化学链反应器研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20201325

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

化学链技术是目前能源技术研究的热点之一，其关键技术包括载体材料的制备和反应器的设计。综述了化学链技术的应用前景，总结了化学链反应器设计原理，回顾了目前世界上公开报道的设计完成、在建或已经运行的化学链反应器，归纳讨论了不同反应器设计细节的共同点及目的。开展以微小颗粒、纳米颗粒作为载体材料时，颗粒聚团在宏观反应器尺度下的流动传递规律、循环反应机理和系统运行控制特性的研究；开展反应器内颗粒流动-传递-反应耦合机制研究，建立多尺度统一模型；在全尺寸化学链反应器上进行系统自热实验研究；利用数值模拟方法研究和开发用于固体燃料转化过程的高效炭/灰分离器是未来化学链反应器发展需要关注的几个方面。

关键词: 化学链, 反应器, 气固反应, 炭/灰分离器, 介尺度

Abstract:

Chemical looping technology is currently one of the hotspots in energy technology research. Its key technologies include the preparation of carrier materials and the design of reactors. In this paper, application prospects of chemical looping were described. The design principles of chemical looping reactor were summarized. The chemical looping reactors reported in concepts, in building or in operation were reviewed. The purposes and design criteria were discussed. Flow patterns, reaction mechanisms and control characteristics during operation should be investigated in macroscopic reactor when using micro/nano-particles as looping materials. Hydrodynamic, mass transfer, heat and reaction coupling mechanism in reactor should be studied and reaction-to-reactor multi-scale model should be constructed. Fully scaled chemical looping reactor by self-heat balance should be tested. More attentions should be paid to the development of efficient carbon/ash stripper with aid of numerical simulation in the future.

Key words: chemical looping, reactor, gas-solid reaction, carbon/ash stripper, meso-scale

中图分类号:

TQ 519

刘一君, 陈时熠, 胡骏, 周威, 向文国. 化学链反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2392-2412.

LIU Yijun, CHEN Shiyi, HU Jun, ZHOU Wei, XIANG Wenguo. Review on reactors for chemical looping process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(5): 2392-2412.

