木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20221375

化工学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (3): 1332-1342.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20221375

木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度

祖凌鑫¹(), 胡荣庭¹(), 李鑫¹, 陈余道¹^,², 陈广林³

^1.桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院，广西桂林 541006
^2.桂林理工大学岩溶区水污染控制与用水安全保障协同创新中心，广西桂林 541004
^3.中国能源建设集团广西电力设计研究院有限公司，广西南宁 530000

收稿日期:2022-10-18 修回日期:2022-12-23 出版日期:2023-03-05 发布日期:2023-04-19
通讯作者: 胡荣庭
作者简介:祖凌鑫（1998—），男，硕士研究生，864868379@qq.com
基金资助:
广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD19110083);广西自然科学基金重点项目(2019GXNSFDA245030)

Carbon release products and denitrification bioavailability from chemical components of woody biomass

Lingxin ZU¹(), Rongting HU¹(), Xin LI¹, Yudao CHEN¹^,², Guanglin CHEN³

^1.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China
^2.Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China
^3.China Energy Engineering Group Guangxi Electric Power Design Institute Co. , Ltd. , Nanning 530000, Guangxi, China

Received:2022-10-18 Revised:2022-12-23 Online:2023-03-05 Published:2023-04-19
Contact: Rongting HU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

木质生物质具有复杂的化学组分和结构，用作硝酸盐污染治理的碳源时，常出现反硝化速率缓慢和有机物残留。选择碎木作为原料，采用化学法逐级去除主要组分木质素（RL）和半纤维素（AF），获取的组分进行碳释放，释放溶液用于反硝化，拟合了碳释放动力学特征，测定了碳释放和反硝化产物的碳、氮类指标和光谱特征值。结果表明，碎木去除木质素后在1732和1251 cm^-1处的红外吸收峰消失。RL和AF的释碳速率分别为天然碎木（NW）的1.8倍和1.2倍，NW的速率为0.11 mg·g^-1·d^-1。碳释放过程符合二级反应动力学（相关系数R²>0.90）和Ritger-Peppas动力学（R²>0.98）特征。碳释放产物可被反硝化利用的效率为26.5%~49.7%，其中NW组最低，去除硝酸盐的碳氮比为1.0~1.5，残留有机物的腐殖化程度较低，主要为类酪氨酸。

关键词: 污染, 生物质, 动力学, 反硝化, 化学组分, 碳释放

Abstract:

Woody biomass has complex chemical components and structures, and when it is used as a carbon source for nitrate pollution control, it often suffers from slow denitrification rate and residual organic matter. Woodchip was selected as raw material. It was used to remove the lignin (RL), and hemicellulose (AF) by chemical methods. The acquired compositions were used for carbon release experiment, and then carbon release solution was utilized for denitrification experiment. The kinetic characteristics of carbon release were fitted. The carbon and nitrogen indexes and spectral characteristics were measured during experiments. The results showed that the infrared absorption peak disappeared at 1732 and 1251 cm^-1 after removing lignin. The carbon release rate reached 0.11 mg·g^-1·d^-1 for natural biomass (NW). Compared with NW, the rate for RL and AF was 1.8 and 1.2 times that of NW. Carbon release processes fitted with second-order reaction kinetics (R²>0.90) and Ritger-Peppas kinetics (R²>0.98). Utilization rates reached 26.5%—49.7% when using the carbon release products in denitrification, and the rate of NW was the lowest among the three groups. The C/N ratio reached 1.0—1.5 in the denitrification. The humification degree was low for residual organic matter, and it mainly was tyrosine.

Key words: pollution, biomass, kinetics, denitrify, chemical composition, carbon release

中图分类号:

X 523

祖凌鑫, 胡荣庭, 李鑫, 陈余道, 陈广林. 木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1332-1342.

Lingxin ZU, Rongting HU, Xin LI, Yudao CHEN, Guanglin CHEN. Carbon release products and denitrification bioavailability from chemical components of woody biomass[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(3): 1332-1342.

