燃煤锅炉烟气中SO3生成的化学动力学模型和实验研究

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170052

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

燃煤锅炉烟气中SO₃能对锅炉设备、大气环境造成包括低温腐蚀、粘污和蓝烟等一系列的危害。因而，对烟气中SO₃主要影响因素及其影响规律的研究对于预测和控制烟气中SO₃浓度以满足不断增长的节能减排标准有重要意义。基于文献中的C/H/O/N/S化学动力学模型的优化、整合建立了化学动力学模型，对烟气中SO₃主要影响因素及其影响规律进行计算研究。还基于自主设计搭建了全混流反应器测量装置，对上述计算工况中的SO₃浓度进行测量。研究发现，烟气中SO₃浓度主要受SO₂、O₂和H₂O的浓度，以及温度和反应停留时间等影响。SO₃浓度受烟气中CO、NO的影响也较为显著，但是受CO₂的影响不大。另外，随着反应停留时间的增加，烟气中SO₃浓度先后经历了3个不同阶段：急剧增加，增长趋势逐渐减缓和逐渐减少。

关键词: 燃煤锅炉, 反应动力学, 实验验证, 三氧化硫, 烟道气

Abstract:

Various harms on equipment and atmospheric environment, including low-temperature corrosion, fouling and blue plumes, can be caused by SO₃ in flue gas for a coal-fired boiler. To predict and control SO₃ concentration to meet the increasing demands for energy conservation and emission reduction, more accurate knowledge on the effect of the factors that influence SO₃ in flue gas is required. Thus, in present work, a kinetic model was built by optimizing the previously developed kinetic models. The effect of the factors that influence SO₃ in flue gas was studied by numerically calculating SO₃ concentration under different conditions. Moreover, SO₃ concentrations under the conditions mentioned above were measured using a perfectly stirred reactor measuring apparatus built in this work. It was found that SO₃ concentration was apparently affected by the factors, namely, the concentrations of SO₂, O₂ and H₂O, as well as temperature and residence time. SO₃ concentration was seemingly affected by the concentrations of CO and NO, while was less influenced by CO₂ concentration. In addition, SO₃ concentration underwent three stages of sharp increase, slow increase and gradual decrease with increasing residence time.

Key words: coal-fired boiler, reaction kinetics, experimental validation, sulfur trioxide, flue gas

中图分类号:

TK229.6

向柏祥, 杨海瑞, 吕俊复. 燃煤锅炉烟气中SO₃生成的化学动力学模型和实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(7): 2896-2909.

XIANG Baixiang, YANG Hairui, LÜ Junfu. Kinetic modelling and experimental studies on SO₃ generation in flue gas for coal-fired boiler[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(7): 2896-2909.

