厌氧发酵制备生物燃气过程的物质与能量转化效率

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141066

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2): 723-729.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141066

厌氧发酵制备生物燃气过程的物质与能量转化效率

牛红志^1,2, 孔晓英¹, 李连华¹, 孙永明¹, 袁振宏¹, 王瑶^1,2, 周贤友^1,2

1 中国科学院广州能源研究所, 中国科学院可再生能源重点实验室, 广东广州 510640;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2014-07-15 修回日期:2014-08-18 出版日期:2015-02-05 发布日期:2015-02-05
通讯作者: 孔晓英
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2012AA101802);中国科学院重点部署项目(KGZD-EW-304-1)。

Material and energy conversion efficiency of biogas preparation process by anaerobic fermentation

NIU Hongzhi^1,2, KONG Xiaoying¹, LI Lianhua¹, SUN Yongming¹, YUAN Zhenhong¹, WANG Yao^1,2, ZHOU Xianyou^1,2

1 Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
2 UCAS, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2014-07-15 Revised:2014-08-18 Online:2015-02-05 Published:2015-02-05
Supported by:
supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (2012AA101802) and Key Deployment Program of CAS(KGZD-EW-304-1).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以稻壳为原料,采用批式中温(35℃±1℃)厌氧发酵工艺研究了稻壳厌氧发酵制备生物燃气的产气性能,在此基础上结合物质流分析方法分析了发酵过程中C、N元素的分布情况以及物质与能量的转化效率。研究结果表明稻壳厌氧发酵制备生物燃气过程的产气率和产CH₄率分别为297.41和164.40 ml·(gVS_RH)^-1,平均CH₄含量为55.28%;C元素流向分布:30.7%生物燃气,6.4%沼液,62.9%沼渣;N元素在剩余物中的流向分布:63.2%沼液,36.8%沼渣;稻壳厌氧发酵制备生物燃气的物质转化效率和能量转化效率分别为30.0%和33.7%。本研究为农业加工废弃物的资源管理和能源化利用提供了理论依据。

关键词: 稻壳, 厌氧, 发酵, 生物燃气产量, 甲烷, 物质流分析, 物质与能量转化效率

Abstract:

The yield of biogas produced by mid-temperature (35℃±1℃) anaerobic fermentation of rice hulls was investigated, and material and energy flows as well as the distribution of element C and N during this fermentation process were also analyzed using the material flow analysis (MFA) method in this paper. The results showed that during the fermenting rice hulls to prepare biogas, the production rates for biogas and for CH₄ were 297.41 and 164.40 ml·(gVS_RH)^-1, respectively; implying that average CH₄ content in biogas was 55.28%, corresponding to 31.16% of the theoretical yield. Based on MFA for the fermentation process system, 30.8% and 6.4% of C element were converted into biogas and slurry, and 62.9% left in residue, separately; 63.2% of N element were converted into slurry and 36.8% left in residue, while negligible N element was in biogas. The efficiencies of material and energy for conversion of rice hulls to biogas were 30.0% and 33.7%, respectively. This study could be as a theoretical basis for resource management and energy utilization of agricultural wastes.

Key words: rice hulls, anaerobic, fermentation, biogas yield, methane, material flow analysis, material and energy conversion efficiency

中图分类号:

X712

牛红志, 孔晓英, 李连华, 孙永明, 袁振宏, 王瑶, 周贤友. 厌氧发酵制备生物燃气过程的物质与能量转化效率[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(2): 723-729.

NIU Hongzhi, KONG Xiaoying, LI Lianhua, SUN Yongming, YUAN Zhenhong, WANG Yao, ZHOU Xianyou. Material and energy conversion efficiency of biogas preparation process by anaerobic fermentation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(2): 723-729.