图/表 9

图1 碎木组分条件下碳释放和反硝化试验设计的流程图

Fig.1 Flow chart of experimental design for carbon release and denitrification under the conditions of woodchip compositions

表1 试验指标的测定方法和仪器

Table 1 Determination methods of indexes and instruments during experiments

序号	指标	方法	仪器（厂家和型号）
1	碎木组分	范氏洗涤法	分析天平（美国，HZK-FA110S）
2	红外光谱特征	漫反射法	原位红外分析仪（美国，Frontier GMT500A）
3	三维荧光光谱	三维荧光光谱分析法	三维荧光扫描光谱仪（日本，Aqualog~UV~800）
4	DOC	燃烧氧化法	总有机碳分析仪（德国，multi N/C 3100）
5	NO $3 -$ -N	紫外分光光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）
6	NO $2 -$ -N	N-（1-萘基）-乙二胺光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）
7	NH $4 +$ -N	纳氏试剂光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）

表1 试验指标的测定方法和仪器

Table 1 Determination methods of indexes and instruments during experiments

序号	指标	方法	仪器（厂家和型号）
1	碎木组分	范氏洗涤法	分析天平（美国，HZK-FA110S）
2	红外光谱特征	漫反射法	原位红外分析仪（美国，Frontier GMT500A）
3	三维荧光光谱	三维荧光光谱分析法	三维荧光扫描光谱仪（日本，Aqualog~UV~800）
4	DOC	燃烧氧化法	总有机碳分析仪（德国，multi N/C 3100）
5	NO $3 -$ -N	紫外分光光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）
6	NO $2 -$ -N	N-（1-萘基）-乙二胺光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）
7	NH $4 +$ -N	纳氏试剂光度法	紫外-可见光谱分光光度计（中国，UV-2355）

表2 木质生物质分离固体组分和碳释放后的化学组分

Table 2 Separating solid components and chemical components after carbon release for woody biomass

碎木，碳释放时间	组分/%
碎木，碳释放时间	中性溶解物	半纤维素	纤维素	木质素	灰分
NW，0 d	11.5	11.6	45.2 $±$ 2.4	31.2 $±$ 2.6	0.5 $±$ 0.2
RL，0 d	13.1 $±$ 0.1	8.1 $±$ 0.2	77.8 $±$ 0.3	1.0	0.3 $±$ 0.1
AF，0 d	9.2	2.3 $±$ 0.3	88.2 $±$ 0.2	0.1	0.1
NW，58 d	11.3 $±$ 0.2	8.3 $±$ 0.2	49.6 $±$ 2.1	30.9 $±$ 1.7	0.1
RL，58 d	10.2	7.7 $±$ 0.7	82.0 $±$ 0.6	0.2 $±$ 0.1	0.1
AF，58 d	6.6	3.0 $±$ 1.2	90.3 $±$ 1.1	0.1	0.1

表2 木质生物质分离固体组分和碳释放后的化学组分

Table 2 Separating solid components and chemical components after carbon release for woody biomass

碎木，碳释放时间	组分/%
碎木，碳释放时间	中性溶解物	半纤维素	纤维素	木质素	灰分
NW，0 d	11.5	11.6	45.2 $±$ 2.4	31.2 $±$ 2.6	0.5 $±$ 0.2
RL，0 d	13.1 $±$ 0.1	8.1 $±$ 0.2	77.8 $±$ 0.3	1.0	0.3 $±$ 0.1
AF，0 d	9.2	2.3 $±$ 0.3	88.2 $±$ 0.2	0.1	0.1
NW，58 d	11.3 $±$ 0.2	8.3 $±$ 0.2	49.6 $±$ 2.1	30.9 $±$ 1.7	0.1
RL，58 d	10.2	7.7 $±$ 0.7	82.0 $±$ 0.6	0.2 $±$ 0.1	0.1
AF，58 d	6.6	3.0 $±$ 1.2	90.3 $±$ 1.1	0.1	0.1

图2 碎木分离组分及NW、RL、AL在碳释放过程中的红外光谱吸收特征曲线and NW, RL, AL during carbon release process

Fig.2 Infrared absorption characteristic of components separated from woodchips

图3 碎木分离组分静态碳释放过程中的DOC累积量变化

Fig.3 DOC accumulation from chemical compositions in woodchip during static carbon release process

表3 碎木分离组分碳释放过程的动力学方程拟合结果

Table 3 Fitting results of kinetic equation for the carbon release process of chemical compositions in woodchip