参考文献 32

[1]	FLEIG D, ANDERSSON K, NORMANN F, et al. SO3 formation under oxyfuel combustion conditions [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50 (14): 8505-8514.
[2]	MOSER R E. SO3's impacts on plant O&M: part I [J]. Power, 2006, 150 (8): 40-40.
[3]	MOSER R E. Benefits of effective SO3 removal in coal-fired power plants: beyond opacity control [C]//Power Plant and Air Pollutant Control MEGA Symposium, Session. 2006.
[4]	GLARBORG P, MARSHALL P. Mechanism and modeling of the formation of gaseous alkali sulfates [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2005, 141 (1): 22-39.
[5]	齐立强, 原永涛, 史亚微. 燃煤烟气中的 SO3对微细颗粒物电除尘特性的影响 [J]. 动力工程学报, 2011, 31 (7): 539-543.QI L Q, YUAN Y T, SHI Y W. Influence of SO3 on electrostatic precipitation of fine particles in flue gas [J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2011, 31 (7): 539-543.
[6]	XIANG B X, ZHANG M, YANG H R, et al. Prediction of acid dew point in flue gas of boilers burning fossil fuels [J]. Energy Fuels, 2016, 30 (4): 3365-3373.
[7]	XIANG B X, TANG B, WU Y X, et al. Predicting acid dew point with a semi-empirical model [J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2016, 106 (5): 992-1001.
[8]	FLEIG D. Experimental and modeling studies of sulfur-based reactions in oxy-fuel combustion [D]. Sverige: Chalmers University of Technology, 2012.
[9]	陈鹏. 静电除尘器除尘效率影响因素的研究 [D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2009.CHEN P. Study on the influence factor of collection efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator [D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2009.
[10]	张悠. 烟气中 SO3 测试技术及其应用研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.ZHANG Y. Research and application of SO3 measurement in flue gas [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013.
[11]	刘建华, 杨晓博, 张琛, 等. Fe2O3对V2O5-WO3/TiO2 催化剂表面性质及其性能的影响 [J]. 化工学报, 2015, 67 (4): 1287-1293.LIU J H, YANG X B, ZHANG C, et al. Effect of Fe2O3 on surface properties and activities of V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts [J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 67 (4): 1287-1293.
[12]	REIDICK H, REIFENHAUSER R. Catalytic SO3 formation as function of boiler fouling [J]. Combustion, 1980, 51: 17.
[13]	BELO L P, ELLIOTT L K, STANGER R J, et al. High-temperature conversion of SO2 to SO3: homogeneous experiments and catalytic effect of fly ash from air and oxy-fuel firing [J]. Energy Fuels, 2014, 28 (11): 7243-7251.
[14]	SPÖRL R, WALKER J, BELO L, et al. SO3 emissions and removal by ash in coal-fired oxy-fuel combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2014, 28 (8): 5296-5306.
[15]	JØRGENSEN T L, LIVBJERG H, GLARBORG P. Homogeneous and heterogeneously catalyzed oxidation of SO2 [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62 (16): 4496-4499.
[16]	ALZUETA M U, BILBAO R, GLARBORG P. Inhibition and sensitization of fuel oxidation by SO2 [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 127 (4): 2234-2251.
[17]	GIMéNEZ-LóPEZ J, MARTINEZ M, MILLERA A, et al. SO2 effects on CO oxidation in a CO2 atmosphere, characteristic of oxy-fuel conditions [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158 (1): 48-56.
[18]	RASMUSSEN C L, GLARBORG P, MARSHALL P. Mechanisms of radical removal by SO2 [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31 (1): 339-347.
[19]	MUELLER M A, YETTER R A, DRYER F L. Kinetic modeling of the CO/H2O/O2/NO/SO2 system: implications for high-pressure fall-off in the SO2+O (+M)= SO3 (+M) reaction [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2000, 32 (6): 317-339.
[20]	YILMAZ A, HINDIYARTI L, JENSEN A D, et al. Thermal dissociation of SO3 at 1000-1400 K [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2006, 110 (21): 6654-6659.
[21]	HINDIYARTI L, GLARBORG P, MARSHALL P. Reactions of SO3 with the O/H radical pool under combustion conditions [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2007, 111 (19): 3984-3991.
[22]	SENDT K, JAZBEC M, HAYNES B S. Chemical kinetic modeling of the H/S system: H2S thermolysis and H2 sulfidation [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29 (2): 2439-2446.
[23]	ALLEN M T, YETTER R A, DRYER F L. High pressure studies of moist carbon monoxide/nitrous oxide kinetics [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1997, 109 (3): 449-470.
[24]	SPENCER H, ROMERO C, LEVY E, et al. Modeling of SO3 formation process in coal-fired boilers [R]. California: Electric Power Research Institute, 2007.
[25]	FLEIG D, ANDERSSON K, JOHNSSON F, et al. Conversion of sulfur during pulverized oxy-coal combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2011, 25 (2): 647-655.
[26]	肖雨亭, 贾曼, 徐莉, 等. 烟气中三氧化硫及硫酸雾滴的分析方法 [J]. 环境科技, 2012, 25 (5): 43-48.XIAO Y T, JIA M, XU L, et al. The analytic method of sulfur trioxide and sulfuric acid mist in flue gas [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 25 (5): 43-48.
[27]	郭阳, 李媛, 汪永威, 等. SCR 脱硝系统烟气中 SO3 测试采样方法对比研究 [J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34 (6): 69-72.GUO Y, LI Y, WANG Y W, et al. Comparison of SO3 testing and sampling methods in flue gas for SCR denitration system [J]. Electric Power Construction, 2013, 34 (6): 69-72.
[28]	DUNN J P, KOPPULA P R, STENGER H G, et al. Oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide over supported vanadia catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1998, 19 (2): 103-117.
[29]	FLEIG D, VAINIO E, ANDERSSON K, et al. Evaluation of SO3 measurement techniques in air and oxy-fuel combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2012, 26 (9): 5537-5549.
[30]	SMITH G P, GOLDEN D M, FRENKLACH M, et al. GRI 3.0 Mechanism [R]. Illinois: Gas Research Institute, 1999.
[31]	Chemkin-pro. release 15101, reaction design [R]. San Diego.
[32]	KEE R J, RUPLEY F M, MILLER J A. The Chemkin thermodynamic data base: Sandia report SAND87-8215B[R]. Livermore, CA, 1987.>, 2007, 31(1): 339-347.
[19]	MUELLER M A, YETTER R A, DRYER F L. Kinetic modeling of the CO/H2O/O2/NO/SO2 system: Implications for high-pressure fall-off in the SO2+O (+M)= SO3 (+M) reaction [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2000, 32(6): 317-339.
[20]	YILMAZ A, HINDIYARTI L, JENSEN A D, et al. Thermal dissociation of SO3 at 1000-1400 K [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2006, 110(21): 6654-6659.
[21]	HINDIYARTI L, GLARBORG P, MARSHALL P. Reactions of SO3 with the O/H radical pool under combustion conditions [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2007, 111(19): 3984-3991.
[22]	SENDT K, JAZBEC M, HAYNES B S. Chemical kinetic modeling of the H/S system: H2S thermolysis and H2 sulfidation [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(2): 2439-2446.
[23]	ALLEN M T, YETTER R A, DRYER F L. High pressure studies of moist carbon monoxide/nitrous oxide kinetics [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1997, 109(3): 449-470.
[24]	SPENCER H, ROMERO C, LEVY E, YAO Z, BILIRGEN H, CARAM H. Modeling of SO3 Formation Process in coal-fired boilers [R]. Electic Power Research Institute, 2007.
[25]	FLEIG D, ANDERSSON K, JOHNSSON F, et al. Conversion of sulfur during pulverized oxy-coal combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2011, 25(2): 647-655.
[26]	FLEIG D, VAINIO E, ANDERSSON K, et al. Evaluation of SO3 measurement techniques in air and oxy-fuel combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(9): 5537-5549.
[27]	肖雨亭, 贾曼, 徐莉, 等. 烟气中三氧化硫及硫酸雾滴的分析方法[J]. 环境科技, 2012, 25(5): 43-48.XIAO Y T, JIA M, XU L, et al. The Analytic Method of Sulfur Trioxide and Sulfuric Acid Mist in Flue Gas [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 25(5): 43-48.
[28]	郭阳, 李媛, 汪永威, 等. SCR 脱硝系统烟气中 SO3 测试采样方法对比研究[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34 (6): 69-72.GUO Y, LI Y, WANG Y W, et al. Comparison of SO3 Testing and Sampling Methods in Flue Gas for SCR Denitration System [J]. Electric Power Construction, 2013, 34(6): 69-72.
[29]	DUNN J P, KOPPULA P R, STENGER H G, et al. Oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide over supported vanadia catalysts [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1998, 19(2): 103-117.
[30]	SMITH G P, GOLDEN D M, FRENKLACH M, et al. GRI 3.0 Mechanism [J]. Gas Research Institute, 1999.
[31]	Chemkin-Pro. Release 15101, Reaction Design [R], San Diego.
[32]	KEE R J, RUPLEY F M, MILLER J A. The Chemkin Thermodynamic Data Base [R], Sandia Report SAND87-8215B, Livermore, CA, 1987.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