图/表 16

参考文献 140

1	Hepworth T C. Oxygen for limelight[J]. Nature, 1892, 47(1208): 176-177.
2	Richter H J, Knoche K F. Reversibility of combustion processes[M]//ACS Symposium Series. Washington, D.
	C.: American Chemical Society, 1983: 71-85.
3	Fan L S. Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010.
4	Breault R. Handbook of Chemical Looping Technology[M]. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Boschstr, 2018.
5	Fan L S, Zeng L, Luo S W. Chemical-looping technology platform[J]. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(1): 2-22.
6	Zeng L, Luo S W, Sridhar D, et al. Chemical looping processes—particle characterization, ionic diffusion-reaction mechanism and reactor engineering[J]. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2012, 28(1): 1-42.
7	Zeng L, Cheng Z, Fan J A, et al. Metal oxide redox chemistry for chemical looping processes[J]. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2018, 2(11): 349-364.
8	Buelens L, Poelman H, Marin G B, et al. 110th anniversary: carbon dioxide and chemical looping: current research trends[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(36): 16235-16257.
9	Salaudeen S A, Acharya B, Dutta A. CaO-based CO₂ sorbents: a review on screening, enhancement, cyclic stability, regeneration and kinetics modelling[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 23: 179-199.
10	Kumar S, Saxena S K. A comparative study of CO₂ sorption properties for different oxides[J]. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2014, 3(3): 1-15.
11	Feng B, An H, Tan E. Screening of CO₂ adsorbing materials for zero emission power generation systems[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(2): 426-434.
12	Zhao H B, Tian X, Ma J C, et al. Development of tailor-made oxygen carriers and reactors for chemical looping processes at Huazhong University of Science & Technology[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 93: 102898.
13	Zhao H B, Tian X, Ma J C, et al. Chemical looping combustion of coal in China: comprehensive progress, remaining challenges, and potential opportunities[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(6): 6696-6734.
14	Tang Y T, You F Q. Life cycle environmental and economic analysis of pulverized coal oxy-fuel combustion combining with calcium looping process or chemical looping air separation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 181: 271-292.
15	He Y D, Zhu L, Li L L, et al. Zero-energy penalty carbon capture and utilization for liquid fuel and power cogeneration with chemical looping combustion[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235: 34-43.
16	Ogidiama O V, Abu Zahra M, Shamim T. Techno-economic analysis of a carbon capture chemical looping combustion power plant[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2018, 140(11): 112004.
17	Navajas A, Mendiara T, Goñi V, et al. Life cycle assessment of natural gas fuelled power plants based on chemical looping combustion technology[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 198: 111856.
18	Petrakopoulou F, Boyano A, Cabrera M, et al. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a combined cycle power plant with chemical looping technology[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(3): 475-482.
19	Kale G R, Kulkarni B D, Bharadwaj K V. Chemical looping reforming of ethanol for syngas generation: a theoretical investigation[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2013, 37(6): 645-656.
20	Petrakopoulou F, Tsatsaronis G. Can carbon dioxide capture and storage from power plants reduce the environmental impact of electricity generation?[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(8): 5327-5338.
21	Hurst T F, Cockerill T T, Florin N H. Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of a coal-fired power station with calcium looping CO₂ capture and offshore geological storage[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(5): 7132.
22	Chisalita D A, Petrescu L, Cobden P, et al. Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post-combustion CO₂ capture and storage using the LCA methodology[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 211: 1015-1025.
23	Yang Q C, Li X F, Yang Q, et al. Opportunities for CO₂ utilization in coal to green fuel process: optimal design and performance evaluation[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(3): 1329-1342.
24	Petrescu L, Müller C R, Cormos C C. Life cycle assessment of natural gas-based chemical looping for hydrogen production[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 7408-7420.
25	Heng L J, Xiao R, Zhang H Y. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via iron-based chemical-looping process using non-aqueous phase bio-oil as fuel[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76: 78-84.
26	Rolfe A, Huang Y, Haaf M, et al. Technical and environmental study of calcium carbonate looping versus oxy-fuel options for low CO₂ emission cement plants[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 75: 85-97.
27	Clarens F, Espí J J, Giraldi M R, et al. Life cycle assessment of CaO looping versus amine-based absorption for capturing CO₂ in a subcritical coal power plant[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 46: 18-27.
28	Wang Z, Li L L, Zhang G Q. Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of hydrogen production via chemical looping combustion thermally coupled steam reforming[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 179: 335-346.
29	Petrescu L, Cormos C C. Environmental assessment of IGCC power plants with pre-combustion CO₂ capture by chemical & calcium looping methods[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 158: 233-244.
30	Petrescu L, Cormos C C. Waste reduction algorithm applied for environmental impact assessment of coal gasification with carbon capture and storage[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 104: 220-235.
31	范峻铭. 化石燃料化学链燃烧能量系统评价方法与全生命周期研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2019.
	Fan J M. Assessment method and study of life-cycle assessment of fossil fuel driven chemical looping combustion energy system[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019.
32	Cheng Z, Qin L, Fan J A, et al. New insight into the development of oxygen carrier materials for chemical looping systems[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 343-351.
33	Protasova L, Snijkers F. Recent developments in oxygen carrier materials for hydrogen production via chemical looping processes[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 75-93.
34	Luo S W, Zeng L, Fan L S. Chemical looping technology: oxygen carrier characteristics[J]. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2015, 6: 53-75.
35	Matzen M, Pinkerton J, Wang X M, et al. Use of natural ores as oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion: a review[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 65: 1-14.
36	Dean C C, Blamey J, Florin N H, et al. The calcium looping cycle for CO₂ capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2011, 89(6): 836-855.