碎木分离组分	二级反应动力学方程					Ritger-Peppas动力学方程
碎木分离组分	拟合公式	R²	c_m	K	t_0.5	拟合公式	R²	n
NW	$1 c = 7.545 t + 0.068$	0.906	14.8	0.13	111.4	$M t M ∞ = 0.15 t 0.26$	0.993	0.26
RL	$1 c = 0.886 t + 0.022$	0.932	45.8	1.13	40.5	$M t M ∞ = 0.32 t 0.16$	0.984	0.16
AF	$1 c = 2.230 t + 0.040$	0.930	24.9	0.45	55.6	$M t M ∞ = 0.23 t 0.20$	0.990	0.20

表3 碎木分离组分碳释放过程的动力学方程拟合结果

Table 3 Fitting results of kinetic equation for the carbon release process of chemical compositions in woodchip

碎木分离组分	二级反应动力学方程					Ritger-Peppas动力学方程
碎木分离组分	拟合公式	R²	c_m	K	t_0.5	拟合公式	R²	n
NW	$1 c = 7.545 t + 0.068$	0.906	14.8	0.13	111.4	$M t M ∞ = 0.15 t 0.26$	0.993	0.26
RL	$1 c = 0.886 t + 0.022$	0.932	45.8	1.13	40.5	$M t M ∞ = 0.32 t 0.16$	0.984	0.16
AF	$1 c = 2.230 t + 0.040$	0.930	24.9	0.45	55.6	$M t M ∞ = 0.23 t 0.20$	0.990	0.20

图4 碎木不同释碳期的浸出液在反硝化过程中DOC含量[（a）、（b）]和碳氮比[（c）、（d）]的变化various carbon release periods

Fig.4 The DOC contents [(a), (b)] and carbon to nitrogen ratios [(c), (d)] in denitrification for woodchip leachates during

图5 第0~2 d [（a）~（c）]和第52~58 d [（d）~（f）]浸出液在反硝化过程中的紫外-可见光谱特征值

Fig.5 Ultraviolet-visible spectral characteristics for leachates of 0—2 d [(a)—(c)] and 52—58 d [(d)—(f)] during denitrification process

图6 碳释放第0~2 d [（a）~（c）]和第52~58 d [（d）~（f）]浸出液及后者反硝化后[（g）~（i）]的三维荧光光谱图

Fig.6 Three-dimensional fluorescence characteristics for leachates of 0—2 d [(a)—(c)] and 52—58 d [(d)—(f)] carbon release, and after denitrification [(g)—(i)] for the latter leachate