679

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	679

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	300	379
比例	44%	56%

摘要

399

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	399

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	207	192
比例	52%	48%

燃煤锅炉烟气中SO₃生成的化学动力学模型和实验研究

Kinetic modelling and experimental studies on SO₃ generation in flue gas for coal-fired boiler

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	闫琳琦, 王振雷. 基于STA-BiLSTM-LightGBM组合模型的多步预测软测量建模[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3407-3418.
[3]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[4]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[5]	罗来明, 张劲, 郭志斌, 王海宁, 卢善富, 相艳. 1~5 kW高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池堆的理论模拟与组装测试[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1724-1734.
[6]	时国华, 何林珅, 赵玺灵, 张世钢. 余热回收喷淋塔的烟气颗粒物脱除特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1735-1745.
[7]	许文烜, 江锦波, 彭新, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 宽速域三种典型型槽油气密封泄漏与成膜特性对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1660-1679.
[8]	禹进, 余彬彬, 蒋新生. 一种基于虚拟组分的燃烧调控化学作用量化及分析方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1303-1312.
[9]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.
[10]	刘潜, 张香兰, 李志平, 李玉龙, 韩梦醒. 油酚分离过程低共熔溶剂的筛选及萃取性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3915-3928.
[11]	王佳铭, 阮雪华, 贺高红. 面向不同工业二氧化碳分离体系的膜材料研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3417-3432.
[12]	陈玉弓, 陈昊, 黄耀松. 基于分子反应动力学模拟的六甲基二硅氧烷热解机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2844-2857.
[13]	黄陆月, 刘畅, 许勇毅, 邢浩若, 王峰, 马双忱. CDI二维浓度传质模型的建立以及实验验证[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2933-2943.
[14]	何聪, 钟文琪, 周冠文, 陈曦. 高海拔地区水泥生料悬浮炉分解特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2120-2129.
[15]	季超, 刘炜, 漆虹. 基于空冷的疏水陶瓷膜冷凝器用于烟气脱湿过程强化的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2174-2182.