37	Bahzad H, Katayama K, Boot-Handford M E, et al. Iron-based chemical-looping technology for decarbonising iron and steel production[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 91: 102766.
38	宋国良. 循环流化床单床与双床煤气化特性分析[C]// 中国工程热物理学会2008年燃烧学学术会议论文集. 西安: 中国工程热物理学会, 2008.
	Song G L. Analysis of coal gasification characteristics in the single and dual fluidized beds [C]//Proceedings of the 2008 Chinese Society of Engineering Thermophysics Combustion academic Conference. Xi'an: CSET, 2008.
39	Zhu X, Imtiaz Q, Donat F, et al. Chemical looping beyond combustion—a perspective[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(3): 772-804.
40	Lyngfelt A, Leckner B, Mattisson T. A fluidized-bed combustion process with inherent CO₂ separation; application of chemical-looping combustion[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(10): 3101-3113.
41	Nandy A, Loha C, Gu S, et al. Present status and overview of chemical looping combustion technology[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 59: 597-619.
42	Lyngfelt A, Brink A, Langørgen Ø, et al. 11, 000 h of chemical-looping combustion operation—where are we and where do we want to go?[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 88: 38-56.
43	Li D Y, Xu R D, Gu Z H, et al. Chemical-looping conversion of methane: a review[J]. Energy Technology, 2020, 8(8): 1900925.
44	Zheng M, Shen L H, Feng X Q. In situ gasification chemical looping combustion of a coal using the binary oxygen carrier natural anhydrite ore and natural iron ore[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 83: 270-283.
45	Adánez J, Abad A, Mendiara T, et al. Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 65: 6-66.
46	Imtiaz Q, Hosseini D, Müller C R. Review of oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU): thermodynamics, material development, and synthesis[J]. Energy Technology, 2013, 1(11): 633-647.
47	赵亚仙, 向文国, 陈时熠. 化学链高温空分制氧性能评价[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(4): 809-813.
	Zhao Y X, Xiang W G, Chen S Y. Performance evaluation of chemical looping air separation/oxygen production at high temperatures[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(4): 809-813.
48	赵亚仙, 谢文霞, 张军, 等. 化学链高温空分制氧与热力发电系统集成性能评价[J]. 发电设备, 2018, 32(3): 158-162.
	Zhao Y X, Xie W X, Zhang J, et al. Performance evaluation of a power plant system integrated with chemical looping air separation[J]. Power Equipment, 2018, 32(3): 158-162.
49	Huang Z, Zhang Y, Fu J J, et al. Chemical looping gasification of biomass char using iron ore as an oxygen carrier[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(40): 17871-17883.
50	Osman M, Zaabout A, Cloete S, et al. Internally circulating fluidized-bed reactor for syngas production using chemical looping reforming[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 377: 120076.
51	Bhavsar S, Veser G. Chemical looping beyond combustion: production of synthesis gas via chemical looping partial oxidation of methane[J]. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(88): 47254-47267.
52	Voitic G, Hacker V. Recent advancements in chemical looping water splitting for the production of hydrogen[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(100): 98267-98296.
53	Fan L, Li F X, Ramkumar S. Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes[J]. Particuology, 2008, 6(3): 131-142.
54	Abanades J C, Murillo R, Fernandez J R, et al. New CO₂ capture process for hydrogen production combining Ca and Cu chemical loops[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(17): 6901-6904.
55	Di Giuliano A, Gallucci K. Sorption enhanced steam methane reforming based on nickel and calcium looping: a review[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2018, 130: 240-252.
56	Weimer T, Berger R, Hawthorne C, et al. Lime enhanced gasification of solid fuels: examination of a process for simultaneous hydrogen production and CO₂ capture[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(8/9): 1678-1686.
57	Connell D P, Lewandowski D A, Ramkumar S, et al. Process simulation and economic analysis of the calcium looping process (CLP) for hydrogen and electricity production from coal and natural gas[J]. Fuel, 2013, 105: 383-396.
58	Lin S Y, Suzuki Y, Hatano H, et al. Developing an innovative method, HyPr-RING, to produce hydrogen from hydrocarbons[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2002, 43(9/10/11/12): 1283-1290.
59	葛蔚, 刘新华, 任瑛, 等. 从多尺度到介尺度: 复杂化工过程模拟的新挑战[J]. 化工学报, 2010, 61(7): 1613-1620.
	Ge W, Liu X H, Ren Y, et al. From multi-scale to meso-scale: new challenges for simulation of complex processes in chemical engineering[J]. CIESC Journal, 2010, 61(7): 1613-1620.
60	李静海, 胡英, 袁权. 探索介尺度科学: 从新角度审视老问题[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 2014, 44(3): 277-281.
	Li J H, Hu Y, Yuan Q. Mesoscience: exploring old problems from a new angle[J]. Scientia Sinica (Chimica), 2014, 44(3): 277-281.
61	Bidwe A R, Hawthorne C, Yu X Z, et al. Cold model study of a dual fluidized bed system for the gasification of solid fuels[J]. Fuel, 2014, 127: 151-160.
62	Song T, Shen L H. Review of reactor for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76: 92-110.
63	Xu D K, Zhang Y T, Hsieh T L, et al. A novel chemical looping partial oxidation process for thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 222: 119-131.
64	Schmitz M, Linderholm C J. Performance of calcium manganate as oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion of biochar in a 10 kW pilot[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 169: 729-737.
65	Markström P, Linderholm C, Lyngfelt A. Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels — design and operation of a 100 kW unit with bituminous coal[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 15: 150-162.
66	Berdugo V T, Lind F, Rydén M, et al. Experience of more than 1000 h of operation with oxygen carriers and solid biomass at large scale[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 190: 1174-1183.
67	Acharya B, Dutta A, Basu P. Circulating-fluidized-bed-based calcium-looping gasifier: experimental studies on the calcination-carbonation cycle[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(25): 8652-8660.
68	Udomsirichakorn J, Basu P, Abdul Salam P, et al. CaO-based chemical looping gasification of biomass for hydrogen-enriched gas production with in situ CO₂ capture and tar reduction[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 127: 7-12.
69	Acharya B, Dutta A, Basu P. Chemical-looping gasification of biomass for hydrogen-enriched gas production with in-process carbon dioxide capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(10): 5077-5083.
70	Lu D Y, Hughes R W, Anthony E J. Ca-based sorbent looping combustion for CO₂ capture in pilot-scale dual fluidized beds[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(12): 1386-1395.
71	Donat F, Hu W, Scott S A, et al. On the distribution of residence times of solids in a circulating fluidised bed reactor for chemical looping combustion[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
72	Baek J, Kim U, Jo H, et al. Chemical looping combustion development in korea development of ambient pressure CLC technology[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
