丝网结构对连通容器气体爆炸的二次抑制效果

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151216

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (4): 1618-1625.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151216

丝网结构对连通容器气体爆炸的二次抑制效果

崔洋洋, 王志荣, 刘明翰, 张锎, 马龙生, 蒋军成

南京工业大学安全科学与工程学院江苏省危险化学品本质安全与控制技术重点实验室, 江苏南京 210009

收稿日期:2015-07-29 修回日期:2015-11-05 出版日期:2016-04-05 发布日期:2016-04-05
通讯作者: 王志荣
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51376088,21436006);江苏省高校自然科学基金项目(11KJA620001,10KJB620001)。

Double-suppression effect of wire mesh on gas explosion in linked vessels

CUI Yangyang, WANG Zhirong, LIU Minghan, ZHANG Kai, MA Longsheng, JIANG Juncheng

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hazardous Chemicals Safety and Control, College of Safety and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China

Received:2015-07-29 Revised:2015-11-05 Online:2016-04-05 Published:2016-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51376088, 21436006) and the Natural Science Foundation for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (11KJA620001, 10KJB620001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

实际生产中大多数储罐、反应器的进料口和卸料口都是与管道相连而形成连通结构,为考查丝网结构对连通容器内气体爆炸的二次抑制作用,以甲烷-空气混合物为研究对象,利用球形容器与管道构成的连通容器进行了抑爆实验,对比分析了单次抑爆与二次抑爆效果,并分析了不同目数和层数的丝网结构对连通容器的二次抑爆效果的影响。结果表明:丝网结构二次抑爆效果优于单次抑爆。当单次抑爆失效时加入40目5层丝网结构进行二次抑爆效果最好;加入60目1层、3层丝网结构无抑爆效果,加入5层、7层、9层丝网结构抑爆效果明显,而且抑爆作用随丝网层数增加而增强。因此,在工程设计中应根据实际情况综合考虑,选用合适的抑爆次数及抑爆结构。

关键词: 爆炸, 连通容器, 单次抑爆, 二次抑爆, 丝网结构, 抑爆影响, 甲烷, 混合物

Abstract:

A series of experiments were conducted to study double-suppression effect of multi-layer wire-mesh structure on methane-air mixture explosion in a spherical vessel connected with pipelines. Explosion double-suppression effect was analyzed for explosion suppression structures with different layers and meshes. The most reasonable multi-layer wire-mesh structure was obtained. The combination of different layer number and mesh number had different explosion suppression effect on the linked vessels. Compared with single-suppression effect, the double-suppression effect was much better. Based on 5-layer 60-mesh, which had little single-suppression effect, the double-suppression effect was more effective while the 5-layer 40-mesh was adopted as double-suppression structure. 1-layer 60-mesh or 3-layer 60-mesh had little suppression effect, but 5-layer was different. When the layer of wire-mesh was more than five, the effect was significant, and the more the number of layers was, the better the explosion suppression effect was. Thus, in actual explosion protection design, the best explosion suppression structure should be decided by taking into account of the comprehensive effect of the times of suppression and layer number and mesh number of wire-mesh structure.

Key words: explosions, linked vessels, single-suppression, double-suppression, wire-mesh, explosion suppression, methane, mixtures

中图分类号:

TE687
TQ086

崔洋洋, 王志荣, 刘明翰, 张锎, 马龙生, 蒋军成. 丝网结构对连通容器气体爆炸的二次抑制效果[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1618-1625.

CUI Yangyang, WANG Zhirong, LIU Minghan, ZHANG Kai, MA Longsheng, JIANG Juncheng. Double-suppression effect of wire mesh on gas explosion in linked vessels[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(4): 1618-1625.

