流化床锅炉内石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中煅烧动力学特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170627

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (12): 4615-4624.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170627

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

流化床锅炉内石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中煅烧动力学特性

陈亮, 王子铭, 王春波

华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 河北保定 071003

收稿日期:2017-05-16 修回日期:2017-09-27 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 王春波
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600701）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（2016XS105）。

Limestone calcination kinetics in simultaneous calcination and sulfation under CFB conditions

CHEN Liang, WANG Ziming, WANG Chunbo

School of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, Hebei, China

Received:2017-05-16 Revised:2017-09-27 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0600701) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016XS105).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用恒温热重实验台研究了循环流化床内石灰石同时煅烧硫化反应中煅烧反应与硫化反应的相互作用。当煅烧环境中存在SO₂时，煅烧反应与硫化反应同时发生，并在颗粒中生成CaSO₄。与纯煅烧工况相比，在含有SO₂的气氛中煅烧石灰石时，颗粒的质量下降速率降低，而煅烧终质量升高。SO₂的存在能够降低石灰石的煅烧速率，而且在0～0.3%的范围内，SO₂浓度越高，煅烧越慢。对该现象提出以下机理：当煅烧过程中存在SO₂时，SO₂会与正在煅烧的石灰石颗粒的CaO层发生硫化反应生成CaSO₄，所生成的CaSO₄会堵塞颗粒的孔隙，增加CO₂的扩散阻力，进而减慢煅烧反应速率。对煅烧产物孔结构的测试和计算表明在同时煅烧硫化中部分孔隙被堵塞、封闭，孔内CO₂有效扩散系数下降，证明所提出的机理能够合理解释SO₂对石灰石煅烧的减缓作用。随着粒径由0.4～0.45 mm减小到0.2～0.25 mm，无论反应环境是否存在SO₂，石灰石的煅烧速率均加快。温度对煅烧速率有明显的影响，850℃下SO₂对石灰石煅烧速率的减缓程度大于880℃，这可能是由于880℃下CaSO₄对颗粒孔隙的堵塞作用下降导致的。

关键词: 煅烧, 硫化, 石灰石, 反应动力学, 循环流化床, 扩散

Abstract:

The interaction of limestone calcination and sulfation in simultaneous calcination/sulfation under circulating fluidized bed furnace conditions was studied by constant-temperature thermogravimetric setup. The sulfation reaction took place simultaneously with calcination and CaSO₄ was formed in the particles when SO₂ was present. Compared to pure calcination condition, the mass loss rate of limestone calcined in the presence of SO₂ was lower but the final mass was higher. Limestone calcination was slowed down by SO₂ presence and the calcination rate decreased with increase of SO₂ concentration within the range of 0-0.3%. A probable mechanism was proposed that CaSO₄ formation by SO₂ sulfation with CaO of limestone particles upon calcination may fill or plug pores in CaO layer, impede CO₂ transfer, and hinder calcination reaction. The mechanism of SO₂ inhibition on limestone calcination was supported by product pore structure analysis and calculation that some pores were plugged and effective CO₂ diffusion coefficient in pores was reduced. However, the calcination rate of limestone was increased with particle size decreased from 0.4-0.45 mm to 0.2-0.25 mm, no matter whether there was SO₂ or not. Temperature also largely affected calcination, SO₂ impeding effect was less pronounced at 880℃ than at 850℃, which was probably due to reduced pore plug of CaSO₄ at 880℃.

Key words: calcination, sulfation, limestone, reaction kinetics, circulating fluidized bed, diffusion

中图分类号:

TK221

陈亮, 王子铭, 王春波. 流化床锅炉内石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中煅烧动力学特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4615-4624.

CHEN Liang, WANG Ziming, WANG Chunbo. Limestone calcination kinetics in simultaneous calcination and sulfation under CFB conditions[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4615-4624.