73	Seo M W, Nguyen T D B, Lim Y I, et al. Solid circulation and loop-seal characteristics of a dual circulating fluidized bed: experiments and CFD simulation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 168(2): 803-811.
74	Rifflart S, Hoteit A, Yazdanpanah M M, et al. Construction and operation of a 10 kW CLC unit with circulation configuration enabling independent solid flow control[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 333-340.
75	Medrano J A, Spallina V, Battistella A. Development of a 2 kW·h chemical-looping reforming reactor with integrated selective metallic-supported Pd membranes for highly efficient in-situ pure H₂ production and CO₂ capture[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
76	Lin S Y, Saito T, Hashimoto K. Development of the three-tower chemical looping coal combustion technology[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 414-418.
77	Lim S, Yamaguchi D, Tang L, et al. Evaluation of chemical looping combustion behavior using Victorian brown coal with ilmenite[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Utah, 2018: 24-27.
78	Rajendran S, Wong M, Stokie D, et al. Performance of a Victorian brown coal and iron ore during chemical looping combustion in a 10 kW_th alternating fluidized bed[J]. Fuel, 2016, 183: 245-252.
79	Pikkarainen T, Hiltunen I, Teir S. Piloting of bio-CLC for BECCS[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
80	Langørgen Ø, Saanum I, Haugen N E L. Performance of a 150 kW chemical looping combustion reactor system for gaseous fuels using a copper-based oxygen carrier[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing,2016.
81	Abad A, Adánez-Rubio I, Gayán P, et al. Demonstration of chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) process in a 1.5 kW_th continuously operating unit using a Cu-based oxygen-carrier[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 6: 189-200.
82	Abanades J C, Alonso M, Rodríguez N, et al. Capturing CO₂ from combustion flue gases with a carbonation calcination loop. Experimental results and process development[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 1147-1154.
83	Abad A, Pérez-Vega R, de Diego L F, et al. Design and operation of a 50 kW_th chemical looping combustion (CLC) unit for solid fuels[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 157: 295-303.
84	Alonso M, Diego M E, Pérez C, et al. Biomass combustion with in situ CO₂ capture by CaO in a 300 kW_th circulating fluidized bed facility[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 29: 142-152.
85	Diego M E, Alonso M. Operational feasibility of biomass combustion with in situ CO₂ capture by CaO during 360 h in a 300 kW_th calcium looping facility[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 325-329.
86	Diego M E, Arias B, Méndez A, et al. Experimental testing of a sorbent reactivation process in La Pereda 1.7 MW_th calcium looping pilot plant[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 50: 14-22.
87	Wang W, Ramkumar S, Li S G, et al. Subpilot demonstration of the carbonation-calcination reaction (CCR) process: high-temperature CO₂ and sulfur capture from coal-fired power plants[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(11): 5094-5101.
88	Whitty K J, Lighty J S, Fry A. Development and scale-up of copper-based chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
89	Siriwardane R, Riley J, Bayham S, et al. 50-kW_th methane/air chemical looping combustion tests with commercially prepared CuO-Fe₂O₃-alumina oxygen carrier with two different techniques[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 213: 92-99.
90	Andrus H E, Chiu J H, Edberg C D, et al. Alstom's chemical looping combustion prototype for CO₂ capture from existing pulverized coal-fired power plants[R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 2012.
91	Soukup G, Pfeifer C, Kreuzeder A, et al. In situ CO₂ capture in a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier-bed material and fuel variation[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 32(3): 348-354.
92	Aghaalikhani A, Schmid J C, Borello D, et al. Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 703-718.
93	Fuchs J, Müller S, Schmid J C, et al. A kinetic model of carbonation and calcination of limestone for sorption enhanced reforming of biomass[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 90: 102787.
94	Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Rauch R, et al. H₂ rich product gas by steam gasification of biomass with in situ CO₂ absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 8 MW fuel input[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(7/8): 914-921.
95	Kraft S, Kuba M, Hofbauer H. The behavior of biomass and char particles in a dual fluidized bed gasification system[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 338: 887-897.
96	Stollhof M, Penthor S, Mayer K, et al. Influence of the loop seal fluidization on the operation of a fluidized bed reactor system[J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 352: 422-435.
97	Ströhle J, Orth M, Epple B. Chemical looping combustion of hard coal in a 1 MW_th pilot plant using ilmenite as oxygen carrier[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 157: 288-294.
98	Thon A, Kramp M, Hartge E U, et al. Operational experience with a system of coupled fluidized beds for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels using ilmenite as oxygen carrier[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 118: 309-317.
99	Armbrust N, Duelli (Varela) G, Dieter H, et al. Calcium looping cycle for hydrogen production from biomass gasification syngas: experimental investigation at a 20 kW_th dual fluidized-bed facility[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(21): 5624-5634.
100	Hawthorne C, Poboss N, Dieter H, et al. Operation and results of a 200-kW_th dual fluidized bed pilot plant gasifier with adsorption-enhanced reforming[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2012, 2(3): 217-227.
101	Zeng J M, Xiao R, Zeng D W, et al. High H₂/CO ratio syngas production from chemical looping gasification of sawdust in a dual fluidized bed gasifier[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(3): 1764-1770.
102	Shen L H, Wu J H, Gao Z P, et al. Characterization of chemical looping combustion of coal in a 1 kW_th reactor with a nickel-based oxygen carrier[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(5): 934-942.
103	Shen L H, Wu J H, Xiao J. Experiments on chemical looping combustion of coal with a NiO based oxygen carrier[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(3): 721-728.
104	Gu H M, Shen L H, Zhang S W, et al. Enhanced fuel conversion by staging oxidization in a continuous chemical looping reactor based on iron ore oxygen carrier[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 334: 829-836.
105	Yan J C, Shen L H, Jiang S X, et al. Combustion performance of sewage sludge in a novel CLC system with a two-stage fuel reactor[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(11): 12570-12581.
106	Ge H J, Shen L H, Feng F, et al. Experiments on biomass gasification using chemical looping with nickel-based oxygen carrier in a 25 kW_th reactor[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 85: 52-60.
