物理法水处理技术

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210880

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (1): 59-72.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20210880

物理法水处理技术

付鹏波¹(),田金乙¹,吕文杰²,黄渊³,刘毅¹,卢浩²,杨强²,修光利¹,汪华林¹()

^1.华东理工大学资源与环境工程学院，化学工程联合国家重点实验室，上海 200237
^2.华东理工大学机械与动力工程学院，上海 200237
^3.上海大学环境与化学工程学院，上海 200444

收稿日期:2021-06-29 修回日期:2021-08-05 出版日期:2022-01-05 发布日期:2022-01-18
通讯作者: 汪华林
作者简介:付鹏波（1990—），男，博士，特聘副研究员，fupb@ecust.edu.cn
基金资助:
博士后创新人才支持计划项目(BX20200129);国家自然科学基金项目(52000073);中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M671030);国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFA0705800);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金

Physical water treatment technology

Pengbo FU¹(),Jinyi TIAN¹,Wenjie LYU²,Yuan HUANG³,Yi LIU¹,Hao LU²,Qiang YANG²,Guangli XIU¹,Hualin WANG¹()

^1.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
^2.School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
^3.School of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received:2021-06-29 Revised:2021-08-05 Online:2022-01-05 Published:2022-01-18
Contact: Hualin WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来我国的水环境和水生态得到了明显的改善，但仍然存在很多的问题，水污染治理形势依然相当严峻。物理分离由于可不加或少加化学、生物药剂，造成二次污染的风险小，被认为是清洁的水处理技术。突破常规以生化法为核心的矿化模式，构建以物理分离法为核心的资源化模式，可减少化学和生物药剂消耗、减排二次污染物，为我国水环境安全提供一条新路线。以市政污水、饮用水、工业水和海上油气开采生产水为例，介绍了物理法水处理技术的最新成果，从而为物理法变革性水处理技术提供新思路。

关键词: 废水, 污染, 废物处理, 回收, 物理法分离, 水污染控制

Abstract:

In recent years, China’s water environment and water ecology have been significantly improved, but there are still many problems, and the situation of water pollution control is still quite severe. Physical separation is considered to be a clean water treatment technology because it does not need to add chemical or biological agents, and the risk of secondary pollution is small. Breaking through the conventional mineralization model centered on biochemical methods and constructing the resource utilization model centered on physical separation methods can reduce the consumption of chemical or biological agents, reduce secondary pollutants, and provide a new route for the safety of water environment in China. This review takes municipal sewage, drinking water, industrial water, and offshore oil and gas production water as examples to introduce the latest achievements of physical water treatment technology, so as to provide new ideas for the innovative water treatment technology by physical methods.

Key words: waste water, pollution, waste treatment, recovery, physical separation, water pollution control

中图分类号:

X 52

付鹏波,田金乙,吕文杰,黄渊,刘毅,卢浩,杨强,修光利,汪华林. 物理法水处理技术[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(1): 59-72.

Pengbo FU,Jinyi TIAN,Wenjie LYU,Yuan HUANG,Yi LIU,Hao LU,Qiang YANG,Guangli XIU,Hualin WANG. Physical water treatment technology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(1): 59-72.

图/表 15

图1 美国能量消耗情况[8]

Fig.1 Energy consumption in the US [8]

图2 带旋流除污器的实际污水源热泵系统原理图[43]

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of actual sewage source heat pump system with hydrocyclone decontamination device[43]

图3 饮用水化学消毒产生有害甚至致癌或具有遗传毒性的副产物[46]

Fig.3 Chemical disinfection of drinking water produces harmful, even carcinogenic or genotoxic by-products[46]

图4 沸腾床分离器结构及原理示意图

Fig.4 Schematic diagram of the structure and principle of the fluidized bed separator

图5 50 m3/h沸腾床分离中试试验

Fig.5 50 m3/h pilot test of fluidized bed separation

图6 50 m3/h沸腾床分离中试标定数据

Fig.6 50 m3/h calibration data of fluidized bed separation pilot test

图7 400 m3/h沸腾床分离工业装置流程示意图

Fig.7 Schematic diagram of 400 m3/h fluidized bed separation industrial plant process

