进水水质对纳滤膜苦咸水软化的分离性能

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161721

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (8): 3133-3140.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161721

进水水质对纳滤膜苦咸水软化的分离性能

宋跃飞, 赵果, 李铁梅, 秦文博

河南师范大学环境学院, 黄淮水环境与污染防治教育部重点实验室, 河南省环境污染控制重点实验室, 河南新乡 453007

收稿日期:2016-12-09 修回日期:2017-04-25 出版日期:2017-08-05 发布日期:2017-08-05
通讯作者: 宋跃飞
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21606074）；中国博士后科学基金项目（2016M592297）；河南省博士后基金项目（2015073）。

Influence of feedwater quality on nanofiltration membrane softening efficiencies for brackish water in long-term operation

SONG Yuefei, ZHAO Guo, LI Tiemei, QIN Wenbo

School of Environment, Key Laboratory of Yellow River and Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Henan Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Control, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, China

Received:2016-12-09 Revised:2017-04-25 Online:2017-08-05 Published:2017-08-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21606074), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M592297) and the Henan Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015073).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对黄淮地区苦咸水，构建了小试级别的纳滤膜法软化系统，并开展了包括pH、总溶解固体含盐量（TDS）和总有机碳（TOC）等进水水质对DL、DK型纳滤膜的软化分离实验。结果表明，pH为3~10、TDS为1317~5926 mg·L^-1和TOC为2.72~12.24 mg·L^-1的进水条件下，DL和DK纳滤膜比通量随pH的增加分别呈先上升后下降和缓慢下降的趋势，随进水TDS和TOC的增加呈整体下降趋势，而纳滤膜对硬度离子（Mg²⁺和Ca²⁺）的截留率均呈明显的上升趋势。DL膜运行至267 h时，膜比通量下降幅度超过10%，进行化学清洗，酸洗后膜比通量恢复率达到85.05%，酸洗加碱洗后该值高达97.2%，结合扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜表征结果，可知化学清洗对膜面污染有较好的去除效果。

关键词: 纳滤, 分离, 结垢, 进水水质, 长期运行

Abstract:

Laboratory-scale experiments were conducted with two different commercial types of the nanofiltration (NF) membranes (DL and DK) to soften one brackish water in the Huanghuai region of China. The influences of feed pH (3-10), feed total dissolved solids (1317-5926 mg·L^-1) and total organic carbon (2.72-12.24 mg·L^-1) on both selected NF membranes separating efficiencies were evaluated. The experimental results indicated that with the increase of feed pH, both DL and DK nanofiltration membrane specific fluxes firstly increased, then decreased, and finally slowly declined. But it decreased all the time with the increase of feed TOC and TDS. The divalent ions (Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺) rejection rates for candidate NF membranes were on the rise during the testing scope. DL nanofiltration membrane was selected to continue to carry out the long-term stability test. When the operating time was running to 267 h, the membrane specific flux decreased by more than 10%, and chemical cleaning was adopted immediately. After chemical acid cleaning, the membrane specific flux recovery rate reached 85.05%; and after the coupling acid cleaning and alkali cleaning, the value is as high as 97.2%. Combined with scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope characterization images, it was clearly showed that the chemical cleaning has good removal effect for membrane fouling.

Key words: nanofiltration, separation, fouling, feed water quality, long-term operation

中图分类号:

X523

宋跃飞, 赵果, 李铁梅, 秦文博. 进水水质对纳滤膜苦咸水软化的分离性能[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(8): 3133-3140.

SONG Yuefei, ZHAO Guo, LI Tiemei, QIN Wenbo. Influence of feedwater quality on nanofiltration membrane softening efficiencies for brackish water in long-term operation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(8): 3133-3140.