107	Xiao R, Chen L Y, Saha C, et al. Pressurized chemical-looping combustion of coal using an iron ore as oxygen carrier in a pilot-scale unit[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 10: 363-373.
108	Wang X D, Wang X J, Kong Z W, et al. Auto-thermal operation and optimization of coal-fueled separated gasification chemical looping combustion in a pilot-scale unit[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383: 123159.
109	Shao Y L, Agarwal R K, Wang X D, et al. Numerical simulation of a 3D full loop iG-CLC system including a two-stage counter-flow moving bed air reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 217: 115502.
110	Liu Y J, Chen S Y, Zhu M, et al. Investigation of a dual cold-flow fluidized bed for calcium looping gasification process[J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 353: 10-19.
111	Ma J C, Zhao H B, Tian X, et al. Chemical looping combustion of coal in a 5 kW_th interconnected fluidized bed reactor using hematite as oxygen carrier[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 157: 304-313.
112	Ma J, Zhao H, Niu P, et al. Design and operation of a 50 kW_th chemical looping combustion (CLC) reactor using coal as fuel[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, 2016.
113	Wei G Q, He F, Huang Z, et al. Continuous operation of a 10 kW_th chemical looping integrated fluidized bed reactor for gasifying biomass using an iron-based oxygen carrier[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(1): 233-241.
114	Cheng M, Li Y, Li Z S, et al. An integrated fuel reactor coupled with an annular carbon stripper for coal-fired chemical looping combustion[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 320: 519-529.
115	Wang S Z, Wang G X, Jiang F, et al. Chemical looping combustion of coke oven gas by using Fe₂O₃/CuO with MgAl₂O₄ as oxygen carrier[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(9): 1353.
116	Feng Y, Wang Q, Fan H, et al. Experiment on chemical looping gasification on dual circulating fluidized bed system with biomass and lignite[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Utah,2018.
117	Chang M H, Huang C M, Liu W H, et al. Design and experimental investigation of calcium looping process for 3-kW_th and 1.9-MW_th facilities[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2013, 36(9): 1525-1532.
118	Chang M H, Chen W C, Huang C M, et al. Design and experimental testing of a 1.9 MW_th calcium looping pilot plant[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2100-2108.
119	Wang D, Chen S Y, Xu C C, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of a new hydrogen-fueled power plant based on calcium looping process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(13): 5389-5400.
120	Chen S Y, Wang D, Xue Z P, et al. Calcium looping gasification for high-concentration hydrogen production with CO₂ capture in a novel compact fluidized bed: simulation and operation requirements[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(8): 4887-4899.
121	Xue Z P, Chen S Y, Wang D, et al. Design and fluid dynamic analysis of a three-fluidized-bed reactor system for chemical-looping hydrogen generation[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(11): 4267-4278.
122	Harris A T, Davidson J F, Thorpe R B. The influence of the riser exit on the particle residence time distribution in a circulating fluidised bed riser[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(16): 3669-3680.
123	van der Meer E H, Thorpe R B, Davidson J F. Flow patterns in the square cross-section riser of a circulating fluidised bed and the effect of riser exit design[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(19): 4079-4099.
124	Wang S D, Yang S J, Zhao K, et al. Influence of exit configuration on the hydrodynamic behaviors of a high-density circulating fluidized bed riser[C]//2011 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference. Wuhan, China: IEEE, 2011: 1-5.
125	李佳瑶. 高密度循环流化床内气固两相流动的模拟研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2016.
	Li J Y. Numerical simulation of gas-solid two-phase flow in high density circulating fluidized bed[D]. Beijing: ChinaUniversity of Petroleum, 2016.
126	Rydén M, Arjmand M. Continuous hydrogen production via the steam-iron reaction by chemical looping in a circulating fluidized-bed reactor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(6): 4843-4854.
127	Siriwardane R V, Fan Y Y. Tri-metallic ferrite oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion: US9797594[P]. 2017-10-24.
128	Lyngfelt A, Linderholm C. Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels — status and recent progress[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 371-386.
129	Kramp M, Thon A, Hartge E U, et al. Carbon stripping — a critical process step in chemical looping combustion of solid fuels[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2012, 35(3): 497-507.
130	Rowe P N, Nienow A W. Particle mixing and segregation in gas fluidised beds: a review[J]. Powder Technology, 1976, 15(2): 141-147.
131	Wirsum M, Fett F, Iwanowa N, et al. Particle mixing in bubbling fluidized beds of binary particle systems[J]. Powder Technology, 2001, 120(1/2): 63-69.
132	Yang X, Ma Z R, Liang Z W, et al. Hydrodynamic characteristics in a cold model of the dual fluidized bed with mixed particles[J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 351: 291-304.
133	Sun H M, Cheng M, Chen D G, et al. Experimental study of a carbon stripper in solid fuel chemical looping combustion[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(35): 8743-8753.
134	Liu Y J, Sun Z, Toan S, et al. Investigations on fluid dynamics of binary particles in a dual fluidized bed reactor system for enhanced calcium looping gasification process[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 361: 803-811.
135	Cheng M, Sun H M, Li Z S, et al. Annular carbon stripper for chemical-looping combustion of coal[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(6): 1580-1593.
136	Chen X, Ma J C, Tian X, et al. Numerical investigation on the improvement of carbon conversion in a dual circulating fluidized bed reactor for chemical looping combustion of coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(12): 12801-12813.
137	Chen X, Ma J C, Tian X, et al. CPFD simulation and optimization of a 50 kW_th dual circulating fluidized bed reactor for chemical looping combustion of coal[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 90: 102800.
138	Chung C, Qin L, Shah V, et al. Chemically and physically robust, commercially-viable iron-based composite oxygen carriers sustainable over 3000 redox cycles at high temperatures for chemical looping applications[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(11): 2318-2323.
139	Shah K, Moghtaderi B, Wall T. Selection of suitable oxygen carriers for chemical looping air separation: a thermodynamic approach[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(4): 2038-2045.
140	Lyngfelt A. Chemical looping combustion: status and development challenges[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(8): 9077-9093.