表 1 不同MTO急冷水净化技术对比

Table 1 Comparison of different MTO quench water purification technologies

技术名称	分离效率/%	压降/MPa	占地/m²	废水回用率/%	再生周期/h	设备投资（400 m³/h）/万元	操作及维护费用/（万元/年）
沸腾床分离	90～95	0.2～0.3	120～150	≥ 98	96～192	1200～1400	10～20
旋流分离	30～60	0.2～0.3	50～70	≥ 95	-	1000～1200	10～20
陶瓷膜分离	95～99	0.3～0.6	120～150	≥ 90	2～8	2800～3600	400～800
布袋过滤分离	40～70	0.2～0.5	120～150	≥ 90	3～5	1400～1800	200～400

图8 以物理法为主的煤化工废水处理变革性技术

Fig.8 Innovative technology for coal chemical wastewater treatment based on physical methods

图9 旋流场活性污泥自公转耦合释碳过程示意图

Fig.9 Schematic diagram of the carbon release process of activated sludge coupled with self-rotation and revolution in hydrocyclone

图10 HAO技术工程改造方案及装置照片

Fig.10 Engineering transformation plan and device photo of HAO technique

图11 以物理法为主的石化废水处理变革性技术

Fig.11 Innovative technology for petrochemical wastewater treatment based on physical methods

表 2 常见生产水处理技术分离精度

Table 2 Separation accuracy of common production water treatment technology

技术分类	设备类型	分离粒径极限/μm
重力分离	API分离器或撇油器	100~150
板块聚结	CPI分离器或错流分离器	30~50
增强聚结	填料式聚结器	10~15
气浮	溶气气浮或诱导气浮	10~20
离心分离	水力旋流器或离心机	12~20
介质过滤	核桃壳等介质过滤器	2
膜过滤	微滤超滤纳滤等	<1

图12 CFC技术在海上气田平台的应用及处理效果

Fig.12 Application and treatment effect of CFC technology on offshore gas field platform

图13 CFC技术在海上油田平台的应用及处理效果

Fig.13 Application and treatment effect of CFC technology on offshore oilfield platform