参考文献 30

[1]	蒋敏华, 肖平. 大型循环流化床锅炉技术[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2009. JIANG M H, XIAO P. Large-scale Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Technology[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 2009.
[2]	GÓMEZ M, FERNÁNDEZ A, LLAVONA I, et al. Experiences in sulphur capture in a 30 MWth circulating fluidized bed boiler under oxy-combustion conditions[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 65(1/2):617-622.
[3]	BRAGANÇA S R, CASTELLAN J L. Desulfurization process using coal with low sulfur content, high oxidizing conditions and metamorphic limestones[J]. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 26(2):375-383.
[4]	MICCIO F, OKASHA F M. Fluidized bed combustion and desulfurization of a heavy liquid fuel[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 105(3):81-89.
[5]	SAASTAMOINEN J J, SHIMIZU T, TOURUNEN A. Effect of attrition on particle size distribution and SO2 capture in fluidized bed combustion under high CO2 partial pressure conditions[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(1):550-555.
[6]	ANTHONY E J, GRANATSTEIN D L. Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion systems[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27(2):215-236.
[7]	尚建宇, 王松岭, 王春波, 等. 脱硫CaO团聚体晶粒产物层内Ca2+和SO42-的扩散行为[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2009, 29(29):52-56. SHANG J Y, WANG S L, WANG C B, et al. The diffusion behavior of Ca2+ and SO42- in CaO sorbent aggregate crystal production layer[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2009, 29(29):52-56.
[8]	姜中孝, 段伦博, 陈晓平, 等. 空气燃烧与O2/CO2燃烧气氛下水蒸气对石灰石煅烧/硫化特性的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(26):14-20. JIANG Z X, DUAN L B, CHEN X P, et al. Effect of water vapor on indirect sulfation during air and O2/CO2 combustion[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(26):14-20.
[9]	武卫芳, 赵长遂, 李庆钊. O2/CO2气氛下醋酸调质石灰石煅烧/硫化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(5):1226-1232. WU W F, ZHAO C S, LI Q Z. Calcination/sulphation characteristics of limestone modified by acetic acid solution at O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(5):1226-1232.
[10]	吕晨, 刘小伟, 郭俊哲, 等. O2/H2O燃烧方式下石灰石的间接硫化反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(1):353-359. LÜ C, LIU X W, GUO J Z, et al. Indirect sulfation characteristics of limestone under O2/H2O combustion atmosphere[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(1):353-359.
[11]	BORGWARDT R H. Calcination kinetics and surface area of dispersed limestone particles[J]. AIChE Journal, 1985, 31(1):103-111.
[12]	GALLAGHER P K, JOHNSON JR D W. The effects of sample size and heating rate on the kinetics of the thermal decomposition of CaCO3[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 1976, 6(1):67-83.
[13]	CALDWELL K M, GALLAGHER P K, JOHNSON JR D W. Effect of thermal transport mechanisms on the thermal decomposition of CaCO3[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 1977, 18(1):15-19.
[14]	HU N, SCARONI A W. Calcination of pulverized limestone particles under furnace injection conditions[J]. Fuel, 1996, 75(2):177-186.
[15]	KHINAST J, KRAMMER G F, BRUNNER C, et al. Decomposition of limestone:the influence of CO2 and particle size on the reaction rate[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(4):623-634.
[16]	INGRAHAM T R, MARIER P. Kinetic studies on the thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1963, 41(4):170-173.
[17]	DARROUDI T, SEARCY A W. Effect of CO2 pressure on the rate of decomposition of calcite[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1981, 85(26):3971-3974.
[18]	王春波, 张斌, 陈亮, 等. 富氧燃烧气氛下石灰石煅烧/硫化特性及模型模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(4):1537-1543. WANG C B, ZHANG B, CHEN L, et al. Characterization and modeling of limestone calcination and sulfation in oxy-fuel combustion atmosphere[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(4):1537-1543.
[19]	SIMONS G A, GARMAN A R, BONI A A. The kinetic rate of SO2 sorption by CaO[J]. AIChE Journal, 1987, 33(2):211-217.
[20]	BORGWARDT R H, BRUCE K R, BLAKE J. An investigation of product-layer diffusivity for CaO sulfation[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(10):1993-1998.
[21]	WANG C, ZHANG Y, JIA L, et al. Effect of water vapor on the pore structure and sulfation of CaO[J]. Fuel, 2014, 130:60-65.
[22]	RAHIALA S, HYPPÄNEN T, PIKKARAINEN T. Bench-scale and modeling study of sulfur capture by limestone in typical CO2 concentrations and temperatures of fluidized-bed air and oxy-fuel combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(12):7664-7672.
[23]	刘妮, 赵敬德, 骆仲泱, 等. 钙基固硫剂高温固硫反应特性的TGA试验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(10):154-157. LIU N, ZHAO J D, LUO Z Y, et al. A thermogravimetric study on sulfation characteristics of calcium-based absorbents[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2002, 22(10):154-157.
[24]	WANG C, CHEN L, JIA L, et al. Simultaneous calcination and sulfation of limestone in CFBB[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 155:478-484.
[25]	SING K S W, EVERETT D H, HAUL R A W, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4):603-619.
[26]	MAHULI S K, AGNIHOTRI R, CHAUK S, et al. Pore-structure optimization of calcium carbonate for enhanced sulfation[J]. AIChE Journal, 1997, 43(9):2323-2335.
[27]	GARCÍA-LABIANO F, ABAD A, DE DIEGO L F, et al. Calcination of calcium-based sorbents at pressure in a broad range of CO2 concentrations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(13):2381-2393.
[28]	FULLER E N, SCHETTLER P D, GIDDINGS J C. New method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1966, 58(5):18-27.
[29]	ISHIDA M, WEN C Y. Comparison of kinetic and diffusional models for solid-gas reactions[J]. AIChE Journal, 1968, 14(2):311-317.
[30]	FOGLER H S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering[M]. New York:Prentice Hall PTR, 2006.

