 30 (12): 1498-1510. DOI: 10.7641/CTA.2013.31087. GAO Z Q. On the foundation of active disturbance rejection control[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2013, 30 (12): 1498-1510. DOI: 10.7641/CTA.2013.31087.
[16]	Gao Z Q. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning[C]//Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Denver, 2003: 4989-4996.
[17]	苏思贤, 杨慧中. 一类多变量系统的自抗扰非线性动态解耦控制[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61 (8): 1949-1954. SU S X, YANG H Z. Active-disturbance-rejection dynamic nonlinear decoupling control for a class of multivariable systems[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61 (8): 1949-1954.
[18]	Huang C E, LI D H, XUE Y L. Active disturbance rejection control for the ALSTOM gasifier benchmark problem[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2013, 21 (4): 556-564.
[19]	张园, 孙明玮, 陈增强. 强制循环蒸发系统线性自抗扰解耦控制的鲁棒设计[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66 (S2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-157.20141914. ZHANG Y, SUN M W, CHEN Z Q. Robust design of linear active disturbance rejection decoupling control for forced-circulation evaporation system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66 (S2): 263-270. DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-157. 20141914.
[20]	HENZE M, GRADY C P L, GUJER W, et al. Activated sludge model No.1: IAWPRC scientific and technical report No.1[R]. London: IAW-PRC, 1987.
[21]	TAKACS I, PATRY G, NOLASCO D, et al. A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process[J]. Water Research, 1991, 25 (10): 1263-1271.
[22]	The European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research. Action 624: optimal management of wastewater systems[EB/OL]. http://www.ensic.inpl-nancy. fr/COSTWWTP
[23]	陈文亮, 姚重华, 吕锡武. 活性污泥工艺的多目标优化分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33 (7): 1918-1925. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2013. 07.025. CHEN W L, YAO C H, LÜ X W. Analysis of activated sludge process by multi-objective optimization[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33 (7): 1918-1925. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2013.07.025.
[24]	SHEN W H, CHEN X Q, PONS M N. Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 155 (1/2): 161-174.
[25]	国家环境保护总局. 城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准: GB 18918—2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plant: GB 18918—2002[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2002.

基于线性自抗扰的城市污水脱氮控制仿真

Nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment processes based on linear active disturbance rejection control and its dynamic simulation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[3]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[4]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[5]	康飞, 吕伟光, 巨锋, 孙峙. 废锂离子电池放电路径与评价研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3903-3911.
[6]	曹跃, 余冲, 李智, 杨明磊. 工业数据驱动的加氢裂化装置多工况切换过渡状态检测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3841-3854.
[7]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[8]	李艳辉, 丁邵明, 白周央, 张一楠, 于智红, 邢利梅, 高鹏飞, 王永贞. 非常规服役超临界锅炉的微纳尺度腐蚀动力学模型建立及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2436-2446.
[9]	王承泽, 顾凯丽, 张晋华, 石建轩, 刘艺娓, 李锦祥. 硫化协同老化零价铁增效去除水中Cr（Ⅵ）的作用机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2197-2206.
[10]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[11]	苏晓丹, 朱干宇, 李会泉, 郑光明, 孟子衡, 李防, 杨云瑞, 习本军, 崔玉. 湿法磷酸半水工艺考察与石膏结晶过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1805-1817.
[12]	张中秋, 李宏光, 石逸林. 基于人工预测调控策略的复杂化工过程多任务学习方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1195-1204.
[13]	张江淮, 赵众. 碳三加氢装置鲁棒最小协方差约束控制及应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1216-1227.
[14]	刘定平, 陈爱桦, 张向阳, 何文浩, 王海. 铝灰半干法水解脱氮研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1294-1302.
[15]	徐银, 蔡洁, 陈露, 彭宇, 刘夫珍, 张晖. 异相可见光催化耦合过硫酸盐活化技术在水污染控制中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 995-1009.