化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20221311

化工学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (1): 205-223.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20221311

化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术进展

孙嘉辰¹^,²(), 裴春雷¹^,², 陈赛¹^,², 赵志坚¹^,², 何盛宝³, 巩金龙¹^,²()

^1.天津大学化工学院，绿色合成与转化教育部重点实验室，天津 300072
^2.天津化学化工协同创新中心，天津 300072
^3.中国石油天然气股份有限公司石油化工研究院，北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-09-30 修回日期:2023-02-14 出版日期:2023-01-05 发布日期:2023-03-20
通讯作者: 巩金龙
作者简介:孙嘉辰（1994—），男，博士研究生，Jiachens@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFA1501302);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(22121004);国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(22122808);中石油科技部项目(2020A-4816)

Advances in chemical-looping oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes

Jiachen SUN¹^,²(), Chunlei PEI¹^,², Sai CHEN¹^,², Zhijian ZHAO¹^,², Shengbao HE³, Jinlong GONG¹^,²()

^1.Key Laboratory for Green Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
^2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering(Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, China
^3.Petrochemical Research Institute, PetroChina Company Limited, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-09-30 Revised:2023-02-14 Online:2023-01-05 Published:2023-03-20
Contact: Jinlong GONG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低碳烯烃生产能力是化工行业技术水平的重要标志。随着低碳烯烃市场需求的增加，新型高效的低碳烯烃生产工艺得到了广泛关注。化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术，通过载氧体中的晶格氧与反应物分子发生反应，实现烷烃分子向烯烃分子的选择性转化，可以提高烯烃产率，有效降低过程能耗和CO₂排放。本文针对化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术，深入分析了载氧体材料的筛选和理论设计、表面活性位和体相氧传输的调控机制、循环稳定性、载氧体的制备、化学链烷烃脱氢反应器和工艺设计优化等方向的研究现状和进展，并系统总结了未来化学链低碳烷烃脱氢技术及相关领域的发展趋势，为化学链烷烃脱氢领域的技术进步提供参考和借鉴。

关键词: 化学链, 载氧体, 氧化脱氢, 选择性氢燃烧, 低碳烷烃

Abstract:

The production capacity of light olefins can reflect the technology level of the chemical industry. With the growing market demand for light olefins, novel and efficient light olefin production processes have attracted extensive attention. With chemical-looping light alkane oxidative dehydrogenation technology, through the reaction of lattice oxygen in the oxygen carrier and reactant molecules, the selective conversion of alkane molecules to olefin molecules can be realized, which can increase the yield of olefins and effectively reduce the process energy consumption and CO₂ emission. This review analyzes the current research progress on the screening and theoretical design of oxygen carrier materials, the regulation mechanism of surface active sites and lattice oxygen transport in the bulk phase, and the optimization of reactors and processes for chemical-looping light alkane oxidative dehydrogenation technology. The future development trends of chemical-looping light alkane oxidative dehydrogenation technologies are systematically summarized to provide instructive perspectives for the advance of relevant technologies.

Key words: chemical-looping, oxygen carrier, oxidative dehydrogenation, selective hydrogen combustion, light alkanes

中图分类号:

TQ 511

孙嘉辰, 裴春雷, 陈赛, 赵志坚, 何盛宝, 巩金龙. 化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 205-223.

Jiachen SUN, Chunlei PEI, Sai CHEN, Zhijian ZHAO, Shengbao HE, Jinlong GONG. Advances in chemical-looping oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(1): 205-223.