参考文献 75

1	Coghlan A. Five billion people face water shortages by 2050, warns UN[Z/OL]. The United Nations, 2018. .
2	International energy outlook2019—with projections to 2050[Z/OL]. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2019. .
3	侯立安, 吴明红, 席北斗, 等. 2019年水环境安全热点回眸[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(1): 215-228.
	Hou L A, Wu M H, Xi B D, et al. Hot spots of advances in water environmental safty in 2019: an overview[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(1): 215-228.
4	余忻, 黄悦, 张志果, 等. 水环境综合治理市场现状和发展形势分析[J]. 给水排水, 2020, 46(6): 85-88.
	Yu X, Huang Y, Zhang Z G, et al. Analysis of the market and development tendency of water environment comprehensive treatment[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2020,46(6): 85-88.
5	Roinas G, Mant C, Williams J B. Fate of hydrocarbon pollutants in source and non-source control sustainable drainage systems[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2014, 69(4):703-709.
6	Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7411): 294-303.
7	Calmano W. Topics of water sciences and technology[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2004, 11(2):126.
8	Sholl D S, Lively R P. Seven chemical separations to change the world[J]. Nature, 2016, 532(7600): 435-437.
9	曲久辉. 物理技术——值得关注的清洁水处理方法[J]. 给水排水, 2014, 50(4): 1.
	Qu J H. Physical technology—a clean water treatment method worth paying attention to[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2014, 50(4): 1.
10	Schaflinger U. Centrifugal separation of a mixture[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 1990, 6(5/6):213-249.
11	Al-Faqheri W, Thio T, Qasaimeh M A, et al. Particle/cell separation on microfluidic platforms based on centrifugation effect: a review[J]. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2017, 21(6):102.
12	Fu P B, Jiang X, Ma L, et al. Enhancement of PM_2.5 cyclone separation by droplet capture and particle sorting[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52: 11652-11659.
13	Fu P B, Wang F, Yang X J, et al. Inlet particle-sorting cyclone for the enhancement of PM_2.5 separation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(3): 1587-1594.
14	Pan J K, Shen Q S, Cui X, et al. Cyclones of different sizes and underflow leakage for aerosol particles separation enhancement[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 280:124379.
15	李洪懿, 陈可可, 翟丁, 等. 导电材料在膜分离领域中的应用[J]. 科技导报, 2015, 33(14): 18-23.
	Li H Y, Chen K K, Zhai D, et al. Applications of conductive materials in membrane separation industry[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2015, 33(14): 18-23.
16	Dou H Z, Xu M, Wang B Y, et al. Microporous framework membranes for precise molecule/ion separations[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(2): 986-1029.
17	Mohshim D F, Mukhtar H B, Man Z, et al. Latest development on membrane fabrication for natural gas purification: a review[J]. Journal of Engineering, 2013, 2013: 101764.
18	Li D K, Kou J, Sun C B, et al. The application of superconducting magnetic separation in copper-moly separation[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2019, 54(11): 1871-1878.
19	Yavuz C T, Prakash A, Mayo J T, et al. Magnetic separations: from steel plants to biotechnology[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(10): 2510-2521.
20	Yeap S P, Lim J K, Ooi B S, et al. Agglomeration, colloidal stability, and magnetic separation of magnetic nanoparticles: collective influences on environmental engineering applications[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2017, 19(11):368.
21	Li J, Zhang X, Fan W Y, et al. Dissolved organic matter dominating the photodegradation of free DNA bases in aquatic environments[J]. Water Research, 2020, 179:115885.
22	Liu B, Wu F, Deng N S. UV-light induced photodegradation of 17α-ethynylestradiol in aqueous solutions[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 98(1/2/3):311-316.
23	da Silva R G, Aquino Neto S, Kokoh K B, et al. Electroconversion of glycerol in alkaline medium: from generation of energy to formation of value-added products[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 351:174-182.
24	Menezes P W, Walter C, Hausmann J N, et al. Boosting water oxidation through in situ electroconversion of manganese gallide: an intermetallic precursor approach[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(46): 16569-16574.
25	Kobya M, Demirbas E, Parlak N U, et al. Treatment of cadmium and nickel electroplating rinse water by electrocoagulation[J]. Environmental Technology, 2010, 31(13):1471-1481.
26	Kobya M, Omwene P I, Ukundimana Z. Treatment and operating cost analysis of metalworking wastewaters by a continuous electrocoagulation reactor[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(2):103526.
27	Zodi S, Potier O, Michon C, et al. Removal of arsenic and COD from industrial wastewaters by electrocoagulation[J]. Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering, 2011, 1(1):55-65.
28	Luhovskyi O F, Gryshko I A, Bernyk I M. Enhancing the efficiency of ultrasonic wastewater disinfection technology[J]. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 40(2):95-101.
29	Blume T, Neis U. Improving chlorine disinfection of wastewater by ultrasound application[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 52(10/11):139-144.
30	Jin X, Li Z F, Zhao X, et al. Effect of ultrasound pre-treatment on ultraviolet disinfection in controlling bacterial photoreactivation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 347-353:2369-2374.
31	Oki T, Koyanaka S, Nishisu Y, et al. Advanced physical separation technology for rare metal recycling[J]. Resources Processing, 2011, 58(3):95-100.
32	Stea D, Foss N J, Christensen P H. Physical separation in the workplace: separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation[J]. European Management Journal, 2015, 33(6):462-471.
33	刘毅. AOH中碳源释放利用机制及应用[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2018.
	Liu Y. Experimental investigation on sludge disruption for organics release in AOH process using a hydrocyclone and its industrial application[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2018.
34	Lu H, Liu Y Q, Cai J B, et al. Treatment of offshore oily produced water: research and application of a novel fibrous coalescence technique[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178: 602-608.
35	汪华林. 液固旋流分离新技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2019.
	Wang H L. Advanced Hydrocyclone Technology for Liquid-Solid Separation [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2019.
36	Kennedy D, Norman C. So much more to know [J]. Science, 2005, 309(5731): 78-102.
37	陆夕云, 林建忠. 能否发展关于湍流动力学和颗粒材料运动学的综合理论?[J]. 科学通报, 2017, 62(11): 1115-1118.
	Lu X Y, Lin J Z. Can we develop a general theory of the dynamics of turbulent flows and the motion of granular materials?[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2017, 62(11): 1115-1118.
38	Qu J H, Wang H C, Wang K J, et al. Municipal wastewater treatment in China: development history and future perspectives[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1-7.
