基于热重法的准东煤等转化率热解动力学模型

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161335

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (4): 1415-1422.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161335

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

基于热重法的准东煤等转化率热解动力学模型

江国栋, 魏利平, 滕海鹏, 郝惠娣

西北大学化工学院, 陕北能源先进化工利用技术教育部工程研究中心, 陕西西安 710069

收稿日期:2016-09-23 修回日期:2017-01-09 出版日期:2017-04-05 发布日期:2017-04-05
通讯作者: 魏利平
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51606153）；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目（2016JQ5101）。

A kinetic model based on TGA data for pyrolysis of Zhundong coal

JIANG Guodong, WEI Liping, TENG Haipeng, HAO Huidi

College of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, Chemical Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education for Advanced Use Technology of Shanbei Energy, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China

Received:2016-09-23 Revised:2017-01-09 Online:2017-04-05 Published:2017-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51606153) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province (2016JQ5101).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

准东煤热解脱挥发分特性对其热加工利用过程具有重要影响，建立准东煤热解通用动力学模型对预测挥发分产率及反应性能具有重要意义。采用热重测量了不同升温速率条件下的准东煤脱挥发分失重特性，使用Friedman、Flynn-Wall-Ozawa（FWO）和Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose（KAS）3种等转化率模型来处理热重实验数据，仔细分析了不同模型参数的获得方法及不同模型中活化能及指前因子的差异。研究结果表明，准东煤活化能分布函数呈现单峰分布；相比其他模型，FWO模型能够较好地描述准东煤的热解过程。

关键词: 煤, 热解, 热重分析, 等转化率, 动力学, 模型

Abstract:

In order to predict the yield of volatiles and reaction performance during pyrolysis of Zhundong coal, which is of significant importance for its thermal processing, a kinetic model is necessary. The devolatilization of Zhundong coal is characterized by thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) at different heating rates. Three types of iso-conversion kinetic models, i.e., Friedman, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose(KAS), are employed to fit TGA data for pyrolysis of Zhundong coal. The pre-exponential factors and activation energies obtained from different kinetic models are analyzed. The results show that there exists unimodal distribution for the activation energies and the FWO model is better for description of pyrolysis process of Zhundong coal.

Key words: coal, pyrolysis, thermogravimetry analysis, iso-conversional, kinetics, model

中图分类号:

TQ530.2

江国栋, 魏利平, 滕海鹏, 郝惠娣. 基于热重法的准东煤等转化率热解动力学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1415-1422.

JIANG Guodong, WEI Liping, TENG Haipeng, HAO Huidi. A kinetic model based on TGA data for pyrolysis of Zhundong coal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1415-1422.