图/表 13

参考文献 120

1	McCoy M. The case for saltigo[J]. Chemical & Engineering News, 2006, 84(11): 28.
2	Sattler J J H B, Ruiz-Martinez J, Santillan-Jimenez E, et al. Catalytic dehydrogenation of light alkanes on metals and metal oxides[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(20): 10613-10653.
3	Monai M, Gambino M, Wannakao S, et al. Propane to olefins tandem catalysis: a selective route towards light olefins production[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(20): 11503-11529.
4	Chen S, Chang X, Sun G D, et al. Propane dehydrogenation: catalyst development, new chemistry, and emerging technologies[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(5): 3315-3354.
5	Kung H H. Oxidative dehydrogenation of light (C₂ to C₄) alkanes[M]//Advances in Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 1-38.
6	Zhu X, Imtiaz Q, Donat F, et al. Chemical looping beyond combustion—a perspective[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(3): 772-804.
7	Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, et al. Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38(2): 215-282.
8	Tang M C, Xu L, Fan M H. Progress in oxygen carrier development of methane-based chemical-looping reforming: a review[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 151(1): 143-156.
9	He F, Huang Z, Wei G Q, et al. Biomass chemical-looping gasification coupled with water/CO₂-splitting using NiFe₂O₄ as an oxygen carrier[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 201(1): 112157.
10	Sun Z, Chen S Y, Hu J, et al. Ca₂Fe₂O₅: a promising oxygen carrier for CO/CH₄ conversion and almost-pure H₂ production with inherent CO₂ capture over a two-step chemical looping hydrogen generation process[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 211(1): 431-442.
11	Gao W B, Guo J P, Wang P K, et al. Production of ammonia via a chemical looping process based on metal imides as nitrogen carriers[J]. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(12): 1067-1075.
12	Zeng L, Cheng Z, Fan J A, et al. Metal oxide redox chemistry for chemical looping processes[J]. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2018, 2(11): 349-364.
13	Haribal V P, Neal L M, Li F X. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane under a cyclic redox scheme—process simulations and analysis[J]. Energy, 2017, 119(15): 1024-1035.
14	Dai Y H, Gao X, Wang Q J, et al. Recent progress in heterogeneous metal and metal oxide catalysts for direct dehydrogenation of ethane and propane[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(9): 5590-5630.
15	Gomez E, Yan B H, Kattel S, et al. Carbon dioxide reduction in tandem with light-alkane dehydrogenation[J]. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2019, 3(11): 638-649.
16	Wang Y L, Hu P, Yang J, et al. C—H bond activation in light alkanes: a theoretical perspective[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(7): 4299-4358.
17	Cavani F, Ballarini N, Cericola A. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane: how far from commercial implementation?[J]. Catalysis Today, 2007, 127(1/2/3/4): 113-131.
18	Callahan J L, Grasselli R K. A selectivity factor in vapor-phase hydrocarbon oxidation catalysis[J]. AIChE Journal, 1963, 9(6): 755-760.
19	Eastman A D, Kolts J H. Oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst: US4370259[P]. 1983-01-25.
20	Creaser D, Andersson B, Hudgins R R, et al. Cyclic operation of the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54(20): 4437-4448.
21	Vrieland G E, Khazai B, Murchison C B. Anaerobic oxidation of butane to butadiene over magnesium molybdate catalysts (Ⅱ): Magnesia alumina supported catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1996, 134(1): 123-145.
22	Grasselli R K, Stern D L, Tsikoyiannis J G. Catalytic dehydrogenation (DH) of light paraffins combined with selective hydrogen combustion (SHC)[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1999, 189(1): 9-14.
23	Neal L M, Yusuf S, Sofranko J A, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane: a chemical looping approach[J]. Energy Technology, 2016, 4(10): 1200-1208.
24	Dudek R B, Gao Y F, Zhang J S, et al. Manganese‐containing redox catalysts for selective hydrogen combustion under a cyclic redox scheme[J]. AIChE Journal, 2018, 64(8): 3141-3150.
25	Yusuf S, Neal L, Bao Z H, et al. Effects of sodium and tungsten promoters on Mg₆MnO₈-based core-shell redox catalysts for chemical looping-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(4): 3174-3186.
26	Ding W X, Zhao K, Jiang S C, et al. Alkali-metal enhanced LaMnO₃ perovskite oxides for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2021, 609(5): 117910-117918.
27	Tian X, Zheng C H, Li F X, et al. Co and Mo co-doped Fe₂O₃ for selective ethylene production via chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 9(23): 8002-8011.
28	Chan M S C, Baldovi H G, Dennis J S. Enhancing the capacity of oxygen carriers for selective oxidations through phase cooperation: bismuth oxide and ceria-zirconia[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, 8(3): 887-897.
29	Wang C J, Yang B, Gu Q Q, et al. Near 100% ethene selectivity achieved by tailoring dual active sites to isolate dehydrogenation and oxidation[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 5447.
30	Wang T, Gao Y, Liu Y, et al. Core-shell Na₂WO₄/CuMn₂O₄ oxygen carrier with high oxygen capacity for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. Fuel, 2021, 303(1): 121286.
31	Chen S, Pei C L, Chang X, et al. Coverage-dependent behaviors of vanadium oxides for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(49): 22072-22079.
32	Chen S, Zeng L, Mu R T, et al. Modulating lattice oxygen in dual-functional Mo-V-O mixed oxides for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(47): 18653-18657.
33	Jiang C G, Chang X, Wang X H, et al. Enhanced C—H bond activation by tuning the local environment of surface lattice oxygen of MoO₃ [J]. Chemical Science, 2022, 13(25): 7468-7474.
34	Novotný P, Yusuf S, Li F X, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using MoO₃/Fe₂O₃ catalysts in a cyclic redox mode[J]. Catalysis Today, 2018, 317(1): 50-55.
35	Li M, Gao Y F, Zhao K, et al. Mg-doped La_1.6Sr_0.4FeCoO₆ for anaerobic oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using surface-absorbed oxygen with tuned electronic structure[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 216(1): 106771-106780.
36	Gao Y F, Wang X J, Corolla N, et al. Alkali metal halide-coated perovskite redox catalysts for anaerobic oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane[J]. Science Advances, 2022, 8(30): eabo7343.
37	Gao Y F, Neal L M, Li F X. Li-promoted La _x Sr_2– _x FeO_4- _δ core-shell redox catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane under a cyclic redox scheme[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(11): 7293-7302.
38	Gao Y F, Haeri F, He F, et al. Alkali metal-promoted La _x Sr_2- _x FeO_4- _δ redox catalysts for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(3): 1757-1766.
39	Gao Y F, Wang X J, Liu J C, et al. A molten carbonate shell modified perovskite redox catalyst for anaerobic oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(17): eaaz9339.
40	Kang K H, Kim T H, Choi W C, et al. Dehydrogenation of propane to propylene over CrO _y -CeO₂-K₂O/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts: effect of cerium content[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2015, 72(5): 68-72.
41	Tian X, Zheng C H, Zhao H B. Ce-modified SrFeO_3- _δ for ethane oxidative dehydrogenation coupled with CO₂ splitting via a chemical looping scheme[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 303: 120894.
42	Dudek R B, Li F X. Selective hydrogen combustion as an effective approach for intensified chemical production via the chemical looping strategy[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 218: 106827.
43	Wang X J, Gao Y F, Krzystowczyk E, et al. High-throughput oxygen chemical potential engineering of perovskite oxides for chemical looping applications[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(4): 1512-1528.