39	Shannon M A, Bohn P W, Elimelech M, et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades[J]. Nature, 2008, 452(7185): 301-310.
40	Kart J. Largest-ever USDA grant to grow vegetables with wastewater[Z/OL]. Forbes, 2018. .
41	van Ginkel S W, Igou T, Chen Y S. Energy, water and nutrient impacts of California-grown vegetables compared to controlled environmental agriculture systems in Atlanta, GA[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 122: 319-325.
42	Song T, Tian J Y, Ni L, et al. Experimental study on performance of a de-foulant hydrocyclone with different reflux devices for sewage source heat pump[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 149: 354-365.
43	Tian J Y, Ni L, Song T, et al. An overview of operating parameters and conditions in hydrocyclones for enhanced separations[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 206: 268-285.
44	Hao X D, Li J, van Loosdrecht M C M, et al. Energy recovery from wastewater: heat over organics[J]. Water Research, 2019, 161: 74-77.
45	Ni L, Tian J Y, Song T, et al. Optimizing geometric parameters in hydrocyclones for enhanced separations: a review and perspective[J]. Separation & Purification Reviews, 2019, 48(1): 30-51.
46	Diana M, Felipe-Sotelo M, Bond T. Disinfection byproducts potentially responsible for the association between chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer: a review[J]. Water Research, 2019, 162: 492-504.
47	Li X F, Mitch W A. Drinking water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and human health effects: multidisciplinary challenges and opportunities[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(4): 1681-1689.
48	Yang M T, Zhang X R, Liang Q H, et al. Application of (LC/)MS/MS precursor ion scan for evaluating the occurrence, formation and control of polar halogenated DBPs in disinfected waters: a review[J]. Water Research, 2019, 158: 322-337.
49	Thun M, Linet M S, Cerhan J R, et al. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
50	Crittenden J C, Trussell R R, Hand D W, et al. MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design[M]. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012.
51	Lv W J, Yang Q, Ma L, et al. Application of minihydrocyclones in methanol-to-olefin process wastewater treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2015, 38(3):504-510.
52	Yang Q, Lv W J, Shi L, et al. Treating methanol-to-olefin quench water by minihydrocyclone clarification and steam stripper purification[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2015, 38(3):547-552.
53	Yang Q, Li Z M, Lv W J, et al. On the laboratory and field studies of removing fine particles suspended in wastewater using mini-hydrocyclone[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 110:93-100.
54	Chen J Q, Wang L, Ma S H, et al. Separation of fine waste catalyst particles from methanol-to-olefin quench water via swirl regenerating micro-channel separation (SRMS): a pilot-scale study[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 152: 108-116.
55	Liu Y, Wang H L, Xu Y X, et al. Achieving enhanced denitrification via hydrocyclone treatment on mixed liquor recirculation in the anoxic/aerobic process[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 189: 206-212.
56	Sun Y X, Liu Y, Zhang Y H, et al. Hydrocyclone-induced pretreatment for sludge solubilization to enhance anaerobic digestion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 374: 1364-1372.
57	Xu Y X, Fang Y Y, Wang Z H, et al. In-situ sludge reduction and carbon reuse in an anoxic/oxic process coupled with hydrocyclone breakage[J]. Water Research, 2018, 141: 135-144.
58	蔡敬伟, 屠佳樱. 我国发展海洋资源开发装备的机遇和挑战[J]. 中国船检, 2018 (9): 68-71.
	Cai J W, Tu J Y. Opportunities and challenges for our country’s development of marine resources development equipment[J]. China Ship Survey, 2018 (9): 68-71.
59	周守为, 李清平, 朱海山, 等. 海洋能源勘探开发技术现状与展望[J]. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(2): 19-31.
	Zhou S W, Li Q P, Zhu H S, et al. The current state and future of offshore energy exploration and development technology[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2016, 18(2): 19-31.
60	Zheng J S, Chen B, Thanyamanta W, et al. Offshore produced water management: a review of current practice and challenges in harsh/Arctic environments[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2016, 104(1/2): 7-19.
61	Igunnu E T, Chen G Z. Produced water treatment technologies[J]. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 2014, 9(3): 157-177.
62	Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah L C, et al. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 170(2/3): 530-551.
63	Multon L M, Viraraghavan T. Removal of oil from produced water by coalescence/filtration in a granular bed[J]. Environmental Technology, 2006, 27(5): 529-544.
64	Kharoua N, Khezzar L, Nemouchi Z. Hydrocyclones for de-oiling applications—a review[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2010, 28(7): 738-755.
65	Anlauf H. Recent developments in centrifuge technology[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2007, 58(2): 242-246.
66	Rubio J, Souza M L, Smith R W. Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2002, 15(3): 139-155.
67	Srinivasan A, Viraraghavan T. Removal of oil by walnut shell media[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(17): 8217-8220.
68	Padaki M, Surya Murali R, Abdullah M S, et al. Membrane technology enhancement in oil-water separation. A review[J]. Desalination, 2015, 357: 197-207.
69	Weschenfelder S E, Louvisse A M T, Borges C P, et al. Evaluation of ceramic membranes for oilfield produced water treatment aiming reinjection in offshore units[J]. Journal of petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 131: 51-57.
70	Weschenfelder S E, Fonseca M J C, Borges C P, et al. Application of ceramic membranes for water management in offshore oil production platforms: process design and economics[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 171: 214-220.
71	Dickhout J M, Moreno J, Biesheuvel P M, et al. Produced water treatment by membranes: a review from a colloidal perspective[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 487: 523-534.
72	Adham S, Hussain A, Minier-Matar J, et al. Membrane applications and opportunities for water management in the oil & gas industry[J]. Desalination, 2018, 440: 2-17.
73	Lu H, Xu X, Xie L S, et al. Deformation and crawling of oil drop on solid substrates by shearing liquid[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 195: 720-729.
74	Lu H, Yang Q, Xu X, et al. Effect of the mixed oleophilic fibrous coalescer geometry and the operating conditions on oily wastewater separation[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2016, 39(2): 255-262.
75	张继伟, 王春林, 荣新明. 曹妃甸11-2油田高含水水平井酸化研究与应用[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(6): 95-100.
	Zhang J W, Wang C L, Rong X M. Research and application of acidizing technology on high water-cut horizontal well of CFD11-2 oilfield[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2018, 31(6): 95-100.

