PN/A颗粒污泥-固相反硝化组合工艺的菌群功能解析

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20221125

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (11): 5128-5137.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20221125

PN/A颗粒污泥-固相反硝化组合工艺的菌群功能解析

张立¹(), 吴建华¹, 崔舒惠¹, 严锋¹, 孙浩³, 钱飞跃¹^,²()

^1.苏州科技大学环境科学与工程学院，江苏苏州 215009
^2.城市生活污水资源化利用技术国家地方联合工程实验室，江苏苏州 215009
^3.苏州市宏宇环境科技股份有限公司，江苏苏州 215009

收稿日期:2022-08-08 修回日期:2022-10-12 出版日期:2022-11-05 发布日期:2022-12-06
通讯作者: 钱飞跃
作者简介:张立（1998—），男，硕士研究生，leez048@post.usts.edu.cn
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20211339);江苏高校自然科学基金面上项目(21KJB610016);苏州市社会发展科技创新项目(SS202114);苏州市建设科技项目(SZJ202129503)

Analysis of bacterial function in combined PN/A granular sludge and solid phase denitrification processes

Li ZHANG¹(), Jianhua WU¹, Shuhui CUI¹, Feng YAN¹, Hao SUN³, Feiyue QIAN¹^,²()

^1.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China
^2.National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Municipal Sewage Resource Utilization Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China
^3.Suzhou Hongyu Environmental Poltron Technologies Incorporated, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China

Received:2022-08-08 Revised:2022-10-12 Online:2022-11-05 Published:2022-12-06
Contact: Feiyue QIAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决部分亚硝化-厌氧氨氧化（PN/A）反应存在的硝酸盐残留问题，将PN/A颗粒污泥与固相反硝化（SPD）系统相耦合，用于高氨氮废水的连续处理。在逐级提高颗粒污泥自养脱氮效能的基础上，系统考察了石英砂、聚丁二酸丁二醇酯（PBS）和羟基丁酸戊酸共聚酯（PHBV）三种填料的SPD效能。结果表明，在高水力选择压下，PHBV的反硝化性能最佳，使PN/A-SPD组合工艺的总氮去除率超过了93%，远高于石英砂（83.6%）和PBS（85.8%）的水平。通过高通量测序与功能基因注释可知，固态碳源的溶出水平是影响生物膜菌群多样性的关键因素。其中，在PHBV表面占据主导的水解菌Clostridium-sensu-stricto-7与Comamonadaceae等反硝化菌形成了稳定的协作关系，在有效洗脱自养脱氮功能菌的同时，显著提升了菌群参与多元素循环的功能潜力。上述发现对于系统优化PN/A-SPD组合工艺，推动其工程化应用具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 自养生物脱氮, 颗粒污泥, 固态碳源, 反硝化, 菌群功能

Abstract:

For the control of residual nitrate in the effluent of partial nitritation and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (PN/A) system, a novel system was developed for the advanced nitrogen removal by coupling solid-phase denitrification (SPD) and PN/A granular sludge. On the basis of increasing the autotrophic denitrification efficiency of granular sludge step by step, the SPD of three fillers, quartz sand, polybutylene succinate (PBS) and hydroxybutyrate valeric acid copolyester (PHBV), was systematically investigated. The results indicated that the denitrification performance of PHBV was the best, the optimal total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency exceed 93% in the PN/A-PHBV system, which was significantly higher than sand (83.6%) and PBS (85.8%) in high hydraulic pressure condition. According to the results of pyrosequencing analysis and the FAPROTAX function predicted, the dissolution level of solid carbon source is an important factor affecting the diversity of biofilm flora. Among them, the hydrolytic bacteria Clostridium-sensu-stricto-7, which was dominant on the surface of PHBV, formed a stable cooperative relationship with denitrifying bacteria such as Comamonadaceae, in addition to effectively eluting autotrophic denitrification functional bacteria, the functional potential of the flora to participate in multi-element cycling was significantly improved. The results of this study have significance in guiding for systematic optimization of the PN/A-SPD combination process and promoting its engineering application.

