温度梯度与产物流动对先锋褐煤热解产物分布的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171345

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (6): 2672-2680.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171345

温度梯度与产物流动对先锋褐煤热解产物分布的影响

周国江¹, 刘竹涛^1,2, 战金辉², 赖登国², 刘晓星²

1. 黑龙江科技大学环境与化工学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150022;
2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2017-10-09 修回日期:2017-11-22 出版日期:2018-06-05 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 战金辉
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600304）；国家自然科学基金项目（91534125）。

Effects of temperature gradient and product flow on distribution of pyrolysis products of Xianfeng lignite

ZHOU Guojiang¹, LIU Zhutao^1,2, ZHAN Jinhui², LAI Dengguo², LIU Xiaoxing²

1. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, Heilongjiang, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2017-10-09 Revised:2017-11-22 Online:2018-06-05 Published:2018-06-05
Supported by:
supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0600304) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91534125).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过两段固定床反应器分离了煤热解和二次反应过程，模拟了传统外热式固定床反应器和外热式内构件固定床反应器内挥发性热解产物流动与固相反应颗粒间的相互作用，研究了不同温度的半焦对先锋褐煤热解产物分布和品质的影响。结果表明：当半焦的温度在500～900℃时，焦油发生剧烈的二次反应，热解气收率增加，焦油收率大幅下降，H/C同时大量降低且均低于空白样，油品质下降；在100～400℃半焦作用下，焦油发生轻微的二次反应，热解气收率略微增加，焦油收率缓慢下降，但H/C均高于空白样，油品质提升。该结果验证内构件外热式固定床反应器热解产生的焦油具有更高的收率及品质。

关键词: 煤热解, 温度, 半焦, 二次反应

Abstract:

The processes of coal pyrolysis and secondary reactions were separated by using two-stage fixed bed reactor to simulate the product flow and the interactions among reaction particles for coal pyrolysis in the traditional indirect heating reactor and indirect heating reactor with internals, and to investigate the effects of different temperature char on the distribution and quality of pyrolysis products of Xianfeng lignite. The results showed that the drastic secondary reactions occurred when tar flowed through the 500-900℃ char layer, the yield of pyrolysis gas increased, the tar yield and atomic H/C ratio were lower than those of blank control experiment, and the quality of oil decreased. Under the action of 100-400℃ char layer, the slight secondary reaction of the tar occurred, the yield of pyrolysis gas increased slightly, the tar yield had a little decrease, the atomic H/C ratio was higher than that of blank control, and the oil quality increased. The results verified the conclusion that the tar with indirect heating reactor with internals produced higher yield and better quality.

Key words: coal pyrolysis, temperature, char, secondary reactions

中图分类号:

TQ530.2

周国江, 刘竹涛, 战金辉, 赖登国, 刘晓星. 温度梯度与产物流动对先锋褐煤热解产物分布的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(6): 2672-2680.

ZHOU Guojiang, LIU Zhutao, ZHAN Jinhui, LAI Dengguo, LIU Xiaoxing. Effects of temperature gradient and product flow on distribution of pyrolysis products of Xianfeng lignite[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(6): 2672-2680.