参考文献 30

[1]	杨忠灿, 刘家利, 何红光. 新疆准东煤特性研究及其锅炉选型[J]. 热力发电, 2010, 39(8):38-40.YANG Z C, LIU J L, HE H G. Study on properties of Zhundong coal in Xinjiang region and type-selection for boilers burning this coal sort[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2010, 39(8):38-40.
[2]	NOLA G D, JONG W D, SPLIETHOFF H. TG-FTIR characterization of coal and biomass single fuels and blends under slow heating rate conditions:partitioning of the fuel-bound nitrogen[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(1):103-115.
[3]	AIN A A, MEHRA A, RANADE V V. Processing of TGA data:analysis of isoconversional and model fitting methods[J]. Fuel, 2016, 165:490-498.
[4]	ŠESTÁK J. Is the original Kissinger equation obsolete today:not obsolete the entire non-isothermal kinetics[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, 2014, 117(117):3-7.
[5]	赵岩, 刘栗, 邱朋华, 等. 准东煤热解动力学单一扫描速率法应用局限性[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2016, 48(7):58-66.ZHAO Y, LIU L, QIU P H, et al. Application limitations of single scanning rate method in pyrolysis kinetics of Zhundong coal[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(7):58-66.
[6]	FRIEDMAN H L. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic[J]. Journal of Polymer Science Part C Polymer Symposia, 1964, 6(1):183-195.
[7]	KISSINGER H E. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2002, 29(11):1702-1706.
[8]	WANG C, LIU Y, ZHANG X, et al. A study on coal properties and combustion characteristics of blended coals in northwestern China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(8):3634-3645.
[9]	QING W, HONGPENG L, BAIZHONG S, et al. Study on pyrolysis characteristics of Huadian oil shale with isoconversional method[J]. Oil Shale, 2009, 26(2):148-162.
[10]	ABOYADE A O, CARRIER M, MEYER E L, et al. Model fitting kinetic analysis and characterisation of the devolatilization of coal blends with corn and sugarcane residues[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2012, 530(1):95-106.
[11]	LIU Q R, HU H Q, ZHOU Q, et al. Effect of inorganic matter on reactivity and kinetics of coal pyrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83:713-718.
[12]	MUSTAFA GÜNE?, SEMIN GÜNE?. A study on thermal decomposition kinetics of some Turkish coals[J]. Energy Sources, 2005, 27(8):749-759.
[13]	VYAZOVKIN S, WIGHT C A. Model-free and model-fitting approaches to kinetic analysis of isothermal and nonisothermal data[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 1999, 340/341:53-68.
[14]	CABALLERO J A, CONESA J A. Mathematical considerations for nonisothermal kinetics in thermal decomposition[J]. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2005, 73(1):85-100.
[15]	BURNHAM A, DINH L. A comparison of isoconversional and model-fitting approaches to kinetic parameter estimation and application predictions[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, 2007, 89(2):479-490.
[16]	SANTOS K G, LOBATO F S, LIRA T S, et al. Sensitivity analysis applied to independent parallel reaction model for pyrolysis of bagasse[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2012, 90(11):1989-1996.
[17]	STARINK M J. The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments:a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2003, 404(1/2):163-176.
[18]	URBANOVICI E, POPESCU C, SEGAL E. Improved iterative version of the coats-redfern method to evaluate non-isothermal kinetic parameters[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 1999, 58(3):683-700.
[19]	CAI J, BI L. Precision of the coats and redfern method for the determination of the activation energy without neglecting the low-temperature end of the temperature integral[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22(4):2172-2174.
[20]	韩运晴, 刘乃安. 面向固体热解单一活化能计算的等转化率动力学分析方法研究[J]. 火灾科学, 2011, 20(1):9-15.HAN Y Q, LIU N A. New isoconversional method for evaluating unambiguous activation energy values for solid decomposition[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2011, 20(1):9-15.
[21]	平传娟, 周俊虎, 程军, 等. 混煤热解反应动力学特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(17):6-10.PING C J, ZHOU J H, CHENG J, et al. Research on the pyrolysis kinetics of blended coals[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2007, 27(17):6-10.
[22]	周俊虎, 平传娟, 杨卫娟, 等. 用热重红外光谱联用技术研究混煤热解特性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2004, 32(6):19-23.ZHOU J H, PING C J, YANG W J, et al. Experimental study on the pyrolysis characteristic of coal blends using TGA-FTIR[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2004, 32(6):19-23.
[23]	王俊宏, 常丽萍, 谢克昌. 西部煤的热解特性及动力学研究[J]. 煤炭转化, 2009, 32(3):1-5.WANG J H, CHANG L P, XIE K C. Study on the pyrolysis and kinetics of coal of western China[J]. Coal Conversion, 2009, 32(6):19-23.
[24]	张海涛, 于庆波, 秦勤, 等. 等转化率法对生物质热解动力学的研究[J]. 热力发电, 2014, 43(1):57-60.ZHANG H T, YU Q B, QIN Q, et al. Kinetic study on biomass pyrolysis processes by iso-conversional method[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2014, 43(1):57-60.
[25]	VYAZOVKIN S. Modification of the integral isoconversional method to account for variation in the activation energy[J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2001, 22(2):178-183.
[26]	AND K M, MAKI T. A simple method for estimating f(E) and k0(E) in the distributed activation energy model[J]. Energy Fuels, 1998, 12(5):864-869.
[27]	韩峰, 蒙爱红, 鲁伟, 等. 沙尔湖褐煤和红沙泉不粘煤的热解动力学及热解产物分布[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 53(3):348-352.HAN F, MENG A H, LU W, et al. Pyrolysis kinetics and product distribution of two coals[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2013, 53(3):348-352.
[28]	ARENILLAS A, RUBIERA F, PEVIDA C, et al. A comparison of different methods for predicting coal devolatilisation kinetics[J]. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2001, 58/59(2):685-701.
[29]	邱朋华, 赵岩, 陈希叶, 等. 碱及碱土金属对准东煤热解特性及动力学影响分析[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2014, 42(10):1178-1189.QIU P H, ZHAO Y, CHEN X Y, et al. Effects of alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of Zhundong coal[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2014, 42(10):1178-1189.
[30]	GÜNE? M, GÜNE? S. A direct search method for determination of DAEM kinetic parameters from nonisothermal TGA data (note)[J]. Applied Mathematics & Computation, 2002, 130(2/3):619-628.

基于热重法的准东煤等转化率热解动力学模型

A kinetic model based on TGA data for pyrolysis of Zhundong coal

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[2]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[3]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[4]	连梦雅, 谈莹莹, 王林, 陈枫, 曹艺飞. 地下水预热新风一体化热泵空调系统制热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 311-319.
[5]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[6]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[7]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[8]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[9]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[10]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[11]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[12]	王浩, 王振雷. 基于自适应谱方法的裂解炉烧焦模型化简策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3855-3864.
[13]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[14]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[15]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.