湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM2.5排放特征的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170345

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (11): 4261-4271.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170345

湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM_2.5排放特征的影响

赵志锋, 杜谦, 董鹤鸣, 苏利鹏, 赵广播, 吕东辉, 王敏, 高建民, 郭馨, 徐力, 赵来福

哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2017-04-05 修回日期:2017-08-22 出版日期:2017-11-05 发布日期:2017-11-05
通讯作者: 杜谦
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（jj20160337）；国家环保公益性行业科研经费专项项目（201009006）；国家科技支撑项目（2014BAA07B03）；创新研究群体科学基金项目（51421063）。

Influence of wet flue gas desulfurization devices on PM_2.5 emission characteristics of coal-fired boilers

ZHAO Zhifeng, DU Qian, DONG Heming, SU Lipeng, ZHAO Guangbo, LÜ Donghui, WANG Min, GAO Jianmin, GUO Xin, XU Li, ZHAO Laifu

School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2017-04-05 Revised:2017-08-22 Online:2017-11-05 Published:2017-11-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(jj20160337), Special Fund for National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Industries of China (201009006), the National Science and Technology Support Project (2014BAA07B03) and Science Foundation for Innovative Research Groups (51421063).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用二级稀释采样方法对1台电厂煤粉炉、1台电厂CFB锅炉和2台工业层燃炉配备的WFGD前后烟气中PM_2.5进行现场采样。采用ELPI分析PM_2.5的数量及质量浓度粒径分布；通过SEM分析PM_2.5的显微结构，通过XRF、ICP-OES和离子色谱法分别对PM_2.5中次量、痕量元素及水溶性离子含量进行测定。研究结果表明，相比于WFGD前，煤粉炉和CFB锅炉WFGD后PM_2.5质量浓度减少，而层燃炉WFGD后PM_2.5质量浓度增加。WFGD后PM_2.5中存在大量块状、层状、片状、细小柱状和球形颗粒聚合体的结构，浆液成分及脱硫产物的附着会使PM_2.5的外观形貌特征发生显著变化。脱硫后由于脱硫浆液的参与，PM_2.5中Ca、S及相应Ca²⁺、SO₄^2-含量显著增加，Si和Al的含量下降；气相的As、Se和Hg也会发生不同的化学变化从而进入PM_2.5。湿法脱硫过程中浆液会捕集烟气中颗粒物，但脱硫浆液成分及脱硫产物会经由干化作用直接形成颗粒或与原有颗粒经碰撞聚合形成新颗粒。

关键词: WFGD, PM_2.5, 粒径分布, 显微结构, 痕量元素

Abstract:

In this paper, a two-stage dilution sampling method was applied to collect PM_2.5 in flue gas before and after the WFGDs in a utility pulverized coal boiler, a utility CFB boiler and an industrial grate-fired boiler, respectively. PSDs (particle size distributions) of PM_2.5 number and mass concentrations were analyzed by ELPI (electrical low pressure impactor), microstructures of PM_2.5 were analyzed by SEM (scanning electron microscopy), and the contents of minor and tract elements and water-soluble ions in PM_2.5 were analyzed by XRF (X-ray fluorescence), ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy) and IC (ion chromatography), respectively. The results showed that the mass concentrations of PM_2.5 generated from the pulverized coal boiler and the CFB boiler after desulfurization were higher than those before desulfurization, but the mass concentrations of PM_2.5 generated from the pulverized coal boiler and the CFB boiler after desulfurization were lower than those before desulfurization. There existed blocky, layered and finely columnar microstructures on the surfaces of PM_2.5 after the WFGDs, and several particles belonging to PM_2.5 were the agglomerates consisting of fine spherical particles. The attachment of the slurry composition and the desulfurization product will cause a significant change in the appearance of the PM_2.5. After desulfurization, the contents of Ca, S and Ca²⁺ and SO₄^2- in PM_2.5 were significantly increased due to the participation of desulfurization slurry, while the contents of Si and Al decreased. The As, Se and Hg in the flue gas will also undergo different chemical changes to enter PM_2.5. During the wet desulfurization process the slurry can trap particles in the flue gas, but the desulfurization slurry composition and desulfurization products will be dried to form particles or be collocated with the original particles to form new ones.

Key words: WFGD, PM_2.5, particle size distribution, microstructure, trace elements

中图分类号:

X513

赵志锋, 杜谦, 董鹤鸣, 苏利鹏, 赵广播, 吕东辉, 王敏, 高建民, 郭馨, 徐力, 赵来福. 湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM_2.5排放特征的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11): 4261-4271.

ZHAO Zhifeng, DU Qian, DONG Heming, SU Lipeng, ZHAO Guangbo, LÜ Donghui, WANG Min, GAO Jianmin, GUO Xin, XU Li, ZHAO Laifu. Influence of wet flue gas desulfurization devices on PM_2.5 emission characteristics of coal-fired boilers[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(11): 4261-4271.