Key words: autotrophic biological nitrogen removal, granular sludge, solid carbon source, denitrification, bacterial community function

中图分类号:

X 703

张立, 吴建华, 崔舒惠, 严锋, 孙浩, 钱飞跃. PN/A颗粒污泥-固相反硝化组合工艺的菌群功能解析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5128-5137.

Li ZHANG, Jianhua WU, Shuhui CUI, Feng YAN, Hao SUN, Feiyue QIAN. Analysis of bacterial function in combined PN/A granular sludge and solid phase denitrification processes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(11): 5128-5137.

图/表 10

图1 PN/A-SPD反应器结构

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of PN/A-SPD reactor

表1 PN/A-SPD反应器各阶段运行条件

Table 1 Operation conditions of PN/A-SPD reactor during different phases

运行阶段	运行时间	PN/A段		SPD段
运行阶段	运行时间	HRT/h	NH $4 +$ -N负荷/（kg·m^-3·d^-1）	HRT/h	上升流速/(m·h^-1)
Ⅰ	第1~15 d	3.5	1.40±0.02	—	—
Ⅱ	第16~30 d	2.5	1.95±0.04	—	—
Ⅲ	第31~100 d	2.0	2.44±0.04	0.4	0.3

表1 PN/A-SPD反应器各阶段运行条件

Table 1 Operation conditions of PN/A-SPD reactor during different phases

运行阶段	运行时间	PN/A段		SPD段
运行阶段	运行时间	HRT/h	NH $4 +$ -N负荷/（kg·m^-3·d^-1）	HRT/h	上升流速/(m·h^-1)
Ⅰ	第1~15 d	3.5	1.40±0.02	—	—
Ⅱ	第16~30 d	2.5	1.95±0.04	—	—
Ⅲ	第31~100 d	2.0	2.44±0.04	0.4	0.3

图2 启动期间PN/A颗粒污泥[（a）、（b）]和不同SPD反应器（c）的脱氮性能变化

Fig.2 Changes in denitrification performance of PN/A granular sludge [(a) , (b)] and different SPD reactors (c) during start-up

图3 石英砂[(a)、(b)]、PBS[(c)、(d)]和PHBV[(e)、(f)]挂膜前后表面的扫描电镜图片

Fig.3 SEM images of fresh and microbe attached sand [(a), (b)], PBS [(c), (d)], and PHBV [(e), (f)]

图4 不同微生物样本在OUT水平上的丰富度（a）、多样性指数（b）、PCoA分析结果（c）和Venn图（d）

Fig.4 Richness (a), diversity indexes (b), PCoA results (c) and Venn diagram (d) of different microorganism samples on OTU level

图5 不同样本在门水平的菌群结构组成（a）、相对丰度前40菌属的组成热图（b）和水解菌与反硝化菌的丰度比较（c）

Fig.5 Bacterial community structure on phylum level (a), heatmap of top 40 genera (b), fractions of hydrolyzing and denitrifying bacteria (c) in different microorganism samples

图6 PN/A颗粒污泥（a）、石英砂（b）、PBS（c）和PHBV（d）表面生物膜TOP 50菌属的相关性网络图

Fig.6 Co-occurrence networks of TOP 50 genera in PN/A granular sludge (a), sand (b), PBS (c) and PHBV (d) biofilm

表2 不同载体上菌群相关性网络的统计分析

Table 2 Statistical results of co-occurrence networks in different bio-carriers

系统	节点数	边数	正相关比例/%	负相关比例/%	平均度
PN/A颗粒	49	385	80.3	19.5	15.714
Sand-SPD	49	450	62.1	37.8	18.367
PBS-SPD	50	436	50.0	50.0	17.440
PHBV-SPD	47	334	53.3	46.7	14.213

图7 不同载体上菌群功能基因的Faprotax预测结果

Fig.7 Faprotax prediction of bacterial gene functions in different biomass carriers