流化床锅炉内石灰石同时煅烧/硫化反应中煅烧动力学特性

Limestone calcination kinetics in simultaneous calcination and sulfation under CFB conditions

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[3]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[4]	周继鹏, 何文军, 李涛. 异形催化剂上乙烯催化氧化失活动力学反应工程计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2416-2426.
[5]	张媛媛, 曲江源, 苏欣欣, 杨静, 张锴. 循环流化床燃煤机组SNCR脱硝过程气液传质和反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2404-2415.
[6]	王承泽, 顾凯丽, 张晋华, 石建轩, 刘艺娓, 李锦祥. 硫化协同老化零价铁增效去除水中Cr（Ⅵ）的作用机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2197-2206.
[7]	李辰鑫, 潘艳秋, 何流, 牛亚宾, 俞路. 基于碳微晶结构的炭膜模型及其气体分离模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2057-2066.
[8]	胡香凝, 尹渊博, 袁辰, 是赟, 刘翠伟, 胡其会, 杨文, 李玉星. 成品油在土壤中运移可视化的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1827-1835.
[9]	白天昊, 王晓雯, 杨梦滋, 段新伟, 米杰, 武蒙蒙. 类水滑石衍生锌基氧化物高温煤气脱硫过程中COS释放行为及其抑制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1772-1780.
[10]	禹进, 余彬彬, 蒋新生. 一种基于虚拟组分的燃烧调控化学作用量化及分析方法研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1303-1312.
[11]	吴选军, 王超, 曹子健, 蔡卫权. 数据与物理信息混合驱动的固定床吸附穿透深度学习模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1145-1160.
[12]	周培旭, 李亚伦, 叶恭然, 庄园, 吴曦蕾, 郭智恺, 韩晓红. 有限空间内工质物性对制冷剂泄漏扩散特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 953-967.
[13]	焦巡, 童成, 李存璞, 魏子栋. 锂硫电池的动力学调控策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 170-191.
[14]	鞠小兵, 李雪纯, 孙芳. 二硫代水杨酸衍生物对光固化材料性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4187-4193.
[15]	陈晨, 杨倩, 陈云, 张睿, 刘冬. 不同氧浓度下煤挥发分燃烧的化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4133-4146.