44	Fan L S. Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation: Gasification, Reforming, and Chemical Syntheses[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017: 57-60.
45	Liu H Y, Wang B J, Fan M H, et al. Study on carbon deposition associated with catalytic CH₄ reforming by using density functional theory[J]. Fuel, 2013, 113: 712-718.
46	Wu T W, Yu Q B, Hou L M, et al. Selecting suitable oxygen carriers for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane by thermodynamic method[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, 140(4): 1837-1843.
47	Carrero C A, Schlögl R, Wachs I E, et al. Critical literature review of the kinetics for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over well-defined supported vanadium oxide catalysts[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(10): 3357-3380.
48	Zhao Z J, Chiu C C, Gong J L. Molecular understandings on the activation of light hydrocarbons over heterogeneous catalysts[J]. Chemical Science, 2015, 6(8): 4403-4425.
49	Zhao Z J, Liu S H, Zha S J, et al. Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2019, 4(12): 792-804.
50	Latimer A A, Kulkarni A R, Aljama H, et al. Understanding trends in C—H bond activation in heterogeneous catalysis[J]. Nature Materials, 2017, 16(2): 225-229.
51	Dickens C F, Montoya J H, Kulkarni A R, et al. An electronic structure descriptor for oxygen reactivity at metal and metal-oxide surfaces[J]. Surface Science, 2019, 681: 122-129.
52	Xiong C Y, Chen S, Yang P P, et al. Structure-performance relationships for propane dehydrogenation over aluminum supported vanadium oxide[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(7): 5816-5827.
53	Jiang C G, Song H B, Sun G, et al. Data-driven interpretable descriptors for the structure-activity relationship of surface lattice oxygen on doped vanadium oxides[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2022, 134(35): e202206758.
54	Idriss H, Barteau M A. Active sites on oxides: from single crystals to catalysts[M]// Advances in Catalysis. New York: Academic Press, 2000: 261-331.
55	Hao F, Gao Y F, Neal L, et al. Sodium tungstate-promoted CaMnO₃ as an effective, phase-transition redox catalyst for redox oxidative cracking of cyclohexane[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 385: 213-223.
56	Tian X, Dudek R B, Gao Y F, et al. Redox oxidative cracking of n-hexane with Fe-substituted barium hexaaluminates as redox catalysts[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2019, 9(9): 2211-2220.
57	Tsikoyiannis J G, Stern D L, Grasselli R K. Metal oxides as selective hydrogen combustion (SHC) catalysts and their potential in light paraffin dehydrogenation[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1999, 184(1): 77-86.
58	Wang J, Song Y H, Liu Z T, et al. Active and selective nature of supported CrO _x for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane with carbon dioxide[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 297(15): 120400.
59	Abello M C, Gomez M F, Ferretti O. Mo/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane: effect of Mo loading[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 207(1/2): 421-431.
60	Khodakov A, Yang J, Su S, et al. Structure and properties of vanadium oxide-zirconia catalysts for propane oxidative dehydrogenation[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1998, 177(2): 343-351.
61	Fukudome K, Ikenaga N O, Miyake T, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane using lattice oxygen of vanadium oxides on silica[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2011, 1(6): 987-998.
62	Wu T W, Yu Q B, Roghair I, et al. Chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane: a comparative study of Ga-based, Mo-based, V-based oxygen carriers[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2020, 157: 108137.
63	Novotný P, Yusuf S, Li F X, et al. MoO₃/Al₂O₃ catalysts for chemical-looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020, 152(4): 044713.
64	Wu T W, Yu Q B, Wang K, et al. Development of V-based oxygen carriers for chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane[J]. Catalysts, 2021, 11(1): 119.
65	Sim S, Gong S J, Bae J, et al. Chromium oxide supported on Zr modified alumina for stable and selective propane dehydrogenation in oxygen free moving bed process[J]. Molecular Catalysis, 2017, 436: 164-173.
66	Yu Z L, Yang Y Y, Yang S, et al. Iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping conversions: a review[J]. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2019, 2(1): 23-34.
67	Grant J T, Venegas J M, McDermott W P, et al. Aerobic oxidations of light alkanes over solid metal oxide catalysts[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(5): 2769-2815.
68	Zheng Y S, Zhang M, Li Q, et al. Electronic origin of oxygen transport behavior in La-based perovskites: a density functional theory study[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019, 123(1): 275-290.
69	Wang H F, Gong X Q, Guo Y L, et al. A model to understand the oxygen vacancy formation in Zr-doped CeO₂: electrostatic interaction and structural relaxation[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(23): 10229-10232.
70	Jiang X, Sharma L, Fung V, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene with soft oxidants via heterogeneous catalysis[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11(4): 2182-2234.
71	Chang H, Bjørgum E, Mihai O, et al. Effects of oxygen mobility in La-Fe-based perovskites on the catalytic activity and selectivity of methane oxidation[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2020, 10(6): 3707-3719.
72	Dai X P, Li R J, Yu C C, et al. Unsteady-state direct partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas in a fixed-bed reactor using AFeO₃ (A= La, Nd, Eu) perovskite-type oxides as oxygen storage[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(45): 22525-22531.
73	Qin L, Cheng Z, Fan J A, et al. Nanostructure formation mechanism and ion diffusion in iron-titanium composite materials with chemical looping redox reactions[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(21): 11302-11312.
74	Shafiefarhood A, Galinsky N, Huang Y, et al. Fe₂O₃@La _x Sr_1- _x FeO₃ core-shell redox catalyst for methane partial oxidation[J]. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(3): 790-799.
75	Hu J W, Galvita V V, Poelman H, et al. A core-shell structured Fe₂O₃/ZrO₂@ZrO₂ nanomaterial with enhanced redox activity and stability for CO₂ conversion[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2017, 17: 20-31.
76	Liu L, Zachariah M R. Enhanced performance of alkali metal doped Fe₂O₃ and Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃ composites as oxygen carrier material in chemical looping combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4977-4983.
77	Imtiaz Q, Kurlov A, Rupp J L M, et al. Highly efficient oxygen-storage material with intrinsic coke resistance for chemical looping combustion-based CO₂ capture[J]. ChemSusChem, 2015, 8(12): 2055-2065.
78	Hossain M M, de Lasa H I. Reactivity and stability of Co-Ni/Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier in multicycle CLC[J]. AIChE Journal, 2007, 53(7): 1817-1829.
79	Zhao H B, Liu L M, Wang B W, et al. Sol-gel-derived NiO/NiAl₂O₄ oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion by coal char[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22(2): 898-905.
80	Lambert A, Delquié C, Clémeneçon I, et al. Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Fe/Mn oxides for chemical looping combustion[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 375-381.
81	Wang S Z, Wang G X, Jiang F, et al. Chemical looping combustion of coke oven gas by using Fe₂O₃/CuO with MgAl₂O₄ as oxygen carrier[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(9): 1353-1360.
82	de Diego L F, Garcı́a-Labiano F, Adánez J, et al. Development of Cu-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(13): 1749-1757.
83	Zhao H B, Mei D F, Ma J, et al. Comparison of preparation methods for iron-alumina oxygen carrier and its reduction kinetics with hydrogen in chemical looping combustion[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2014, 9(4): 610-622.