文献	床型	热功率/kW_th	文献	床型	热功率/kW_th
[64]	鼓泡床，快速床	10	[4]	快速床，喷动床	50
[65]	快速床，循环流化床	100	[90]	快速床，循环流化床	3000
[66]	鼓泡床，循环流化床	4000	[91-93]	快速床，循环流化床	100
[67-69]	鼓泡床，快速床	12	[94-95]	鼓泡床，快速床	8000
[70]	快速床，快速床	75	[96]	快速床，循环流化床	10000
[71]	鼓泡床，快速床	8	[97]	快速床，快速床	1000~20000
[72]	快速床，快速床	50	[98]	多层鼓泡床，快速床	25
[72]	快速床，快速床	200	[99]	鼓泡床，快速床	20
[73]	鼓泡床，快速床	—	[100]	鼓泡床，快速床	200
[74]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床，鼓泡床	10	[101]	鼓泡床，快速床	0.6
[75]	鼓泡床，快速床，过滤膜	2	[102-103]	喷动床，快速床	1~10
[76]	移动床，鼓泡床，快速床	100~1000	[104]	喷动床，鼓泡床，快速床	2
[77]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床	10	[105]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床，快速床	5
[78]	鼓泡床	10	[106]	鼓泡床，快速床	25
[79]	移动床，快速床	10~50	[107]	鼓泡床，快速床	100
[80]	快速床，快速床	150	[108]	移动床，快速床，鼓泡床	—
[81]	移动床，快速床	1.5	[109]	移动床，快速床，鼓泡床	—
[82]	快速床，快速床	30	[110]	快速床，鼓泡床，快速床	10
[83]	快速床，快速床	50	[111]	快速床，快速床	5
[84-85]	快速床，快速床	300	[112]	快速床，快速床	50
[86]	快速床，快速床	1700	[113]	鼓泡床，快速床	10
[63]	移动床，快速床	25	[114]	快速床，下行床，鼓泡床，快速床	30
[87]	快速床，回转床	120	[115]	鼓泡床，快速床	10
[88]	快速床，循环流化床	10	[116]	快速床，快速床	—
[88]	快速床，循环流化床	200	[117]	移动床，回转床	3
[89]	多层鼓泡床，快速床	50	[118]	移动床，回转床	1900