[1]	黄琮琪, 吴一梅, 陈建业, 邵双全. 碱性电解水制氢装置热管理系统仿真研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 320-328.
[2]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[3]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[4]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[5]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[6]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[7]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[8]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[9]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[10]	陈朝光, 贾玉香, 汪锰. 以低浓度废酸驱动中和渗析脱盐的模拟与验证[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2486-2494.
[11]	朱理想, 罗默也, 张晓东, 龙涛, 余冉. 醌指纹法指示三氯乙烯污染土功能微生物活性应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2647-2654.
[12]	张艳梅, 袁涛, 李江, 刘亚洁, 孙占学. 高效SRB混合菌群构建及其在酸胁迫条件下的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2599-2610.
[13]	张兰河, 赖青燚, 王铁铮, 关潇卓, 张明爽, 程欣, 徐小惠, 贾艳萍. H₂O₂对SBR脱氮效率和污泥性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2186-2196.
[14]	张建华, 陈萌萌, 孙雅雯, 彭永臻. 部分短程硝化同步除磷耦合Anammox实现生活污水高效脱氮除磷[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2147-2156.
[15]	胡香凝, 尹渊博, 袁辰, 是赟, 刘翠伟, 胡其会, 杨文, 李玉星. 成品油在土壤中运移可视化的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1827-1835.

物理法水处理技术

Physical water treatment technology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 75

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价