84	Liu Y K, Long Y H, Tang Y Q, et al. Effect of preparation method on the structural characteristics of NiO-ZrO₂ oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion[J]. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2019, 35(6): 1024-1031.
85	Marin G B, Galvita V V, Yablonsky G S. Kinetics of chemical processes: from molecular to industrial scale[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 404: 745-759.
86	Iliuta I, Tahoces R, Patience G S, et al. Chemical-looping combustion process: kinetics and mathematical modeling[J]. AIChE Journal, 2010, 56(4): 1063-1079.
87	Khawam A, Flanagan D R. Solid-state kinetic models: basics and mathematical fundamentals[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(35): 17315-17328.
88	Hancock J D, Sharp J H. Method of comparing solid‐state kinetic data and its application to the decomposition of kaolinite, brucite, and BaCO₃ [J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1972, 55(2): 74-77.
89	Tian Y, Dudek R B, Westmoreland P R, et al. Effect of sodium tungstate promoter on the reduction kinetics of CaMn_0.9Fe_0.1O₃ for chemical looping-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 398(15): 125583.
90	Chen Y Y, Nadgouda S, Shah V, et al. Oxidation kinetic modelling of Fe-based oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications: impact of the topochemical effect[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 279(1): 115701.
91	Riley J, Siriwardane R, Tian H J, et al. Experimental and kinetic analysis for particle scale modeling of a CuO-Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier during reduction with H₂ in chemical looping combustion applications[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 228(15): 1515-1530.
92	Riley J, Siriwardane R, Tian H J, et al. Particle scale modeling of CuFeAlO₄ during reduction with CO in chemical looping applications[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 251(1): 113178.
93	Li Z, Cai J, Liu L. A first-principles microkinetic rate equation theory for heterogeneous reactions: application to reduction of Fe₂O₃ in chemical looping[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(43): 15514-15524.
94	Sokolov S, Bychkov V Y, Stoyanova M, et al. Effect of VO _x species and support on coke formation and catalyst stability in nonoxidative propane dehydrogenation[J]. ChemCatChem, 2015, 7(11): 1691-1700.
95	Al-Ghamdi S A, Hossain M M, de Lasa H I. Kinetic modeling of ethane oxidative dehydrogenation over VO _x /Al₂O₃ catalyst in a fluidized-bed riser simulator[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(14): 5235-5244.
96	Hossain M M. Kinetics of oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene using lattice oxygen of VO _x /CaO/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(15): 4309-4318.
97	Fan L S, Zeng L, Wang W, et al. Chemical looping processes for CO₂ capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion-prospect and opportunity[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(6): 7254-7280.
98	Joshi A, Shah V, Mohapatra P, et al. Chemical looping—a perspective on the next-gen technology for efficient fossil fuel utilization[J]. Advances in Applied Energy, 2021, 3(25): 100044.
99	Song T, Shen L H. Review of reactor for chemical looping combustion of solid fuels[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76: 92-110.
100	刘一君, 陈时熠, 胡骏, 等. 化学链反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2392-2412.
	Liu Y J, Chen S Y, Hu J, et al. Review on reactors for chemical looping process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(5): 2392-2412.
101	Darvishi A, Davand R, Khorasheh F, et al. Modeling-based optimization of a fixed-bed industrial reactor for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 24(5): 612-622.
102	Rostom S, de Lasa H. Propane oxidative dehydrogenation on vanadium-based catalysts under oxygen-free atmospheres[J]. Catalysts, 2020, 10(4): 418.
103	Fattahi M, Kazemeini M, Khorasheh F, et al. Fixed‐bed multi‐tubular reactors for oxidative dehydrogenation in ethylene process[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2013, 36(10): 1691-1700.
104	Kotanjac Ž S, van Sint Annaland M, Kuipers J A M. A packed bed membrane reactor for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane on a Ga₂O₃/MoO₃ based catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(1): 441-445.
105	Che-Galicia G, Ruiz-Martínez R S, López-Isunza F, et al. Modeling of oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene on a MoVTeNbO/TiO₂ catalyst in an industrial-scale packed bed catalytic reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 280(15): 682-694.
106	Chu B Z, Truter L, Alexander Nijhuis T A, et al. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene over phase-pure M1MoVNbTeO _x catalysts in a micro-channel reactor[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2015, 5(5): 2807-2813.
107	Rostom S, de Lasa H I. Propane oxidative dehydrogenation using consecutive feed injections and fluidizable VO _x /γ-Al₂O₃ and VO _x /ZrO₂-γAl₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(45): 13109-13124.
108	曾亮, 巩金龙. 化学链重整直接制氢技术进展[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(8): 2854-2862.
	Zeng L, Gong J L, Advances in chemical looping reforming for direct hydrogen production[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(8): 2854-2862.
109	Zaynali Y, Alavi-Amleshi S M. Comparative study of propane oxidative dehydrogenation in fluidized and fixed bed reactor[J]. Particulate Science and Technology, 2017, 35(6): 667-673.
110	Argyle M, Bartholomew C. Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review[J]. Catalysts, 2015, 5(1): 145-269.
111	Shen Q, Huang F, Tian M, et al. Effect of regeneration period on the selectivity of synthesis gas of Ba-hexaaluminates in chemical looping partial oxidation of methane[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 9(1): 722-731.
112	Park C, Hsieh T L, Pottimurthy Y, et al. Design and operations of a 15 kW_th subpilot unit for the methane-to-syngas chemical looping process with CO₂ utilization[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 59(15): 6886-6899.
113	韦迪, 喻俊杰, 邵媛媛, 等. 丙烷化学链氧化脱氢过程模拟与能耗分析[J]. 石油学报 (石油加工), 2020, 36(6): 1361-1369.
	Wei D, Yu J J, Shao Y Y, et al. Process simulation and energy consumption analysis of chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of propane[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2020, 36(6): 1361-1369.
114	Rostom S, de Lasa H. Downer fluidized bed reactor modeling for catalytic propane oxidative dehydrogenation with high propylene selectivity[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2019, 137: 87-99.
115	Brody L, Neal L, Liu J C, et al. Autothermal chemical looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane: redox catalyst performance, longevity, and process analysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2022, 36(17): 9736-9744.
116	Yusuf S, Haribal V, Jackson D, et al. Mixed iron-manganese oxides as redox catalysts for chemical looping-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane with tailorable heat of reactions[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 257(15): 117885.
117	Yüzbasi N S, Abdala P M, Imtiaz Q, et al. The effect of copper on the redox behaviour of iron oxide for chemical-looping hydrogen production probed by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(18): 12736-12745.
118	Huang Z, Gao N, Lin Y, et al. Exploring the migration and transformation of lattice oxygen during chemical looping with NiFe₂O₄ oxygen carrier[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 429(1): 132064.
119	Zichittella G, Polyhach Y, Tschaggelar R, et al. Quantification of redox sites during catalytic propane oxychlorination by operando EPR spectroscopy[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(7): 3596-3602.
120	Docherty S R, Rochlitz L, Payard P A, et al. Heterogeneous alkane dehydrogenation catalysts investigated via a surface organometallic chemistry approach[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(9): 5806-5822.