参考文献 28

[1]	MORARWSKA L, ZHANG J. Combustion sources of particles:health relevance and source signatures[J]. Chemosphere, 2002, 49(9):1045-1058.
[2]	岳敏, 谷学新, 邹洪, 等. 多环芳烃的危害与防治[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 24(3):40-44. YUE M, GU X X, ZOU H, et al. The hazards and preventation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon[J]. Journal Capital Normal University (Nature Science Edition), 2003, 24(3):40-44.
[3]	朱先磊, 张远航, 曾立民, 等. 北京市大气细颗粒物PM2.5的来源研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2005, 18(5):1-5. ZHU X L, ZHANG Y H, ZENG L M, et al. Source identification of ambient PM2.5 in Beijing[J]. Research of Environmental Science, 2005, 18(5):1-5.
[4]	戴莉, 薛永华, 冯银厂, 等. 成都市大气颗粒物来源解析研究[C]//中国环境科学学会2009年学术年会, 2009. DAI L, XUE Y H, FENG Y C, et al. Study on the source of atmospheric particulate matter in Chengdu[C]//China Environmental Science Society 2009 Academic Year, 2009.
[5]	肖致美, 毕晓辉, 冯银厂, 等. 宁波市环境空气中PM10和PM2.5来源解析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2012, 25(5):549-555. XIAO Z M, BI X H, FENG Y C, et al. Source apportionment of ambient PM10 and PM2.5 in urban area of Ningbo City[J]. Research of Environmental Science, 2012, 25(5):549-555.
[6]	严向宏. 上海宝山区大气细颗粒气溶胶PM2.5特征研究与源解析[D]. 上海:华东理工大学, 2011. YAN X H. The character and source apportionment of fine particles PM2.5 in Baoshan District, Shanghai[D]. Shanghai:East China University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[7]	周科. 燃煤细微颗粒物生成特性与炉内控制的研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2011. ZHOU K. The properties and control of fine particulates generated from coal combustion[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[8]	郝吉明, 段雷, 易红宏, 等. 燃烧源可吸入颗粒物的物理化学特性[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2008:43-121. HAO J M, DUAN L, YI H H, et al. Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Particulate Matter Combustion Sources[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2008:43-121.
[9]	NIELSEN M T, LIVBJERG H, FOGH C L, et al. Formation and emission of fine particles from two coal-fired power plants[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2002, 174(2):79-113.
[10]	王珲, 宋蔷, 姚强, 等. 电厂湿法脱硫系统对烟气中细颗粒物脱除作用的实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2008, 28(5):1-7. WANG H, SONG Q, YAO Q, et al. Experimental study on removal effect of wet flue gas desulfurization system on fine particles from a coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(5):1-7.
[11]	李壮, 王海涛, 董鹤鸣, 等. 湿法脱硫对660 MW煤粉炉PM2.5排放影响的实验研究[J]. 节能技术, 2015, 33(5):398-402. LI Z, WANG H T, DONG H M, et al. Experimental study on wet desulfurization on PM2.5 emissions from a 660MW coal-fired pulverized coal boiler[J]. Energy Conservation Technology, 2015, 33(5):398-402.
[12]	夏永俊, 桂良明, 吴英, 等. 某200MW燃煤发电机组颗粒物生成与排放特性[J]. 热力发电, 2016, 45(7):27-31. XIA Y J, GUI L M, WU Y, et al. Formation and emission characteristics of PMs in a 220MW coal-fired unit[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45(7):27-31.
[13]	MEIJ R, TE WINKEL B. The emissions and environmental impact of PM10 and trace elements from a modern coal-fired power plant equipped with ESP and wet FGD[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 85(6):641-656.
[14]	于敦喜, 徐明厚, 易帆, 等. 燃煤过程中颗粒物的形成机理研究进展[J]. 煤炭转化, 2004, 27(4):7-12. YU D X, XU M H, YI F, et al. A review on particle formation mechanisms during coal combustion[J]. Coal Conversion, 2004, 27(4):7-12.
[15]	赵志锋, 杜谦, 赵广播, 等. 燃煤电厂煤粉炉及CFB锅炉PM2.5产生及排放特性的现场实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1163-1170. ZHAO Z F, DU Q, ZHAO G B, et al. Field experimental research on PM2.5 generation and emission characteristics of pulverized coal and CFB boilers in power plants[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3):1163-1170.
[16]	ZHAO Z F, DU Q, ZHAO G B, et al. Fine particle emission from an industrial coal-fired circulating fluidized-bed boiler equipped with a fabric filter in China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(7):4769-4780.
[17]	PAGELS J, STRAND M, RISSLER J, et al. Characteristics of aerosol particles formed during grate combustion of moist forest residue[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2003, 34(8):1043-1059
[18]	王清成. 层燃炉煤燃烧炭黑形成机理的实验研究及排放控制方法[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2007. WANG Q C. Experimental study on soot formation mechanism and emission control methods derived from lump coal combustion in stoker-fired boiler[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2007.
[19]	张松松, 路义萍, 杜谦, 等. 工业锅炉PM2.5产排特性试验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2014, 34(4):843-848. ZHANG S S, LU Y P, DU Q, et al. Experimental study on production and emission characteristics of PM2.5 from industrial boilers[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2014, 34(4):843-848.
[20]	段雷, 马子轸, 李振, 等. 燃煤电厂排放细颗粒物的水溶性无机离子特征综述[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(3):1117-1122. DUAN L, MA Z Z, LI Z, et al. Characteristics of water soluble inorganic ions in fine particles emitted from coal-fired power plants[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(3):1117-1122.
[21]	颜金培, 杨林军, 鲍静静. 湿法脱硫烟气中细颗粒物的变化特性[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(2):387-392. YAN J P, YANG L J, BAO J J. Impact property on fine particles from coal combustion in wet flue gas desulfurization process[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 41(2):387-392.
[22]	霍旺. 石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫过程的吸收、氧化及结晶机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2009. HUO W. Mechanism research on the absorption, oxidation and crystallization in the process of limestone-gypsum WFGD[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2009.
[23]	刘小伟, 徐明厚, 于敦喜, 等. 元素钾、硅和铝在PM10的形态与分布研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2006, 27(5):887-890. LIU X W, XU M H, YU D X, et al. Research on the morphology and distribution of K, Si and Al in PM10 during coal combustion[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2006, 27(5):887-890.
[24]	YAN R, GAUTHIER D, FLAMANT G. Volatility and chemistry of trace elements in a coal combustor[J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(15):2217-2226.
[25]	YUDOVICH Y E, KETRIS M P. Arsenic in coal:a review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2005, 61(3):141-196.
[26]	ALVAREZ-AYUSO, QUEROL X, OMAS A. Environmental impact of a coal combustion desulphurization plant:abatement capacity of desulphurization process and environmental characterization of combustion by-products[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(11):2009-2017.
[27]	唐修义, 黄文辉. 中国煤中微量元素[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2004:167-173. TANG X Y, HUANG W H. Microelements in Coal of China[M]. Beijng:The Commercial Press, 2004:167-173.
[28]	王珲. 湿法烟气脱硫系统对颗粒物及重金属排放影响的研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2010. WANG H. Study on the effect of WFGD on PM and heavy metal emission from coal-fired power plants[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2010.

湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM_2.5排放特征的影响

Influence of wet flue gas desulfurization devices on PM_2.5 emission characteristics of coal-fired boilers

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[2]	刘春雨, 周桓宇, 马跃, 岳长涛. CaO调质含油污泥干燥特性及数学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3018-3027.
[3]	郭祥, 乔金硕, 王振华, 孙旺, 孙克宁. 碳燃料固体氧化物燃料电池结构研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 290-302.
[4]	侯晓松, 刘晨星, 任爱玲, 郭斌, 郭渊明. 超声雾化/表面活性剂强化吸收耦合生物洗涤净化甲苯废气[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4692-4706.
[5]	周东一, 肖湘华, 肖飚, 刘益才. 脂肪类复合相变储能材料中脂肪酸最佳质量含量的确定方法[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 560-566.
[6]	田锐, 王沛力, 吕超, 段雪. 有机-无机复合材料中无机相分散度三维荧光分析[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 3002-3013.
[7]	高姣丽, 李恩泽, 康锦, 成怀刚. 盐湖老卤动态变温分离高纯结晶硫酸镁[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(6): 3022-3030.
[8]	陈怡沁, 许于, 周静红, 隋志军, 周兴贵. 锂离子电池异构建模及内部传质机理探究：粒径分布的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(2): 1078-1088.
[9]	牟新竹, 陈振乾. 污泥厚度对超声波辅助热风干燥污泥特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 241-252.
[10]	赵云, 向中华. 微流控制备金属/共价有机框架功能材料研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(6): 2547-2563.
[11]	代晓玉, 马远恩, 许志明, 张霖宙, 赵锁奇, 徐春明. 催化裂化油浆组成分布对中间相沥青光学织构的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(6): 2678-2687.
[12]	刘作华, 王闯, 孙伟, 陶长元, 王运东. 弹性搅拌桨强化液-液两相混沌混合及液滴分散特性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(10): 4611-4620.
[13]	牛照程, 张丹, 王辉辉, 王珍珍, 邓才智. 有限截面通道内喷雾顺流掺混动力学特征的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(S2): 117-122.
[14]	赵京, 张玉锋, 魏小林, 李腾, 宾峰. 高碱煤燃烧过程中亚微米颗粒物PM₁的生成特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3113-3120.
[15]	王浩男, 玄伟伟, 夏德宏. 不同温度下煤灰熔渣的结构演变规律[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3094-3103.

湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM2.5排放特征的影响

Influence of wet flue gas desulfurization devices on PM2.5 emission characteristics of coal-fired boilers

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

湿法脱硫装置对燃煤锅炉PM_2.5排放特征的影响

Influence of wet flue gas desulfurization devices on PM_2.5 emission characteristics of coal-fired boilers