参考文献 30

[1]	DAO T D, LABORIE S, CABASSUD C. Direct As(Ⅲ) removal from brackish groundwater by vacuum membrane distillation:effect of organic matter and salts on membrane fouling[J]. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2016, 157(1):35-44.
[2]	TANG W, KOVALSKY P, HE D, et al. Fluoride and nitrate removal from brackish groundwaters by batch-mode capacitive deionization[J]. Water. Res., 2015, 84(11):342-349.
[3]	HAIDARI A H, BLANKERT B, TIMMER H, et al. PURO:a unique RO-design for brackish groundwater treatment[J]. Desalination, 2017, 403(S1):208-216.
[4]	GREENLEE L F, LAWLER D F, FREEMAN B D, et al. Reverse osmosis desalination:water sources, technology, and today's challenges[J]. Water. Res., 2009, 43(9):2317-2348.
[5]	GARG M C, JOSHI H. Optimization and economic analysis of small scale nanofiltration and reverse osmosis brackish water system powered by photovoltaics[J]. Desalination, 2014, 353(11):57-74.
[6]	JEONG S, RICE S A, VIGNESWARAN S. Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination[J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2014, 165(S1):60-68.
[7]	GUASTALLI A R, XAVIER S F, PENRU Y, et al. Comparison of DMF and UF pretreatments for particulate material and dissolved organic matter removal in SWRO desalination[J]. Desalination, 2013, 322(8):144-150.
[8]	LI X, CAO Y, YU H, et al. A novel composite nanofiltration membrane prepared with PHGH and TMC by interfacial polymerization[J]. J. Membrane Sci., 2014, 466(9):82-91.
[9]	LABBAN O, LIU C, CHONG T H, et al. Fundamentals of low-pressure nanofiltration:membrane characterization, modeling, and understanding the multi-ionic interactions in water softening[J]. J. Membrane Sci., 2017, 521(1):18-32.
[10]	牟超, 胡国新. 超声作用对NaCl和MgCl2溶液在纳滤膜内传质的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(S1):386-390. MOU C, HU G X. Influence of ultrasonic treatment on NaCl aqueous and MgSO4 aqueous solution in nanofiltration membrane transport[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(S1):386-390.
[11]	ANG W L, MOHAMMAD A W, BENAMOR A, et al. Hybrid coagulation-NF membrane processes for brackish water treatment:effect of pH and salt/calcium concentration[J]. Desalination, 2016, 390(7):25-32.
[12]	SARI M A, CHELLAM S. Relative contributions of organic and inorganic fouling during nanofiltration of inland brackish surface water[J]. J. Membrane Sci., 2017, 523(2):68-76.
[13]	SONG Y, LI T, ZHOU J, et al. Analysis of nanofiltration membrane performance during softening process of simulated brackish groundwater[J]. Desalination, 2016, 399(12):159-164.
[14]	姜雨薇, 冉艳红. 纳滤膜技术在废水处理中的应用与发展趋势[J]. 现代化工, 2011, 31(2):25-28. JIANG Y W, RAN Y H. Application of nanofiltration technology in wastewater treatment and its trends[J]. Mod. Chem. Ind., 2011, 31(2):25-28.
[15]	MOGHEIR Y, FOUL A A, ABUHABIB A A, et al. Assessment of large scale brackish water desalination plants in the Gaza strip[J]. Desalination, 2013, 314(4):96-100.
[16]	晏云鹏, 全学军, 葛淑萍, 等. 垃圾渗滤液生化出水絮凝-纳滤处理及过程机理[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(6):2280-2287. YAN Y P, QUAN X J, GE S P, et al. Flocculation-nanofiltration treatment of biologically treated leachate and process mechanism[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(6):2280-2287.
[17]	ALTAEE A, SHARIF A O. Alternative design to dual stage NF seawater desalination using high rejection brackish water membranes[J]. Desalination, 2011, 273(6):391-397.
[18]	WALHA K, AMAR R B, FIRDAOUS L, et al. Brackish groundwater treatment by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in Tunisia:performance and cost comparison[J]. Desalination, 2007, 207(3):95-106.
[19]	ALTAEE A, SHARIF A O. Alternative design to dual stage NF seawater desalination using high rejection brackish water membranes[J]. Desalination, 2011, 273(6):391-397.
[20]	YOON J, AMY G, YOON Y. Transport of target anions, chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate, through RO, NF, and UF membranes[J]. Water. Sci. Technol., 2005, 51(6):327-334.
[21]	高从堦. 海水淡化及海水与苦咸水利用[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2007:105-111. GAO C J. Seawater Desalination and the Water Reuse for Seawater and Brackish Water[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2007:105-111.
[22]	刘训东, 杨宏伟, 杨小平, 等. 纳滤膜淡化苦咸水技术现状及进展[J]. 净水技术, 2008, 27(4):19-21. LIU X D, YANG H W, YANG X P, et al. The status and development of brackish water desalination with nanofiltration[J]. Water. Purifi. Technol., 2008, 27(4):19-21.
[23]	王磊, 福士宪一. 影响超滤膜长期、稳定运行的因素分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2002, 18(4):44-46. WANG L, FU S X Y. Influencing factors analysis for ultrafiltration membrane performance during the long-term operation[J]. Chin. Water Wastewater, 2008, 18(4):44-46.
[24]	CHANG H, LIANG H, QU F, et al. Towards a better hydraulic cleaning strategy for ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid:effect of brackish water composition[J]. J. Environ. Sci., 2016, 43(5):177-186.
[25]	ZAZOULI M A, NASSERI S, ULBRICHT M. Fouling effects of humic and alginic acids in nanofiltration and influence of solution composition[J]. Desalination, 2010, 250(1):688-692.
[26]	MOHAMMAD A W, TEOW Y H, ANG W L, et al. Nanofiltration membranes review:recent advances and future prospects[J]. Desalination, 2015, 356(12):226-254.
[27]	MUKHERJEE R, MONDAL M, SINHA A, et al. Application of nanofiltration membrane for treatment of chloride rich steel plant effluent[J]. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2016, 4(1):1-9.
[28]	WANG J, WANG L, MIAO R, et al. Enhanced gypsum scaling by organic fouling layer on nanofiltration membrane:characteristics and mechanisms[J]. Water Res., 2016, 4(3):1-9.
[29]	TU K L, CHIVAS A R, NGHIEM L D. Effects of membrane fouling and scaling on boron rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes[J]. Desalination, 2011, 279(3):269-277.
[30]	ONG C S, GOH P S, LAU W J, et al. Nanomaterials for biofouling and scaling mitigation of thin film composite membrane:a review[J]. Desalination, 2016, 393(S1):2-15.