模式	载氧体	温度/℃	气相组成	转化率（H₂或C _n H₂_n₊₂）/%	选择性/%	文献
选择性氢燃烧	Na₂WO₄/CaMnO₃	850	40% H₂，40% C₂H₄，Ar平衡气（100 ml/L）	>85 (H₂)	~90	[24]
	Na₂WO₄/Mg₆MnO₈	850	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（4500 h^-1）	81.8（C₂H₄）	76.0	[25]
	Na₂WO₄/LaMnO₃	800	40% C₂H₄，Ar平衡气（3400 h^-1）	70（C₂H₆）	85	[26]
	Co_0.3Mo_0.7/Fe₂O₃	825	12.5% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（40 ml/min）	56.2（C₂H₆）	87.4	[27]
	Bi-Ce_0.75Zr_0.25O₂	550	2.5% C₂H₄，2.5% H₂，N₂平衡气（100 ml/min）	90（H₂）	—	[28]
	Ni-HY	600	10% C₂H₆, He平衡气（5100 h^-1）	18（C₂H₆）	97	[29]
	Na₂WO₄/CuMn₂O₄	720	10% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（50 ml/min）	58.8（C₂H₆）	86.4	[30]
氧化脱氢	V-TiO₂	500	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	~17（C₃H₈）	90	[31]
	MoVO _x -Al₂O₃	500	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	36（C₃H₈）	89	[32]
	H₃PMo₁₂O₄₀/Al₂O₃	450	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	~7（C₃H₈）	>90	[33]
	MoO _x -Fe₂O₃	600	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（1500 h^-1）	4.9（C₂H₆）	62.2	[34]
	Mg-La_1.6Sr_0.4FeCoO₆	725	40% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（10 ml/min）	52.9（C₂H₆）	89.4	[35]
	LiBr-La_0.8Sr_0.2FeO₃	500	80% C₄H₁₀，Ar平衡气（30 ml/min）	75.6（C₄H₁₀）	56.2	[36]
	Li₂O-La _x Sr_2-_x FeO_4-_δ	700	37.5% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（40 ml/min）	61（C₂H₆）	90	[37-38]
	Li₂CO₃-La_0.8Sr_0.2FeO₃	700	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（40 ml/min）	50（C₂H₆）	91	[39]
	Cr-Ce-K/Al₂O₃	630	50% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（17 ml/min）	57.5（C₃H₈）	78	[40]
	Ce-SrFeO₃	725	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（20 ml/min）	29（C₂H₆）	82	[41]