参考文献 37

1	张妍, 张秋英, 李发东, 等. 基于稳定同位素和贝叶斯模型的引黄灌区地下水硝酸盐污染源解析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(3): 484-493.
	Zhang Y, Zhang Q Y, Li F D, et al. Source identification of nitrate contamination of groundwater in Yellow River Irrigation Districts using stable isotopes and Bayesian model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(3): 484-493.
2	Wang S Q, Zheng W B, Currell M, et al. Relationship between land-use and sources and fate of nitrate in groundwater in a typical recharge area of the North China Plain[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 609: 607-620.
3	李晓欣, 王仕琴, 陈肖如, 等. 北方区域尺度地下水-包气带硝酸盐分布与变化特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2021, 29(1): 208-216.
	Li X X, Wang S Q, Chen X R, et al. Spatial distribution and changes of nitrate in the vadose zone and underground water in Northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(1): 208-216.
4	李学先, 吴攀, 查学芳, 等. 基于水化学及稳定同位素的岩溶山区城镇水体硝酸盐来源示踪[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(4): 1428-1439.
	Li X X, Wu P, Zha X F, et al. Tracing nitrate sources in urban waters of Karst mountainous area using hydrochemistry and stable isotope[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41(4): 1428-1439.
5	范天凤, 董伟羊, 赵转军, 等. 改性枸杞枝作为反硝化脱氮碳源的研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(9): 3513-3520.
	Fan T F, Dong W Y, Zhao Z J, et al. Study on the modified Chinese wolfberry branches as carbon source for denitrification[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41(9): 3513-3520.
6	Liu L J, Wang F, Xu S H, et al. Woodchips bioretention column for stormwater treatment: nitrogen removal performance, carbon source and microbial community analysis[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 285: 131519.
7	凌宇, 闫国凯, 王海燕, 等. 6种农业废弃物初期碳源及溶解性有机物释放机制[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(5): 2422-2431.
	Ling Y, Yan G K, Wang H Y, et al. Release mechanisms of carbon source and dissolved organic matter of six agricultural wastes in the initial stage[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(5): 2422-2431.
8	张雯, 张亚平, 尹琳, 等. 以10种农业废弃物为基料的地下水反硝化碳源属性的实验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(5): 1787-1797.
	Zhang W, Zhang Y P, Yin L, et al. The characteristics of carbon sources for denitrification in groundwater from ten kinds of agricultural wastes[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(5): 1787-1797.
9	秦梦彤, 胡婧, 李冠华. 生物质生物预处理研究进展与展望[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(5): 85-91.
	Qin M T, Hu J, Li G H. Recent developments and future prospect of biological pretreatment[J]. China Biotechnology, 2018, 38(5): 85-91.
10	李登龙, 李明源, 王继莲, 等. 木质纤维素预处理方法研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(19): 326-332.
	Li D L, Li M Y, Wang J L, et al. Research progress of lignocellulose pretreatment methods[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(19): 326-332.
11	Zhang Q, Chen X, Wu H, et al. Comparison of clay ceramsite and biodegradable polymers as carriers in pack-bed biofilm reactor for nitrate removal[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(21): 4184.
12	Zhong H, Cheng Y, Ahmad Z, et al. Solid-phase denitrification for water remediation: processes, limitations, and new aspects[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2020, 40(8): 1113-1130.
13	Wang H S, Chen N, Feng C P, et al. Insights into heterotrophic denitrification diversity in wastewater treatment systems: progress and future prospects based on different carbon sources[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 780: 146521.
14	王彤, 汪涵, 周明达, 等. 污水脱氮功能微生物的组学研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(12): 4844-4870.
	Wang T, Wang H, Zhou M D, et al. Advances in omics of functional microorganisms for nitrogen removal in wastewater[J]. Microbiology China, 2021, 48(12): 4844-4870.
15	任俊莉, 刘慧莹, 王孝辉, 等. 木质纤维素资源化主要途径及半纤维素优先资源化利用策略[J]. 生物加工过程, 2020, 18(1): 1-12.
	Ren J L, Liu H Y, Wang X H, et al. Various approaches of lignocellulose utilization and strategies for hemicellulose-preferred lignocellulose biorefinery[J]. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2020, 18(1): 1-12.
16	陈广林, 胡荣庭, 祖凌鑫, 等. 木质碳源释碳能力的优化及其对地下水生物反硝化的强化效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(1): 154-163.
	Chen G L, Hu R T, Zu L X, et al. Optimization of carbon release capacity of wood carbon source and its enhancement on biological denitrification efficiency of groundwater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2022, 16(1): 154-163.
17	He X S, Xi B D, Wei Z M, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of water extractable organic matter during composting of municipal solid waste[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(4): 541-548.
18	Li P H, Hur J. Utilization of UV-Vis spectroscopy and related data analyses for dissolved organic matter (DOM) studies: a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2017, 47(3): 131-154.
19	Kumke M U, Specht C H, Brinkmann T, et al. Alkaline hydrolysis of humic substances—spectroscopic and chromatographic investigations[J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 45(6/7): 1023-1031.
20	Hu R T, Zheng X L, Xin J, et al. Selective enhancement and verification of woody biomass digestibility as a denitrification carbon source[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244: 313-319.
21	邓祥胜, 李明蔓, 何鹏, 等. 桉树伐桩分解过程中木质纤维素成分的变化特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(5): 160-169.