文献	床型	热功率/kW_th	文献	床型	热功率/kW_th
[64]	鼓泡床，快速床	10	[4]	快速床，喷动床	50
[65]	快速床，循环流化床	100	[90]	快速床，循环流化床	3000
[66]	鼓泡床，循环流化床	4000	[91-93]	快速床，循环流化床	100
[67-69]	鼓泡床，快速床	12	[94-95]	鼓泡床，快速床	8000
[70]	快速床，快速床	75	[96]	快速床，循环流化床	10000
[71]	鼓泡床，快速床	8	[97]	快速床，快速床	1000~20000
[72]	快速床，快速床	50	[98]	多层鼓泡床，快速床	25
[72]	快速床，快速床	200	[99]	鼓泡床，快速床	20
[73]	鼓泡床，快速床	—	[100]	鼓泡床，快速床	200
[74]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床，鼓泡床	10	[101]	鼓泡床，快速床	0.6
[75]	鼓泡床，快速床，过滤膜	2	[102-103]	喷动床，快速床	1~10
[76]	移动床，鼓泡床，快速床	100~1000	[104]	喷动床，鼓泡床，快速床	2
[77]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床	10	[105]	鼓泡床，鼓泡床，快速床	5
[78]	鼓泡床	10	[106]	鼓泡床，快速床	25
[79]	移动床，快速床	10~50	[107]	鼓泡床，快速床	100
[80]	快速床，快速床	150	[108]	移动床，快速床，鼓泡床	—
[81]	移动床，快速床	1.5	[109]	移动床，快速床，鼓泡床	—
[82]	快速床，快速床	30	[110]	快速床，鼓泡床，快速床	10
[83]	快速床，快速床	50	[111]	快速床，快速床	5
[84-85]	快速床，快速床	300	[112]	快速床，快速床	50
[86]	快速床，快速床	1700	[113]	鼓泡床，快速床	10
[63]	移动床，快速床	25	[114]	快速床，下行床，鼓泡床，快速床	30
[87]	快速床，回转床	120	[115]	鼓泡床，快速床	10
[88]	快速床，循环流化床	10	[116]	快速床，快速床	—
[88]	快速床，循环流化床	200	[117]	移动床，回转床	3
[89]	多层鼓泡床，快速床	50	[118]	移动床，回转床	1900