模式	载氧体	温度/℃	气相组成	转化率（H₂或C _n H₂_n₊₂）/%	选择性/%	文献
选择性氢燃烧	Na₂WO₄/CaMnO₃	850	40% H₂，40% C₂H₄，Ar平衡气（100 ml/L）	>85 (H₂)	~90	[24]
	Na₂WO₄/Mg₆MnO₈	850	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（4500 h^-1）	81.8（C₂H₄）	76.0	[25]
	Na₂WO₄/LaMnO₃	800	40% C₂H₄，Ar平衡气（3400 h^-1）	70（C₂H₆）	85	[26]
	Co_0.3Mo_0.7/Fe₂O₃	825	12.5% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（40 ml/min）	56.2（C₂H₆）	87.4	[27]
	Bi-Ce_0.75Zr_0.25O₂	550	2.5% C₂H₄，2.5% H₂，N₂平衡气（100 ml/min）	90（H₂）	—	[28]
	Ni-HY	600	10% C₂H₆, He平衡气（5100 h^-1）	18（C₂H₆）	97	[29]
	Na₂WO₄/CuMn₂O₄	720	10% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（50 ml/min）	58.8（C₂H₆）	86.4	[30]
氧化脱氢	V-TiO₂	500	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	~17（C₃H₈）	90	[31]
	MoVO _x -Al₂O₃	500	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	36（C₃H₈）	89	[32]
	H₃PMo₁₂O₄₀/Al₂O₃	450	19% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（21 ml/min）	~7（C₃H₈）	>90	[33]
	MoO _x -Fe₂O₃	600	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（1500 h^-1）	4.9（C₂H₆）	62.2	[34]
	Mg-La_1.6Sr_0.4FeCoO₆	725	40% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（10 ml/min）	52.9（C₂H₆）	89.4	[35]
	LiBr-La_0.8Sr_0.2FeO₃	500	80% C₄H₁₀，Ar平衡气（30 ml/min）	75.6（C₄H₁₀）	56.2	[36]
	Li₂O-La _x Sr_2-_x FeO_4-_δ	700	37.5% C₂H₆，N₂平衡气（40 ml/min）	61（C₂H₆）	90	[37-38]
	Li₂CO₃-La_0.8Sr_0.2FeO₃	700	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（40 ml/min）	50（C₂H₆）	91	[39]
	Cr-Ce-K/Al₂O₃	630	50% C₃H₈，N₂平衡气（17 ml/min）	57.5（C₃H₈）	78	[40]
	Ce-SrFeO₃	725	80% C₂H₆，Ar平衡气（20 ml/min）	29（C₂H₆）	82	[41]