图8 Sand（a）、PBS（b）和PHBV（c）体系的反硝化反应机制

Fig.8 Mechanisms of denitrification in sand (a), PBS (b) and PHBV (c)

参考文献 46

1	Kosgey K, Chandran K, Gokal J, et al. Critical analysis of biomass retention strategies in mainstream and sidestream ANAMMOX-mediated nitrogen removal systems[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(1): 9-24.
2	Yan P, Shi H X, Chen Y P, et al. Optimization of recovery and utilization pathway of chemical energy from wastewater pollutants by a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 133: 110160.
3	Strous M, Heijnen J J, Kuenen J G, et al. The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1998, 50(5): 589-596.
4	Qian F Y, Gebreyesus A T, Wang J F, et al. Single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal process at high loading rate: granular reactor performance, kinetics, and microbial characterization[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(5): 2379-2389.
5	Cao S B, Du R, Zhou Y. Coupling anammox with heterotrophic denitrification for enhanced nitrogen removal: a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2021, 51(19): 2260-2293.
6	Zhang Q Q, Zhao Y H, Wang C J, et al. Expression of the nirS, hzsA, and hdh genes and antibiotic resistance genes in response to recovery of anammox process inhibited by oxytetracycline[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 681: 56-65.
7	Bu F, Hu X, Xie L, et al. Cassava stillage and its anaerobic fermentation liquid as external carbon sources in biological nutrient removal[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science B, 2015, 16(4): 304-316.
8	Zhao J M, He Q C, Chen N, et al. Denitrification behavior in a woodchip-packed bioreactor with gradient filling for nitrate-contaminated water treatment[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 154: 107454.
9	Fernández F J, Castro M C, Villasenor J, et al. Agro-food wastewaters as external carbon source to enhance biological phosphorus removal[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 166(2): 559-567.
10	Yang L, Guo L K, Ren Y X, et al. Denitrification performance, biofilm formation and microbial diversity during startup of slow sand filter using powdery polycaprolactone as solid carbon source[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 105561.
11	Park S, Kim H K, Kim D H, et al. The effectiveness of injected carbon sources in enhancing the denitrifying processes in groundwater with high nitrate concentrations[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 131: 205-211.
12	Wang J L, Chu L B. Biological nitrate removal from water and wastewater by solid-phase denitrification process[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2016, 34(6): 1103-1112.
13	Chu L B, Wang J L. Denitrification performance and biofilm characteristics using biodegradable polymers PCL as carriers and carbon source[J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 91(9): 1310-1316.
14	Li C Y, Wang H Y, Yan G K, et al. Initial carbon release characteristics, mechanisms and denitrification performance of a novel slow release carbon source[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 118: 32-45.
15	Si Z H, Song X S, Wang Y H, et al. Intensified heterotrophic denitrification in constructed wetlands using four solid carbon sources: denitrification efficiency and bacterial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 267: 416-425.
16	Li P, Zuo J E, Wang Y J, et al. Tertiary nitrogen removal for municipal wastewater using a solid-phase denitrifying biofilter with polycaprolactone as the carbon source and filtration medium[J]. Water Research, 2016, 93: 74-83.
17	Xu Z S, Dai X H, Chai X L. Biological denitrification using PHBV polymer as solid carbon source and biofilm carrier[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 146: 186-193.
18	Li H, Liu Q S, Dong H B, et al. Porous solid carbon source-supported denitrification in simulated mariculture wastewater[J]. Environmental Technology, 2021, 42(8): 1196-1203.
19	Ye L T, Yu G, Zhou S B, et al. Denitrification of nitrate-contaminated groundwater in columns packed with PHBV and ceramsites for application as a permeable reactive barrier[J]. Water Supply, 2017, 17(5): 1241-1248.
20	Liu W R, Wang Q, Shen Y L, et al. Enhancing the in situ enrichment of anammox bacteria in aerobic granules to achieve high-rate CANON at low temperatures[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 278: 130395.
21	Qian F Y, Cui S H, Liu F, et al. Effect of hydraulic selection pressure on the characteristics of partial nitritation/anammox granular sludge in a continuous-flow reactor[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 24: 102042.
22	黄子恒, 张立, 崔舒惠, 等. 冷冻PN/A颗粒污泥快速活化过程中的污泥形态与菌群演化特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(2): 920-927.
	Huang Z H, Zhang L, Cui S H, et al. Characterization of sludge morphology and bacterial community evolution in the rapid activation of freeze-stored PN/A granular sludge[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(2): 920-927.
23	国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
	The State Environmental Protection Administration. Methods of Analysis for Water and Wastewater Monitoring [M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environment Science Press, 2002.
