带绕流板的湍流管道内细颗粒物沉积实验

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180240

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (S1): 15-19.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180240

带绕流板的湍流管道内细颗粒物沉积实验

吴建东, 刘乔, 王昊

北京大学工学院微纳米热质传递实验室, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2018-03-07 修回日期:2018-07-15 出版日期:2018-09-30 发布日期:2018-09-30
通讯作者: 王昊,E-mail:hwang@coe.pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600605）。

Experimental investigation of fine particle precipitation in rectangular duct with staggered baffles

WU Jiandong, LIU Qiao, WANG Hao

Laboratory of Micro-nano Heat and Mass Transfer, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2018-03-07 Revised:2018-07-15 Online:2018-09-30 Published:2018-09-30
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2016YFB0600605).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

微细颗粒物在管内的沉积现象发生于各类颗粒输运、通风系统、烟气管道积尘过程。实际过程中有各类复杂的管道情况，然而现有研究多针对的是光滑管道。对带有扰流挡板的管道内微细颗粒物沉积进行实验探究。搭建了带有系列扰流挡板的湍流管道系统，研究粉煤灰和碳酸钙颗粒在各类条件下的沉积情况。实验获得带扰流挡板的管道的沉积效率，发现其数量级高于光管，与文献中的模型研究结果一致。实验进一步在挡板涂抹油脂，发现其抑制颗粒物在壁面上的反弹，使得沉积效率得以少量提高；同时也说明，限制微细颗粒沉积的主要瓶颈在于其流场跟随性强从而无法有效到达挡板壁面，而不是其在壁面上的反弹。实验结果证明管道中的挡板结构对颗粒物沉积产生重要影响，挡板壁面属性为次要因素，结论可为相关积尘、除尘工业管道设计提供重要参考。

关键词: 细颗粒物, 湍流, 沉积, 壁面, 扰流

Abstract:

Particle precipitation in duct flow is important in particle industry and HAVC. There are various duct geometries in industry, but most experiments in the literatures were conducted on smooth ducts. In the present study, a rectangular duct with a series of staggered baffles being installing inside was set up. Power plant ash and CaCO₃ particles were sprayed into the air flow through the duct. The measurement showed that the baffles significantly increased the particle precipitation by orders of magnitude, which was consistent with the modeling results in the literatures. By greasing the baffle surfaces, the reflection of particles on the surfaces were repressed and thus precipitation was enhanced by a limited amount. The results showed that the baffle structures have critical influence on the fine particle deposition while the baffle surface property may not be a significant factor.

Key words: fine particle, turbulence, precipitation, wall, baffled flow

中图分类号:

TB126

吴建东, 刘乔, 王昊. 带绕流板的湍流管道内细颗粒物沉积实验[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(S1): 15-19.

WU Jiandong, LIU Qiao, WANG Hao. Experimental investigation of fine particle precipitation in rectangular duct with staggered baffles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(S1): 15-19.