名称	反应模型	微分形式f(x)=1/k_app×dx/dt	积分形式g(x)=k_app dt
F1	First-order or Avrami–Erofe’ev (n=1)	(1-x)	-ln(1-x)
F1.5	Three-halves order	(1-x)^3/2	2[(1-x)^-1/2-1]
F2	Second-order	(1-x)²	1/(1-x)-1
F3	Third-order	(1-x)³	(1/2)[(1-x)^-2-1]
R1	Zero-order	1	x
R2	Contracting area	2(1-x)^1/2	1-(1-x)^1/2
R3	Contracting volume	3(1-x)^2/3	1-(1-x)^1/3
D1	1-D diffusion	1/(2x)	x²
D2	2-D diﬀusion, Valensi equation	1/[-ln(1-x)]	(1-x)ln(1-x)+x
D3	3-D diffusion, Jander equation	3(1-x)^1/3/[2(1-x)^-1/3-1]	[1-(1-x)^1/3]²
D4	Ginstling-Brounshtein equation	3/[2(1-x)^-1/3-1]	1-2x/3-(1-x)^2/3
AE0.5	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=0.5)	(1/2)(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^-1	[-ln(1-x)]²
AE1.5	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=1.5)	(3/2)(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^1/3	[-ln(1-x)]^2/3
AE2	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=2)	2(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^1/2	[-ln(1-x)]^1/2
AE3	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=3)	3(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^2/3	[-ln(1-x)]^1/3