[1]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[2]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[3]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[4]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[5]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[6]	王泽栋, 石至平, 刘丽艳. 考虑气泡非均匀耗散的矩形反应器声流场数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1965-1973.
[7]	杨星宇, 马优, 朱春英, 付涛涛, 马友光. 梳状并行微通道内液液分布规律研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 698-706.
[8]	章承浩, 罗京, 张吉松. 微反应器内基于氮氧自由基催化剂连续氧气/空气氧化反应的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 511-524.
[9]	张梦波, 楼琳瑾, 冯艺荣, 郑雨婷, 张浩淼, 王靖岱, 阳永荣. 烷基铝氧烷合成技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 525-534.
[10]	谢煜, 张民, 胡卫国, 王玉军, 骆广生. 利用膜分散微反应器高效溶解D-7-ACA的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 748-755.
[11]	付家崴, 陈帅帅, 方凯伦, 蒋新. 微反应器共沉淀反应制备铜锰催化剂[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 776-783.
[12]	孙嘉辰, 裴春雷, 陈赛, 赵志坚, 何盛宝, 巩金龙. 化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 205-223.
[13]	刘坤, 尹远, 耿文强, 夏昊天. 不同操作参数下介质阻挡放电的固氮性能研究及机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4045-4053.
[14]	袁妮妮, 郭拓, 白红存, 何育荣, 袁永宁, 马晶晶, 郭庆杰. 化学链燃烧过程Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃载氧体表面CH₄反应：ReaxFF-MD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4054-4061.
[15]	张经纬, 周弋惟, 陈卓, 徐建鸿. 微反应器内的有机合成前沿进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3472-3482.