参考文献 21

[1]	杨林军. 燃烧源细颗粒物污染控制技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2011:189. YANG L J. Fine Particles Control Technology of Combustion Sources[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2011:189
[2]	ZHAI Z J, ZHANG Z, ZHANG W, et al. Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD(Ⅰ):Summary of prevalent turbulence models[J]. HVAC&R Research, 2007, 13(6):853-870.
[3]	SEHMEL G A. Particle eddy diffusivities and deposition velocities for isothermal flow and smooth surfaces[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1973, 4(2):125-138.
[4]	WELLS A C, CHAMBERLAIN A C. Transport of small particles to vertical surfaces[J]. British Journal of Applied Physics, 1967, 18(12):1793.
[5]	LIU B Y H, AGARWAL J K. Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flow[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1974, 5(2):145-155.
[6]	PAPAVERGOS P G, HEDLEY A B. Particle deposition behavior from turbulent flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1984, 62(5):275-295.
[7]	LU H, LU L. Numerical investigation on particle deposition enhancement in duct air flow by ribbed wall[J]. Building and Environment, 2015, 85:61-72.
[8]	LU H, LU L. A numerical study of particle deposition in ribbed duct flow with different rib shapes[J]. Building and Environment, 2015, 94; 43-53.
[9]	LAI A C K, BYRNE M A, GODDARD A J H. Measured deposition of aerosol particles on a two-dimensional ribbed surface in a turbulent duct flow[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1999, 30(9):1201-1214.
[10]	LAI A C K. Modeling indoor coarse particle deposition onto smooth and rough vertical surfaces[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(21):3823-3830.
[11]	刘含笑, 姚宇平, 郦建国, 等. PM2.5测试方法对比及其燃煤电厂的排放特征分析[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2017, 23(5):43-48. LIU H X, YAO X P, LI J G, et al. Contrast of PM2.5 test methods and emissions characterization research for coal-fired power plant[J]. China Powder Science and Technology, 2017, 23(5):43-48.
[12]	BROCHARD F, DAILLANT J. Drying of solids wetted by thin liquid films[J]. Can. J. Phys., 1990, (68):1084-1088.
[13]	WOOD N B. A simple method for the calculation of turbulent deposition to smooth and rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1981, 12(3):275-290.
[14]	FAN F G, AHMADI G. A sublayer model for turbulent deposition of particles in vertical ducts with smooth and rough surfaces[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 1993, 24(1):45-64.
[15]	SIPPOLA M R, NAZAROFF W W. Experiments measuring particle deposition from fully developed turbulent flow in ventilation ducts[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2004, 38(9):914-925.
[16]	TIAN L, AHMADI G. Particle deposition in turbulent duct flows-comparisons of different model predictions[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 38(4):377-397.
[17]	SOMMERFELD M. Validation of a stochastic Lagrangian modelling approach for inter-particle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2001, 27(10):1829-1858.
[18]	樊建人, 胡桂林, 姚军, 等. 气固两相圆柱绕流的直接数值模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2003, 24(3):433-436. FAN J R, HU G L, YAO J, et al. Direct numerical simulation of particle dispersion in the temporal wake of a circular cylinder[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2003, 24(3):433-436.
[19]	CROWE C T, SCHWARZKOPF J D, SOMMERFELD M, et al. Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2011.
[20]	贺铸, 柳朝晖, 陈胜, 等. 各向同性湍流中颗粒弥散的直接数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2006, 57(2):300-305. HE Z, LIU Z H, CHEN S, et al. Direct numerical simulation of particle behavior in homogeneous isotropic turbulence[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2006, 57(2):300-305.
[21]	王兵, 张会强, 王希麟. 颗粒趋壁沉积的直接数值模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2009, 30(1):90-92. WANG B, ZHANG H Q, WANG X L. Direct numerical simulation of particle deposition[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(1):90-92.

带绕流板的湍流管道内细颗粒物沉积实验

Experimental investigation of fine particle precipitation in rectangular duct with staggered baffles

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[3]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.
[4]	丁俊华, 俞树荣, 王世鹏, 洪先志, 包鑫, 丁雪兴. 多重效应下超高速干气密封流场模拟及密封性能试验[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099.
[5]	李纪元, 李金旺, 周刘伟. 不同扰流结构冷板传热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1474-1488.
[6]	朱兵国, 何吉祥, 徐进良, 彭斌. 冷却条件下渐扩/渐缩管内超临界压力二氧化碳的传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1062-1072.
[7]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[8]	王永倩, 王平, 程康, 毛晨林, 刘文锋, 尹智成, Ferrante Antonio. 氨气/甲烷贫预混旋转湍流火焰稳定性及NO生成[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4087-4094.
[9]	张建伟, 高伟峰, 董鑫, 冯颖. 浸没式撞击流反应器流场涡特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3553-3564.
[10]	罗佳, 吴双应, 肖兰, 周世耀, 陈志莉. 撞击速度对连续液滴撞击热圆柱壁面局部传热特性影响的实验[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2944-2951.
[11]	欧阳萍, 张睿, 周剑, 刘海燕, 刘植昌, 徐春明, 孟祥海. 铜铝双金属复合离子液体的电化学行为及电沉积铜机理[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 3212-3221.
[12]	施炜斌, 龙姗姗, 杨晓钢, 蔡心悦. 计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2573-2588.
[13]	王利民, 郭舒宇, 向星, 付少童. 湍流系统的能量最小多尺度模型研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2415-2426.
[14]	李岩, 田阿慧, 周毅. 反应性双射流中标量输运和化学反应特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 1947-1963.
[15]	兰文杰, 胡晓洁, 蔡迪宗. 界面探针法测量液滴与固体壁面间相互作用力[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1119-1126.