名称	反应模型	微分形式f(x)=1/k_app×dx/dt	积分形式g(x)=k_app dt
F1	First-order or Avrami–Erofe’ev (n=1)	(1-x)	-ln(1-x)
F1.5	Three-halves order	(1-x)^3/2	2[(1-x)^-1/2-1]
F2	Second-order	(1-x)²	1/(1-x)-1
F3	Third-order	(1-x)³	(1/2)[(1-x)^-2-1]
R1	Zero-order	1	x
R2	Contracting area	2(1-x)^1/2	1-(1-x)^1/2
R3	Contracting volume	3(1-x)^2/3	1-(1-x)^1/3
D1	1-D diffusion	1/(2x)	x²
D2	2-D diﬀusion, Valensi equation	1/[-ln(1-x)]	(1-x)ln(1-x)+x
D3	3-D diffusion, Jander equation	3(1-x)^1/3/[2(1-x)^-1/3-1]	[1-(1-x)^1/3]²
D4	Ginstling-Brounshtein equation	3/[2(1-x)^-1/3-1]	1-2x/3-(1-x)^2/3
AE0.5	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=0.5)	(1/2)(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^-1	[-ln(1-x)]²
AE1.5	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=1.5)	(3/2)(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^1/3	[-ln(1-x)]^2/3
AE2	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=2)	2(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^1/2	[-ln(1-x)]^1/2
AE3	Avrami-Erofe’ev (n=3)	3(1-x)[-ln(1-x)]^2/3	[-ln(1-x)]^1/3

[1]	周小文, 杜杰, 张战国, 许光文. 基于甲烷脉冲法的Fe₂O₃-Al₂O₃载氧体还原特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2611-2623.
[2]	袁妮妮, 郭拓, 白红存, 何育荣, 袁永宁, 马晶晶, 郭庆杰. 化学链燃烧过程Fe₂O₃/Al₂O₃载氧体表面CH₄反应：ReaxFF-MD模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(9): 4054-4061.
[3]	郭丹, 方雨洁, 许一寒, 李致远, 黄守莹, 王胜平, 马新宾. 乙烷和二氧化碳催化转化的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3406-3416.
[4]	王保文, 张港, 刘同庆, 李炜光, 王梦家, 林德顺, 马晶晶. CeO₂/CuFe₂O₄氧载体CH₄化学链重整耦合CO₂热催化还原研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(12): 5414-5426.
[5]	赵旭, 卜昌盛, 王昕晔, 张鑫, 程晓磊, 王乃继, 朴桂林. 铁基载氧体辅助无烟煤焦富氧燃烧动力学分析[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 384-392.
[6]	赵林洲, 郑燕娥, 李孔斋, 王亚明, 蒋丽红, 范浩熙, 王雅静, 祝星, 魏永刚. Ce_1-_xNi_xO_y氧载体在化学链甲烷重整耦合CO₂还原中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(8): 4371-4380.
[7]	刘一君, 陈时熠, 胡骏, 周威, 向文国. 化学链反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(5): 2392-2412.
[8]	蔡润夏, 李凡星. 复杂氧化物载氧体的调变策略及在过程强化中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(12): 6122-6130.
[9]	孙焱, 沈晓文, 许细薇, 蒋恩臣, 刘雪聪. 化学链耦合催化重整热解生物油制备合成气[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5607-5619.
[10]	丁鼎, 陆文多, 侯璐, 陆安慧. 纤维状BPO₄/SiO₂催化剂的制备及其丙烷氧化脱氢性能[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5590-5597.
[11]	仉利, 姚宗路, 赵立欣, 李志合, 易维明, 付鹏, 袁超. 生物质热化学转化提质及其催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3416-3427.
[12]	袁妮妮,白红存,安梅,胡修德,郭庆杰. 化学链过程中Cu低浓度掺杂改性Fe-基载氧体反应性能：实验与理论模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5294-5302.
[13]	苏迎辉,郑浩,张磊,曾亮. LaMn_1-_x_-_yFe_xCo_yO_3-_δ钙钛矿载氧体用于化学链部分氧化[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5265-5277.
[14]	吴志强, 张博, 杨伯伦. 生物质化学链转化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 2835-2853.
[15]	王璐璐, 宋涛, 张将, 段媛媛, 沈来宏. 10MW_th高硫石油焦化学链气化制合成气耦合硫磺回收新系统模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(6): 2279-2288.

化学链低碳烷烃氧化脱氢技术进展

Advances in chemical-looping oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 120

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价