24	Awata T, Oshiki M, Kindaichi T, et al. Physiological characterization of an anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacterium belonging to the “Candidatus scalindua” group[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 79(13): 4145-4148.
25	Chen W D, Wen D H. Archaeal and bacterial communities assembly and co-occurrence networks in subtropical mangrove sediments under Spartina alterniflora invasion[J]. Environmental Microbiome, 2021, 16(1): 10.
26	Qu Z L, Liu B, Ma Y, et al. Differences in bacterial community structure and potential functions among Eucalyptus plantations with different ages and species of trees[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 149: 103515.
27	Ibrahim M I, Alsafadi D, Alamry K A, et al. Properties and applications of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) biocomposites[J]. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2021, 29(4): 1010-1030.
28	Liu L F, Yu J Y, Cheng L D, et al. Biodegradability of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) composite reinforced with jute fibre[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2009, 94(1): 90-94.
29	Haaijer S C M, Lamers L P M, Smolders A J P, et al. Iron sulfide and pyrite as potential electron donors for microbial nitrate reduction in freshwater wetlands[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2007, 24(5): 391-401.
30	Pandey C B, Kumar U, Kaviraj M, et al. DNRA: a short-circuit in biological N-cycling to conserve nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 738: 139710.
31	Zhang Q, Ji F Y, Xu X Y. Effects of physicochemical properties of poly-ε-caprolactone on nitrate removal efficiency during solid-phase denitrification[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 283: 604-613.
32	Xiang T, Liang H, Wang P, et al. Insights into two stable mainstream deammonification process and different microbial community dynamics at ambient temperature[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 331: 125058.
33	Speth D R, in’t Zandt M H, Guerrero-Cruz S, et al. Genome-based microbial ecology of anammox granules in a full-scale wastewater treatment system[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 11172.
34	Zhou Q, Sun H M, Jia L X, et al. Simultaneously advanced removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in a biofilter packed with ZVI/PHBV/sawdust composite: deciphering the succession of dominant bacteria and keystone species[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 347: 126724.
35	Ma S J, Ma H J, Hu H D, et al. Effect of mixing intensity on hydrolysis and acidification of sewage sludge in two-stage anaerobic digestion: characteristics of dissolved organic matter and the key microorganisms[J]. Water Research, 2019, 148: 359-367.
36	Li W W, Khalid H, Zhu Z, et al. Methane production through anaerobic digestion: participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 226: 1219-1228.
37	Pérez-Pantoja D, Donoso R, Agulló L, et al. Genomic analysis of the potential for aromatic compounds biodegradation in Burkholderiales[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 14(5): 1091-1117.
38	Li J, Zheng L, Ye C B, et al. Evaluation of an intermittent-aeration constructed wetland for removing residual organics and nutrients from secondary effluent: performance and microbial analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 329: 124897.
39	Zhu X Z, Lee L W, Song G Q, et al. Deciphering mono/multivalent draw solute-induced microbial ecology and membrane fouling in anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research, 2022, 209: 117869.
40	Zhang Q, Zhang C, Zhu Y N, et al. Effect of bacteria-to-algae volume ratio on treatment performance and microbial community of a novel heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification bacteria-chlorella symbiotic system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 342: 126025.
41	Tang J L, Wang X C, Hu Y S, et al. Nutrients removal performance and sludge properties using anaerobic fermentation slurry from food waste as an external carbon source for wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 271: 125-135.
42	Mao Y P, Xia Y, Zhang T. Characterization of Thauera-dominated hydrogen-oxidizing autotrophic denitrifying microbial communities by using high-throughput sequencing[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 128: 703-710.
43	Gavande P V, Basak A, Sen S, et al. Functional characterization of thermotolerant microbial consortium for lignocellulolytic enzymes with central role of Firmicutes in rice straw depolymerization[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 3032.
44	He X, Zhang S Y, Jiang Y H, et al. Influence mechanism of filling ratio on solid-phase denitrification with polycaprolactone as biofilm carrier[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 337: 125401.
45	李桂龙, 李朋发, 吴萌, 等. 化肥配施有机肥对花生根际细菌群落结构及共存网络的影响[J]. 土壤, 2022, 54(3): 498-507.
	Li G L, Li P F, Wu M, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic manure on peanut rhizosphere bacterial community structure and co-occurrence network[J]. Soils, 2022, 54(3): 498-507.
46	Deng Y L, Ruan Y J, Ma B, et al. Multi-omics analysis reveals niche and fitness differences in typical denitrification microbial aggregations[J]. Environment International, 2019, 132: 105085.