	Deng X S, Li M M, He P, et al. Characteristics of lignocellulosic components variation during the decomposition of Eucalyptus stumps[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(5): 160-169.
22	孙海燕, 贾茹, 吴艳华, 等. 杉木无性系心材与边材微观结构特征快速检测[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(1): 184-188.
	Sun H Y, Jia R, Wu Y H, et al. Rapid detection of microstructural characteristics of heartwood and sapwood of Chinese fir clones[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(1): 184-188.
23	Kundu C D, Samudrala S P, Kibria M A, et al. One-step peracetic acid pretreatment of hardwood and softwood biomass for platform chemicals production[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 11183.
24	Zhuang J S, Li M, Pu Y Q, et al. Observation of potential contaminants in processed biomass using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(12): 4345.
25	余旭芳, 周俊, 任兰天, 等. 小麦秸秆堆肥水溶性有机物的结构和组成演变[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(4): 1199-1204.
	Yu X F, Zhou J, Ren L T, et al. Compositional and structural evolutions of dissolved organic compounds during composting of wheat straw[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(4): 1199-1204.
26	邵留, 徐祖信, 王晟, 等. 新型反硝化固体碳源释碳性能研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(8): 2323-2327.
	Shao L, Xu Z X, Wang S, et al. Performance of new solid carbon source materials for denitrification[J]. Environmental Science, 2011, 32(8): 2323-2327.
27	李丹, 文飚, 曹春昱. 植物原料中半纤维素预水解反应动力学及其机理研究进展[J]. 中国造纸, 2019, 38(2): 61-66.
	Li D, Wen B, Cao C Y. Research progress on hemicellulose pre-hydrolysis kinetics and mechanism of plant materials[J]. China Pulp & Paper, 2019, 38(2): 61-66.
28	叶科丽, 唐艳军, 傅丹宁, 等. 纤维素水解制备葡萄糖的研究进展[J]. 中国造纸学报, 2020, 35(2): 81-88.
	Ye K L, Tang Y J, Fu D N, et al. Research progress in preparation of glucose by hydrolysis of cellulose[J]. Transactions of China Pulp and Paper, 2020, 35(2): 81-88.
29	朱辉翔, 张树楠, 彭英湘, 等. 不同固体碳源释碳特征及其对反硝化脱氮效果研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(2): 206-214.
	Zhu H X, Zhang S N, Peng Y X, et al. Study on carbon release characteristics and denitrification performance of different solid carbon sources[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2021, 42(2): 206-214.
30	孙卓华, 王雪琪, 袁同琦. 基于木质素优先降解策略的木质素高值化利用研究进展[J]. 林业工程学报, 2022, 7(4): 1-12.
	Sun Z H, Wang X Q, Yuan T Q. Recent advances in valorization of lignin based on the lignin-first depolymerization strategy[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2022, 7(4): 1-12.
31	Hu R T, Zheng X L, Zheng T Y, et al. Effects of carbon availability in a woody carbon source on its nitrate removal behavior in solid-phase denitrification[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 246: 832-839.
32	付昆明, 张晓航, 刘凡奇, 等. 葡萄糖碳源条件下C/N对反硝化和N₂O释放性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15(4): 1279-1288.
	Fu K M, Zhang X H, Liu F Q, et al. Effect of C/N on denitrification and N₂O release with glucose as the carbon source[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2021, 15(4): 1279-1288.
33	韦宗敏, 黄少斌, 蒋然. 碳源对微生物硝酸盐异化还原成铵过程的影响[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2012, 38(9): 4-7, 14.
	Wei Z M, Huang S B, Jiang R. Effect of carbon on dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium process[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2012, 38(9): 4-7, 14.
34	王宇蕴, 赵兵, 马丽婷, 等. 堆肥腐殖化过程及微生物驱动机制[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(5): 22-28.
	Wang Y Y, Zhao B, Ma L T, et al. Humification process and microbial driving mechanism of composting[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 22-28.
35	李雅妮, 徐华成, 江和龙. 鄱阳湖水体溶解有机质分子量分布、荧光特征及对重金属分布的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(4): 1029-1040.
	Li Y N, Xu H C, Jiang H L. Molecular weight distribution, fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter and their effect on the distribution of heavy metals of Lake Poyang[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2020, 32(4): 1029-1040.
36	张强, 席北斗, 杨津津, 等. 不同物料堆肥富里酸的结构特征的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(2): 763-770.
	Zhang Q, Xi B D, Yang J J, et al. Structural characteristics of fulvic acid composted with different materials[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(2): 763-770.
37	闫晓寒, 文威, 解莹, 等. 溶解性有机物特性及在国内的污染研究现状[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(6): 169-178.
	Yan X H, Wen W, Xie Y, et al. Study on the properties of dissolved organic matter and its pollution status in China : a review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 43(6): 169-178.

[1]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[2]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[3]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[7]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[8]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[9]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[10]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[11]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[12]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[13]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[14]	陈佳起, 赵万玉, 姚睿充, 侯道林, 董社英. 开心果壳基碳点的合成及其对Q235碳钢的缓蚀行为研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3446-3456.
[15]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.

木质生物质化学组分的碳释放产物特征和反硝化利用程度

Carbon release products and denitrification bioavailability from chemical components of woody biomass

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价