参考文献 29

[1]	LI X H, MA J S, LI L L, et al. Semi-coke as solid heat carrier for low-temperature coal tar upgrading[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 143:79-85.
[2]	CHENG S, LAI D, SHI Z, et al. Suppressing secondary reactions of coal pyrolysis by reducing pressure and mounting internals in fixed-bed reactor[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25(4):507-515.
[3]	GAO Z, ZHENG M, ZHANG D, et al. Low temperature pyrolysis properties and kinetics of non-coking coal in Chinese western coals[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2016, 89(4):544-559.
[4]	LADNER W R. The products of coal pyrolysis:properties, conversion and reactivity[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1988, 20:207-222.
[5]	LIU J, JIANG X, SHEN J, et al. Influences of particle size, ultraviolet irradiation and pyrolysis temperature on stable free radicals in coal[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 272:64-74.
[6]	SONOYAMA N, NOBUTA K, KIMURA T, et al. Production of chemicals by cracking pyrolytic tar from Loy Yang coal over iron oxide catalysts in a steam atmosphere[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(4):771-775.
[7]	LIU Z, GUO X, SHI L, et al. Reaction of volatiles-a crucial step in pyrolysis of coals[J]. Fuel, 2015, 154:361-369.
[8]	SONG H, LIU G, ZHANG J, et al. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of low rank coals by TG-FTIR method[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 156:454-460.
[9]	HAYASHI J, TAKAHASHI H, DOI S, et al. Reactions in brown coal pyrolysis responsible for heating rate effect on tar yield[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14(2):400-408.
[10]	JIN L, BAI X, LI Y, et al. In-situ catalytic upgrading of coal pyrolysis tar on carbon-based catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 147:41-46.
[11]	刘振宇. 煤快速热解制油技术问题的化学反应工程根源:逆向传热与传质[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(1):1-5. LIU Z Y. Origin of common problems in fast coal pyrolysis technologies for tar:the countercurrent flow of heat and volatiles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(1):1-5.
[12]	陈兆辉, 高士秋, 许光文. 煤热解过程分析与工艺调控方法[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10):3693-3707. CHEN Z H, GAO S Q, XU G W. Analysis and control methods of coal pyrolysis process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10):3693-3707.
[13]	KHAN M R. A literature survey and an experimental study of coal devolatilization at mild and severe conditions:influences of heating rate, temperature, and reactor type on products yield and composition[J]. Fuel, 1989, 68(12):1522-1531.
[14]	DOOLAN K R, MACKIE J C, TYLER R J. Coal flash pyrolysis:secondary cracking of tar vapours in the range 870-2000 K[J]. Fuel, 1987, 66(4):572-578.
[15]	XU W C, TOMITA A. The effects of temperature and residence time on the secondary reactions of volatiles from coal pyrolysis[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1989, 21(1):25-37.
[16]	ZENG D, HU S, SAYRE A N, et al. On the rank-dependence of coal tar secondary reactions[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2):1707-1714.
[17]	水恒福, 张德样, 张超群. 煤焦油分离与精制[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2007. SHUI H F, ZHANG D X, ZHANG C Q. Separation and Purification of Coal Tar[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2007.
[18]	ZHANG C, WU R, XU G. Coal pyrolysis for high-quality tar in a fixed-bed pyrolyzer enhanced with internals[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 28(1):236-244.
[19]	赖登国, 战金辉, 陈兆辉, 等. 内构件移动床固体热载体油页岩热解技术[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10):3647-3657. LAI D G, ZHAN J H, CHEN Z H, et al. Oil shale pyrolysis by solid heat carrier in internal-structured moving bed[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10):3647-3657.
[20]	陈昭睿. 煤热解过程中热解气停留时间对热解产物的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015. CHEN Z R. Influence of gas residence time on product distribution of coal pyrolvsis[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2015.
[21]	ZHANG Y, HAN Z, WU H, et al. Interactive matching between the temperature profile and secondary reactions of oil shale pyrolysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(4):2865-2873.
[22]	LIANG P, WANG Z, BI J. Process characteristics investigation of simulated circulating fluidized bed combustion combined with coal pyrolysis[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(1):23-28.
[23]	ARENILLAS A, RUBIERA F, PIS J J. Simultaneous thermogravimetric-mass spectrometric study on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1999, 50(1):31-46.
[24]	HIGMAN C, VAN DER BURGT M. Gasification[M]. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2011.
[25]	ZHANG K, LI Y, WANG Z, et al. Pyrolysis behavior of a typical Chinese sub-bituminous Zhundong coal from moderate to high temperatures[J]. Fuel, 2016, 185:701-708.
[26]	VAN HEEK K H, HODEK W. Structure and pyrolysis behaviour of different coals and relevant model substances[J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(6):886-896.
[27]	HAYASHI J, KAWAKAMI T, TANIGUCHI T, et al. Control of molecular composition of tar by secondary reaction in fluidized-bed pyrolysis of a subbituminous coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1993, 7(1):57-66.
[28]	LAI D, SHI Y, GENG S, et al. Secondary reactions in oil shale pyrolysis by solid heat carrier in a moving bed with internals[J]. Fuel, 2016, 173:138-145.
[29]	张军民, 刘弓. 低温煤焦油的综合利用[J]. 煤炭转化, 2010, 33(3):92-96. ZHANG J M, LIU G. The comprehensive utilization of low temperature tar[J]. Coal Conversion, 2010, 33(3):92-96.

温度梯度与产物流动对先锋褐煤热解产物分布的影响

Effects of temperature gradient and product flow on distribution of pyrolysis products of Xianfeng lignite

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	代宝民, 王启龙, 刘圣春, 张佳宁, 李鑫海, 宗凡迪. 非共沸工质辅助过冷CO₂冷热联供系统的热力学性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 64-73.
[4]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[5]	邹启宏, 李乾, 葛天舒. 基于多目标下的两级并联除湿热泵系统实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 265-271.
[6]	杨天阳, 邹慧明, 周晖, 王春磊, 田长青. -30℃电动汽车补气式CO₂热泵制热性能实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 272-279.
[7]	魏进家, 刘蕾, 杨小平. 面向高热流电子器件散热的环路热管研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 60-73.
[8]	杨松涛, 李东洋, 牛玉清, 李鑫钢, 康绍辉, 李洪, 叶开凯, 周志全, 高鑫. 氟化物势能函数和热力学性质的分子模拟研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3828-3840.
[9]	陈泉, 郑泽希, 李然, 孙其诚, 杨晖. 散斑能见度光谱法测量筒仓内颗粒流的颗粒温度[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2603-2611.
[10]	刘怡琳, 李钰, 余亚雄, 黄哲庆, 周强. 基于重置温度方法的双参数介尺度气固传热模型构建[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2612-2621.
[11]	郑默, 李晓霞. ReaxFF MD模拟揭示的煤热解挥发分自由基反应的竞争与协调[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2732-2741.
[12]	任嘉辉, 刘豫, 刘朝, 刘浪, 李莹. 基于分子指纹和拓扑指数的工质临界温度理论预测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1493-1500.
[13]	杨英杰, 杨赫, 朱家龙, 郭双淇, 尚妍, 李扬, 靳立军, 胡浩权. 淖毛湖煤慢速热解过程官能团相互作用[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(2): 865-875.
[14]	黄顺进, 张丽, 颜井冲, 王志刚, 雷智平, 李占库, 任世彪, 王知彩, 水恒福. 高碱煤与煤矸石掺烧SO₂和NO减排及结渣抑制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5581-5591.
[15]	张舒蕾, 李冰杰, 蒋健, 董新宇, 刘璐. 凸面恒温基底上固着液滴蒸发特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5537-5546.