参考文献 27

[1]	National data(National Bureau of Statistics of China). http://data.stats. gov.cn/index
[2]	Zheng G J, Zhou Y J, Zhang J, Cheng K K, Zhao X B, Zhang T, et al. Pretreatment of rice hulls for cellulase production by solid substrate fermentation [J]. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology, 2007, 27: 65-71
[3]	Lim J S, Manan Z A, Alwi S R W, Hashim H. A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16: 3084-3094
[4]	Vadiveloo J, Nurfariza B, Fadel J G. Nutritional improvement of rice husks [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2009, 151: 299-305
[5]	Thomsen S T, Kadar Z, Schmidt J E. Compositional analysis and projected biofuel potentials from common West African agricultural residues [J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2014, 63: 210-217
[6]	Imamoglu E, Dalay M C, Sukan F V. Regional differences in rice hulls supply for bioethanol production [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2013, 171: 2065-2074
[7]	Oduguwa O O, Edema M O, Ayeni A O. Physico-chemical and microbiological analyses of fermented corn cob, rice bran and cowpea husk for use in composite rabbit feed [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2008, 99: 1816-1820
[8]	Demirbas A, Ozturk T. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural solid residues [J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2004, 1: 483-494
[9]	Li Lianhua(李连华), Ma Longlong(马隆龙), Yuan Zhenhong(袁振宏), Liu Xiaofeng(刘晓风). Study on anaerobic digestion of straw stalk [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science(农业环境科学学报), 2007, 26(1): 335-338
[10]	Comino E, Rosso M, Riggio V. Investigation of increasing organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and cow manure mix [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101: 3013-3019
[11]	Grundmann P, Ehlers M H, Uckert G. Responses of agricultural bioenergy sectors in Brandenburg (Germany) to climate, economic and legal changes: an application of Holling's adaptive cycle [J]. Energ. Policy, 2012, 48: 118-129
[12]	Benbelkacem H, Bayard R, Abdelhay A, Zhang Y, Gourdon R. Effect of leachate injection modes on municipal solid waste degradation in anaerobic bioreactor [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101: 5206- 5212
[13]	Zhen Feng(甄峰), Li Dong(李东), Sun Yongming(孙永明), Li Zhibing(李志兵), Yuan Zhenhong(袁振宏). High value application and purification technology of biogas [J]. Environment Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2012, 35(11): 103- 108
[14]	Rohatgi K, Prasad S V, Rohatgi P K. Release of silica-rich particles from rice husk by microbial fermentation [J]. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1987, 6: 829-831
[15]	Contreras L M, Schelle H, Sebrango C R, Pereda I. Methane potential and biodegradability of rice straw, rice husk and rice residues from the drying process [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65: 1142-1149
[16]	Okeh O C, Onwosi C O, Odibo F J C. Biogas production from rice husks generated from various rice mills in Ebonyi State, Nigeria [J]. Renewable Energy, 2014, 62: 204-208
[17]	Li L H, Li D, Sun Y M, Ma L L, Yuan Z H, Kong X Y. Effect of temperature and solid concentration on anaerobic digestion of rice straw in South China [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 7261-7266
[18]	Brunner P H, Rechberger H. Practical Handbook for Material Flow Analysis[M]. Boca Raton, Fla. London: CRC, 2004
[19]	Rechberger H, Cencic O, Fruhwirth R. Uncertainty in material flow analysis [J]. J. Ind. Ecol., 2014, 18: 159-160
[20]	Yu Qiang, Zhuang Xinshu, Lv Shuangliang. Liquid hot water pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and its comparison with chemical pretreatment methdes for the sugar recovery and structural hanges [J]. Bioenergy Research, 2013, 129: 592-598
[21]	Kitani O, Hall C W. Biomass Handbook[M]. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1989. https://www.ecn.nl/phyllis2/ Browse/ Standard/ECN-Phyllis#rice husk
[22]	Weiland P. Bases of the Methane Fermentation — Biology and Substrate//Biogas als Regenerative Energie — Stand und Perspektiven [M]. Tagung Hanover, 2001: 19-33
[23]	Mustonen S, Raiko R, Luukkanen J. Bioenergy consumption and biogas potential in Cambodian households [J]. Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 1875-1892
[24]	Contreras L M, Schelle H, Sebrango C R, et al. Methane potential and biodegradability of rice straw, rice husk and rice residues from the drying process [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(6): 1142-1149
[25]	Nijaguna B. Biogas Technology[M]. New Delhi, India: New Age International (P) Ltd., 2002
[26]	Buswell A M, Muller H F. Mechanics of methane fermentation [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering Chemistry, 1955, 44(3): 550-559
[27]	Li Dong(李东), Ye Jingqing(叶景清), Zhen Feng(甄峰). Effects of anaerobic co-digestion of different proportions between rice straw and chicken manure on biogas yield rate [J]. Transactions of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业机械学报), 2013, 29(2): 232-238

厌氧发酵制备生物燃气过程的物质与能量转化效率

Material and energy conversion efficiency of biogas preparation process by anaerobic fermentation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[2]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[3]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[4]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[5]	高学金, 姚玉卓, 韩华云, 齐咏生. 基于注意力动态卷积自编码器的发酵过程故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2503-2521.
[6]	胡南, 陶德敏, 杨照岚, 王学兵, 张向旭, 刘玉龙, 丁德馨. 铁炭微电解与硫酸盐还原菌耦合修复铀尾矿库渗滤水的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2655-2667.
[7]	黄玉龙, 吕凡, 仇俊杰, 章骅, 何品晶. 易腐垃圾厌氧消化沼液理化性质及VOCs分子特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1275-1285.
[8]	胡晗, 杨亮, 李春晓, 刘道平. 天然烟浸滤液水合物法储甲烷动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1313-1321.
[9]	彭晓婉, 郭笑楠, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8浆液法分离CH₄/N₂的双吸收-吸附塔工艺流程建模与模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 784-795.
[10]	沈嘉辉, 王侃宏, 郁达伟, 胡大洲, 魏源送. 游离氨调理污泥厌氧消化优化产甲烷过程与强化有机物释放[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4147-4155.
[11]	廖珊珊, 张少刚, 陶骏骏, 刘家豪, 汪金辉. 竖直射流火撞击障碍管道数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234.
[12]	王悦琳, 晁伟, 蓝晓程, 莫志朋, 佟淑环, 王铁峰. 合成气生物发酵法制乙醇的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3448-3460.
[13]	唐翠萍, 张雅楠, 梁德青, 李祥. 聚乙烯己内酰胺链端改性及其对甲烷水合物形成的抑制作用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(5): 2130-2139.
[14]	童海航, 石德智, 刘嘉宇, 蔡桦伊, 罗丹, 陈飞. 金属纳米颗粒辅助木质纤维素暗发酵生物制氢的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1417-1435.
[15]	高学金, 何紫鹤, 高慧慧, 齐咏生. 基于联合典型变量矩阵的多阶段发酵过程质量相关故障监测[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(3): 1300-1314.