参考文献 21

[1]	王志荣, 周超, 师喜林, 等. 连通容器内预混气体泄爆过程[J]. 化工学报, 2011, 62 (1): 287-291. WANG Z R, ZHOU C, SHI X L, et al. Gas explosion venting of premixed gases in linked vessels[J]. CIESC Journal, 2011, 62 (1): 287-291.
[2]	WANG Z R, PAN M Y, JIANG J C. Experimental investigation of gas explosion in single vessel and connected vessels[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26 (6): 1094-1099.
[3]	OH K H, KIM H, KIM J B, et al. A study on the obstacle-induced variation of the gas explosion characteristics[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2001, 14 (6): 597-602.
[4]	GVOZDEVA L G. Normal shock waves reflection on porous compressible materials[J]. ATAA, 1986, 106: 155-165.
[5]	ROBERT Z. Deflagration suppression using expanded metal mesh and polymer foams[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20 (4): 659-663.
[6]	ZHANG B, XIU G L, BAI C H. Explosion characteristics of argon/nitrogen diluted natural gas-air mixtures[J]. Fuel, 2014, 124: 125-132.
[7]	ZHANG B, BAI C H, XIU G L, et al. Explosion and flame characteristics of methane/air mixtures in a large-scale vessel[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2014, 33 (4): 362-368.
[8]	郭长铭, 陈志刚. 多孔钢板对气象爆轰波传播影响的实验研究[J]. 实验力学, 2000, 15 (4): 400-407. GUO C M, CHEN Z G. Experimental study on gaseous detonation propagation in a perforated steel plate section[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2000, 15 (4): 400-407.
[9]	郭长铭, 李剑. 爆轰波在阻尼管道中声吸收的实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2000, 20 (4): 289-295. GUO C M, LI J. Experimental investigation of acoustic absorption of detonation by absorbing materials lining wall[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2000, 20 (4): 289-295.
[10]	祝钊, 贾振元, 罗海珠. 瓦斯输送管道内抑爆过程数值模拟研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2014, 54 (1): 37-42. ZHU Z, JIA Z Y, LUO H Z. Numerical simulation research on explosion suppression process in gas transmission pipeline[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2014, 54 (1): 37-42.
[11]	戴林超, 赵彩虹, 刘桢, 等. 管道内瓦斯爆炸传播规律的数值模拟研究[J]. 矿业工程研究, 2011, 26 (1): 31-34. DAI L C, ZHAO C H, LIU Z, et al. Numerical simulation study of gas explosion propagation law in the pipe[J]. Mineral Engineering Research, 2011, 26 (1): 31-34.
[12]	HOJO H, TSUDA K, ARAI S. The combustion suppression effect of metal wire-mesh and the flame propagation in pipes[J]. Chemical Engineering, 1986, (2): 153-158.
[13]	HOJO H, TSUDA K, KANO N. The flow resistance and the combustion suppression effect of metal wire-mesh[J]. High Pressure Fluid, 1984, (5): 239-247.
[14]	TSUDA K, HOJO H. The combustion suppression effect of metal wire-mesh in vertical pipes[J]. Safety Engineering, 1990, (4): 251-255.
[15]	邓军, 田志辉, 罗振敏, 等. Mg(OH)2/CO2抑爆瓦斯实验研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2013, 44 (10): 4-6. DENG J, TIAN Z H, LUO Z M, et al. Experimental research on suppressing gas explosion by Mg(OH)2/CO2.[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44 (10): 4-6.
[16]	张巨峰, 王晖, 武元, 等. 管道内多层金属丝网对预混可燃气体爆炸火焰传播的影响[J]. 湖南科技大学学报 (自然科学版), 2012, 27 (2): 18-21. ZHANG J F, WANG H, WU Y, et al. Effect of multi-layer wire mesh upon pre-mixed combustible gas explosion in the tube[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 27 (2): 18-21.
[17]	喻健良, 周崇, 刘润杰. 管道内预混气体爆燃过程的实验研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2004, 33 (6): 453-466. YU J L, ZHOU C, LIU R J. Experimental investigation into deflagration of premixed gases in tubes[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2004, 33 (6): 453-466.
[18]	喻健良, 孟伟, 王雅杰. 多层丝网结构抑制管内气体爆炸的实验[J]. 天然气工业, 2005, 25 (6): 116-118. YU J L, MENG W, WANG Y J. Experiment to suppress gas explosion in pipe with structure of multi-layer wire mesh[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25 (6): 116-118.
[19]	喻健良, 蔡涛, 李岳, 等. 丝网结构对爆炸气体淬熄的试验研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2008, 14 (2): 13-16. YU J L, CAI T, LI Y, et al. Experiment to quench explosive gas with structure of wire mesh[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 14 (2): 13-16.
[20]	喻健良, 刘润杰, 毕明树, 等. 网孔结构和可压缩材料抑制爆炸波的研究评述[J]. 化学工业与工程技术, 2002, 23 (91): 12-15. YU J L, LIU R J, BI M S, et al. Review of explosion suppression effect of mesh structure and compressible material[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering, 2002, 23 (91): 12-15.
[21]	程长德, 王志荣, 张尚峰. 丝网结构对连通容器抑爆效果的影响[J]. 解放军理工大学学报 (自然科学版), 2014, 15 (6): 564-570. CHENG C D, WANG Z R, ZHANG S F. Suppressive effect of explosion in linked spherical vessels and pipelines impacted by structure of wire mesh[J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 15 (6): 564-570.

丝网结构对连通容器气体爆炸的二次抑制效果

Double-suppression effect of wire mesh on gas explosion in linked vessels

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨克, 贾岳, 纪虹, 邢志祥, 蒋军成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰对瓦斯爆炸压力及火焰传播的抑制作用及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3597-3607.
[2]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[3]	汪尔奇, 彭书舟, 杨震, 段远源. 含HFO混合体系气液相平衡的理论模型评价[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3216-3225.
[4]	刘晓洋, 喻健良, 侯玉洁, 闫兴清, 张振华, 吕先舒. 螺旋微通道对掺氢甲烷爆轰传播的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3139-3148.
[5]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[6]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[7]	姚晓宇, 沈俊, 李健, 李振兴, 康慧芳, 唐博, 董学强, 公茂琼. 流体气液临界参数测量方法研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1847-1861.
[8]	胡晗, 杨亮, 李春晓, 刘道平. 天然烟浸滤液水合物法储甲烷动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1313-1321.
[9]	武子超, 汪志雷, 李荣业, 李可昕, 华敏, 潘旭海, 王三明, 蒋军成. 点火方式对欠膨胀氢气射流爆炸超压影响规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1409-1418.
[10]	彭晓婉, 郭笑楠, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8浆液法分离CH₄/N₂的双吸收-吸附塔工艺流程建模与模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 784-795.
[11]	唐茹意, 潘罕骞, 郑侠俊, 张广欣, 汪星平, 崔希利, 邢华斌. Z型全氟聚醚的结构表征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 479-486.
[12]	席国君, 刘子涵, 雷广平. FeTPPs-CuBTC协同强化低浓度煤层气吸附分离[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 3940-3949.
[13]	杨克, 王辰升, 纪虹, 郑凯, 邢志祥, 毕海普, 蒋军成. 聚多巴胺包覆混合粉体抑制甲烷爆炸的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4245-4254.
[14]	廖珊珊, 张少刚, 陶骏骏, 刘家豪, 汪金辉. 竖直射流火撞击障碍管道数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4226-4234.
[15]	王燕, 何佳, 杨晶晶, 林晨迪, 纪文涛. 草酸盐和碳酸氢盐抑制聚乙烯粉尘爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4207-4216.