[1]	祖凌鑫, 胡荣庭, 李鑫, 陈余道, 陈广林. 木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1332-1342.
[2]	高歆婕, 许载周, 彭永臻, 黄雨薇, 丁静, 安泽铭, 汪传新. 污泥双回流-厌氧/好氧/缺氧强化内源反硝化深度脱氮[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5098-5105.
[3]	车林, 金文标, 陈洪一, 迟惠中, 梁云跃. 反硝化微生物菌剂提升A²/O工艺TN去除效果[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(S1): 467-474.
[4]	巩有奎, 李美玲, 孙洪伟. 不同NO₃^-浓度An/A/O-SBR系统PAOs-GAOs竞争及N₂O释放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1675-1683.
[5]	陈唐维, 潘志成, 陈滢, 刘敏, 陈婷婷, 钟亚萍. 旋流器分流比对剩余污泥的释碳性能影响[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5761-5769.
[6]	胡智丰,邓时海,张超,李德生,彭帅. 集成式铁基质生物膜反应器自养反硝化深度脱氮[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(7): 3304-3312.
[7]	黄珊, 陆勇泽, 朱光灿, 孔赟. 耦合生物阴极SND的MLMB -MFC的构建与运行[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(4): 1772-1780.
[8]	巩有奎, 彭永臻. 运行方式对SBBR亚硝酸型同步脱氮及N₂O释放的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2289-2297.
[9]	巩有奎, 任丽芳, 彭永臻. 不同DO下SBBR亚硝酸型同步脱氮及N₂O释放特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(4): 1550-1558.
[10]	刘小芳, 郭海燕, 张胜男, 黄靓. 聚糖菌反硝化影响因素及内碳源转化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 1127-1134.
[11]	巩有奎, 赵强, 彭永臻. 不同C/N下SBBR脱氮过程N₂O释放及胞外多聚物变化[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4847-4855.
[12]	王琦, 赵骥, 但琼鹏, 李夕耀, 张琼, 彭永臻. 反硝化聚磷菌的培养富集及处理生活污水的稳定运行[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4828-4834.
[13]	巩有奎, 彭永臻. 曝气强度对SBBR同步生物脱氮及N₂O释放影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4410-4419.
[14]	孙雅雯, 张建华, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. 外加碳源类型对A²/O-BCO系统脱氮除磷性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3626-3634.
[15]	李晓佳, 王然登, 荣宏伟, 曹勇锋, 李翠翠. 生物除磷颗粒污泥去除Pb²⁺的效能机制[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1663-1669.

PN/A颗粒污泥-固相反硝化组合工艺的菌群功能解析

Analysis of bacterial function in combined PN/A granular sludge and solid phase denitrification processes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价