进水水质对纳滤膜苦咸水软化的分离性能

Influence of feedwater quality on nanofiltration membrane softening efficiencies for brackish water in long-term operation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵亚欣, 张雪芹, 王荣柱, 孙国, 姚善泾, 林东强. 流穿模式离子交换层析去除单抗聚集体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3879-3887.
[2]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[3]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[4]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[5]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[6]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[7]	张缘良, 栾昕奇, 苏伟格, 李畅浩, 赵钟兴, 周利琴, 陈健民, 黄艳, 赵祯霞. 离子液体复合萃取剂选择性萃取尼古丁的研究及DFT计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2947-2956.
[8]	高金明, 郭玉娇, 鄂承林, 卢春喜. 一种封闭罩内顺流多旋臂气液分离器的分离特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2957-2966.
[9]	韩奎奎, 谭湘龙, 李金芝, 杨婷, 张春, 张永汾, 刘洪全, 于中伟, 顾学红. 四通道中空纤维MFI分子筛膜用于二甲苯异构体分离[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2468-2476.
[10]	朱兴驰, 郭志远, 纪志永, 汪婧, 张盼盼, 刘杰, 赵颖颖, 袁俊生. 选择性电渗析镁锂分离过程模拟优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2477-2485.
[11]	王蕾, 王磊, 白云龙, 何柳柳. SA膜状锂离子筛的制备及其锂吸附性能[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2046-2056.
[12]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.
[13]	蔺彩虹, 王丽, 吴瑜, 刘鹏, 杨江峰, 李晋平. 沸石中碱金属阳离子对CO₂/N₂O吸附分离性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2013-2021.
[14]	孙永尧, 高秋英, 曾文广, 王佳铭, 陈艺飞, 周永哲, 贺高红, 阮雪华. 面向含氮油田伴生气提质利用的膜耦合分离工艺设计优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2034-2045.
[15]	张正, 何永平, 孙海东, 张荣子, 孙正平, 陈金兰, 郑一璇, 杜晓, 郝晓刚. 蛇形流场电控离子交换装置用于选择性提锂[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2022-2033.